[1. CALL TO ORDER:]
[00:00:06]
ANYTHING. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WELCOME TO THE NORTHERN CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR JULY. 19TH I WOULD INVITE EVERYONE TO PLEASE SEND WITH CITY COUNCIL AND RECITE INTERNATIONAL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. WE JUST, UH I WILL BE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS . ONE NATION $100 INTO THIS WALL WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE. COURT MASON. THE ROLE PLEASE COUNCIL WILL TURN ON THEIR MICROPHONES. MAYOR SPAULDING HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER BRISK HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER DEREK HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER FELLAS. COUNCIL MEMBER KISS HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER SAW TROUT HERE I HAVE SEVEN PRESENT FOR THE JULY 1920 22 REGULAR MEETING ACTION ON THE MINUTES
[4. ACTION ON MINUTES]
PRIOR TO TONIGHT'S MEETING A COPY OF THE PROPOSAL MINUTES FROM OUR JULY 5TH MEETING WERE DISTRIBUTED TO COUNCIL MEMBERS. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED MINUTES? AND THAT WOULD MOVE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES BY CONSENSUS. ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA. WOULD ANYONE FROM STAFFORD COUNCIL LIKE TO RECOMMEND ANY ADDITIONS[6. HEARING OF VISITORS]
OR CORRECTIONS? HEARING VISITORS. WE'RE MOVING RIGHT ALONG AS COUNSEL CAN SEE. WE HAVE SOME GUESTS WITH US THIS EVENING. IT'S ALWAYS A PLEASURE , AND IT SEEMS REOCCURRING THEME HERE IN NEW ALBANY, THEY WERE ABLE TO ENTER A SPORTS THEME THAT HAD AN OUTSTANDING SEASON.AND I KNOW THIS TEAM HAS WORKED SUPER HARD OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS TO OVERCOME MANY OBSTACLES, BUT ONE IN PARTICULAR OUR COLLEAGUES UP AND UPPER ARLINGTON AND NOTHING GAVE MANY OF US MORE PLEASURE THAN TO WATCH THE FINAL COUPLE OF MINUTES OF THAT GAME.
UNFORTUNATELY I WAS ACTUALLY OUT OF TOWN WITH MY SON, WYATT AT A LACROSSE CAMP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH AND MY WIFE. CATEGORY THE GAME AND CALLED ME LITERALLY FROM THE PARKING LOT AND SAID THAT WAS THE BEST SPORTING EVENT SHE HAD SEEN LIVE IN A LONG TIME , AND SHE PLAYED FOR THE HIGH SCHOOL. UH DIVISION ONE, UH, CHAMPIONSHIP WHEN SHE WAS A LITTLE BIT YOUNGER IN HER DAY, SO THAT'S THAT SAYS A LOT. IT WAS AN INCREDIBLE EVENT. I'M GLAD THE COMMUNITY GOT A CHANCE TO GO OUT THERE. BUT THAT LAST COUPLE OF MINUTES OF THE GAME AND THE HEART THAT THIS TEAM SHOWED AND THE ABILITY TO NOT GIVE UP EVEN WHEN YOU'RE DOWN BY A COUPLE OF GOALS AGAINST YOUR BIGGEST RIVAL. UM REALLY SHOWS A LOT AND I JUST REALLY TIP MY HAT TO THESE YOUNG LADIES AND THEIR COACHING STAFF FOR ALL THEIR HARD WORK AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS THIS YEAR, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND READ THIS PROCLAMATION AND INVITE MY FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS TO ALSO PROVIDED COMMENTS. A PROCLAMATION CONGRATULATING THE NEW ALBANY HIGH SCHOOL 2022 DIVISION ONE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP GIRLS LACROSSE TEAM. THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS ARE STUDENTS OF NEW ALBANY, PLAYING LOCAL SCHOOLS AND REPRESENT THE 2022 INVOLVING HIGH SCHOOL VARSITY GIRLS LACROSSE TEAM. AUBREY. BAG AND STUFF. IF I PREMISE VERSUS PRONOUNCING THE NAMES. I APOLOGIZE UPFRONT. GREECE ZILLA BALZAC, MARY CARSON, ABIGAIL CHANDOS, CASSIDY CLASSMAN. ABBY COAL, LILY DRIGGS. ANAKIN DUNCAN . MANY MANY ECONOMISTS MEGAN FIN, CATHERINE GERD CHARLOTTE HOLIDAY. ALEXANDRA. WHO STO FAITH JOHNSON. TERRAN JOLLY MEGAN KOLNER. KATIE COULD CHUCK ALI LOVES 80 TODAY. LAURA MASON , ELLEN MCCLELLAND, BRIDGET O. CONNELL MADDIE PAUSE CAROLINE SIEGFRIED AND NATALIE WEAVER, WHEREAS THE NEW ALBANY HIGH SCHOOL VARSITY LACROSSE TEAM WON THE DIVISION ONE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP WITH AN OVERALL RECORD OF 21 2. OF COURSE, ONE OF THOSE LOSSES BEING TO YOU, EH? WHEREAS THE 2022 VARSITY GIRLS LACROSSE TEAM COMPLETED THEIR SEASON AS CONFERENCE AND REGIONAL CHAMPS, AND WE'RE UNDEFEATED IN THE CONFERENCE AND REGIONAL PLAY, WHEREAS THE 2022 GIRLS LACROSSE TEAM WAS NAMED AS CENTRAL HEIL, CENTRAL OHIO SPORTS AWARDS TEAM OF THE YEAR WAS RANKED NUMBER ONE IN THE MIDWEST BY THE USA LACROSSE MAGAZINE. HAD EIGHT FIRST TEAM PLAYERS FIVE FIRST TEAM ALL REGIONAL PLAYERS TO REGIONAL PLAYERS OF THE YEAR. FOUR FIRST TEAM, ALL OHIO PLAYERS AND ALL OHIO GOALIE OF THE YEAR AND ONE ALL AMERICAN. THAT'S A PRETTY DARN GOOD LIST. WHEREAS THE 2022 GIRLS LACROSSE TEAM DEFEATED SIX OTHER TEAMS DECLARED STATE CHAMPIONS FOR THE OHIO HIGH SCHOOL DIVISION ONE GIRLS LACROSSE CHAMPIONSHIP AT HISTORIC CREW STADIUM NOW THEREFORE, I SLOAN TEASE BALDING MAYOR OF THE CITY OF NEW ALBANY COUNTY'S OF FRANKLIN AND LICKING ON BEHALF OF THE COUNCIL, AND OUR RESIDENTS WISH TO CONGRATULATE THIS WONDERFUL TEAM ON THEIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND COMMEND THEM FOR THEIR FOCUS, GRIT AND COMMITMENT TO TEAMWORK, RESULTING IN THIS AWESOME ACHIEVEMENT. LADIES.
[00:05:03]
CONGRATULATIONS. ALRIGHT COUNSEL. I KNOW YOU KNOW, SUBMISSION, LADIES AS WELL. SO ANY OTHER COMMENTS? I GOT SOME. I KNOW A LOT OF THESE YOUNG LADIES. I'VE WATCHED HIM PLAY FOR YEARS AND I WATCHED HIM PLAY WITH MY DAUGHTER FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND THEY'RE INCREDIBLE AND THEY'VE ALL GROWN TO BE INCREDIBLE ATHLETES AND YOUNG LADIES AND SO PROUD THAT THEY'RE PART OF OUR CITY AND SO HAPPY THAT SHE DID IT. I DON'T WANT TO HEAR MARY USA ANYMORE IN THIS ROOM REALLY DON'T DOESN'T MATTER ANYMORE. WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS, RIGHT? SO CONGRATULATIONS GROWS VERY, VERY IMPRESSED. VERY, VERY GREAT YEAR FOR YOU WELL DESERVED. SOME OF US UP HERE HAD A DAUGHTER THAT PLAYED ON ONE OF THE FIRST TEAMS THAT WE HAD NEW ALBANY INDY THREE, AND THAT FIRST SEASON. WE DIDN'T WIN A GAME. I THINK THE NEXT YEAR WE WON ONE AND KEEP IN MIND. THIS IS INDEED THREE. INVITE OUR SENIOR YEAR. WE FINALLY WON A STATE CHAMPIONSHIP. IS THIS THE FIRST D ONE CHAMPIONSHIP, THEN THAT IS INCREDIBLE. JUST IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, REALLY? 15 YEARS OR SO THAT THIS PROGRAM IS JUST RISEN TO. REALLY I'M NOT GONNA SAY A STATE POWERHOUSE. I MEAN, YOU'RE WELL KNOWN ACROSS THE COUNTRY, SO CONGRATULATIONS, VERY PROUD OF YOU, AND YOU KEEP IT GOING. JUST KEEP THAT GOING. THERE YOU GO. HAD A BIT. I THINK THAT THE WAY THAT YOU WON THE CHAMPIONSHIP IN WHAT YOU WENT THROUGH WAS PRETTY BAD. ANYTHING IT SAYS A LOT ABOUT YOU AND YOUR WORK ETHIC AND YOU'RE HOW MUCH YOU REALLY WANTED THAT CHAMPIONSHIP AND I THINK AS YOU GO FORWARD, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE GREAT FUTURES AHEAD OF YOU. AND I THINK THAT'S ALL THIS WILL ALWAYS BE SOMETHING YOU SHARE AND REMEMBER FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. AND WE'RE VERY PROUD OF YOU. YEAH, WELL DONE. UM, LIKE MARLENE. I'VE KNOWN A LOT OF THESE YOUNG LADIES SINCE THEY WERE THREE YEARS OLD RUNNING AROUND. UM AND THE C. YOU GUYS GROW INTO THE YOUNG LADIES. YOU OURS, NOT JUST THE CROSSWISE, BUT IN SCHOOL, AND EVERYTHING HAS BEEN A JOY TO WATCH. ESPECIALLY WITH THE WAY THE SEASON ENDED LAST YEAR. I WAS AT THAT GAME AND SAT IN THE PARKING LOT AND WAS WAITING FOR MY PHONE RINGS. A THERE WAS A MISTAKE. IT WAS NOT A GOAL AND COME BACK IN TIME, AND IN THAT CALL NEVER CAME. SO TO FOLLOW IT UP THIS YEAR AND THEN TO COME DOWN TO THE WIRE WITH A NOT DISSIMILAR GAME, BUT NOW WE'RE KIND OF ON THE OTHER END OF IT, UM VERY IMPRESSIVE. HOW MANY? I KNOW THE WHOLE TEAM IS NOT HERE AND PRICE AND FOLKS TRAVELING. HOW MANY OF YOU YOUNG LADIES ARE PLANNING ON PLAYING NEXT YEAR AT A DIFFERENT LEVEL IN COLLEGE. SO YEAH, I MEAN, BE FUN TO FOLLOW YOU NOT JUST YOUR NEW ALBANY DAYS BUT BECOME FANS OF ALL THE DIFFERENT COLLEGES THAT CLEARLY PLAYING FOR NEXT YEAR. BUT CONGRATULATIONS. UM THIS IS KIND OF A PERFECT BOW TO PUT ON THE CAP OF THESE LAST TWO SEASONS. I THINK IT'S BEEN THE BEST ATHLETIC. UH TIME IN THE HISTORY OF THE SCHOOL WITH WHAT THE PROGRAMS HAVE DONE LAST YEAR THIS YEAR, I KNOW THAT THERE'S A LOT OF SENIORS LEAVING, BUT THE TALENT POOL IS RICH FOR THE FUTURE. SO WE PLAN ON SEEING YOU GUYS HERE NEXT YEAR, OKAY, PRESSURE KIDS THAT ARE YOUR AGE, AND MY KIDS ARE MUCH YOUNGER, BUT I KNOW THAT WHAT YOU GUYS HAVE DONE HERE REALLY HAVE DONE HERE IS AN INSPIRATION TO YOU KNOW THE YOUNG LADIES OF NEW ALBANY TO GO OUT AND FOLLOW IN YOUR FOOTSTEPS AND SO VERY WELL DONE EXCITED HAVING SEX ALL RIGHT. WELL, THANK YOU, LADIES. NICE GUY. WE SQUEEZE. POPULATION RIGHT HERE.HMM. MATURITY. HMM HMM HMM. HMM. HERE, LITTLE FELLA. STOP. WORKERS COMP INJURY. YEAH.
[00:10:05]
LIKE TO SEE YOU WANT TO STAY COLD HOURS AGAINST HIM. OKAY DRAGON TWO. CONGRATULATIONS THERE ARE ENOUGH PROCLAMATIONS FOR THE PLAYERS AND THE COACHES. THANK YOU, LADIES.CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. I JUST FORGOT. ANNOUNCING BASKETBALL, OKAY? WE'RE STILL UNDER HEARING OF VISITORS. AND I KNOW MR JUST MINUTES WITH US THIS EVENING, RICHARD HAVE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS FOR COUNCIL. WELL YOU KNOW WHAT? I WASN'T EXPECTING THIS. BUT LET ME DOVETAIL INTO ALWAYS COMING DOWN THE LINE. UH THE FUTURE.
DEDICATION OF MY LAND TO THE TO THE NEW WHAT WOULD WE CALL THE FIELDHOUSE? THE INDOOR FIELDHOUSE. I WOULD LOVE MY LAND TO BE DEDICATED TO THAT USE. AND, UH, BUT I DIDN'T. I DIDN'T COME TO REALLY SAY THAT. YOU KNOW, THIS IS LIKE, SO I WANTED TO DOVETAIL INTO THAT BECAUSE I THINK OUR COMMUNITY DESERVES THAT MOVE, AND I THINK THE TIME IS RIGHT. AND UH, THE TWO THINGS THAT I'VE BEEN TASKED TO DO. ONE IS A PERSONAL. DEDICATED TO PROVIDE EVERY ELECTED OFFICIAL IN THE STATE. YOU CAN GIVE IT AWAY IF YOU WANT. TO EVERY ELECTED OFFICIAL. IN THE STATE OF OHIO. WITH THE COFFEE. WE HAD ENOUGH. BRILLIANT. CAST. IT IS REALLY EVEN HIT ME, MAN. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND. YOU KNOW, PHILLIPS. YOU KNOW, AND MY VEHICLE JUST YOU KNOW, 100 BUCKS A DAY DRIVING AROUND THE STATE OF OHIO. SO BUT MY SECOND TASK IS FROM MY WIFE. OUR CARPET GOT PUT ON HOLD. AND OUR DRAPES GOT PUT ON HOLD. IN OUR NEW COUNTRY KITCHEN SINK GOT PUT ON HOLD.
OUR NEW APPLIANCES GOT PUT ON HOLD WHEN I GOT A CALL FROM DAVID MORTON. ABOUT PURCHASING OUR LAND. AND SO, UH, EVERYTHING'S KIND OF ON HOLD IN IN MY LIFE RIGHT NOW, AND I'D LIKE TO KNOW. YOU KNOW WHEN WE MIGHT HEAR SOMETHING, AND THE SOONER THE BETTER, UH, WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD AND, UH MY WIFE WOULD REALLY LIKE TO KNOW WHAT TIME PRIME MINISTER BECAUSE WE WERE DOING A BUNCH OF REMODELING LIKE I THINK I'VE SAID BEFORE, WITH THE NEW ROOF ON THE HOUSE AND PAINTING THE INSIDE OF THE HOUSE AND NEW CARPET AND DRAPES AND KITCHEN SINK TO APPLIANCES BECAUSE WE WERE GOING TO HAVE A PRETTY MUCH YOU KNOW. FIRE IN THE FIREPLACE, CHRISTMAS GATHERING, AND, UH AND EVERYTHING IN THAT KIND OF HAS ALL BEEN KIND OF PUT ON HOLD BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO SPEND ANY MORE MONEY ON THE HOUSE. YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST GOING TO BE SACRIFICED TO THE BULLDOZER. SO, UH, ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO CREATED EXECUTIVE ORDER. AND EXPEDITE THAT PROCESS WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, RICHARD. I KNOW WE'RE WORKING DILIGENTLY TO TRY TO SEE HOW THE CITY CAN PARTNER WITH THE JOINT PARKS. UM NO, THEY HAVEN'T PRETTY AMBITIOUS PLAN THAT MAY INCLUDE THE FIELDHOUSE AND PART OF THAT AMBITIOUS PLAN AND REQUIRE SOME LAND ACQUISITION, SO WE'LL CONTINUE TO WORK DILIGENTLY THROUGH THAT PROCESS AND REALLY APPRECIATE YOU. BEING VERY UPFRONT ABOUT YOUR INTEREST AND YOUR PATIENTS AS WELL. THANKS, SIR. ALRIGHT ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNCIL REGARDING SOMETHING NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. BOARDING COMMISSION REPORTS IN THE UPDATE
[7. BOARD/COMMISSION REPORTS]
FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. UH AND A INTERESTING MOVE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS CANCELED. THAT NEVER HAPPENS THAT I'M AWARE OF. BUT WE DID HAVE OUR MEETING CANCELED LAST NIGHT. SO NOW REPORT ALRIGHT PARKS AND TRAILS. ADVISORY BOARD MEETS ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD NO B[00:15:03]
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING SUSTAINABILITY PETER RUTH STREET , BUT WE DID HAVE A MEETING. I DON'T WANT TO MAKE ALL THE OTHER BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS JEALOUS, BUT WE DID A FIELD TRIP. WE WENT AND VISITED THE NEW TAYLOR FARM PARK. UH TOOK THE TEAM OVER AND GOT TO SEE FIRSTHAND. WE WENT BACK IN AND SAUL, WE HAVE SOME ROUGH STAKING WHERE THE TRAILS ARE GOING TO GO, BUT GOT TO GO BACK IN THE REAR ACREAGE TO SEE ACTUALLY. UH HOW THE PARK IS ACTUALLY COMING TO FRUITION AND IT IT'S GONNA BE BEAUTIFUL BACK THERE. UM SO THE PLANTINGS ARE COMING IN VERY WELL. I THINK IT'S GOING EXACTLY WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE DOING AND IT'S GOING TO BE A TRUE ASSET TO THE COMMUNITY. UM WE TOURED THE BARN AND THE HOUSE CHICKEN COOP AS WELL. JUST PINGING. SOME IDEAS FOR POSSIBLE USE IS DOWN THE ROAD FOR THOSE, UM AND WANT TO MAKE CLEAR WE ARE GOING TO BE TREATING THE AREA FOR MOSQUITOES BECAUSE IT IS A RIGHT ENVIRONMENT FOR MOSQUITOES RIGHT NOW, SO WE DID GET CLEARANCE WITH THE EPA THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY TREAT BACK. THERE DOESN'T HAVE TO REMAIN. YEAH. NATIVE AREA SO BESIDES. THE MOSQUITOES TOURS FANTASTIC AND I CAN'T WAIT FOR THE TRAILS TO GET OPEN. SO ACTUALLY, THE MOSQUITO TREATMENT IS FOR THE 98 ACRES.AND WHAT ABOUT THE JASON PONDS THAT ARE SORT OF IN THE RIGHT AWAY INTO THE CAROLINE DEDICATION? THOSE ARE NOT. SO I KNOW THAT FRANKLIN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN OUT. THEY'VE THEY'VE BEEN OUT THERE SEVERAL TIMES NOW. OKAY SURVEYED. SO IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE TREATMENT IS GOING TO BE OF THE ENTIRE AREA. THEY ARE TARGETING CERTAIN ZONES BASED ON THEY'VE THEY'VE DONE SOME SOME TESTING, WHERE THEY CAPTURED CERTAIN TYPES OF MOSQUITOES AND HARVESTED TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT'S THERE, SO THEY'RE DOING A MORE TARGETED TREATMENT. WE HAVE TO BE INTENTIONALLY MINDFUL TO THE ENVIRONMENT, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE TREATMENT WILL BE OF THE ENTIRE NIGHT. ENTIRE 100 ACRES, SO THEY LIKE A FOGGING TECHNIQUE OR UH, I DON'T THINK THAT IT'S FOGGING. I THINK IT'S MORE OF A GRANULAR MATERIAL. YES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, SLOAN JUST AS A FOLLOW UP BECAUSE I HAD A RESIDENT ASKED ME THIS TODAY. THIS MIGHT BE FOR ADRIAN. PROBABLY. YOU HAD MENTIONED THE TRAILS. IS THAT STILL ON TRACK FOR THIS PHASE ONE TO OPEN UP THIS YEAR. THE TRAILS ARE STILL, UM, SCHEDULED TO BE OPEN, PROBABLY IN NOVEMBER LATE FALL OF THIS YEAR, AND THEN SOME PLANTINGS WILL UM, FALL BACK INTO THE WINNER IN SPRING MONTHS. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT ANYTHING ELSE FROM SUSTAINABLE ADDRESS REPORT? THE IDEA PANEL.
NO MEETING. CEMETERY RESTORATION BOARD MEETING MEETING OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS COMMISSION.
QUARTERS OF CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATION. HAS ANYONE FROM COUNCIL RECEIVED ANY CORRESPONDENCE OR COMMUNICATION SINCE OUR LAST MEETING, THEY WANT TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON
[9. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARING]
OKAY, THAT TAKES US TO SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARING. ORDINANCE O TWO TWO DASH. 2022 IN ORDER TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN THE CITY OF NEW ALBANY BY MANY OF THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE 25.12 PLUS MINUS ACRES OF LAND. GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF SMITH'S MILL ROAD, WEST OF BEACH ROAD AND NORTH OF STATE ROUTE 1 61 FROM INFILL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. EU DE TO INFILL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IP D FOR AN AREA TO BE KNOWN AS THE BEACH CROSSING WEST ZONING DISTRICT, AS REQUESTED BY M. B J HOLDINGS LLC. CARE IF ERIN UNDERHILL MR MAYOR. THANK YOU.SO THE SITE IS LOCATED. UH, WE'RE WITHIN THE RED OUTLINE HERE. SO THIS IS STATE ROUTE 1 61. THIS IS THE LOWER DOT COM HEADQUARTERS AND SMITH'S MILL ROAD TO THE NORTH, SO THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THE VICINITY OR ADJACENT TO THE SITE. AND AS YOU MENTIONED, THE SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED PD PD ALLOWS FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY AND USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS. SO CURRENTLY, THE PG TEX IS ALLOWING FOR FLEXIBILITY BY PROVIDING A MIXTURE OF USES THAT INCLUDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES, RETAIL AND RESTAURANTS. AND SOME OF OUR TYPICAL GENERAL EMPLOYMENT USES THAT YOU SEE THROUGHOUT THIS SECTION OF THE A BUSINESS PARK. SO YOU CAN SEE THE ZONING RIGHT HERE IN THE SURROUNDING LG. SO WHAT THIS RESIGNING DOES. IT'S ACTUALLY REMOVING THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND THOSE RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES AND IT'S ADDING WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION USERS . SO WHAT THE OUTCOME OF THAT IS ESSENTIALLY IS THAT THIS IS ALLOWING FOR THE EXACT SAME USES AS THE SURROUNDING LG AREAS THAT WE SEE THROUGHOUT THE BUSINESS. PARTS OF IT IS CONSISTENT IN AS
[00:20:04]
FAR AS USES GO, HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO KEEP THE EU DE ZONING IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR FLEXIBILITY AND LOCK COVERAGE AND SETBACKS, SO THEY ARE PROPOSING A SLIGHTLY REDUCED BY 10 FT. STEP BACK ALONG THE EASTERN EDGE ONLY ALONG THE EASTERN EDGE OF THE SITE AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED AND IT'S IN THE TEXT NOW THAT THEY'RE BEING ENHANCED THE LANDSCAPING AT THE DISCRETION OF CITY STAFF WANTS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. OTHERWISE THERE'S NO OTHER PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ZONING TEXT. THESE ARE THE SAME DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE EXISTING AND ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORING COMMERCIAL USES. SO THE PROPOSAL MATCHES THE RECOMMENDATIONS BOTH FROM THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THE USE AND THE USES WITHIN THE STRATEGIC PLAN AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL DURING THEIR MEETING LAST MONTH. STAFF IS HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. WAS THERE ANY INPUT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER DIRECTLY TO THE EAST AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING? IS THERE ANY CONCERNS ABOUT THE SETBACK. I DO NOT BELIEVE SO WE SEND OUT NEIGHBOR NOTIFICATION LETTERS TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FT, AND WE WERE NOT CONTACTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. MY ONLY QUESTION ABOUT THE PROPERTY AND IT'S NOT MY DIRECTED TOWARDS THE ORDINANCES. THAT IS THE PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT HAS THE SILO ON IT. IS THAT NOT CORRECT? READ THAT DISCUSSED THE LAST MEETING AND BEFORE PREVIOUS MEANS THAT BE A GOOD IDEA. I DON'T KNOW WHO OWNS THE SILO. BE A GOOD IDEA IF WE COULD SOMEHOW, TOM GET OUR LOGO UP ON THAT SILO. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT CAN BE PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT OR. ORIGINALLY THE SILO HAD AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER ON IT. UM IT IS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT'S CONTROLLED BY OH DOT CONTROLLED BY THE SIGNAGE, ALLOWING SIGNAGE ON THAT SILO HAS TO BE ENDORSED, APPROVED BIO DOT THEY WERE NOT SUPPORTIVE OF THE PEACE. SIGN IT. THAT'S WHERE THAT CAME DOWN. SO THE FUTURE OF THAT SILO IS IN QUESTION AS A RESULT OF JURISDICTION OVER IT, RIGHT, JUST WHETHER IT'S GOING TO EXIST OR NOT, OR WHETHER IT'S GOING TO EXIST, OKAY? THANK YOU. WELL, WE'LL LOOK INTO A LITTLE BIT BATTLE. OUR FRIENDS AT ALL DOT IF THEY CAN MEET US HALFWAY PERFECT. PERFECT WAY TO ADVERTISE OUR CITY WITH THEIR LEVEL AND THAT STYLE. I'M PRETTY SURE LAST MINUTE YOU VOLUNTEERED TO BRING A PAMPER, REMEMBER MAY NOT LOOK AT THAT NICE BUT FAIR ENOUGH ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE ORDERS FROM COUNCIL? THEN WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING WHERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC LIKE TO SPEAK REGARDING ORDINANCE, 2022 2022. HEARING NO COMMENT WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. YOU'RE VERY EMOTIONAL. THE ORDINANCE MOVE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 20 TO 2022 2ND.COUNCIL MEMBER SHELL. YES MAYOR SPAULDING. YES. BRISK COUNCIL MEMBER. DEREK YES, FELLOWS? YES COUNCIL MEMBER KESS. YES YES. FIRST ORDINANCE 20 TO 2022. ORDINANCE 0 23 2022 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 11571165. AND NEW ALBANY DESIGN GUIDELINES AS REQUIREMENTS. SECTION FIVE.
RESIDENTIAL OUTSIDE OF VILLAGE CENTER OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ALBANY, OHIO, IS CODIFIED ORANGES AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. IT'S A CHRISTIAN. YES MR MAYOR. I THINK WE GET THE AR THINK WE GET THE PRESENTATION PULLED UP HERE IN A SECOND, BUT LIKE WE DID IN THE LAST TIME, I THINK WE'RE GONNA PRESENT THOSE PIECES OF LEGISLATION AT ONCE THE ORDINANCE THAT YOU JUST READ AND THEN THE RESOLUTION FOLLOWS YES , I KNOW ABOUT MAKING IT. YOU NEED THIS ONE. SOME OF THESE. WE NEED TO ENERGY ADDUCE RESOLUTION. EXPLANATION OF THE THREE YOU CAN JUST EXPLAIN ABOUT COLLECTIVELY AND THEN WHEN YOU GO TO PASS THEM TO INTRODUCE THEM. AS THEY COME UP. RIGHT THANK YOU, COUNSEL. MR CHRISTIAN. I THINK WE'RE READY. SO AS WE JUST DISCUSSED BRIEFLY , WE ARE DOING A SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR SOME PROPOSED CODE CHANGES. WE ALSO ARE REPRESENTING ON A RESOLUTION FOR AN ENGAGED IN ALBANY STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE FOR THE HAMMOCK FOCUS AREA. WE HAD AN EXTENSIVE PRESENTATION. DURING OUR LAST MEETING. WE HEARD A LOT OF FEEDBACK FROM MEMBERS OF THE
[00:25:03]
PUBLIC AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS , SO I WILL GO OVER A LITTLE BIT OF SHORTER PRESENTATION AND THE CHANGES THAT WE MADE BETWEEN THAT MEETING AND THIS ONE. SO GROUPS GROUPS TOGETHER KIND OF THE MAJOR TOPICS THAT WE HEARD BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTION PROCESS AND THEN BOTH AGAIN IN OUR LAST COUNCIL MEETING, WE HEARD A LOT ABOUT SCHOOL POPULATION TRAFFIC, DEFINING THE GEOGRAPHY OF A HAMLET. COMMERCIAL BUILDING HEIGHTS, ACHIEVING A MIXED USE GREEN THE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL RATIO. AND DENSITY. WE'RE GONNA GO. I'M GONNA TAKE YOU THROUGH WHAT? WE'VE UPDATED IN THE PLAN, AND THEN WE WILL ALSO HEAR FROM MK SK WILL HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE DENSITY. SO THE FIRST TWO ITEMS I WANT TO TALK ABOUT OUR SCHOOL POPULATION AND TRAFFIC. SO AGAIN, REITERATING WE DID HEAR A LOT ABOUT THIS DURING OUR LAST MEETING. I JUST WANTED TO KIND OF ZOOM OUT AGAIN TO LET FOLKS KNOW WHEN IN THE PROCESS WE TAKE A LOOK AT THE REVIEW, TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND SCHOOL IMPACTS. SO RIGHT NOW WHERE WE'RE AT AS WE'RE IN THE STRATEGIC PLAN PHASE UM, THE ORANGE BOX. IF YOU'RE LOOKING IF YOU'RE WATCHING FROM HOME, SO WHEN WE'RE THIS IS WHERE WE'RE AT TONIGHT AND WHAT WE TAKE A LOOK AT WHEN WE DO STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATES ARE LANDINGS, DISTRICTS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. LATER ON, IF AN APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED HAMLET IN THIS INSTANCE IS IN FACT APPLIED FOR AND PROPOSED FOR REZONING THAT DOES GO THROUGH A PUBLIC PROCESS, THERE ARE THE ROCKY FORK, BLACK RECORD REVIEWS AND APPLICATION AND MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS THAT NOBODY PLANNING COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MAKES THE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL. WHO TAKES FINAL ACTION ON A RESIGNING CHANGE APPLICATION. SO WE'VE INSERTED SOME LANGUAGE HERE FROM OUR CODE SECTION HERE ON THE DIFFERENT ITEMS THAT WE THE DIFFERENT FACTORS. THERE ARE MULTIPLE FACTORS THAT WE CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING ON HIS SETTING CHANGE, AND YOU CAN SEE THE TWO THAT WE'VE HIGHLIGHTED HERE IN RED ARE TRAFFIC AND STUDENT IMPACT. THOSE ARE TWO OF THE MANY FACTORS THAT REVIEW AT THE TIME OF REZONING. WE DID DO AN UPDATE TO THE RESOLUTION EXHIBIT THAT WAS INCLUDED TO YOU VIA EMAIL, AND IT'S BEEN PRINTED OUT FOR YOU TODAY AT YOUR AT YOUR SEATING SPOTS WE DID AT US A COUPLE OF SENTENCES AND OUR DEVELOPMENT. SENIORS JUST KIND OF REITERATING THE FACT THAT, UM IF IT WENT AT HIM ON DEVELOPMENTS PROPOSED, WE WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH REASONING PROCESS AND THESE ARE SOME OF THE CONSIDERATIONS THAT WE WILL HAVE TO ARE SOME OF THE FACTORS WE WILL HAVE TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION AT THAT TIME. AND THEN AGAIN, REITERATING WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT LITTLE BIT LAST TIME IS AFTER A REZONING WERE STUNNED AT DAN. WE STILL HAVE TO COME BACK DUE TO THE RECOMMENDED THE REZONING CLASSIFICATION OR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. WE DO STILL HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW.AND THAT TAKES AN EVEN CLOSER LOOK VERY, VERY DETAILED. CLOSE LOOK AT AN APPLICATION AT THAT TIME, WE USUALLY HAVE PRETTY DETAILED ENGINEERING PLANSITECTF BUILDINGS ARE GOING TO BE LOCATED AND WE'LL HAVE A DETAILED STATEMENT OF THE PROPOSED USE FOR THE PROPERTY.
THOSE ARE JUST SOME OF THE MANY SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. JUST GOING QUICK QUESTION. I THOUGHT IN SOME OF THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THAT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW HAD TO BE WITHIN THIS SEQUENCE AS WELL, SO THAT'S CORRECT. AND I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY THAT I LEFT THAT OUT. SO IN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, WE DID OUT OF CURRENT UPDATE THAT THE AIR BE REVIEWED THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND THEY DO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THAT'S IN THERE. YES AND THEN YEAH, SORRY.
I MISSED THAT. THAT'S OKAY. SO MOVING ON TO ANOTHER TOPIC. WE DO HAVE A DEFINED GEOGRAPHY NOW , BEFORE I RECALL, THERE'S A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS BUBBLE THAT WAS KIND OF SHOWN IN THE PLANS ORIGINALLY IN THE LANDES MAP. AND WE HEARD FROM COUNCIL. WE DID MAKE THE CHANGE THAT WE DEFINE THE SITE BOUNDARY TO WHAT'S SHOWN IN RED HERE. AND THEN WE ALSO UPDATED OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP. IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARD TO SEE AT THIS SCALE HERE, BUT WE'VE KIND OF DONE THIS LITTLE POP OUT HERE AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE THIS AREA IS OUTLINED HATCH THERE. BASED ON SOME MORE FEEDBACK. WE DID UPDATE A FEW THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. I'VE HIGHLIGHTED THE NEW TEXT AND RED IF IT IS EDITING A PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SO THE FIRST ONE IS THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING HEIGHT. ORIGINALLY, WE HAD IN THERE THAT IT WOULD BE 55 FT WILL BE THE LIMIT BASED ON FEEDBACK. WE'VE REDUCED THAT THE 50 FT TO MAXIM OTHER BUILDINGS THAT ARE IN THE AREA. WE ALSO HEARD SOME FEEDBACK ABOUT MAKING SURE WE ACHIEVE A MIXED USE GREEN, SO YOU'VE ADDED SOME LANGUAGE IN THERE TO DEVELOP ADDED IN BRAND NEW DEVELOPMENT STANDARD TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S INCLUDED IN THERE. AND THEN LASTLY, WE'VE ALSO ADDED THAT ANY COMMERCIAL USE IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SUGAR RUN STREAM CORRIDOR WOULD NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE RATIO OF 200 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES FOR EVERYONE TO DWELLING UNIT THAT'S DEVELOPING TO SAY, I HAVE ONE QUESTION REGARDING THE SOUTH OF THAT'S TRIGGER ONE AREA DEVELOPER. WHOEVER DOES, UM
[00:30:06]
BRINGS IN A PLAN BESIDES NOT TO PUT RESIDENTIAL IN THE SOUTH. THE NICE IT'S STILL WOULD NOT COUNT TOWARDS THAT IT STILL WOULDN'T COUNTERTERRORISM ARE THE RATIO RESIDENTIAL WE STILL HAVE THE MAXIMUM DENSITY DEVELOPER WOULD DECIDE TO PUT RESIDENTIAL ON THE SOUTH SIDE.THAT WOULD POTENTIALLY THROW OUT 26 TO 1. UM RATIO, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND THE RATIO AND THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO MAKE THAT UP BY PUTTING MORE COMMERCIAL ON THE NORTH SIDE, WHICH THEN WOULD BE IN CONFLICT CONFLICT WITH OTHER PROVISIONS, WHICH TALKED ABOUT RESIDENTIAL BEING LOCATED EAST SIDE IN ORDER TO TRANSITION INTO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. SO THERE THERE AS I WAS MENTIONING AT THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING, THESE THINGS ARE INTERWOVEN SO YOU CAN'T PULL ONE THREAD WITHOUT PULLING IT A COUPLE OF OTHER THREATS. THE THOUGHT IS THAT THERE SHOULD BE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF SOME KIND THERE. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IT MIGHT BE, UH, JUST THE MAIN PURPOSE BASED ON THE FEEDBACK THAT WE RECEIVED LAST MEETING THAT WE DIDN'T WANT THAT COMMERCIAL IMPACT THE RATIO IN THE NORTH OF THE KOREA YEAH, I THINK THAT'S KIND OF ADDRESSES THE VERY ASTUTE QUESTION THAT LARRY COHEN ASKED, WHICH WAS IF THERE'S AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY SOUTH SURE TO RUN. UM, THAT DILUTE THE COMMERCIAL. QUOTIENT ON THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT, AND THAT WOULD SORT OF TAKE AWAY. THE PURPOSE OF A LOT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS TO DRIVE THAT RETAIL COMMERCIAL AREAS, SO THIS VERY CLEARLY SAID LISTEN. UH WHATEVER SOUTH OF THE CREEK DOESN'T COUNT TOWARDS COMMERCIAL. YEAH. BECAUSE I THINK WE WOULD VIEW IT. ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IS A COMMERCIAL VENTURE. NOT I MEAN I GET THERE'S RESIDENTS, BUT IT'S FROM A TACTICAL STANDPOINT, TREATED MORE LIKE A BUSINESS. I THINK I SAID THAT RIGHT NOW. IT'S A LITTLE CONFUSING. THANK YOU FOR WALKING ME THROUGH IT. APPRECIATE IT. SO AND THEN THE NEXT THING WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS IS DENSITY AND WE HAVE JEFF CONGONHAS AND ACTUALLY SLOW . VERY SORRY FOR YOUR NAME. WRONG, UM, HERE TO DISCUSS DENSITY, JEFF. I CAN HANDLE THIS CLICKER FUEL NEEDED ON THE NEXT SLIDE. THERE'S A RENDERING NEXT SLIDE. UH HUH. BEATING. JEFF THANK YOU, ENOS MPS TO SEE EVERYONE. JUST A FEW HIGHLIGHTS HERE. UM SORT OF REITERATE SOME OF THE POINTS OF THE PAST FEW MONTHS. SO AS IT RELATES TO THESE ENVIRONMENTS MAKES USE ENVIRONMENTS AND WHAT WE FIND DESIRABLE HAMLET. WE KNOW THAT THEY SORT OF THRIVE ON PEOPLE.
FOOTBALL AND THE ENERGY THAT THAT CREATES THE MORE PEOPLE THE BETTER OPPORTUNITY TO SUPPORT THAT DESIRABLE LIFESTYLE AMENITIES, GROUND AUTHORITIES, ETCETERA. UM WE KNOW THAT NEW ORLEANS IS, BY AND LARGE 234 HISTORIC COMMUNITY AND THE HAMLET. EVERYTHING THAT WE'VE DONE TO DATE SUPPORTS. THAT SEEMS FINE AND VERY DESIRABLE IN ACHIEVING THE CHARACTER.
INFECTION UM, APPROPRIATE HERE. HOW. JUST A LITTLE BIT ON HOW DID DENSITY BUT WE'VE BEEN CHATTING ABOUT, UM ACCOUNT FOR OPEN SPACE JUST LIKE YOU WOULD COME FOR A STREETS PARKING CIRCULATION. ACCOUNT FOR PROPERTY SITUATIONS LIKE STUFF. MAX. GRS. APPROXIMATELY BUILDINGS, ORGANIZATION OF THINGS AND 234 STORY BUILDING THE RESULT OF THAT. IT'S ABOUT SIX PARADE. AND HE TURNED THAT OUT OF HER. TURN THAT DOWN A LITTLE BIT. SURE. BUT AFTER CHATTING, JOE THE PROCESS, BUT THE CITY WE LANDED SIX UNITS. WHAT IF THE MORE VIBRANT ARGUMENTS VERY HER SURE. BUT STILL HAVING CARE OF A VIBRANT NEXT TUESDAY. WE BELIEVE SITTING THERE GRADE. QUESTION NO, I THINK I ASKED THIS THE LAST TIME. THE LAST MEETING. ARE YOU ALSO TAKING IN CONSIDERATION THE DENSITY? AROUND WHAT WILL BE THE HAMLET. JUST TO THE JUST TO THE WEST. THERE IS THE L C COMMUNITIES. THERE'S A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT GOING UP HARLEM ROAD LINKS DEVELOPMENT IS OUT THERE. THERE'S A LOT OF DEVELOPMENTS THAT WILL BE CONTRIBUTING. TO THAT COMMERCIAL BUSINESS. NOW, IF IT'S 6 TO 1, YOU NEED 6 TO 1 WHEN WE'RE CONSIDERING ALL THE OTHER. DENSITY THAT'S IN THE AREA. IT'S A GREAT POINT, I THINK ABOUT ASHLEY, BUT I THINK WITHIN A BY AND WATCH HER ANYWAY. CAN YOU WALK THERE? ANYBODY? RESIDENTS IN SILENCE.
SOLID YES. UM THOSE WILL ALL TELL THEM TO SUPPORT THIS COMMERCIAL. AS YOU SUGGEST.
[00:35:08]
YEAH, LIKE I SAID. YOU KNOW, WE THINK IT WOULD, IT WOULD HAVE A STRONGER CHANCE FOR CONTINUED VIBRANCY. IF IT WERE THAT DENSITY NUMBER WERE INCREASED, BUT WE DIDN'T THINK SIX IS A REASONABLE FLOOR AND WHAT YOU END UP WITH SIX IS, UM A COMMUNITY THAT STARTS TO LOOK DIFFERENT THAN TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY COMMUNITY WITH FRONT AND BACK. SO THAT'S SORT OF THE RESULT. YOU KNOW, TERRIBLE. IT WILL RESULT IN A COMMUNITY THAT LOOKS MORE LIKE A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WAS 6 TO 1 STARTS TO VEER AWAY FROM OKAY, GET 456 UNITS OF PAPER. IT STARTS TO LOOK LESS AND LESS. OKAY? I'M NOT SURE IF I ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION. YOU DID. ANY MOTHER. JUST JUST ONE. ON THAT POINT. I HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF WORKING WITH AUDITORS ON A FAIRLY REGULAR BASIS, AND THEY'RE VERY MATHEMATICALLY PRECISE. UM MY SWEET SPOT. I CAN'T WAIT TO HEAR WITH THOSE GUYS. SO YOU KNOW, THIS IS THIS IS A LOT MORE ART THAN SCIENCE, RIGHT? THERE'S NOT A PEER REVIEWED STUDY FROM THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY THAT SAYS HOW MANY UNITS BREAKER HAVE TO SUPPORT RETAIL? I MEAN, THERE'S NO SUCH THING EXISTS. NO THERE'S NOT, BUT WE KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW. RIGHT THERE'S NOT, BUT WE KNOW THAT PROXIMITY TO A PLACE WALK ABILITY OF THE PLACE CONVENIENCE OF BEING LOCATION OF THINGS AROUND A COMMON PLACE, AGREED, WILL ALL START TO CONTRIBUTE TO SUPPORT SERIOUSNESS AND THEN JUST SO THAT FOLKS LISTENING AT HOME AND MAYBE SOME FOLKS IN THE AUDIENCE HERE TONIGHT CAN APPRECIATE YOUR FIRM'S EXPOSURE TO MAKING THESE TYPES OF DETERMINATION. AND THIS ISN'T THE FIRST TIME YOU'VE EXAMINED SOMETHING LIKE THIS. MAYBE SOME OTHER PROJECTS WHERE YOU MADE THE SAME CALCULATIONS TO DETERMINE WHAT A VIBRANT COMMUNITY WOULD LOOK LIKE, SPENT A LOT OF TIME WORKING IN GRANBY YARD, WHICH HAS A SIGNIFICANT COMPONENT WE WORKED AT, UM BRIDGE PARK DUBLIN. WE SPEND TIME WORKING ON THAT SORT OF URBAN ANSWER AND RETAIL PROJECTS TO SORT OF HAVE A SENSIBILITY.FORWARD. YOU USED. TO OVER TIME YOU GET TO UNDERSTAND THAT RECIPE MORE AND MORE OBVIOUSLY THINGS 60. FOR LONGER THAN JUST OPENED. SO WHAT WERE SOME OF THE DENSITIES AND THOSE DEVELOPMENTS? UM. GREAT QUESTION, SO I WOULD SAY IF RANGES FROM. UM 10 TO 15, DEPENDING ON WHAT 10 TO 50. YEAH. ALRIGHT APARTMENTS ON TOP OF 50 UNITS BREAKERS REALLY NOT HIGH RISE SINCE FOUR. PANAMANIAN, THE BODY 53. NOW MY OTHER QUESTION ONE OTHER QUESTION IF YOU HAD OFFICE COMMERCIAL LIKE A BUSINESS THAT REQUIRE A LOT OF OFFICE SPACE.
YEAH HELPED ALSO TO SUPPORT THEE THERE THAT WOULD HELP THE COMMUNITY WANTS SURE POINT OF THE HANDLERS OF THE COMMUNITY IS ASKING FOR MORE WALKABLE OPTIONS FOR DINING AND GOING OUT, NOT NECESSARILY THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY. BUT YOU CAN'T HAVE ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER. PERHAPS YOU CAN HAVE MORE OFFICE COMMERCIAL. UNLESS RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND STILL GET THE RESTAURANTS THAT THE COMMUNITY IN THAT AREA IS REALLY LOOKING FOR. YEAH GREAT QUESTION. SO WE WANT IS 18 HOURS A DAY. ACTIVATION. SO WE WANT FROM BREAKFAST. TO DESERVE COVERED IN TERMS OF WE WANT PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE HAVING COFFEE WE WANT EMPLOYEES HAVING LUNCH. EVERYONE RESIDENTS AND VISITORS ON SITE. BUT THAT'S THE SORT OF WHEN WE SAY, 18 OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S WHAT WE MEAN. YEAH. WE WANT, YOU KNOW. THAT RECIPE TO GIVE US PRESIDENTS. BOYS. MY CONCERN IS NEVER BEEN THE TYPE OF RESIDENTS IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WHAT TYPE OF DENSITY THAT WE HAVE HAD RATHER HAVE LESS RESIDENTIAL DENSITY, REGARDLESS OF THE TYPE OF RESIDENCE IT IS, YEAH, BUT HAVE A LITTLE MORE COMMERCIAL. PARENTS WILL ACTIVATE THE PLACE MORE THAN EMPLOYEES, BOYS FRIENDS. AND WHEN HER OFF OCCASION. THEY'RE NOT. RESIDENTS TEND TO PROVIDE. SO IT'S A BALANCE. I GET IT. THAT'S WHAT SILLY EXAMPLE OF EARLY DAYS OF THE SHORT RESTAURANTS SURPRISE.
[00:40:04]
THERE WERE NO JOBS THERE. YOU DIDN'T. PRACTICING KNOWLEDGE, SO TOTALLY DIFFERENT PROBLEMS. I UNDERSTAND THAT'S THE BALANCE. APPRECIATE YOUR TAKING THE TIME TO ANSWER THE QUESTION SO MUCH CHIP WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THIS COMBINATION THAT WE'VE TRIED TO CREATE HERE IN RESPONSE TO THE COUNCIL'S DIRECTION IS TT TO ENCOURAGE A CERTAIN TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. AND WHEN YOU TAKE A LOOK AT CATHOLIC AND HOW THAT COMPLEMENTS MARKET SQUARE OR THE RICHMOND SQUARE DEVELOPMENT YOU START TO APPLY THAT SIX UNITS TO THE ACRE OF DENSITY. WE THINK THAT THAT'S VIOLENT. SO YOU COULD IMAGINE SOMETHING LIKE THAT LINING 605, CREATING A GATEWAY INTO THE REST OF THE WORLD CENTER OR CREATING SOME TYPE OF A AN EDGE ON CENTRAL COLLEGE GROWTH. SO YOU KNOW, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO COME IN WITH. BUT WE THINK THAT THERE ARE THROUGH THE COMBINATION OF STANDARDS THAT WE CAN YOU CAN SET THE TABLE FOR A CERTAIN TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT THAT'S GOING TO BE COMPLEMENTARY TO EVERYTHING ELSE THAT EXISTS. ITS JOB. APPRECIATE IT. SO I CAN TALK ABOUT THE CODE CHANGES REAL QUICK. OKAY. THANK YOU. IT LOOKS LIKE WE MIGHT ADD. LET'S SEE THERE THERE. SORRY ABOUT THAT. SO JUST TO GIVE A PRESENTATION REITERATE SOME THINGS FROM THE LAST TIME WE HAD A MEETING THE CODE CHANGES. WE REALLY DIDN'T MAKE A LOT OF WHOLE LOT OF UPDATES TO THEM. WE DID MAKE SOME CHANGES. I KNOW MARY SPAULDING. YOU BROUGHT UP THE FACT THAT YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT, UM THOSE, UH, APARTMENT IN OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS WEREN'T TRIGGERED WHEN YOU KNOW AN INDIVIDUAL OWNER LIKE ON HARLEM ROAD OR KITZMILLER READ, READ UP THEIR HOME TO AND THERE TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WAS PRETTY CRYSTAL CLEAR. WE ALSO FIXED SOME TYPOS THAT WE'RE KIND OF HANGING OUT THERE. I WILL GO OVER THE CODE CHANGES AGAIN FOR EVERYONE, JUST TO, UM BRING IT BACK UP FRESH IN YOUR MINDS. SO WE ARE UPDATING REALLY FOUR SECTIONS OCCURRED. THE FIRST ONE IS CHAPTER 11 57, WHICH IS THE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICT. I LIKE TO CALL US THE AIR B CODE. SO WE DID UPDATE THIS SECTION OF CODE TO MAKE SURE THAT HAMLET FILE BLUE HAMLET. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS REQUIRE ARB REVIEW AND APPROVAL.WE UPDATED THE NEXT TO TALK ABOUT INTERCHANGEABLY. SO PREVIOUSLY PRIVATE. THIS CODE UPDATE. THERE WERE NO PARK LANDED UP IN SPACE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICALLY FOR HIM ON DEVELOPMENTS. THIS CODE UPDATE REQUIRES HAMLETS TO PROVIDE A COMBINE DEPARTMENT AND OPEN SPACE AMOUNT OF 25. AS RECOMMENDED IN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. WE ALSO ADDED SOME DIFFERENT TYPES OF PARKING AND OPEN SPACE THAT MIGHT BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE HAMLET JUST TO GIVE SOME EXAMPLES IN OUR CITY CODE. AND THEN THE BIG CHANGE BETWEEN THESE TWO CODES. ACTIONS IS THE PARK LINE AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS PREVIOUSLY EXISTED IN OUR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. AND WE KNOW THAT WITH HAMLET DEVELOPMENTS THERE MAY NOT ALWAYS BE OR ANYTHING THAT'S REALLY NOT TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. THERE MAY NOT ALWAYS BE A PLAQUE THAT TRIGGERS THE REQUIREMENTS, SO WE RELOCATED ALL OF THE PARKING 11 STATES REQUIREMENTS TO 11 65 UNDER OUR GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. WHAT DOES ACCOMPLISHES IS THAT WHEN, IF AND WHEN DEVELOPMENT HAPPENS, PARKING AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS ARE ALWAYS TRIGGERED. THEN THE LAST ONE THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT IS THE UPDATES TO THE NEW ALBANY DESIGN, GUIDANCE LINES AND REQUIREMENTS. SECTION FIVE PRESIDENTIAL FOR OUT OUTSIDE VILLAGE CENTER. SO REALLY ALL WE DID HEAR A FEW, BUT THE EXHIBIT ATTACHED TO THE RESOLUTION WE REALLY DID WAS AT A CLARIFYING SENTENCE THAT STATES THAT THE EXISTING MULTI FAMILY, UM, REQUIREMENTS THAT EXIST IN SECTION FIVE TODAY ALSO APPLY.
TO ALL TYPES OF MONTHS. MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, MAYBE NOT JUST APARTMENT BUILDINGS, BUT LIKE TOWNHOUSES, ANOTHER ATTACHED OTHER ATTACHMENTS LIKE THAT. THAT'S ALL WE HAVE FOR TODAY, AND WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS HAVE. HMM. WE SPECIFICALLY DEVELOPED. SPECIFICALLY DEFINE WHAT THE BOUNDARIES ARE OF THIS HAMLET, AS OPPOSED TO INDICT AT THE INTERSECTION. YES I'LL GO BACK TO THAT SLIDE IS SURE TO SLIDES HERE THAT TALKS ABOUT THAT, SO IT'S OUTLINED IN RED HERE ON THE SCREEN. THAT IS OPTIMISM TEXT THAT THAT IS THE BOUNDARY CORRECT. AND THEN WE ALSO UPDATED. I KNOW THEY WERE USED TO BE SOME KIND OF BUBBLES FLOATING AT THE INTERSECTION, LITTLE BULL'S EYES, SO WE ACTUALLY UPDATED THE FUTURE LANDINGS MAP. IT'S HARD TO SEE HERE, BUT WE HAVE THIS LITTLE ZOOM OUT HATCHES IN THE SAME BOUNDARY THAT SHOWN THIS PREVIOUS SCREEN HERE. SO THAT WILL, UH AS A PART OF THIS
[00:45:01]
PROCESS, OUR LAND USE MAPS WILL BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THAT. CHRISTOPHER DURING THE LAST MINUTE. THE PROPOSAL WAS FOR 55 FT BUILDING HEIGHT CENTER COMMERCIAL AREA. AND YOU DROP THAT DOWN TO 50. MY QUESTION ISO DO A FOUR STORY BUILDING? OR SHOULD WE BE SPECIFIC ABOUT THE AMOUNT? SO I THINK WE ALL AGREED LAST MEETING THAT THREE STORIES WOULD BE THE IDEAL FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT THERE. SHOULD WE BE MORE SPECIFIC AROUND 50 FT NOT TO EXCEED THREE STORIES OR IS IT? WHETHER ARCHITECTURAL DEVICES THAT CAN BE USED TO GET FOUR STORIES AND 50 FT. WE'RE TALKING THREE STORIES ABOVE GRADE. I MEAN, YOU COULD HAVE A BASEMENT WHICH FOR RIGHT AND WE HAVE WE DO HAVE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS GR REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS OUTSIDE OF THE VILLAGE CENTER. SO NO MATTER THE HEIGHT, THEY ALWAYS HAVE TO ADHERE TO APPROPRIATE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARD. APPROPRIATE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND FORM SO WE BELIEVE THAT THAT WOULD ENSURE THAT WE CAN APPROPRIATE DESIGN LIMITED ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS WITH PRETTY MUCH LIMITED TO A THREE STORY ABOVE GREAT BUILDING. AFTER TT NOT NECESSARILY, BUT IT WOULD STILL ENSURE THAT WE HAVE A APPROPRIATELY DESIGNED BUILDINGS. SO THAT'S. SO WHEN YOU YOU HAVE 50 FT IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND 40 FT ON THE PERIMETER, THAT'S CORRECT.THOUGHT IN SOME OF OUR DISCUSSION LAST WEEK, THERE WAS A LOT OF CONVERSATION ABOUT HAVING ONE UNIFORM HEIGHT, THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT. AS OPPOSED TO DIFFERENTIATING FURTHER BACK. IN TERMS OF KEEPING IT AT 40, OR 45, FT ELEVATION. ACROSS THE BOARD. I'D BE CURIOUS OF THOUGHTS ON THAT. THE CONVERSATION THAT WE HAD DURING THE LAST MEETING. I BELIEVE I RECALL CORRECTLY WAS ABOUT THE 55 AROUND THE GREEN. I DO HAVE A SLIDE. I CAN KIND OF JUMP TO THE SCHOOL. YOU GUYS KIND OF WHERE THAT 40 FT WOULD BE REQUIRED IN THE 55 FT. IF YOU WOULD BEAR WITH ME FOR YOU FOR JUST A SECOND. SKIP THROUGH A BUNCH OF SLIDES. I APOLOGIZE. I THINK IT'S TOWARDS THE PARIS RIGHT THERE. SO IF YOU WERE TO THIS WOULD BE ACTUALLY BE 58 TIMES.
WE DID NOT THINK THIS SLIDE BECAUSE WE WEREN'T PLANNING ON PRESENTING ON IT. BUT EVERYTHING IN PINK WOULD BE 40 FT. AND THEN EVERYTHING KIND OF AROUND REALLY AROUND THE CIVIC GREEN KIND OF INTERIOR TO THE SITE. WE REALLY EXPECTED A MIXTURE OF COMMERCIAL USES THAT WOULD THAT'S WHAT WOULD BE ALLOWED TO BE UP TO 50 FT. TALL THAT'S ALMOST TWO THIRDS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. WHEN YOU THINK 55 FT. I DON'T KNOW THAT PERCENTAGE OF THIS HAPPENING HOME. WELL JUST VISIBLY. YOU CAN SEE IT'S THE MAJOR WORKING WELL, A LOT OF THAT'S PARKING TOO, SO WELL. I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT M K S K HAD ADVISED US THAT IF WE DIDN'T ALLOW AT LEAST 50 FT AROUND THAT GREEN THAT THE COMMERCIAL SPACE JUST WOULD NOT WORK. I LOVE IT, AND ONE OF YOU MIGHT WANT TO SPEAK TO THAT THAT THAT WAS MY RECOLLECTION THAT THAT WAS THEY FELT THAT THAT WOULD JUST BE YEAH, I DON'T KNOW UNTENABLE. YEAH, I DON'T WANT TO ACTING RESPECT. UH, 55. IN THE CORE OF THE PROJECT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROJECT. FOR EVERY STREET IS GOING TO PROVIDE SOME FLEXIBILITY AND PROVIDE ITSELF. CREATIVE AUTHORSHIP. TO WHATEVER DEVELOPER TAKES THIS GROUND, CREATE SOMETHING THAT IS FANTASTIC. SOMETHING THAT SORT OF OVERLY BREATH. BUT THE FLEXIBILITY TO HAVE SOME VARIATION OF HIGHLAND CAN PROVIDE. DESIRABLE ARCHITECTURAL OUTCOMES AS IT RELATES TO THE COMMERCIALIZING. DENSITY AROUND THEM OR SOMETHING. FAVORABLY. I DON'T WANT TO SAY WILL IT OR WON'T IT WHERE IT'S HAPPINESS. BASICALLY USES TO CREATE THAT SENSE OF VIBRANCY THAT SCALE. I PERSONALLY APPRECIATE THAT IN THE DESIGN, AND I WANTED TO KNOW THAT I LIKE THAT THE STANDARDS CLEARLY DEFINED THE NEED FOR A CIVIC GREEN AND THAT CENTRAL LOCATION WHICH I THINK IS A CLARIFICATION THAT IS REALLY HELPFUL TO GUIDE THE DESIGN. UM, I THINK THAT HAVING THAT DIFFERENTIATION OF HEIGHT BETWEEN THE MIDDLE AND THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY WILL MAKE IT LOOK MORE. INTERESTING AND YOU KNOW BETTER FOR THE FLOW OF THAT DEVELOPMENT. ONE OF THE THINGS I'LL SAY THIS IS, UM NOT SCIENCE. YOU'RE ALLUDING TO THIS. WITH THE DENSITY SOLO THINGS UNIONS PERFECT LOTS, OF COURSE STORY ABOUT THAT. SO I DON'T SEE THAT NECESSARY. OBVIOUS WHEREBY A FOUR STORY BUILDING I JUST THINK. SHE HAD A
[00:50:10]
FLAT ROOF. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET FOUR STORIES ANYWAY? I MEAN , YOU KNOW 57 DORMERS ON THE U.S. BUT WITH A FLAT ROOF. WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF NO, LIKE A FLAT ROOF WOULDN'T PASS THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS RIGHT OR IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT. THE CITY CENTER SO IT MAY GOOD.
THERE'S OTHER FLAT BUILDING THAT CITIES COMMERCIAL. YEAH, BUT LET ME ASK THE QUESTION THIS WAY. IF IT'S 55 FT. IN WHAT IN THIS AREA THAT YOU DEFINE THERE. COULD SOMEBODY PUT RESIDENTIAL IN THERE AS OPPOSED TO A GREEN SPACE OR IS IT MANDATED AND IT'S GOING TO BE A CENTER GREEN AND COMMERCIAL. COULD YOU HAVE 55 FT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN THERE? SO. AGAIN AS I JUST MENTIONED TO THESE OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THEY KIND OF WORK IN WORK TOGETHER.
REALLY? THEY HAVE TO STILL ALWAYS MEET THAT 25% PER MINUTE OPEN SPACE AND THE DENSITY REQUIREMENT WOULD NEVER SEED BASED ON A RECOMMENDATION, UNDERSTAND THAT BUT IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO, THEY COULD PUT 55 WOULD HIKE BUILDINGS RESIDENTIAL IN THAT AREA AND SOMEHOW SATISFY THE GREEN SPACE. IN OTHER PARTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE NOT SAYING YOU HAVE TO PUT X Y AND Z IN THIS SPACE CORRECT PUT. THAT'S WHY I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A 55 FT HEIGHT. AND WHAT THE POTENTIAL CAN BE FOR IT. IF IT'S NOT GOING TO BE COMMERCIAL, WE'RE GETTING IT DOWN TO 50 AND THIS AND THAT 45 BUT I THINK THAT JOE, I THINK YOU WERE KIND OF TALKING ABOUT THAT EARLIER THAT WHEN YOU PULL ONE LEVER, YOU'VE GOT THE OTHER LEVEL THERE. SO IF WE DID THAT FOUR STORY RESIDENTIAL THAT WOULD AFFECT THAT 200 PER UNIT RATIO COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL BUT MY UNDERSTANDING THAT CORRECTLY , THAT'S CORRECT. SO IF YOU FOCUS YOUR RESIDENTIAL ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT FIRST OF ALL, YOU WOULD VIOLATE SOME OF THE OTHER STANDARDS, WHICH CALLED FOR THE COMMERCIAL TO BE ON THE WESTERN SIDE IN THE RESIDENTIAL TO BE ON THE EASTERN SIDE. YOU'D USE UP MOST OF YOUR DENSITY. IF NOT ALL OF YOUR DENSITY IN THAT AREA. YOU DON'T HAVE TO MAKE THAT UP IN COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE EAST SIDE. SO AGAIN, THESE ARE THESE ARE ALL KNITTED TOGETHER IN A WAY THAT HOPEFULLY THERE WON'T BE ANY SURPRISES. I CAN'T GUARANTEE THAT, BUT WE'RE REALLY TRYING TO UM, CREATE A. CREATE A ROADMAP HERE THAT IS GOING TO UO WHAT'S GOING ON AROUND THE PERIMETER. SO WE HAVE GOT WE HAVE THE COMMERCIAL AUTO ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST . WE WANT TO TRANSITION AWAY FROM THAT. INTO MORE PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED COMMERCIAL AND THEN FROM THERE INTO MORE OF A CASS.
WAIT! ASKED. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE 605. SPARKING THE MAIN 50 THE PIPE.
AND WE'RE GOING TO MAKE YOU KNOW THE MARKET AND MAIN APARTMENT BUILDINGS ARE 49 FT. TALL BELIEVE IT TO THE RIDGE OF THE ROOF? TYPE TO THE VERY TOP. 49 CORRECT. I WOULD ALSO ADD TO JUST HAVE SOME CONTEXT. THERE ARE COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ARE DIRECTLY IN THIS IMMEDIATE AREA, INCLUDING RIGHT BEHIND THE SITE WITH THE CDG BUILDING, AND SOME OF THOSE SOME OF OUR COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT ALLOWED TO 65 FT. TONIGHT AS WELL. PART OF WHY WE WERE PUSHING THE COMMERCIAL BACK THAT DIRECTION TO BEGIN WITH, WASN'T IT? THAT'S CORRECT. SORT OF HAVE THIS TRANSITION OF THIS SEVERELY IF YOU WILL COMMERCIAL GOING ON 65, THEN OUR SORT OF GREEN SPACE VERSION OF COMMERCIAL SLASH RETAIL 55. BUT NOW WE'VE COMPROMISED 50 AND THEN THE RESIDENTIAL CLOSER TO OUR OTHER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND THE REST OF OUR RESIDENTIAL THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE WAY IT WAS ALL SUPPOSED TO FLOW AND THAT THAT WOULD MAKE IT VERY NICE VISUAL TRANSITION AS WELL RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT, AND THAT ADDITIONAL UP TO 50 FT IN HEIGHT THAT IS ALSO LIMITED TO I BELIEVE 250 FT OFF CENTRAL COLLEGE ROAD AS WELL AS STATE ROUTE SIX AND FIVE SO THEY CAN ONLY BUILD BUILDINGS. SOMEONE COULD ONLY BUILD BUILDINGS.
THAT'S ALL 50 FT. OFF MAJOR ROADWAYS. AND THE PART THAT STICKS IN MY MIND THAT, UH, WAS TOLD TO US LAST WEEK FROM MK SK OR FROM THE LAST MEETING WAS THAT WERE ALREADY SORT OF ASKING THESE COMMERCIAL PEOPLE TO COME HERE WITH A FAIRLY LOW DENSITY. FOR WHAT FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, PROBABLY AS LOW AS MK SK, I THINK WAS RECOMMENDING WAS STILL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
AND WE WERE ASKING THEM TO PUT IT IN THE MIDDLE SO THAT YOU CAN'T IT'S NOT EASILY ACCESSIBLE OR SEEN FROM THE ROAD. AND THEN ON TOP OF IT NOW WE'RE LOWERING THE HEIGHT, SO IT'S EVEN HARDER
[00:55:04]
TO BE SEEN. AND I THAT AGAIN. WE'RE GOING TO GET TO A POINT WHERE THIS WE'RE ASKING THIS THING TO FAIL, AND WE NEED TO MAKE A DECISION ABOUT DO WE WANT IT OR DON'T WE? I THINK THAT'S A LOT OF WHAT I HEARD FROM THE LAST MEETING. THE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL IN THE ORDINANCE. WE'RE GONNA WAIT FOR ANY QUESTIONS ON THE RESOLUTION UNTIL IT'S CONSIDERED. EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE PRESENTED TOGETHER. I THINK THAT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO THE POINT. UM OBVIOUSLY, WE'LL DO OUR BEST AS COUNSEL TO ALLOW MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK REGARDING THE ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS BUT STICK AROUND IN CASE WE NEEDED TO SPEAK TO BOTH. WITH THAT WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND ASK MY SPEAKER CARD. TRICIA. GOOD EVENING. HOW ARE YOU? I'M NOT THANK YOU. TRICIA SIGNEES 7267. WELL, THE LINKS DRIVE. I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE 600 ALBANY LINKS HOMEOWNERS AND ABOUT ROUGHLY 43 HOMEOWNERS THAT THANKED ME FOR REPRESENTING THEM TONIGHT, BUT COULDN'T BE HERE. I THINK EVERYBODY'S TRAVELING BECAUSE YOU'RE OUT OF SCHOOL AND ABOUT HALF OF OUR COMMUNITY IS CURRENTLY AT THE KAHANE POOL CHEERING ON THE DOLPHINS. IT IS THE CHAMPIONSHIPS WILL MEET TONIGHT, SO MY KIDS ARE WELL REPRESENTED. THEY'RE GETTING CHEERED ON BY THEIR FATHER. I WAS ON DUTY LAST NIGHT, MR UNIVERSE? YES YES. SO WHEN HE SAYS, YOU WIN, UM. SO WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. I DO FEEL A BIT . I APPRECIATE THAT YOU ARE LISTENING AND THAT WE'RE MAKING SOME CHANGES. I DO AGREE WITH MARLENE. DO WE WANT THIS? I FEEL LIKE THE COMMUNITY HAS TOLD US WE DON'T WANT THIS. UM HAVE WE HEARD THAT? ARE WE LISTENING? I KNOW WE'RE DEBATING ON, UM, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. AND WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT. THE TRAFFIC YET AND I KNOW THAT'S LIKE THE NEXT PHASE THAT WOULD BE PUSHED INTO THE NEXT PHASE. JUST AS A PARENT THAT DROPPED HER KID OFF AT SCHOOL OR PICKS HER UP ON TUESDAYS EARLIER DROPS OFF EARLY ON FRIDAYS. IT'S ALREADY BACKED UP TO THIS POINT, SO I FEEL LIKE I DON'T KNOW. AT WHAT POINT DO WE ADDRESS THAT? BUT IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT 33 ACRES WITH SIX. 6 TO 1 RATIO. AND IF THE 6 TO 1 APPLIES TO 100% OF THE LAND, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 100 AND 98 UNITS. SO IT DOES CONCERN ME YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT PROBABLY ABOUT 400 FOLKS THAT WILL BE LIVING ON THAT CORNER. SO WHERE DO THEY COME IN AND OUT, RIGHT, SO I DON'T THINK THEY CAN COME OUT SIX OF FIVE. SO HOW DO WE HOW DO WE MANAGE THAT? BRUCE HAD A GOOD IDEA. DO WE BUILD SPACE AROUND THAT CORNER TO ACCOUNT FOR A ROUND ABOUT THAT. WE MAY WANT TO PUT THEIR ONE DAY, RIGHT ? UM SO I JUST URGE YOU TO TAKE A LOOK AT IF WE WANT THIS AT ALL. UM THERE'S A LOT OF THINK THAT COLLECTIVE CONCERN IS TRAFFIC AND THE COLLECTIVE CONCERN IS THAT THIS WILL BECOME A BIG APARTMENT COMPLEX. RIGHT SO YOU DO HAVE SOME DIFFERENT UNITS. REGARDLESS OF THERE'S YOU KNOW, 198 OR 50 OF THEM ARE 600 OF THEM. I SEE INVESTORS GAVELING THOSE UP AND PEOPLE RUNNING THEM OUT, RIGHT, SO THAT'S WHAT IT THAT'S WHAT IT MIGHT BECOME. AND I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF TALK ABOUT MILLENNIALS LIVING THERE. AND I KNOW IT'S A COOL WORD THAT THEY'RE 40 YEARS OLD. RIGHT IF YOU IF YOU LOOK AT THE DEMOGRAPHIC OF MILLENNIALS, THERE WILL HAPPEN CHILDREN RIGHT NOW, AND THEY WANT TO BE IN THE DISTRICT. SO PLEASE DON'T DISCOUNT THE DRAW THAT THAT WILL HAVE UM, I DON'T WANT TO DRIVE YOU CRAZY WITH ALL THE QUESTIONS WE'VE ALREADY HAD, AND I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING THAT YOU'VE DONE TO GET US TO THIS POINT. BUT PLEASE CONSIDER THAT WE MIGHT NOT WANT THIS AT ALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, TRICIA.ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC? I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANOTHER SPEAKING CARDS. SO ANYONE ELSE NOTHING. DON'T MAKE ME YOU KNOW, DRAG YOU UP THERE. SORRY DIDN'T MEAN TO CALL YOU BY NAME, UH, MAP. MCFADDEN, 7073 MAYNARD PLACE EAST. I DON'T WANT TO BE LABOR. THE POINT I THINK WE'VE ALL MADE OUR CONCERNS ABOUT DENSITY KNOWN TRAP BECAUSE A BIG ONE AGAIN, EVERYBODY MORE THAN 1 61. THE WHOLE THING STARTS. WE'LL TAKE THAT ROAD TO GO TO SCHOOL. IT'S A VERY BUSY INTERSECTION. LOT OF TURNS WHERE I MEAN, WE KIND OF WENT THROUGH THIS LAST YEAR AND THIS COINCIDENCE, BUT I BELIEVE IT WAS LIKE IN TWO CONSECUTIVE DAYS . TOO BAD ACCIDENTS AT THAT INTERSECTION. SO AS FIRST YOU MENTIONED, ADDING SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 200 UNITS, 350 TO 600
[01:00:01]
PEOPLE, POTENTIALLY UM, THAT'S A LOT OF CARS. WHERE DO THEY GO TO GET IN AND OUT? MR PRESIDENT.CORRECTLY POINTED OUT, WE KIND OF KEEP PUNCHING THIS THING INTO SUBMISSION IN A WEIRD WAY, WHERE WE HAVE TO ASK OURSELVES. WE KEEP KIND OF RESTRICTING RESTRICTING IT TO FIT WHAT WE WANT IN ONE YOU GET TO ASK THE QUESTION. DO WE WANT THIS? OR DO WE WANT SOMETHING ELSE? AGAIN THE SCHOOL IMPACT IS ANOTHER ONE. I'D LIKE TO SEE I DO APPRECIATE ALL THE TIME. I DO APPRECIATE ALL THE EFFORT THAT YOU KNOW EVERYONE'S GOING BEFORE US. I APPRECIATE SOME CONCESSIONS AS WELL. UM SO THANK YOU FOR ALL THE HARD WORK, BUT I THINK IT IS. THE REAL QUESTION IS, IS IT SOMETHING WE ACTUALLY WANT TO PUT THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC. THEY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS, EITHER THIS ORDINANCE OR THE RESOLUTION. WE'LL HEAR THE RESOLUTION. NEXT OF SOMEONE CHANGES THEIR MIND. YOU'LL YOU'LL GET A SECOND CHANCE. UM JUST A COUPLE OF COMMENTS OF BEFORE I OPENED UP THE COUNCIL. FIRST OF ALL, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UM JUST A COUPLE OF COMMENTS. YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK IT'S ANYONE IN THE ROOM.
SURPRISED TO HEAR THAT THERE'S A LOT GOING ON IN CENTRAL OHIO, THE REGION'S GROWING VERY QUICKLY. LAST COUNCIL MEETING. WE HAD A VERY, UM INTERESTING PROPOSALS SHARED WITH US BY KODA ABOUT, YOU KNOW, INCREASING MASS TRANSIT THE AREA. WE TALKED ABOUT GROWTH AND MORE FANCY. AND UH, YOU KNOW, CENTRAL OHIO IS ON THE RADAR FOR DEVELOPMENT AND A LOT OF WAYS NOT JUST NEW ALBANY BUT A LOT OF OTHER COMMUNITIES AS WELL. AND THERE'S MOUNTING DEVELOPMENT PRESSURE. THERE HAS BEEN FOR SOME TIME AND IT'S ONLY GOING TO CONTINUE. UM AND SO A LOT OF COMMUNITIES THAT MAYBE HAVEN'T SPENT A LOT OF TIME. EXAMINING WAYS THAT THEY CAN HELP CONTROL OR CONTROLS EVEN A TOUGH WORD. I WOULD SAY INFLUENCE WAYS THAT THE COMMUNITY CAN INFLUENCE DEVELOPMENT ARE SORT OF SCRAMBLING TO GET AHEAD OF IT. I THINK THE ALBANY IS IN A GREAT JOB FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS BEING VERY MINDFUL WITH ITS CIVIC PLANNING AND TRYING TO CREATE STANDARDS THAT ARE TIME TESTED AND PROVEN AND CAN STAND THE TEST OF TIME. BUT THE TOOLS THAT WE CAN UTILIZE OUR FIRST OUR STRATEGIC PLAN, WHICH WE SPEND A GREAT DEAL OF TIME DEVELOPING AND GOT US TO THIS POINT OF TALKING ABOUT A HAMLET. UM THAT STRATEGIC PLAN WAS REVIEWED BY VARIOUS COMMITTEES, INCLUDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED FOR ADOPTION CENTER COUNCIL APPROVED BY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION SENT TO THE COMMUNITY AND IN THAT STRATEGIC PLAN HAD COMMENTS ABOUT NOT ONLY ONE HAMLET BUT TO AND, UH, OBVIOUSLY AS A DEVELOPMENT PLAN VERY QUICKLY, THEN FOLLOWED. UH WE'VE GOT A LOT OF FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY. A LOT OF REALLY GREAT FEEDBACK ABOUT WHAT? THEY WANTED TO SEE WHAT THEY DIDN'T WANT TO SEE WHAT CONCERNS THEY HAD THINGS THAT DEVELOPER THAT WANTED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW ALBANY HAVE TO PAY ATTENTION TO.
THESE ARE THINGS THAT THE COMMUNITY HAS BEEN VERY CLEAR ABOUT. UM, TRAFFIC TRAFFIC IS CRITICAL FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE TO BE ABLE TO GET FOLKS IN AND OUT OF OUR COMMUNITY AND LOGICAL WAY ALL OF US ON COUNCIL HAVE LIVED THROUGH TRAFFIC SNARLS IN THE PAST. UM YOU KNOW, I THINK I LAUGHINGLY SAID SEVERAL YEARS AGO THAT I DROVE UP TO A DETOUR SIGN. AND ON TOP OF THAT WAS THE DETOUR SIGN. I DIDN'T KNOW WHICH WAY TO GO. SO WE DON'T WANT TO LIVE IN THAT ENVIRONMENT NOW THAT THE TRAFFIC ON 605 IF EITHER WITH OR WITHOUT ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IS SOMETHING THAT YOU KNOW ALL OF US THE SCHOOL, THE CITY NEED TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME HAVING CONVERSATIONS ABOUT HOW CAN WE ALLEVIATE SOME OF THAT ISSUE? HOPEFULLY THERE'S THREE BELTS SCHEDULE IS INCONVENIENT, AS IT'S GOING TO BE FOR SOME FAMILIES WILL HELP ALLEVIATE SOME OF THAT. THE SCHOOL BUS SHORTAGE IS ALSO HAVING A MASSIVE IMPACT ON THAT. BUT THOSE ARE ISSUES THAT WE HAVE TO GET ADDRESSED WITH OR WITHOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT. SECOND IS THE SCHOOL IMPACT. I MEAN, NO DEVELOPMENT HAPPENS IN THIS COMMITTEE WITHOUT US HAVING A LONG CONVERSATION ABOUT THE IMPACT ON SCHOOLS. IT MAY BE THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT WE FACTOR INTO ALL THESE DECISIONS . THERE'S OTHER COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE RUN MUCH FASTER THAN WE HAVE THAT PUT IN MANY MORE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. TO THE DETRIMENT OF THEIR SCHOOLS, AND WE'VE TRIED TO MAINTAIN THAT BALANCE VERY DILIGENTLY FOR A LONG, LONG PERIOD OF TIME. UM BUT AGAIN, THERE'S ONLY SO MANY THINGS THAT A CITY CAN DO TO INFLUENCE DEVELOPMENTS. SO AGAIN. I TALKED ABOUT THE STRATEGIC PLAN. THAT'S WHY WE WENT THROUGH THAT PROCESS. WE MADE CHANGES PLAN. WE'RE GOING TO POSSIBLY MAKE CHANGES TO TONIGHT TO CLARIFY THE STANDARDS. THE NEXT IS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES IN ORDER FOR A DEVELOPER TO COME INTO OUR COMMUNITY AND I PROPOSE A PROJECT AGAIN. IT'S GOT TO MEET THE STRATEGIC PLAN. IT'S GOT TO MEET THE DEVELOPMENT CENTERS. THEY'RE ALL GUIDELINES FOR THEM TO MEET. THE NEXT STEP IS ZONING ORDINANCES. WHAT DOES LEARNING REQUIREMENTS LAYOUT AND THEN THE PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS, AND I THINK NEW ALBANY SHOULD BE VERY PROUD OF THEIR VERY ROBUST PLANNING AND REVIEW PROCESS THAT WE HAVE. AGAIN AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CAME FORWARD THAT WAS,
[01:05:05]
YOU KNOW, WELL CONCEIVED. A LOT OF TIME ENERGY WENT INTO IT. IT WAS A BEAUTIFUL LOOKING PRODUCT, BUT WASN'T WHAT THE COMMUNITY WANTED. AND WE GOT A LOT OF FEEDBACK ON THAT AND AT THE END OF THE DAY COUNCIL DID NOT SUPPORT THE PROJECT AS IT WAS PROPOSED, AND AGAIN, IT WAS THAT VERY ROBUST PUBLIC PROCESS AND ENGAGEMENT THAT GOT US AT THAT POINT. NOW THROUGH THESE CHANGES , WE'RE ADDING ANOTHER ELEMENT. THE AIR B HAS TO REVIEW ITS GOT TO GO TO PLANNING COMMISSION HAS TO COME TO COUNCIL. THERE'S GOING TO BE A GREAT DEAL OF PUBLIC INPUT AND JUST TO BE CRYSTAL CLEAR LIKE WE ENCOURAGE PUBLIC INPUT. IT MAKES THE PROJECT BETTER. UH, YOUR INPUT WILL IMPROVE THIS PROJECT. IF ONE DOES COME FORWARD, UM UNDOUBTEDLY. BUT I ALSO HAVE CONCERNS THAT IF WE IF WE DON'T TRY TO STRENGTHEN OUR ABILITY TO INFLUENCE THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT WHERE WE ARE AT IN THE PROCESS WHERE WE PASSED THE STRATEGIC PLAN WE HAVE A PROPERTY OWNER. THAT EITHER MAY DEVELOP THIS OR SELL IT FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO DEVELOP. IF WE FAIL TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT SOME OF THESE TOOLS TO INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT, WE'RE GOING TO BE AT RISK DEVELOPER COULD COME IN AND MAKE A PROPOSAL. WE DON'T HAVE GOOD GROUNDS TO STAND AGAINST IT. AND AT THE END OF THE DAY IF THE PROJECT IS REJECTED, IT OPENS US UP TO A POSSIBLE LEGAL CHALLENGE. AND THE LAST THING I WANT TO DO AND NO OFFENSE. I'M A LAWYER. I DON'T WANT TO JUDGE DOWNTOWN, TELLING US WHAT WE GET TO BUILD HERE IN NEW ORLEANS. THAT'D BE THE LAST THING I WANT TO HAVE HAPPENED. SO THIS IS A THIS IS A BALANCING TEST. THERE'S NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. UM AND WE HAVE TO DO OUR LEVEL HEADED BEST TO TRY TO ACHIEVE THAT. IT'S NOT EASY, YOU KNOW THAT THESE ARE NOT EASY CONVERSATIONS. UH AND IT'S YOU KNOW, I THINK WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE THE BEST OF IT. IT'S STILL A FAIR QUESTION. IS THIS SOMETHING WE WANT TO HAVE? UM ON ONE END, ON THE OTHER HAND, DO WE HAVE TO TRY TO DO THE OUR BEST TO TRY TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF TOOLS WE HAVE IN OUR BOX, SO TO SPEAK TO INFLUENCE THE ANY PROJECT THAT MIGHT COME ALONG? SO THOSE ARE JUST MY COMMENTS. I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE FLOOR TO THE REST OF COUNCIL. I THINK YOU MADE A GOOD POINT. MR MAYOR. REGARDING BALANCING OF. WHAT A FUTURE PROJECT THERE SHOULD LOOK LIKE. THE ORIGINAL PLAN THAT CAME THROUGH AND WE ALL HEARD FROM THE COMMUNITY THAT THE DENSITY THERE WAS MUCH TOO HIGH FROM WHAT THE COMMUNITY EXPECTED. THE COUNCIL DID A VERY GOOD JOB AND LISTENING TO THE FEEDBACK OF THE COMMUNITY GAVE AMPLE OPPORTUNITY TO THE COMMUNITY TO COME IN AND SPEAK AND HELP US. RETHINK WHAT A HAMLET DESIGN SHOULD LOOK LIKE. I ALSO KNOW THAT THAT AREA IS GOING TO BE DEVELOPED AT SOME POINT IN TIME. AND WE WANT TO HAVE SOME CONTROL OVER HOW THAT IS. GOING TO BE DEVELOPED, AND I THINK THE PLANS THAT WE HAVE IN PLACE. ARE GETTING US THERE, AND I KNOW THAT BACK WHEN WE WERE DEBATING THE FIRST PROJECT THAT WAS BEING PROPOSED THAT A LOT OF THE COMMUNITY WAS TELLING ME THAT IF WE COULD LEAST GET THAT DENSITY CUT IN HALF. THEY PROVIDE MORE COMMERCIAL SPACE THAT IT WOULD BE A GOOD PROJECT.FOR THE COMMUNITY, AND THAT WOULD BE A BIG STEP FORWARD. AND I THINK THAT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY STAFF FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY FROM LAST MEETING HAS ENABLED US TO MAKE THOSE CHANGES THAT ARE NECESSARY. TO ENSURE THAT WE KEEP THE DENSITY DOWN. THAT ARE COMMERCIAL. BUSINESSES THAT WE REQUESTED IN THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL SPACE THAT IS GOING TO BE IN THERE WILL BE ADEQUATE. UH THE HUB KEEPS THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY DOWN, BUT ALSO PROVIDE AMENITIES TO THE COMMUNITY REVENUE STREAM TO THE CITY THROUGH THE THROUGH THE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY, SO IN MY OPINION, THIS IS A MUCH BETTER PRODUCT AND WHAT WE HAD ORIGINALLY HAD IN THE PAST AND IT'S TAKEN US TO A POINT WHERE WE WOULD HAVE SAID. BACK LAST NOVEMBER IF WE CAN CUT THIS IN HALF AND INCREASE THE COMMERCIAL VIABILITY AND ACTIVITY IN THAT AREA THAT WE WOULD ACCEPT IT.
AND YOU START WHERE MY HEAD WAS . SO UH, I'M NOT. I WOULD STILL LIKE TO SEE THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY A LITTLE LESS THAN WHAT IT IS, BUT WE'VE MADE SUCH A VAST IMPROVEMENT IN TERMS OF WHAT THE RESIDENTS HAVE ASKED US TO DO. DURING THE LAST GO AROUND THAT, YOU KNOW. I WOULD ACCEPT WHERE WE ARE TODAY WITH THIS PROPOSAL, BUT STILL HOPE THAT WE CAN KEEP RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AT A MINIMUM. 6 TO 1 IS GOOD IF WE COULD DO BETTER THAN THAT, I WOULD BE HAPPY, BUT I THINK WE'RE ALL THIS PROPOSALS VERY STRONG. THANK YOU, MR FELLOWS. I WOULD JUST. KIND OF AGREEING WITH COUNCIL MEMBER FELLOWS, I THINK, UM AND SOMEWHAT BUT MAYORS, SPAULDING SAID TO LIKE
[01:10:02]
WE WANT TO WE HAVE WE WANT THIS PROPERTY. THIS PROPERTY IS GOING TO BE DEVELOPED. UM ITS CURRENT USE IS NOT THE FUTURE USE OF THE OF THE LAND AND WE WANT TO BE IN CONTROL. AND I THINK THAT THIS PROCESS SPEEDING UP OF THE OF THE LOT HAS REALLY JUST GIVEN US MORE AND MORE CONTROL OVER WHAT WE WANT TO SEE IN THERE, AND IT'S UM I'M UNCOMFORTABLE WITH ADDITIONAL TOOLS TO CONTROL THE SCHOOL IMPACT. I APPRECIATE THE CITY'S, UM, SPELLING THAT OUT. UM AND I THINK THAT THIS IS A THIS IS A BETTER USE OF THE LAND THAN OTHER USES THAT I COULD IMAGINE, AND IF WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONTROL AND HAVE SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAPPENED, I THINK THAT THAT WOULD BE IN BOTH CITIES. BEST INTEREST. I'M COMING AT THIS, BUT I THINK FROM THE KIND OF OPPOSITE ANGLE SO I'LL JUST START BY COULD BE VERY HONEST, I WOULDN'T I FIRST SAW THAT CONCEPT OF HAVING A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT THIS LOCATION . I WAS REALLY EXCITED ABOUT IT. UM, I SAW THE PLAN. I KNEW IT WAS FAR TOO DENSE. I KNEW THEY WERE GOING TO BE A LOT OF CONCERNS, AND I KNEW IT WAS GOING TO TAKE A LOT OF WORK. AND IT ALL JUST SORT OF GOT VERY OUT OF HAND BEFORE WE COULD REALLY WORK ON IT AT THAT TIME, AND THAT'S FINE. SO WE TOOK IT. OH OUT, AND WE DID IT CORRECTLY TOOK IT BACK. WE HADN'T DONE OUR STANDARDS WELL ENOUGH AT THE TIME. WE HAVEN'T DEFINED IT, AND WE'VE DONE IT IN A MUCH BETTER FASHION NOW, AND I'M GOOD WITH THAT. UH WE ARE TAKING THIS THING DOWN, THOUGH, TO THE ABSOLUTE STUDS IN TERMS OF THE EXPERTS THAT WE HIRED TO TELL US WHAT CAN BE SUCCESSFUL. UM, SO E SUCCESSFUL. I'M HOPEFUL THE DEVELOPER WILL STILL WANT TO DO IT. I'M NOT COMPLETELY POSITIVE THAT THAT WILL HAPPEN. AND I RECOGNIZE THE CONCERNS ABOUT THE TRAFFIC AND THE DENSITY AND THE IMPACT ON THE SCHOOLS. IT'S NOT THAT I DON'T I LIVE VERY CLOSE TO IT. I LIVE IN WINDSOR. I LIVE IN A VERY HIGH DENSITY LOCATION . I DEAL WITH THE TRAFFIC JUST AS MUCH AS EVERYBODY DOES. AND I DON'T WANT IT AND I KNOW THAT WE HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL AND GET THE PROPER STUDIES AND BE VERY CAREFUL WITH OUR SCHOOLS HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT THIS WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT IT WITH OUR SUPERINTENDENT. I HAVE HAD MANY , MANY THOUGHTFUL CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE ABOUT THIS. I DON'T TAKE IT LIGHTLY. BUT I DO THINK A MIXED DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. COULD BE A VERY EXCITING OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR TOWN WHERE WE ARE HEARING FROM SO MANY PEOPLE THAT THEY'RE BORED WITH THE OPTIONS THAT THEY HAVE IN TERMS OF PLACES TO GO AND SOCIALIZE WITH THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THE CITY WITH THEM.SO I AM VERY HOPEFUL AND OPTIMISTIC THAT WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK AND THAT IT IS NOW AT A PLACE WHERE IT WILL BE BALANCED IN TERMS OF PEOPLE'S CONCERNS, AND WE WILL STILL END UP WITH SOMETHING THAT CAN BE A REALLY COOL AMENITY FOR OUR CITY. I WANT THAT FOR US, UM BUT YOU KNOW, WE'LL HAVE TO SEE WHERE IT GOES FROM HERE, I GUESS. UM FIRST I'VE EXITED. THANK TRICIA , ESPECIALLY FOR KIND OF SPEARHEADING THE CHARGE THAT COUNTLESS HOURS YOU'VE SPENT ON THIS PROJECT AND MATT AND LARRY IS NOT HERE IN KIRK IS NOT HERE. YOU MIGHT HAVE SWIMMERS, OR, UM BUT KATIE WITH THE EMAILS LIKE I MEAN, THE TWO POINT THE CONVERSATION IN THE INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY WILL ULTIMATELY MAKE THIS PROJECT FAR BETTER THAN WHAT IT STARTED AT, AND IT WAS I MEAN, 12. I JUST WANT TO HEARKEN BACK TO THAT FIRST PLANETS. 12 UNITS BREAKER. UM AND IT WAS TOO BIG CHALLENGED VILLAGE CENTER, AND IT WASN'T A GREAT PRODUCT. AND, UH, I MEAN, HE'D SAY, BUT IF NOT FOR THE COMMUNITY FEEDBACK, MAYBE THAT JUST MOVES ALONG AND IT'S LIKE, OKAY, AND, UM, WE DON'T KNOW, BUT BECAUSE OF YOU GUYS BEING HERE IN YOUR INPUT, I DO THINK IT'S GOING TO BE A BETTER PROJECT AND I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU SAID SOME OF THE LAST MEETING YOU DON'T YOU WOULDN'T MIND IF NOTHING THAT DEVELOPED THERE. I DON'T NECESSARILY DISAGREE WITH THAT, LIKE FROM ME SITTING HERE PERSONALLY. YOU KNOW, I LIKE THE WAY IT IS AND CHANGE IS SCARY, BUT THE REALITY IS WE'RE INVITING A GLOBAL BRAND NEW OUR CITY TO DEVELOP. AND.
THESE FOLKS WANT TO LIVE WHERE THEY WORK, AND I THINK WE NEED TO OFFER THE FOLKS THAT ARE GOING TO BE THERE AN OPTION AND INTEL CAME ALONG. WELL AFTER THIS, YOU KNOW WAS ON THE RAILS AND HEADING DOWN THE ROAD WITH THE TIMING JUST WORKS OUT THAT YOU KNOW YOU LOOK AT WE HAVE.
WE'RE CITY OF 11,000 PEOPLE. I MEAN, YOU LOOK AT OUR PEERS. WE PUNCH SO FAR ABOVE OUR WAY WITH THE ARLINGTON'S AND THE DUBLIN'S. YOU HAVE 100,000. WE'RE A VERY SMALL COMMUNITY AND
[01:15:03]
UNFORTUNATELY YOU KNOW, WE HAVE 5000 KIDS IN OUR SCHOOL DISTRICT. SO HALF OF OUR SCHOOLS . KIDS DON'T EVEN LIVE IN NEW ALBANY. BUT YOU KNOW, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE FACE PRESSURE WITH BECAUSE WE WANT TO OFFER. YOU KNOW, RESIDENTIAL IN OUR CITY, BUT NOW WE'RE KIND OF HANDCUFFED BECAUSE THE SCHOOLS ARE ALREADY KIND OF FULL. NOW WE DO WORK EXTREMELY CLOSELY WITH SUPERINTENDENT SAWYER'S WITH THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT WE HAVE IN THE SCHOOL. WE ARE NOT YOU KNOW, WE ARE ASSURED. THIS PROJECT WILL NOT PUT US OVER THE LIMIT. IT'S NOT EVEN ACTUALLY PUT US TO THE LIMIT. UM BECAUSE THE CITY IS GONNA GROW. WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE 11,000 FOLKS FOREVER, AND WE'VE DONE A VERY GOOD JOB CONTROLLING THAT GROWTH. I THINK IN THE LAST 10 YEARS WE'VE ONLY ADDED 3000 OR SO ROOFS. SOMEBODY LOOK AT A PERCENTAGE WISE. WE DIDN'T DECREASE BY 40% BUT WE'RE GOING FROM 7500 TO 11,000 SO WE ARE VERY, VERY AWARE OF NOT THROWING THE PLANNING THAT'S BEATEN WHILE MANY GREAT SO FAR ASIDE JUST FOR THIS ONE PROJECT, AND I DO THINK I GENUINELY THINK THAT IF THIS PROJECT IS DONE, RIGHT, AND WITH THE YOU KNOW WHAT WE'VE DONE HERE TONIGHT.AND THE PLAN THAT COMES ALONG. I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE AN ASSET TO OUR COMMUNITY, AND I KNOW SOME FOLKS ARE JUST GONNA NOT AGREEING. I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THAT. UM BUT, YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR NOT ONLY YOU KNOW, THE SCHOOL IMPACT I DON'T THINK IS GOING TO BE MITIGATED AND WE'RE GOING TO WORK WITH SUPERINTENDENT SAWYER'S DENSITIES. FAR BETTER. YOU KNOW , I THINK IT WAS EYE OPENING THAT WINDSOR'S ACTUALLY SEVEN YEARS PER ACRE, UM, RIGHT DOWN THE STREET TRAFFIC. I THINK WE CAN MAKE THAT INTERSECTION SAFER WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. YOU KNOW , I RIDE MY BIKE OUT THERE ALL THE TIME, AND IT'S IT FEELS LIKE A COUNTRY INTERSECTION IN FOCUS KIND OF ROLL THROUGH THERE, AND, UM, I THINK THEY GO WAY TOO FAST. WE'RE KIND OF LIMITED ON WHAT WE CAN DO WITH THE SPEED LIMIT NOW BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THE TRAFFIC COUNCIL THERE. I THINK WITH POTENTIAL ROUNDABOUT , I THINK WITH A POTENTIAL TUNNEL UNDER 65 TO GET FOLKS FROM ONE SIDE OF 65 TO THE OTHER. I THINK THESE ARE OPPORTUNITIES THAT COULD RESULT FROM A PROJECT LIKE THIS. SO UM, I THINK THAT COULD AND THEN WE COULD REVISIT THE SPEED LIMIT UP THE ROAD. SO I, YOU KNOW. I KNOW FOLKS ARE NEVER GOING TO KIND OF AGREE WITH WHERE WE'RE AT NOW, BUT I DO THINK THAT WE'VE GOTTEN FAR. 100% BETTER PRODUCT THAN WHAT WE STARTED WITH WHEN WE BEGIN THIS PROCESS, AND I THANK YOU GUYS, FOR ALL THE WORK YOU'VE DONE. I'LL JUMP IN, UM. I'M NOT GOING TO REHASH THE PROJECT THAT WE LOOKED AT AND VOTED DOWN LAST TIME. I THINK WE ALL SPOKE TO THAT AS TO WHY BUT WHAT I WILL SAY ON THIS, UM, IS THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TODAY. THE 15 THAT WE HAVE HERE FOR THE HAMLET AT FIRST JUST WANT TO THANK STAFF FOR REALLY TAKEN THE TIME. TO TAKE EVERYBODY'S, UM REMARKS COMMENTS, ADVICE AND REALLY. CONTINUALLY DEVELOPING THESE STANDARDS, REALLY, PROBABLY EVEN UP UNTIL WE CAME TODAY. I THINK WE HAD A REVISION IN OUR MAILBOXES EARLY AS THIS MORNING AND SO UM, THAT REALLY SPEAKS VOLUMES TO THE COMMUNITY THAT WE HAVE HERE THAT WE'RE WILLING TO COME TOGETHER AND REALLY TRY TO WORK SOMETHING OUT. THAT WOULD UH, HOPEFULLY HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON OUR COMMUNITY AND IN CERTAIN AREA, AND I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT FIRST UM SECOND, UM , THANK YOU, MAYOR FOR GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS. I MEAN, I KNOW WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME AND THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT, BUT THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING. OF THE PROCESS. IT'S A GOOD FIRST STEP FOR ANY DEVELOPER THAT WANTS TO REZONE THAT PROPERTY.
IT'S STILL IS GOING TO GO THROUGH MANY, MANY PROCESSES FROM PLANNING. ZONING REQUIREMENT. IT'S GOTTA GO THROUGH OUR VPC BACK TO COUNCIL. SO WHATEVER YOU KNOW, POTENTIALLY DOES COME TO THIS SITE. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY. IF WE APPROVE ALL OF THIS TO GIVE FEEDBACK ON WHAT THIS IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE, AND I HOPEFULLY, WE'VE DEMONSTRATED FROM A CITY PERSPECTIVE THAT WE'RE WILLING TO LISTEN AND TO MAKE AND TAKE THOSE. YOU KNOW THOSE COMMENTS AND FEEDBACK TO HEART AND SEE IF WE CAN PUT SOMETHING TOGETHER TO PUT IT ON PAPER. I WILL REITERATE COUNCIL MEMBER RISKS COMMENTS THAT HOPEFULLY WITH ALL OF THIS WILL HAVE A GOOD PRODUCT AND WE'LL HAVE POTENTIALLY DEVELOPER BUT I DO LIKE TO STAY ON THE FRONT END OF THIS, UM, WHERE WE DO HAVE SOME SAY INTO WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE. AND I FEEL
[01:20:02]
THAT THE NEW STANDARDS 15 THAT WE HAVE HERE. UH DO PUT US IN A POSITION OF POTENTIALLY STRENGTH ON WHAT'S DEVELOPED OR POTENTIALLY DEVELOPED IN THIS PROCESS, BUT UM, I WILL SAY ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT A LOT AND I'M LOOKING AT THE STANDARDS AND IT'S A SENTENCE THAT'S IN THERE. BUT THE PROPOSAL TO REZONE PROPERTY TO ALLOW FOR HAMLET WOULD GO THROUGH A PUBLIC PROCESS WHERE VARIOUS FACTORS BASIS FOR APPROVAL ARE CONSIDERED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SCHOOL IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AND SO WE WILL CONTINUE TO KEEP AN EYE BE VERY DILIGENT AS IT LOOKS AT THOSE THREE AREAS, AND I KNOW THAT IS IMPORTANT TO ME, AND I'VE CLEARLY HEARD IT FROM THE PEOPLE TODAY AND IN OTHER MEETINGS THAT HAVE SAID THE EXACT SAME THING, AND I KNOW I'LL SPEAK FOR MYSELF . BUT IN OTHER CONVERSATIONS WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS, I KNOW WE ARE ALL FOCUSED ON THAT AS WELL. AND SO WE'LL SEE WHERE THIS GOES TODAY FROM THE ORDINANCE IN THE RESOLUTION, BUT I LIKE WHERE WE'RE HEADED TODAY VERSUS WHERE WE WERE ABOUT 67 MONTHS AGO. THAT LEAVES ME. UM AND IT UP. UM I DO. THANK STAFF AND M. K S K AND ALL THE WORK THAT THEY THEY'VE DONE ON THIS. THIS HAS BEEN AN PROBABLY ONE OF THE MORE COMPLEX CONTROVERSIAL KIND OF, UM, ISSUES THAT WE'VE DEALT WITH AS COUNSEL. I THINK THAT THE STANDARDS THAT WOULD COME COME TO ARE MUCH BETTER THAN WHERE WE WERE. NINE MONTHS AGO, SIX MONTHS AGO. WHATEVER THAT TIME FRAME WAS AND I THINK THAT WE DO NEED STANDARDS THAT WILL HELP US BETTER MANAGED TO WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE WHAT THE COMMUNITY WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THAT DEVELOPMENT. UM TO JOE'S POINT. SOME OF THE COMMENTS IS YOU PULL ONE THREAD, AND IT TWISTS ANOTHER AND IT'S A VERY COMPLEX. SPACE FOR 33 ACRES THAT WE'RE TRYING TO WORK WITH HERE. IT'S I DON'T KNOW IF 33 ACRES THAT ANY MORE COMPLEX THAN THAT. RIGHT NOW, UM, I'M STILL UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE ELEVATION IN THE BACK PART OF THE PROPERTY GIVEN PRETTY OPEN ABOUT THAT. I DO THINK WE NEED TO STANDARDS. I THINK THAT THAT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE DO PASS SOMETHING, BUT. YOU KNOW, MY HEAD IS STILL AROUND THE ELEVATION IN IN SOME OF THE FLEXIBILITY IT LEAVES TO DEVELOP HIGH RISE OR WHATEVER IN THAT SPACE. UM TRAFFIC CONCERNS AND ALL THE OTHER. AS WE SAID, IT'S ALL THOSE HAVE TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION CONSIDERATION. AND WITH THE SCHOOLS WHO KNOWS IF THERE'S ANOTHER BUILDING ADDED IN THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY OR EXPANDS THE CAMPUS HOW MUCH TRAFFIC WILL GO DOWN 605 AND WHAT CAPABILITIES ARE THE ROAD THERE? FEED THAT AND ACCESS POINTS AND I WORRY A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT DOWN THE ROAD. BECAUSE THAT THERE AREN'T TOO MANY OTHER PLACES TO PUT BUILDINGS ON THE CAMPUS. AND IF SOMETHING IS IN THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY, 605 IS A MAJOR ACCESS POINT TO THAT. AND, UH, AS AN IN AND OUT EGRESS. THAT'S THAT'S SOMETHING THAT GOING TO EVEN ADD TO THAT TRAFFIC SO SENSITIVE TO THAT. STILL THE AREA IS GOING TO BE DEVELOPED. SO SOME TRAFFIC IS GOING TO GO THROUGH THERE. WHAT'S IT GOING TO BE? HOW MUCH IS IT GOING TO BE? UNTIL SO. MHM. OKAY WELL, THANK YOU. EVERYONE FOR PROVIDING COMMENT IS THEIR EMOTION ON THE EXCUSE ME EMOTION ON THE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE 23 2022. I MEAN, FOR THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 23 2022 2ND. REMEMBER TEST? YES, YES, FELLOWS YES, COUNCIL MEMBER DECK. HOW ABOUT NOW? BECAUSE THE HEIGHT ELEVATION AND I'M NOT HAPPY WITH WELDING. YES COUNCIL MEMBER? WELL, CHILD COUNCIL MEMBER SHOP? YES SIX. YES VOTES AND ONE NOTE. 23 2022. LESSON OR SORRY. YOUR DOCTOR CARES RIGHT THERE. NO INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES,[11. RESOLUTIONS AND PUBLIC HEARING]
RESOLUTIONS AND PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION 25 2022 OF RESOLUTION TO APPROVE ADOPTED INCORPORATE THE HAMLET FOCUS AREA PLAN AND TO THE 2021 ENGAGED, NO OBVIOUS STRATEGIC PLAN, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MARBLE. I THINK WE'VE HEARD A FAIRLY ROBUST PRESENTATION ON THIS CHANGES ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE NEW ALBANY HAMLET FOCUS AREA PLAN. UM AGAIN, JENNIFER. WE CAN JUST MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE MINUTES SO THAT IF ANYONE AT HOME NEEDS TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT, IT'S RARELY[01:25:03]
AVAILABLE. APPRECIATE THAT, UM, IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK REGARDING RESOLUTION OR 25 2022 REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF THE ENGAGEMENT OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE. RIGHT HERE IN NO COMMENT WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I WOULD MOVE FOR THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ARE 25 2022 SECONDS. YES, MA'AM. THEY'RE STARTING. YES PROGRESS? YES THE SAME REASONS AS EARLIER STATED. COUNCIL MEMBER PEST. YES MICHELLE? YES YES. HAD SIX YES VOTES AND BUILT. THE FIRST SOLUTION ARE 25 2022. THEORIES ALRIGHT. I BELIEVE STAFF HAVE A REQUEST REGARDING RESOLUTION ARE 30. YEAH WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT WE TABLE THIS UNTIL THE COUNCIL MEETING ON SEPTEMBER, THE SIXTH. AT THE REQUEST OF STAFF. I WOULD MOVE FOR THE TABLING OF RESOLUTION ARE 30 2022 UNTIL OUR MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 6TH SECOND. BUILDING YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, ASPECTS OF RESOLUTION. 13 2022 SEPTEMBER SIX. THAT TAKES US TO STANDING COMMUNITY REPORTS ANYONE CARE TO MAKE A STANDING COMMITTEE REPORT. REPORTS OF[13. REPORTS OF REPRESENTATIVES]
REPRESENTATIVES JOINING UPDATE FROM WARP. SEE NO MEETING THERE ON SUMMER RECESS. ANY UPDATE FROM THE JOINT PARKS? YES I HAVE AN UPDATE TODAY. THEY HAD A MEETING LAST WEEK. AND REALLY, THERE'S ONE ITEM UNDER NEW BUSINESS THAT I THINK FOLKS WOULD BE INTERESTED IN. THEY PASSED A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY. TO PROCEED WITH A LEVY FOR OPERATING EXPENSES FOR THE FIELD HOUSE AND THEY PASSED A RESOLUTION NECESSITY TO PROCEED WITH A BOND LEVY FOR BUILDING A FIELDHOUSE. THE BAND LEVY THAT WAS PASSED WAS FOR ABOUT 46 MILLION. WHICH WHEN THEY GET THE EXACT NUMBERS, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE RIGHT AROUND 2.1 TO 2.2 MILLS IS WHAT THEY'LL BE ASKING TO BUILD THE FIELDHOUSE AND THE, UH OPERATING EXPENSES, REALLY IS A REPLACEMENT FOR THEIR 20 YEAR. THAT EXPIRES IN LATE 23 EARLY 24 , WHICH IS ABOUT 240.69, MILS.UM, AND SO THOSE ARE THE TWO THAT THEY PASSED FOR THE RESOLUTION THE THIS THURSDAY I SHOULD SAY RESOLUTION NECESSITY ONCE THEY GET THE NUMBERS BACK THEN THEY WILL GO AHEAD AND PASS A RESOLUTION THIS THURSDAY TO PROCEED. GO. UH, IF THAT PASSES THEM, THEY WILL TAKE THE PACK IT DOWN TO THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS. AND THEN THEY'LL FILE HERE SOON, SO THEY'RE JUST WAITING ON THE COUNTY TO GET THE NUMBERS BACK, AND THEY WILL GO TO RESOLUTION TO SEE IF THAT WILL PASS AND THEN FROM THERE, BOARD OF ELECTIONS BUT THE BIG NEWS THERE IS THEY DID PASS AT LEAST THE NECESSITY FOR BOTH THE BUILDING AND OPERATING OF THE FIELD HOUSE. WITH THE BALLOT THROUGH THE FALL DOWN. THAT'S IT WELL. THEY STILL NEED TO DO THAT ON THURSDAY, BUT IF THEY PASS THAT ON THURSDAY, YES, YEAH, THEY DO A SURVEY. I FEEL LIKE I GOT SOMETHING FROM PARKS AND REC SHARE THE RESULTS OF THE FEEDBACK THEY GOT. OBVIOUSLY, IT MUST HAVE BEEN POSITIVE. IT WAS POSITIVE. UM IT WAS POSSIBLE. OKAY, THAT SO THEY DID GET THE SUPPORT THAT THEY WERE LOOKING FOR. I GUESS. THEY WERE HOPING TO EXPECT, YES. AND I THINK THAT'S GOOD FOR TODAY. ALRIGHT ANY UPDATE FROM NEW ALBANY PLAYING LOCAL SCHOOLS? THEY ACTUALLY HAD A MEETING YESTERDAY MORNING. UH TRIED TO LOG IN ON, UH, YOUTUBE AND THERE WAS TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY WAS IN PERSON THAT WOULD LIKE THE PRIDE AND I THINK, UM IT WAS AN 11 MINUTE MEETING, SO I DON'T THINK WE MISSED MUCH, BUT SO YEAH, I TRY . BY THE TIME YOU GOT ON, IT WAS OVER LIKE MIKE, AND THEN HE WAS DONE. ALRIGHT. WELL, 11 MINUTES . UH MARLENE, THEY BROKE YOUR RECORD. ALRIGHT ANY UPDATE FROM PLAIN TOWNSHIP THERE WAS A
[01:30:05]
MEETING SOME OF THE INFORMATION THE POOL. IS HAVING ITS BIGGEST YEAR EVER. I THINK WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE HEAT AND TEMPERATURES THAT'S NOT SURPRISING THERE. THEY'VE BEEN AVERAGING 1000 PEOPLE AS WELL AND THUS FAR THE BEST YEAR EVER IN TERMS OF MEMBERSHIPS AND REVENUE. AND NO LEAK THIS YEAR. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IS SEEING CONSIDERABLE INCREASES IN ALL OF ITS ACTIVITY. IN A 20 DAY PERIOD. UH, PRIOR TO THIS LAST MEETING THEY HAD 145 VMS RUNS AND 62 FIRE RUNS 20 DAY PERIOD. THEY'VE HAD SOME DAYS WHERE THEY'VE HAD 20 RUNS. IN A DAY.AND IT'S ACROSS THE BOARD. IT'S NOT JUST ASSISTED LIVING. IT'S EVERYTHING. SO THEY'RE JUST SEEING A HUGE RUN UP. DO THEY EVER GIVE YOU A BREAKDOWN BETWEEN THE ONES THAT ARE IN THE TOWNSHIP AND THEN BROKEN OUT VERSUS MUTUAL AID RUNS TOMORROW . I'LL ASK TO SEE HOW MUCH I HAVEN'T SEEN. I HAVEN'T SEEN IT LIKE THAT. BUT THEY'RE PRETTY GOOD AT SLICING AND DICING INFORMATION. ALASKA FOR THAT, BUT SIMILARLY, WE WOULD ALSO HAVE TO OFFSET AGAINST HOW MANY RUNS COME INTO OUR TERRITORY WHEN OUR GUYS ARE DOING SOMETHING ELSE, TOO. SO IT'S A VERY COLLEGIAL KIND OF BACK AND FORTH THAT GOES ON SO AS MANY WE'D HAVE TO KIND OF LOOK AT HOW MANY COMMITTED HOW MANY GO OUT. THEY ARE SEEING A BIG RUN, AND THEY'RE CONTINUING TO PURSUE THE FIRE TRUCK AND VMS AND AGAIN HAVING CONSIDERABLE WEIGHT SIGN ON SOME OF THAT. AND THEY THAT'S ABOUT IT. THEY DO HAVE A MEETING TOMORROW AND I WOULD PRESUME AT SOME POINT THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT AS TO REPLACEMENT TO THE VACANT POSITION ON BOARD DUDE BY THE END OF THIS MONTH, SO PRESENT, THEY DID HAVE A SPECIAL MEETING LAST WEEK. I CAN'T TAKE IT MANY SESSION TO DISCUSS CANDIDATES AND I'M PRESUMING. I DON'T KNOW THAT SOME ACTIONS TAKEN SHORTLY BECAUSE I'M GOING TO WRAP UP. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR THAT UPDATE. REPORTS THE CITY
[14. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICIALS]
OFFICIALS DON'T KNOW FOLKS SAW IT. I'LL CERTAINLY. SEND AROUND A COPY TO YOUR CITY EMAIL. BUT THERE WAS A REALLY GREAT ARTICLE IN ON SITE MAGAZINE. WE'VE GIVEN SEVERAL INTERVIEWS TO THEM OVER THE YEARS. RON STUNNERS ALWAYS TREATED US VERY VERY WELL, BUT IT WAS VERY GOOD ARTICLE TALKING ABOUT THE BIOTECH FIRMS AND WHY THEY LOVE THE BUCKEYE BUCKEYE COUNTRY, AND YOU KNOW, IT DID NOT SURPRISINGLY TOUCHED ON A LOT OF OUR PARTNERS HERE IN NEW ALBANY, BUT A COUPLE OF THE STATS THAT WE'RE SORT OF SURPRISING TO ME IS OHIO EMPLOYEES, ALMOST 80,000 PEOPLE IN BIOSCIENCE INNOVATION. AND OUR COLLEGES UNIVERSITIES AWARD MORE THAN 10,000 BIOSCIENCE DEGREES A YEAR. AND SOME OF THESE COMPANIES HAVE RECOGNIZED THE HOTBED OF BIOSCIENCE IN OHIO , AND THE DEGREE PROGRAMS THAT HAVE BEEN PUT IN PLACE. BUT YOU LOOK AT OUR PARTNERS, YOU KNOW AMGEN AMERICAN REGION HYMNS AND HERS AMPLIFIED BIO PHARMA BITE. THEY'RE ALL FANTASTIC PARTNERS IN AN EMERGING GROWTH AREA. THAT WORKS. I DID HAVE RIGHT HERE IN OUR BACKYARD, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND SEND THAT ARTICLE AROUND. IT'S A PRETTY GOOD READ. RON DOES GOOD WORK AND JUST WANTED TO PASS THAT ALONG. UH UM, JOE, DID YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE INVITATION FROM MARY GINTHER? SURE I'LL LET YOU COVER THAT IN YOUR REPORT. UM ANY UPDATE FROM THE CLERK OF COUNCIL NORTHPORT? FINANCE DIRECTOR. I DO HAVE A REPORT. I HAVE PASSED OUT JUNE'S MONTHLY FINANCIAL SUMMARY. SO WE HAVE COMPLETED ABOUT HALF PEOPLE . ALL THEY HAVE COMPLETED HALF THE YEAR. THIS REPORT THE FIRST PAGES THE GENERAL FUND ACTIVITY , JUSTIN NO. IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS THAT WERE APPROVED LAST MEETING. THEY WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE JULY REPORT. UM OUR REVENUE IS MATCHING OR A LITTLE BIT MORE AS FAR AS IN COMPACTION LAST YEAR, SO WE'RE TRENDING PRETTY WELL WITH THAT.OUR EXPENSES ARE. DOWN AND LESS THAN BUDGET. WE'RE STILL TRYING TO RAMP UP SOME DIFFERENT, UM, POSITIONS. BUT OTHER THAN THAT ARE OPERATING COSTS ARE IN LINE. OR LESS THAN LAST YEAR. UM, OUR INCOME TAX BREAK DOWN BELOW. WE'RE PRETTY CLOSE TO HOW WE WERE BROKEN OUT LAST YEAR. THE ONLY ONES ARE THE NET PROFITS IS LAGGING A LITTLE BIT, BUT THE OTHER AREAS ARE MORE THAN THAT CHAIR NEXT PAGE. I DID INCLUDE BECAUSE BEING HALF A YEAR. UM COMPLETE. I DID INCLUDE THE TREND ANALYSIS FOR THE GENERAL FUND INCOME TAX ACTIVITY. I THINK THIS INFORMATION IS PRETTY
[01:35:03]
HELPFUL TO SEE HOW INCOME TAX COLLECTIONS HAVE BEEN OVER THE YEARS AND WHAT TREND WE'RE GOING TOWARDS. UM IF YOU'RE LOOKING ABOUT, I WOULD SAY THREE QUARTERS OF THE WAY DOWN ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE. THERE'S A REVENUE PROJECTION AS A PERCENT OF YOUR TODAY, ACTUAL AND THAT IS SHOWING IT IF WE'RE CONTINUING ON THIS TREND, WHAT GENERAL FUND WILL LOOK LIKE AT THE END OF THE YEAR, APPROXIMATELY 30 MILLION IN INCOME TAX. HEY, BETHANY. YES? WHERE DID YOU SEE THAT? 30 MILLION ARE YOU LOOKING AT 2021? ARE YOU SO IF YOU GO DOWN WHERE IT SAYS THE MOST RECENT THREE YEAR BASIS ON THE BOTTOM OF THE GENERAL FUND AGED, I GOT YOU.THANK YOU. I SEE IT NOW. THE NEXT PAGE DETAILS. THE FUND BALANCES AS YOU'VE SEEN BEFORE, GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF WHERE WE STAND WITH OUR FUND BALANCES AND WHAT ENCUMBRANCES WE HAVE AGAINST THEM. AND HEY, JACK. AFTER THE FUND BALANCE, I PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE NUMBER OF THESE PAGES. I APOLOGIZE. THE FOURTH PAGE IS THE INCOME TAX TREND ANALYSIS, BUT THIS IS ALSO SHOWING FOR ALL FUNDS THAT WE COLLECT. THEN LAST TWO PAGES ARE THE INTERESTED INVESTMENT INCOME , AND IT SHOWS THE ALLOCATION OF WHERE ARE BALANCES ARE LOCATED AS FAR AS INVESTMENTS VERSUS DEPOSITORIES. AND THAT IS THE FIRST PAGE OF THAT. AND THEN THE LAST PAGE BREAKS DOWN OUR CUSTODY ACCOUNTS THAT ARE MANAGED BY RED TREAT AND THE TOP BOXES ARE GENERAL INVESTMENTS.
THE SECOND BOX IS THE MONEY THAT WE HAVE PLACED AN INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT THAT IS SET ASIDE.
AND THEN THE FINAL BOX AT THE BOTTOM SHOWS THE STATE GRANT INFRASTRUCTURE. THAT IS WITH RED TREE. THERE'S A PORTION OF THAT WITH RED TREE AND APPORTION WITH STAR OHIO. INTEREST RATES, UM, ARE INCREASING THEIR. WE JUST HAD OUR INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEETING TODAY WITH OUR INVESTMENT ADVISORS AND A LOT OF INFORMATION, A LOT OF INTERESTING INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN SHARED, BUT I WILL SAY THAT THEY'RE WORKING HARD TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF WHAT WE NEED TO IN ORDER TO, UM BE FAVORABLE IN THIS ENVIRONMENT. I WILL SAY RIGHT NOW. ONE THING THAT THEY STRESSED IS WE HAVE ABOUT 40% OF OUR PORTFOLIO AND THE GENERAL INVESTMENTS THAT'S AVAILABLE AND THEY'RE GOING TO START TO POINT THEM IN THIS INCREASED INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENT. THAT'S ABOUT IT. YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? LET ME KNOW. MHM THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING FINANCE DIRECTORS REPORT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY UPDATE FROM CITY MANAGEMENT. FEW ITEMS FOR THE MAYOR'S INTRODUCTORY COMMENT FEW MINUTES AGO FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY, COLUMBUS HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO HOST THE U. S CONFERENCE OF MAYORS ANNUAL MEETING THAT WILL OCCUR IN JUNE OF 2023. AND MAYOR SPAULDING IS A MEMBER OF THE CONFERENCE OF MAYORS. UH THEY ARE INTERESTED IN. UM UM SOLICITING. CONTRIBUTORS TO POTENTIALLY PARTICIPATE AND HELP FUND THE CONFERENCE. THERE ARE. SEVERAL SUGGESTED CONTRIBUTION LEVELS.
THOSE ARE. $32,500 LEVELS. AND SOMETHING THAT WE COULD CONSIDER POTENTIALLY TALK ABOUT IN THE COMING WEEKS, BUT I THINK THE MAYOR AND I HAVE BEEN INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING AND WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 10TH, AND IT'S GOING TO BE HELD OR HOSTED BY THE MAYOR OF COLUMBUS, FROM 5 30 TO 7 30. THIS IS I THINK TO TRY TO ORGANIZED CENTRAL OHIO TO HELP PREPARE FOR THE UPCOMING CONFERENCE ASKING FOR MUNICIPALITIES TO DO THIS. WITH THOSE DIFFERENT LEVELS, THE WHOLE STATE OR YEAH, SO THIS IS THIS APPEARS TO BE LIKE A GENERAL FUND RESIDENCES PROBABLY WENT OUT TO NOT ONLY YOU KNOW CITIES, BUT COMPANIES AS WELL TO TRY TO RAISE MONEY TO HELP, YOU KNOW, SHOW OFF COLUMBUS, SO TO SPEAK EXPERIENCE, COLUMBUS IS ALSO GOING TO PLAY A ROLE AS WELL. UM YOU KNOW, IT'S BEEN VERY FORTUNATE WITH THE U. S CONFERENCE OF MAYORS TO HAVE YOU
[01:40:05]
KNOW, A STRONG PRESENCE AND STRONG LEADERSHIP IN THE ORGANIZATION FOR A LONG TIME.THE PAST PRESIDENT MANUEL FOR GOVERNOR. MARY GUNTHER WILL LIKELY BE PRESIDENT IN THE COMING YEARS. SO AGAIN REALLY GOOD PRESENCE IN OHIO CERTAINLY THOROUGHLY ENJOYED MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THE U. S CONFERENCE OF MAYORS DURING COVID ALL SORTS OF RESOURCES THAT WERE PROVIDED TO US THAT WERE HELPFUL TO UNDERSTAND CERTAIN ASPECTS OF PUBLIC HEALTH ORDERS AND COVID IN GENERAL. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE MEETINGS ON A REGULAR BASIS TO TALK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES EXCITING THINGS. LIKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL GROWTH AND RESIDENTIAL GROWTH, AND THEN THINGS THAT ARE A LITTLE BIT MORE HARDER TO WRAP YOUR HEADS AROUND LIKE, YOU KNOW, MASS SHOOTINGS AND CIVIL UNREST AND HOMELESSNESS. SO AGAIN, THESE ARE JUST REALLY GREAT RESOURCES THAT THE CONFERENCE PUT TOGETHER. AND YOU KNOW, I THINK WE SHOULD CONSIDER PROVIDING SOME LEVEL OF SUPPORT. WHATEVER WE THINK IT MIGHT BE APPROPRIATE , BUT IT'S YOU KNOW, AGAIN, IT'S A IT'S GONNA BE A CHANCE FOR COLUMBUS TO REALLY SURE, WHERE'S THE ENTIRE COUNTRY MIGHT ALSO WANT TO HEAR FROM THE MAYOR OF THE SILICONE HEARTLAND WHEN THEY'RE IN TOWN? WHO KNOWS? YOU KNOW? MAYBE MAYBE I GET A CHANCE TO SAY HELLO. A COUPLE OF OTHER OTHER ITEMS. ABOUT A MONTH AGO COUNCIL AUTHORIZED OR APPROVED RESOLUTION ARE 20 TO 2022. AH, ONE OF THE ITEMS. IN THAT RESOLUTION INCLUDED THE. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO REQUEST A AMENDMENT OF THE TO AWAIT LINE TO WAIT LINE IS OUR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY. AND SO WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM OHIO E P. A AND JULY 12TH. CONFIRMING THAT THEY HAD IN FACT, UH, ADJUSTED THE BOUNDARIES SO WE ARE NOW. ABLE TO SERVE THE ENTIRE. AREA TO THE EAST, UP TO MINK ROAD NORTH OF 1 61. RELATED TO THAT WE'VE BEEN IN ONGOING NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CITY OF COLUMBUS. IN THAT SAME RESOLUTION, WE HAD LANGUAGE RELATING TO THE WATER AND SEWER AGREEMENTS, WHICH STATES THAT THE CITY MANAGER HAS THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE AGREEMENT. UM YOU KNOW, I'LL JUST I'LL READ THIS SECTION OF THE SECTION ONE TOGETHER WITH ANY CHANGES, SO BASICALLY THE CITY MANNERS MANAGERS AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS TOGETHER WITH ANY CHANGES THERE, TOO APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY'S LEGAL COUNSEL, AND NOT SUBSTANTIALLY ADVERSE KEYWORDS TO THE CITY. OR INCONSISTENT ABOUT THIS RESOLUTION. THERE WAS SOME LANGUAGE IN THE WATER AND SEWER AGREEMENT THAT REFERRED TO MERGERS AND BACK IN THE BELIEVE IT WAS IN THE MID TO LATE EIGHTIES. UH MERGER TALK WAS WAS WAS THE PRIMARY ISSUE OF THE DAY. I THINK FROM STORIES THAT MIKE MARTIN SHARED WITH ME OVER THE YEARS, I THINK THE TOWNSHIP ACTUALLY APPROVED THE MERGER, AND I THINK THE CITY DOWN IT WOULD HAVE CREATED A SITUATION LIKE WHAT EXISTS TODAY IN ATASCADERO, WHERE THE TOWNSHIP IN THE VILLAGE AT THAT TIME MERGED. UM THROUGH THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. I REQUESTED THAT COUNCIL THAT COLUMBUS TAKE THAT OUT, AND THAT WAS ACTUALLY IN THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT THAT I SUBMITTED THE COUNCIL AS PART OF THAT ATTACHMENT TO THE RESOLUTION. COLUMBUS REJECTED THAT REQUEST. ON THE BASIS THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO REMOVE THAT SAME PROVISION FROM ALL OF THEIR OTHER WATER AND SEWER GREEN WAS BASICALLY THERE'S A MOST FAVORED NATIONS TYPE OF PROVISION. IN THE AGREEMENTS. SO JUST FOR FULL TRANSPARENCY. I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT COUNCIL WAS AWARE THAT COLUMBUS DID NOT WANT TO PULL THAT OUT. WHEN YOU TAKE A LOOK WHEN YOU COMPARE THIS CURRENT SITUATION TO OUR EXISTING AGREEMENT, THERE IS NO DEGRADATION OF OUR POSITION. WOULD WE HAVE LIKED TO TAKE IT OUT? YEAH SO I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT COUNCIL WAS AWARE OF THAT COUNCIL HAS ANY TYPE OF DIRECTION AND WE CAN CERTAINLY BRING BACK ANOTHER PIECE OF LEGISLATION. IF YOU'D LIKE TO RECONSIDER IT. OR WE CAN LET IT LET IT SIT. AND I CAN CONTINUE TO AS WE WORK THROUGH THE FINAL CHANGES TO THE AGREEMENT I CAN SIGN OFF. APPROVED, BUT WHAT'S THE DOWNSIDE OF IT'S STILL BEING IN THERE? WHAT IS THAT OPEN US UP TO THE PROBABILITY OF US EVER TRYING TO EMERGE AT THIS POINT WITH ALL OF THE ALL OF THE GROUND? UM NOBODY WAS MUCH SMALLER BACK IN THE EIGHTIES, AND IT WAS A LARGER SECTION OF INCORPORATED TOWNSHIP LAND AVAILABLE SO THAT WE POTENTIALLY COULD HAVE HAD A PRETTY
[01:45:04]
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. BASICALLY MERGED ALL OF PLAYING TOWNSHIP INTO THE LOBBY. UH MOST OF THAT AREA HAS BEEN EITHER ANNEX BY COLUMBUS, CERAMICS. BIDEN, ALBANY, SO THERE'S VERY LITTLE UNINCORPORATED AREA LEFT UNINCORPORATED AREA HAS ALREADY BEEN DIVIDED UP THROUGH OUR PRIOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS. THE LARGEST REMAINING AREA IS THE PARK ZONE, WHICH IS PART OF THE COLUMBUS GROWTH AREA, AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE THE AREA THAT'S UNINCORPORATED BETWEEN KITZMILLER AND BABBITT, WHICH IS PART OF THE CITY'S GROWTH AREA.SO, UM YEP. I FELT THAT AT THIS POINT IN OUR HISTORY, IT DIDN'T SEEM LIKE IT WAS THAT IT WAS IT WAS NECESSARY TO BE IN THE AGREEMENT. SO I SUGGESTED THAT WE TAKE IT OUT. BUT AGAIN, COLUMBUS SAID THAT IF THERE MAY BE OTHER COMMUNITIES AROUND THE OUTER BELT THAT WOULD BE IN A DIFFERENT POSITION. AND IT WOULD HAVE TO REMOVE IT FROM ALL OF THEIR OTHER AGREEMENTS IF THEY REMOVED IT FROM SO THEY REFUSED TO DO I TRIED. JOE I'M ASSUMING IF WE WANTED TO MAKE THE ADDITIONS OR CHANGES, WE PROBABLY NEED TO DO THAT BY NEXT MEETING NO LATER THAN THAT. YES.
SO WE CONTINUE TO POLISH UP THE LANGUAGE. I THINK WE'VE HAD SEVERAL VOLLEYS BACK AND FORTH WITH THE COLUMBUS STAFF. GREAT STATES REPRESENTING THE CITY ALONG WITH THEN. AH! THEIR ATTORNEYS HAVE RELAY THEIR THEIR THOUGHTS AS FIRST CHANGES TO BURBAGE REALLY NOTHING ELSE SUBSTANTIVE RELATED TO THOSE CHANGES. IT'S ALL WORDSMITHING. THIS WAS THE ONE ISSUE THAT I THOUGHT COULD GO EITHER WAY. UM AGAIN IF WE COMPARE IT TO OUR EXISTING AGREEMENT THAT'S BEEN IN PLACE WITH COLUMBUS SINCE THE LATE EIGHTIES EIGHTIES. I THINK WE'RE NOT IN A SUBSTANTIALLY WORSE POSITION IF YOU COMPARE IT TO WHAT I SHARED WITH YOU WHEN WE CONSIDER THIS RESOLUTION YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO ARGUE THAT YOU KNOW, IT'S, UM, WE'RE GIVING SOMETHING BACK. UM I THINK GIVEN COLUMBUS POSITION, I DON'T I DON'T THINK THAT THEY WOULD BACK OFF. OF THAT POSITION. SO IF THERE'S AGAIN IF YOU HAVE ANY DIRECTION. UM I'M HAPPY TO GO AND WE CAN EITHER BRING SOMETHING BACK OR I CAN PROCEED. I THINK WE ALREADY GAVE YOU THE AUTHORITY FOR THIS BECAUSE I THINK THE LANGUAGE WAS SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF UNLESS IT MATERIALLY GAVE US A DISADVANTAGE. SOME WASN'T THAT THE WORDS WERE SUBSTANTIALLY ADVERSE, ACTUALLY, ADVERSE, SO I THINK THAT WE'VE GIVEN SOME LEEWAY THERE WHERE IF ALL OF US AGREE THAT THAT AND JOE GROUPS.
THAT'S NOT SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE. HE DOESN'T HAVE TO GO AND WE DO THIS WHOLE THING WITH US. FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. I GROUP THAT THAT YOU'VE ALREADY GIVEN THE AUTHORITIES SO AH, JUST A COUPLE OF OTHER QUICK ITEMS. WE HAVE A MCCOY STAKEHOLDERS MEETING ON THE 21ST, WHICH I'LL BE ATTENDING. ALSO TASTE OF NEW ALBANY OR COUNSEL TABLE. WE HAVE TO BELIEVE A TOTAL OF 10 SEATS AVAILABLE. SEVEN SEATS HAVE BEEN COMMITTED TO, SO WE HAVE THREE POTENTIAL OPENINGS OF ANYBODY ELSE IN COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE. AND, UM I THINK THAT'S IT. HEY ANY UPDATE FROM
[15. POLL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT]
THE CITY ATTORNEY? NO REPORT. PAUL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT WHERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNCIL REGARDING ANY ISSUE, WE DISCUSSED THE SCENE. YES, MA'AM. I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO US. I KNOW IT'S BEEN A LONG ROAD AND A LOT OF LATE NIGHT AWAY FROM OUR FAMILIES. SO THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. BUT WE DON'T REALLY WANT THAT THERE. I APPRECIATE WHAT WE WENT THROUGH TO GET TO WHERE RIGHT NOW. IT'S DEFINITELY BETTER THAN WHERE WE STARTED. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT. I KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO STAY ENGAGED ON THIS AND PROVIDE US WITH FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY, WHICH IS SUPER IMPORTANT. SO YEAH. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE STAY ENGAGED. REALLY APPRECIATE IT. LONG ROAD TO GHOST. OH, FOR SURE. YEAH. ALRIGHT PULFORD COUNCIL COMMENT ANY ADDITIONAL COUNSEL COMMENT?[17. OTHER BUSINESS]
THEN WE HAVE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION TONIGHT. I MOVE THAT WE ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO OUR VICE CODE 1 21.22 G ONE FOR DISCUSSION REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND THE SECOND REASON UNDER 1 21.22 G TWO TO CONSIDER THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE. PREMATURE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION. WE'RE GIVEN UNFAIR, COMPETITIVE OR BARGAINING ADVANTAGE TO A PERSON WITH PERSONAL PRIVATE INTERESTS AND ADVERSE OF PUBLIC INTEREST.[01:50:04]
WE MAY ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION. SECOND. MAYOR SPAULDING YES. COUNCIL MEMBER SHAWL YES.COUNCIL MEMBER WILL TRAVEL COUNCIL MEMBER KISS? YES, FELLOWS? YES, YES. COUNCIL MEMBER BREAST? YES SEVEN. YES VOTES TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 8 22. PM MAYOR. I HAVE A PERSONAL EMERGENCY. I'M GOING TO ASK TO BE EXCUSED FOR THE REST OF THE MEETING. OKAY? YES, MA'AM. YES. TOUCH UP, A I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE MOVE OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION. SECOND ISL MEMBER SHAW. YES MEMBER. WELL, TROUT MAYOR SPAULDING. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER RISK. NOT HERE. OH, THAT'S RIGHT. SHE SAID SHE WAS THROWING OUT. COUNCIL MEMBER DEREK YES, FELLOWS? YES COUNCIL MEMBER KISSED? YES SIX YES VOTES AND ONE ABSENT EMOTIONAL EXECUTIVE SESSION. REGULAR MEETINGS. RESUMING AT 8 55. PM.
ANOTHER JOURNALIST KNEW THAT WE ADJOURNED SECOND, AND THAT'S A SECOND. I'M HERE. ADJOURNING AT 50 GOT HIM. THE MINUTE DID NOT MOVE. GOODNIGHT THANK YOU, JE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.