[I. Call To Order]
          [00:00:06]
          CAN WE START? THEY'RE RECORDING. ARE WE GOOD TO GO? AWESOME SO AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO CALL TO ORDER THE NEW ALBANY ARCHITECTURAL VIEW BOARD MEETING FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 8 2022 YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR HENSON . HERE MR EATON. HERE, MR STRILER HERE, MR BROWN. MR THOMAS, MR. MALIK HERE MORE HERE, MR DEREK HERE. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR AN ACTION ON 
          [III. Action of Minutes: June 13, 2022]
THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 13TH MEETING? JUNE 13 2022. SECOND BODY HASN'T ANY REVISIONS. I WOULD MOVE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. I'LL SECOND. I'M SORRY, DID NOT SEE THE SECOND DID MR JENSEN, SECOND. MR EATON? YES MR HENSON. MR STROLLER? YES MR THOMAS? YES, MR BROWN. MR MALINS STAND. MS MOORE? YES. HMM. AT THIS TIME. DO WE HAVE ANY STAFF IF WE HAVE ANY ADDITIONS OR 
          [IV. Additions or Corrections to Agenda]
CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA? SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS. BUT BEFORE WE GET PRESENTATIONS, I DID WANT TO INTRODUCE OUR NEW PLANNER CHELSEA NICHOLS JOINS US FROM THE CITY OF WEST HERBAL. WE'RE EXCITED TO HAVE HER. SHE'LL BE KIND OF TAKING OVER A LOT OF THE BOARDS AND COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS ASSOCIATE STEVE AND I HEAR AS WELL. MOST LIKELY, WE'RE STILL KIND OF FIGURING WHAT THAT'S GONNA LOOK LIKE. BUT SHOULD BE MORE OF THE PRIMARY CONTACT REPORTS COMMISSIONED. SO SHE IS NOW THE NEW YOU SHE IS THE NEW ME. WE ARE. OKAY CONGRATULATIONS. RELATIONS WELCOME, MISS NICHOLS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. SO NOW I'D LIKE TO SWEAR IN ANY WITNESSES AND APPLICANTS AND STAFF WHO PLAN TO SPEAK REGARDING THE APPLICATION ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND SQUARE TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY BUSINESS HERE FOR ITEMS NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. SEEN NONE. I'M 
          [VII. Cases:]
GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH CASE AIR B 84 2022 4 CERTIFICATE APPROPRIATENESS FOR A NEW BUILDING EDITION OF WORKING HIGH STREET. THE APPLICANT IS DESIGN GROUP HERE. WE'VE BEEN FRAZIER AND COULD I PLEASE CAN WE PLEASE HAVE A STAFF REPORT? THANK YOU. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. THE APPLICATION SITE IS LOCATED THAT 14 SOUTH HIGH STREET AND THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE HISTORIC VILLAGE CENTER AND ZONED URBAN CENTER. THE SITE IS LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF HIGH STREET AND MAIN STREET. THE PROPERTY CONTAINS ONE SINGLE FAMILY HOME, WHICH HAS BEEN CONVERTED TO A COMMERCIAL USE OCCUPIED BY BUSH TAX COMPANY. THEY ARE BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED A PATIO TO BE INSTALLED AT THE PROPERTY IN THE AT THE JUNE MEETING OF THIS YEAR, THE PATIO HAS NOT BEEN INSTALLED YET. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS NOW PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT A 975 SQUARE FOOT SECOND STORY ADDITION ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. THE APPLICANT PROVIDED BOTH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN AND THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. THE SECOND STORY ADDITION IS WITHIN THE EXISTING FOOTPRINT OF THE CURRENT BUILDING. THE APPLICANT ALSO PROVIDED EXISTING ELEVATIONS. THE EXISTING MATERIAL ON THE BUILDING IS WHITE. UH, HORIZONTAL VINYL SIDING. AND THE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES ARE GRAY. THE CURRENT SLIDE SHOWS THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS AND THESE ARE THE REVISED ELEVATIONS SINCE THE PACKET WENT OUT TO THE BOARD, THE APPLICANT DID REVISED THE DESIGN AND THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE CITY ARCHITECTS RECOMMENDATIONS. AND UM, THESE NEW ELEVATIONS REFLECT THOSE CHANGES. AND THOSE CHANGES WERE DESCRIBED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND THE APPLICANT AGREED TO THE DESIGN CHANGES AND BROUGHT THEM TO YOU TONIGHT, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A WHITE BOARD AND BATTEN STYLE CITING ON THE ADDITION, THE PANEL BOARDS WOULD BE HARDY MATERIAL, AND THE 
          [00:05:02]
BATTENS WOULD BE THIN STRIPS OF WOOD MOLDING. THE APPLICANT ALSO PROPOSES TO REMOVE ALL OF THE EXISTING HORIZONTAL VINYL SIDING. ORIGINALLY THE PROPOSAL WAS TO REPLACE THE EXISTING FINAL WITH THE SAME BOARD AND BATTEN STYLE AS THE ADDITION SO THAT THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE ALL THE AND NEW WOULD BE THE BOARD AND BATTEN PATTERN. THE CITY ARCHITECT RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT RETAIN THE HORIZONTAL STYLE PATTERN WITH THE NEW HARDY BOARD MATERIAL, AND THAT WOULD HELP DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE OLD AND THE NEW PARTS OF THE BUILDING. THE APPLICANT AGREES WITH THE CITY ARCHITECTS RECOMMENDATIONS AND IS NOW SHOWING THE EXISTING HORIZONTAL WHITE VINYL CITING AS BEING REPLACED WITH THE HORIZONTAL WHITE HARDY BOARD, CITING STAFF SUPPORTS THE REQUEST TO REPLACE THE EXISTING VINYL SIDING WITH THE HARDY BOARD MATERIAL SINCE THAT MIMICS WOOD MATERIAL. AND HARDY PANEL BOARD HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY USED IN OTHER PARTS OF THE VILLAGE CENTER. EVEN THOUGH THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE MATERIALS TO INCLUDE THE CITY ARCHITECTS RECOMMENDATIONS. WITH REGARD TO DESIGN AND MATERIAL STAFF STILL RECOMMEND THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE EXISTING HORIZONTAL VINYL, CITING BE REPLACED WITH HORIZONTAL HARDY BOARD, CITING. THE APPLICANT PROVIDED THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN THAT WAS IN YOUR PACKET, AND THEY HAVE UPDATED THE DIGITAL SAMPLE MATERIAL BOARD TO REFLECT THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE TO THE ELEVATION. AND IN CONCLUSION, THE DESIGN GUIDELINES STATE THAT THE KEY TO SENSITIVE RENOVATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS IS TO OBSERVE AND RESPECT THE PHYSICAL AND, UM, POLITICAL CONTEXT OF THE PROPERTY AND TO DESIGN NEW ELEMENTS IN A SENSITIVE WAY THAT FITS WITH THE EXISTING STRUCTURES. WITH THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE CITY ARCHITECT IN THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE BY THE APPLICANT, UM. THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT APPEAR TO DESTROY THE CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING. AND IT DOES LOOK LIKE IT IS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 
          UM COHESIVE CONSTRUCTION. THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION WITH THE CONDITION CONDITION LISTED ON THIS SCREEN, THE SECOND CONDITION THAT WAS LISTED IN THIS STAFF REPORT WAS REMOVED . SINCE THE APPLICANT HAS PRESENTED THE REVISED ELEVATIONS AND THE CITY ARCHITECT WILL CONTINUE TO REVIEW THE APPLICATION. AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. SO QUICK QUESTION HERE. THIS APPLICATION IS RB 84 2022. FIVE. 
          YOU HAVE THEIR SUGGESTED MOTION FOR ARB 55 22 IS I PRESUME THAT IT SUGGESTED MOTION IS INTENDED TO BE FOR 84 2022. YES YOU'RE CORRECT. THAT'S THE TYPE OF MY APOLOGIES, SO THE ONLY CONDITION REPLACING REPORT IS THE SINGLE CONDITION PLACED THEIR CORRECT. YES, THANK YOU. WHAT TO HAVE. 
          AND FREEDOM FREIGHTER FROM CAIRO. SPEAK ABOUT ANY CHANGES MAIL. I CERTAINLY THINK WE ARE THANK YOU. FROM MY STANDPOINT. LITTLE FRIEND. EVEN IN THE ROOM. I WOULD AGREE. I THINK THE SCALE OF THE ADDITION IS WAY MORE IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. SO FOR THAT, I THINK IT'S A IMPROVEMENT OVER THE FIRST SUBMISSION AND THE DORMERS ARE DUE AT A NICE CHARACTER TO IT. I KNOW THERE'S SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE VERTICAL HARDY BOARD BOARD AND BATTEN AGAINST THE HORIZONTAL CLAPBOARD , BUT I THINK IT'S FAIR AND APPROPRIATE IN THIS APPLICATION TO USE THAT. THAT COMBINATION OF MATERIALS, I THINK ULTIMATELY IT WILL HELP BREAK UP THE LONG WALLS OF THE SIDES OF THE HOUSE, BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THERE'S NO BREAK. FROM THE STRUCTURE LASERS SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE LAST WHERE IS IT? THANK YOU, UM. THIS IS IN THE SAME PLANE RIGHT HERE. SO 
          [00:10:08]
THERE'S NO BREAK HORIZONTALLY RIGHT HERE. AND I THINK IN LIGHT OF THAT I WOULD BE SUPPORTIVE OF THE OF THE CHANGE IN MATERIAL HERE JUST TO HELP DEFINE THE FRONT BOX FROM THE, UM YOU KNOW, FROM THE ADDITION ON THE REAR BUT BUT OVERALL I THINK IT'S IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE OF THE AREA. THANK YOU. I AGREE. I THINK IT'S HIM HUGE REASON, PROVING THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR WORKING TO THE ARCHITECT. ONE VERY MINOR. I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM THE REAR ELEVATION. YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE PEAK OF THEIR THE PITCHES ARE MATCHING HERE. BUT YOU CAN SEE THE ELEVATION HERE IS MUCH HIGHER. I'M ASSUMING THIS IS THE CORRECT LOOKING AT HERE. THIS IS CORRECT. THAT. WAS GOING TO DIE IN THE EXISTED. CORRECT. IT WILL BE SUBSTANTIALLY. WELL, WE'RE ON THE CELEBRATION. IT WAS ALMOST AT THE PEAK ON THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL MUCH BETTER LOOK, IT'S GOING TO LOOK MUCH BETTER FROM THE SIDE, DEAR. I THINK WHEN THAT ROOF IS LOWER MATCHES THE REAR ELEVATION SO. I WANT THE PUBLIC. SUBJECT TO THE ARCHITECTURE. SAMPLE. I GET IT, BUT I DO THINK IT'S THE WORST. I MEAN, I THINK COUNTRY TOO MUCH. IT'S ASSUMED THE APPLICANT IS OKAY WITH THAT. YES. GOOD QUESTION. THERE'S MENTION OF GOOSE NECK LIGHTING. THE NORTH ELEVATION. I KNOW THAT WAS GOING TO COME IN AT US SEPARATE DATE. IS THAT NOT IN QUESTION ANYMORE? NOW THAT THE DORMERS HAVE BEEN ADDED. MIND. UH YES, I BELIEVE HE STILL WANTS TO DO THE SIGNAGE AND GOOSE NECK GLIDING ON THE NORTH SIDE. OKAY, SO THAT WOULD BE ON THE NORTH SIDE. I KNOW. 
          RIGHT NOW. THERE'S A FREESTANDING SIGN. SO I WASN'T SURE IF IT WAS GOING TO BE ON THE BUILDING. OKAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING, OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THAT'S NOT BEFORE US. I'M SORRY PERFORMANCE CORRECT. HMM. CROWD DARK MAKEUP MOTION. I'M SURE SCREEN THEM MORE. SUGGESTING MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR 84 2022. SUBJECT TO TRUE SERVICE CERTIFICATE APPROPRIATE. FOR AIR B 84 22 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ONE. THE APPLICANT WILL INSTALL THE INTERESTING HORIZONTAL SIDING. ABSOLUTELY WILL BE REPLACED WITH THE HARDY POINT MATERIAL FOR THE CITY ARCHITECTS DIRECTION. THE ROOF LINE OF THE REAR EDITION. WILL BE ELEVATION WILL BE UPDATED. SHOW AWAY 12 12 PITCH TO MATCH THE EXISTING ORIGINAL STRUCTURE. SECOND. MR BROWN? YES, MR THOMAS? YES? MR EATON? YES. MR STROLLER? YES. MR MALLETS? YES MISS MORE. YES, MR HENSON. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. UNDERSTAND PROJECT BUSINESS. YES WE DO SO AS 
          [VIII. Other Business]
PROMISED, AND WE DISCUSSED DURING OUR LAST MEETING OF CANADA'S GIVING AN UPDATE ON REALLY KIND OF A LONG LIST OF PROJECTS THAT WE KIND OF STANDING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION. SO THIS IS JUST A SNIPPET OF THOSE PROJECTS THAT REALLY RELATE TO THE PURVIEW OF THIS BOARD. SO I KIND OF BROKE THEM UP INTO WHEN WE WANT TO. TAKE A STAB AT THESE OR KIND OF ADDRESSED THESE PROJECTS SO HERE , PROBABLY IN OCTOBER. WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A LOOK AT OUR WAIVER CODE SECTION CHANGES THAT WE'VE KIND OF DISCUSS THEIR BROUGHT UP WHENEVER WEAVER IS BROUGHT BEFORE THE AIR B AND CONJUNCTION WITH A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. WELL WORKSHOPS. SOME OF THOSE CHANGES WITH THE BOARD. MAYBE IN OCTOBER , UM, GIVE OURSELVES A COUPLE OF 
          [00:15:03]
MONTHS TO PUT THAT TOGETHER AND TO BE CLEAR. I'M NOT ABSOLUTELY SURE THAT WE NEED CHANGES. BUT I THINK PEOPLE WHO ARE MARRIED WHO HAVE BEEN INVOLVED WORKING WITH THAT SECTION. AS WELL AS STAFF AND COUNCIL IF THEY WANT TO BE AND LEGAL COUNSEL SHOULD THINK ABOUT IT. THAT'S YOUR GOAL HERE THAT SOMEBODY THINK ABOUT IT, AND IF WE DECIDE NOT TO CHANGE IT. BUT THEN WE BEGIN TO APPLY IT AS WRITTEN. THAT'S YES, THAT'S A GOOD REFRESHER. SO WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO BETWEEN NOW AND THEN ONE OF THE THINGS WE'LL DO BETWEEN NOW AND THEN RELATED TO THAT AS WELL. TAKE A LOOK AT OTHER COMMUNITIES FOR BEST PRACTICES TO SEE HOW THEY HAVE THEIR WAIVER. CODE SECTIONS ARE WRITTEN IF THEY HAVE LABOR CODE SECTIONS AT ALL, OR IF EVERYTHING GOES THROUGH AS A VARIANCE, SO WE'LL DO THAT RESEARCH AND PRESENT THAT TO YOU KNOW, OCTOBER, UM PROBABLY MORE LIKELY AS A WORKSHOP THAN AN ACTUAL ADOPTION MOST LIKELY SOME OTHER PROJECTS WE HAVE ON THE HORIZON. SO YOU'VE MET ONE OF OUR NEW PLANNERS. WE DO HAVE ANOTHER PLANNER AS WELL. WE'RE PROBABLY GONNA JUST TAKE, UM, TAKE A SHOT AT ONE OF THESE PROJECTS THIS YEAR ONLY WORK ON GETTING THESE TWO NEW PLANNERS TRAINED UP. AND WE'RE OUR DEPARTMENT IS ALSO GEARING UP PRETTY HEAVILY FOR INTEL, AS YOU CAN IMAGINE. SO UM, WE'LL SHIFT A LOT OF THESE PROJECTS TO 2023. 
          SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED IS THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING RULES UPDATE. I KNOW. I THINK JOHN BROUGHT IT UP DURING OUR LAST ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING THAT OUR CODE DOES REQUIRE. THE ORGANIZATION WILL BE MEETING BE HELD IN MARCH. UM AND IF THERE ARE NO OTHER BUSINESS ITEMS, WE STILL HAVE TO MEET. UM THIS BOARD IS NOT THE ONLY BOARD THAT'S BROUGHT THAT UP TO US, AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, SO WE'RE GONNA TAKE A LOOK AT UPDATING THAT WITH OUR CITY LAW DIRECTOR TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY LIKE CHARTER THINGS OR ANYTHING THAT WOULD HAVE TO CHANGE, SO WE THINK THAT MIGHT NEED TO BE PUSHED AFTER 2023. WE'RE ALSO GOING TO BE DOING AN EVALUATION OF OUR URBAN CENTER CODE. SO NEXT YEAR WILL PROBABLY TAKE A LOOK AT THINGS THAT ARE WORKING THINGS THAT AREN'T WORKING THINGS THAT YOU MIGHT NEED TO TAKE A LOOK AT CHANGING DURING UP FOR POTENTIALLY A FULL CODE UPDATE. MAYBE IN 2024 I THINK THIS BOARD MORE THAN ANY BOARD HAS NOTICED SOME OF THE THINGS THAT COME UP LIKE THINGS THAT EITHER AREN'T MENTIONED OR INCONSISTENT. OR MAYBE, UM, JUST NEED TO BE UPDATED. ONE OF THOSE THINGS I THINK THEY CAME UP THIS YEAR POTENTIALLY WAS THE UNDERGROUND PARKING STANDARDS FOR THE RICHMOND SQUARE PROJECT THAT WE DID. THE TOP OF MY HEAD. UM SOMETHING ELSE THAT TALKS ABOUT THAT THIS BOARD TALKS ABOUT A LOT IS THE USE OF HARDY PLANK ON RESIDENTIAL HOMES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. I THINK WE'VE KIND OF ALL COME TO SOME SORT OF CONCLUSION THAT WHEN APPLIED CORRECTLY, HARDY PLANK IS INAPPROPRIATE MATERIAL TO BE USED IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. SO WE'LL TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. 
          BUT ALSO WHEN YOU TAKE A LOOK AT ONE THING, IT KIND OF OPENS UP A WHOLE CAN OF WORMS WITH THE UPDATE IN GENERAL, SO THAT'S GOING TO BE A SOUNDS LIKE AN EASY FIX, BUT I THINK WE'RE GONNA PUSH THAT TO 2023 AS WELL. LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT ALL OF OUR STANDARDS IN THE TRS. LASTLY THE SAND CURRENT UPDATES. I KNOW THAT WE HAVE THE BAR IN HERE. THINK IT WAS LAST YEAR. UM WE IDENTIFIED SOME SOME KIND OF CHANGES THAT COULD BE MADE IT WAS DISCUSSING WHETHER A SIGN WAS A SIGN IF IT WAS ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, AND IF IT WAS ON THE INTERIOR BUILDING, IT WASN'T CONSIDERED A SIGN. UM BUT AGAIN KIND OF IN THE SAME VEIN. ONCE YOU OPEN UP PANDORA'S BOX THERE, YOU CAN GET A WHOLE HOST OF UPDATES THAT MAY NEED TO BE MADE AND ONE PLAN THAT WE'VE THAT'S KIND OF BEEN ON OUR BACK BURNER FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS REALLY IS REALLY DOING A VILLAGE CENTER SIGN PLAN. BOTH IN TERMS OF WAY FINDING AND TRYING TO INCLUDE MORE DAVID VERSE SELECTION OF SIGNS IN THE VILLAGE CENTER. SO WE IMAGINE THAT WE WILL PROBABLY BRING THE VILLAGE CENTER SIGN PLANS TO THE BOARD NEXT YEAR, AT LEAST START WORKING ON THAT AND MAYBE WE CAN WRAP SOME OF THESE CO CHANGES UP IN THAT PROJECT AS WELL. UM, DID I MISS ANYTHING? BUT OKAY, I THINK THAT'S HELPFUL SO THAT SOMEBODY IS KEEPING TRACK OF THESE, BUT I RAISED THEM OVER TIME. AND I THINK JUST SO WE CAN HAVE A CONTINUED REPORTS SO THAT MAYBE AFTER THE FIRST OF THE YEAR, YOU CAN UPDATE THIS AND SAY, HERE'S WHERE WE ARE NOW GOING TO DO IT AT THE PACE THAT THAT IS THAT IS MORE CONVENIENT TO STAFF, BUT SURE, I THINK WE JUST SHOULDN'T LOSE TRACK OF IT. 
          SURE AND YOU GUYS HAVE DONE THIS. BUT IF THERE ARE THINGS THAT COME UP WITH OTHER APPLICATIONS AS WE MOVE FORWARD, IT'S LIKE KIND OF PUTTING UP ON SOMETHING LIKE, HEY, THAT'S A GOOD UPDATE. LET'S REMEMBER THIS. WE'RE UPDATING ARABIC CENTER CODE OF THE D G R S. WE CERTAINLY WELCOME OUR FEEDBACK. I GUESS I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION THE STAFF. THAT MAY ALSO BE MIKE. UM, WHERE HAS ANYTHING HAPPENED IN THE HAMLET CONCEPT. YES SO WE JUST WENT THROUGH A PROJECT OF CREATING STANDARDS AND OUR STRATEGIC PLAN. REALLY WAS STUDYING THE CONCEPT OF A HAMLET FURTHER AND IT'S BACKS APPLICATION IN NEW ALBANY SO THAT ACTUALLY WAS JUST ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL. SORRY STRATEGIC PLAN WILL BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THIS CHANGE IS ONE OF THE CODE 
          [00:20:05]
CHANGES THAT WE DID IN CONJUNCTION WITH THAT WAS TO THE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD. THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE BOARD'S PURVIEW AUTHORITY, SO WE DID ADD AT YOUR GUYS' RECOMMENDATION DURING ADOPTION PROCESS THAT ANY HAMLET FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WILL HAVE TO COME BEFORE, UM, ARCHITECTURE BE BORED AND YOU GUYS WILL REVIEW AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION COULD COULD YOU SEND AT LEAST TO ME THAT WHAT GOT ADOPTED? SURE PROBABLY. I'M NOT 100% SURE YET, BUT WE WILL. WE WILL PROBABLY WE'RE UPDATING THE ENTIRE STRATEGIC PLAN BOOK PRODUCING A BRAND NEW COPY WILL PROBABLY DISTRIBUTE THOSE TO YOU GUYS AS WELL. AND THEN THE NEXT MONTH OR SO, BUT, YEAH, I WILL FOLLOW UP WITH YOU GUYS, AND I'M NOT YOUR RIGHT. WHENEVER WE TALK ABOUT HAMLET, I ALWAYS SEE THIS LITTLE ENGLISH VILLAGE RUTH, BUT I CAN GIVE YOU BRIEF RECAP ON SOME OF THE STANDARDS. MHM. SIX UNITS PER ACRE. UH THERE HAS TO BE 200 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL UNIT PROPERTY. THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. HAS A CREEK RUNS ABOUT TWO THIRDS OF THE WAY DOWN FROM CENTRAL COLLEGE. UH INCLUDED IN THE STANDARDS IS THAT THE AREA BELOW THE CREEK? THAT IF ANY COMMERCIAL PROPERTY GOES IN THERE, NONE OF THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE IS COUNTED IN THE RATIO OF 200 SQUARE FEET PER RESIDENTIAL UNIT. IT PREVENTS SOMEONE FROM BASICALLY LOADING THAT WITH SUFFICIENT COMMERCIAL SPACE THAT THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO PUT ANY IN THE HIGHER PORTION, SO IT REALLY SAYS THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE COMMERCIAL IN THEIR RELATIVE RELATIVE TO THE TO THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF CENTRAL COLLEGE, AND YOU GUYS ARE CORRECTLY WHERE I'M WRONG. SURE AROUND CENTRAL COLLEGE AND 65 THAT THE HEIGHT ELEVATION IS 40 FT. THE CENTER CORE AREA WHERE THERE IS INTENDED TO BE A COMMERCIAL ARE AREA THAT IT WOULD BE 50 FT OF ELEVATION. UMS OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH ARE BASICALLY THAT SECTION IN A SMALL PORTION ON THE EAST SIDE OF 605. AS WELL. BUT THAT IS IT IN TERMS OF WHAT A HAM CAN BE PREVIOUS, THE STRATEGIC PLAN WAS A DOT ON THE MOUTH AND THERE WAS NO PERIMETER OF HOW FAR THAT COULD GO. SO THAT'S CLEARLY BEEN DELINEATED AND WOULD NOT GO NORTH OF CENTRAL COLLEGE NORTHEASTWARD. ANYTHING OTHER THAN THAT. ANY OTHER STANDARDS. 
          I MISSED 25% GREEN SPACE THAT WAS UPDATED IN OUR CITY CODE. UM AS WELL. THERE WERE SEVERAL CODE UPDATES THAT ACCOMPANY THEM. THE PROCESS WORK TOGETHER BASICALLY WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. AS HE SAID IT WILL COME TO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NOW THAT WASN'T THERE ALSO, AS PART OF IT, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO PROVIDE ANY DEVELOPER IS GOING TO HAVE TO BRING A STUDY IN TERMS OF SCHOOL IMPACT. AS WELL AS ROADS. OR ANS GO AHEAD, 12 12 ROUGHLY. IT WAS NOT CLEAR BECAUSE THE DEVELOPER CAME IN WITH 12. I THINK, WASN'T IT? YES BUT THE CITY STANDARD WAS LESS THAN THAT. SO REALLY, WE'RE NO HAMLET STANDARDS. THEY WERE ORIGINALLY THEY CAME IN WITH 12. SO THIS IS THIS ARE LESS THAN THE OTHER. EXACTLY. UE WERE RESIDENTS WHO CAME AND SPOKE. UH AND I THINK THERE UNTIL THEIR THIS WAS JUST THE DESIGN STANDARDS UNTIL A ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMES FORWARD. 
          I THINK IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN WHAT PUBLIC OPINION WILL BE. I THINK THAT RESIDENTS DO WANT TO SEE THE PROPERTY DEVELOPED. THEY'RE HAPPY TO SEE COMMERCIAL. IDEALLY SOME RESTAURANTS OR THINGS LIKE THAT WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL. THEY ARE THEY HAVE BEEN. RETICENT TO SEE APARTMENT BUILDINGS GOING UP. AND THEY'RE CONCERNED ABOUT IMPACT ON THE SCHOOLS, AND THEY'RE ALSO VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IMPACT ON 605. THAT INTERSECTION BACKS UP WITH PEOPLE BRINGING THEIR KIDS TO SCHOOL IN THE MORNING. UM AND WITH INTEL AND INCREASED TRAFFIC THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY, I THINK THERE'S A LOT AND PUTTING RESIDENTS AND COMMERCIAL IN THAT AREA THAT'S GOING TO ADD TO SOME OF THAT. THERE WERE SOME REQUESTS ABOUT COULD THERE POTENTIALLY BE A ROUNDABOUT PUT IN ON CENTRAL COLLEGE AND 605 IN THE FUTURE, BUT THAT GETS INTO COUNTY ROADS, AND THERE'S SOME 
          [00:25:04]
OTHER STANDARDS THERE THAT COME INTO PLAY, WHETHER A ROUNDABOUT COULD OR COULDN'T BE PUT IN THERE, BUT CLEARLY GIVEN TRAFFIC IN THE FUTURE. THAT'S NOT A BAD CONSIDERATION. TRUE CHARACTER LOT OF ASTHMATICS MENTIONING THERE WERE A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT DETAILS THAT, UM THERE. 
          QUESTIONS ABOUT DETAILS. WE CAN REVIEW AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF THE PROJECT OF SOMETHING ACTUALLY PROPOSED. JUST AS MIKE MENTIONED THE DESIGN STANDARDS AND STRATEGIC PLAN. SO THERE WERE QUESTIONS THAT REALLY PERTAIN MORE LIKE THE REZONING PROCESS FOR THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCESS, WHICH WE OBVIOUSLY JUST DIDN'T HAVE ANY INTEREST FOR AT THAT TIME BECAUSE THERE WAS NO PROPOSAL. SO DEFINITELY THERE WAS A LOT OF LOT OF DISCUSSION. THERE'LL BE A I THINK, GIVEN THE VISIBILITY THIS PROJECT HAS HAD IN THE COMMUNITY, I THINK GOING FORWARD DEVELOPER. BRINGING SOMETHING FORWARD IS GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE ROCKY FORD. COURT, THEN GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH. ARCHITECTURE REVIEW, STRATEGIC PLANNING AND THEN THROUGH CITY COUNCIL, SO THERE'S MULTIPLE REVIEW STEPS AND I THINK RESIDENTS ARE CONCERNED WILL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION. TO THOSE EARLIER MEETINGS MORE SO THAN MAYBE THEY HAVE PAST WHAT WE'LL SEE. THANK YOU. THANKS I THINK IT HELPS THAT WE KNOW OF STANDARDS TO WORK WITH. ALSO IN THAT WE ELIMINATED THE IN THE REGIONAL STREET ORIGINAL STRATEGIC PLANNING. THERE WAS THERE WERE IDENTIFIED TO HAMLET LOCATIONS, SECOND LOCATION OFFERS 62 ETCETERA HAS BEEN ELIMINATED. SO THERE WILL BE ONLY ONE HAMLETS. WE WENT DOWN FROM 2 TO 1. WHEN IS THIS SCHEDULED TO BE FORMALLY APPROVED? VOTED ON SO WE DON'T HAVE SUBMITTAL YET FROM ANY DEVELOPER, UM I WILL TELL YOU THAT WE LIKED WHAT WE LIKELY WILL HAVE A RESIGNING SUBMITTAL WITHIN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS, SO THAT WILL NEED IN TERMS OF THE PURVIEW OF THIS BOARD. THEY WILL HAVE TO MAKE IT ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE REASONING PROCESS, WHICH IS ROCKY FOR A BLACK MAN FOR PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL FINAL ACTION, AND THEN IF THAT'S APPROVED, I HAVE TO COME BACK FOR A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BECAUSE WE'RE ANTICIPATING LIBYAN YPFD REASONING. WHICH WOULD STOP HERE FIRST. AND YOU WOULD MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION. AFTER ALL, THE ENTITLEMENTS ARE KIND OF IN PLACE FOR THE ZONING IS WHEN YOU GUYS CAN STOP AT IT. THANK YOU. I'M GUESSING THAT MEETING WILL LAST LONGER THAN THIS 1 21 COMMENT, MR YELLING WE'VE GONE ON EARLIER IN THE PROCESS THAT BY THE TIME IT GETS HERE, IT'LL BE LET'S KEEP ON TRACK. PUT IT THIS WAY. I THINK THAT THIS MEETING WILL BE MUCH EASIER THAN ANY OTHER OF THE STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMISSION COUNSEL. I LIKE TO BE ON THIS. THIS IS THE BEST POINT. I'M SURE THERE'LL BE PUBLIC COMMENT, BUT I CAN'T IMAGINE THAT WILL BE AS HEAT. 
          WELL I DON'T KNOW ABOUT HEATING BUT IS SENSATIONAL. WORK THAT'S WHY YOU GET PAID AND WE DON'T 
          [IX. Poll members for comment]
SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO QUESTION THE VALUE OF IT ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM OUR MEMBERS? NO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE REPORTS. YES. AND AGAIN WELCOME THE STEPS. UM, MOTION FOR GERMAN. SO MOVED SECOND MR BROWN SECONDS. MR STROLLER? YES. MR BROWN? YES, MISS MORE. YES. MR MALIK? YES, MR THOMAS. MR BIDEN ? YES, MR HINSON'S YES.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.