[I. Call To Order]
[00:00:04]
FOLKS WHY DON'T WE GET STARTED? WE'RE JUST ABOUT SEVEN O'CLOCK. WELCOME EVERYONE WELCOME OUR GUESTS TONIGHT. UM, FIRST ORDER OF ACTION IS CALLED TO ORDER. CAN WE HAVE A CLERK? WHEN THE WORLD CALLED PLEASE MR LASSEN HAS YES, MR. SMITH PRESIDENT, MS SAMUELS, PRESIDENT. MR. SCHELL PRESIDENT, MR JACOB PRESIDENT WILL TROUT HASN'T. OKAY. ACTION ON MINUTES. FIRST ITEM ON THE
[III. Action of Minutes]
AGENDA IS ACTION MINUTES FROM THE LAST TIME WE MET. ARE THERE ANY CORRECTIONS TO LAST MONTH'S MINUTES? MR CHAIRMAN, I MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 22ND MEETING. SECOND. MR JACOB. YES, MISS SAMUELS? YES. MR SCHELL? YES MR SMITH? YES, MR LOGIN IS YES. ARE THERE ANY[IV. Additions or Corrections to Agenda]
ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA FROM STAFF OR THE BOARD MEMBERS FOR TONIGHT? OH, THANKS, CHRIS. THE ONLY CHANGE IS THE TABLING REQUEST FOR THE SECOND ITEM LISTED ON THE AGENDA. WE'LL GET TO THAT. YES. UM. THE NEXT THING WE'D LIKE TO DO FREDDY GUESTS WE HAVE IN THE AUDIENCE.ANYONE WANTING TO SPEAK TONIGHT WE'LL HAVE TO SWEAR YOU IN. PLEASE RISE. DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? JOHN. OKAY LET'S UH LET'S HEAR OUR FIRST CASE. OKAY
[VII. Cases]
THANK YOU. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. UM THIS APPLICATION SITE IS LOCATED AT 6500 NEW ALBANY ROAD. THIS IS A VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE PAVEMENT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF CODE SECTION 11 44.4, D. B OVERALL 51.75 ACRE SITE WAS DEVELOPED AS THE DISCOVERY CAMPUS AND CONSISTS OF TWO PARCELS. THE NORTHERN A PARCEL CONTAINS THE DATA CENTER. THE SOUTHERN PARCEL CONTAINS OFFICE CALL CENTER AND HAS A PRIVATE DRIVE. ABOUT HIS SHARED AND SERVICES BOTH PARCELS.DISCOVER PROPERTIES CURRENTLY OWNS AND OCCUPIES BOTH OF THE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT . THE APPLICANT WISHES TO EXECUTE A LOT SPLIT, WHICH WOULD ADJUST THE PROPERTY LINE THAT RUNS EAST WEST BETWEEN THE TWO LOTS. DISCOVER INTENDS TO SELL THE PARCEL TO THIS SOUTH. AND RETAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE PARCEL TO THE NORTH. AND THEY WOULD, UM , LIKE TO MAINTAIN THE ACCESS FOR THE PRIVATE DRIVE AND COMBINE THAT WITH THEIR PERSONAL TO THE NORTH. AS PART OF THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, THE APPLICANT REQUEST A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR THE PARKING LOT PAVEMENT, TOO.
BE AS CLOSE AS SIX FT TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND CODE REQUIRES AT LEAST 15 FT. SO THE RED LINE ON THE SCREEN INDICATES THE CURRENT LOT LINE LOCATION AND THE BLUE LINE REPRESENTS THE PROPOSED PLOTLINE LOCATION. AFTER THEY DO THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. THE PROPOSED VARIANTS WOULD ONLY REDUCE THE SETBACK FOR A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY LINE WHERE IT STARTS TO CURVE HERE ON THE SCREEN. IN FRONT OF THE CURB CUT TO THE SITE. AND BECAUSE OF THIS, THE REQUEST DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SUBSTANTIAL. THE VARIANCE PRESERVES THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE ZONING DISTRICT. THE VARIANCE IS PARTIALLY DUE TO EXISTING CONDITIONS AS A SITE IS ALREADY DEVELOPED, AND THE VARIANTS WOULD NOT RESULT IN ANY OTHER CHANGES OR ACTIVATE ANY NEW REQUIREMENTS. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THE ESSENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED. AGAIN THE SITE IS, UM EXISTING BUILT CONDITION AND THE VARIANTS AND LOT LINES ONLY EXIST ON PAPER ESSENTIALLY AND WILL NOT CHANGE THE BUILT CONDITION. THE PLOT LINE TO THE NORTH DOES NOT HAVE ANY CURB CUTS. UM I'M SORRY. THE LOT TO THE NORTH DOES NOT HAVE
[00:05:05]
ANY CURB CUTS OTHER THAN THOSE THAT ARE ON THE SHARED DRIVE. RIGHT IN THIS AREA HERE. THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH HAS DIRECT CURB CUTS AND MULTIPLE LOCATIONS AND ACCESS POINTS ONTO THE SITE.UM WHEREAS THE ONLY PUBLIC STREET ACCESS FOR THE LOT TO THE NORTH IS VIA THE PRIVATE DRIVE.
THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT WOULD ENSURE THAT THE DATA CENTERS ACCESS TO THE PRIVATE DRIVE IS SUSTAINED AND WOULD ENSURE NO ADDITIONAL CURB CUTS ARE NECESSARY. THE VARIANCE ALLOWS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT TO CONTINUE ITS COHESIVE DESIGN BETWEEN THE SITES AND ENSURE THE DATA CENTER HAS PUBLIC STREET ACCESS VIA THE PRIVATE DRIVE. UM, IF THE PROPERTY SHOULD HAVE DIFFERENT OWNERS IN SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION AND WE DO NOT HAVE ANY RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU IS THE APPLICANT HERE? GEORGE SPEAK, SIR. YES MY NAME IS GARY HUMANS COUNCIL DISCOVERED PROPERTIES DOT OR LLC. AH! NICHOLS DID A NICE JOB OF SUMMARIZING WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR. IN OUR OPINION AGAIN, IT'S NOT A HUGE CHANGE TO THE ZONING CODE. IT'S BEING ON A PORTION OF THE DRIVE. I'M CERTAINLY HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF ANYONE HAS CONCERNS, BUT WITH THAT, I GUESS I BELIEVE IT IN ORDER TO MAKE THEIR DECISION. OKAY. THANK YOU. THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF ANY QUESTIONS. JUST JUST ONE. UM THE ADJACENT LANDOWNERS WERE NOTIFIED, CORRECT? YES THAT'S BACK FROM ANYBODY. WE DID HAVE A COUPLE, UM, PEOPLE CALL TO REQUEST MORE INFORMATION AND WHEN I GAVE THEM THE MATERIALS, THEY RECOGNIZE THAT IT DID NOT AFFECT THEIR PROPERTY. SO NO COMPLAINTS ARE CORRECT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. HAVE YOU ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT ON THE SOUTHERN PARCEL YET? WHEN YOU SEE AN AGREEMENT WE'VE WRITTEN OUR CLIENT'S PURCHASE AGREEMENT , WHICH ONE OF THE CONTINGENCIES IN THAT AGREEMENT IS THE APPROVAL OF THIS ZONING VARIANCE AND THE PERSPECTIVE. PURCHASER IS AWARE OF THIS, BUT THEY WROTE IT INTO WROTE IT INTO THOSE EVERYBODY IS ON THE SAME PAGE WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE TONIGHT. JUST QUESTION FOR STAFF. IS THERE PRECEDENT THAT WE'VE DONE THIS BEFORE? ANYWHERE IN THAT? UM I AM NOT SURE ABOUT THE LOT LINE, BUT I KNOW FOR BUILDINGS.
STEVE PROBABLY COULD SPEAK TO THAT BETTER THAN I CAN ON THE HISTORY. YEAH, ONE PLACE THAT COMES TO MIND IMMEDIATELY AS THE WATER'S EDGE BUILDINGS. SO THAT'S NORTH OF 1, 61 AND WEST OF 605. SO THOSE ARE SOME ALSO SOME OF THE ORIGINAL BUILDINGS IN THE NEW ALBANY INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARK. AND THE ZONING REQUIRES, YOU KNOW, LIKE A 15 FT. 20 FT, UM, PAVEMENT SETBACK BETWEEN SITES, BUT JUST LIKE HERE IN ORDER TO WHILE FOR COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT STYLE, SO IT FEELS LIKE ONE CAMPUS. THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ALSO IMPROVED. SIMILAR VARIANTS IS THERE TO ALLOW FOR ONE COHESIVE PARKING LOTS THROUGHOUT THE THREE WATER STORAGE BUILDINGS AND THAT SECTION OF THE BUSINESS PART OKAY. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS, FOLKS. IT'S VERY EMOTIONAL. I MOVE TO APPROVE VARIANTS 95 TO 2 TO SECOND. MR SMITH? YES MR JACOB? YES? MR SCHELL? YES. MS SAMUELS? YES, MR LEGEND. CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU. OKAY I BELIEVE THE NEXT.
ONE WAS WE WERE GOING TO TABLE THIS ONE CAN NEVER. I'M GONNA MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE VARIANTS 9620 TO 2 TO THE OCTOBER 24TH BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING. SECOND TIME. MR SHELL, DID YOU SECOND? YES. MR LEDGER SAYS YES, MR SCHELL? YES? MR JACOB? YES. MR SMITH? YES, MISS SAMUELS.
OKAY CAN WE HEAR THE STAFF REPORT ON VARIANTS? 1 12 TO 2 TO 0 TO 2. SURE, THANK YOU. THIS APPLICATION. IS THERE VARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PAVEMENT AND BUILDING SETBACKS FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LOCATED HERE, AS SHOWN IN RED JUST TO ORIENT EVERYONE. THE ROAD THAT
[00:10:05]
RUNS IMMEDIATELY. NORTH OF THE SITE IS WORTHINGTON ROAD. THIS LARGER, REDDEST STATE AROUND 1 61. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE NEW ALBANY BUSINESS PARK. SOME OF THE SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE A NEW WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION CENTER BEING DEVELOPED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE SITE.YOU CAN START TO SEE A LITTLE BIT MORE. CLEARLY, THE FACEBOOK SITE IS LOCATED DOWN HERE. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE A NEW AXIOM BUILDING THAT IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION HERE. SO AS STATED THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PAVEMENT, PAVEMENT AND BUILDING SETBACKS IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING, WHICH THE FOOTPRINT OF WHICH IS SHOWN IN YOUR PACKETS AND ALSO HERE ON THE SCREEN. EXPLAIN NOW SOME OF THOSE THE EXISTING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AND WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED WITH THE VARIANCE REQUEST. SO AS THE LEARNING TAX FREED'S TODAY IT DOES REQUIRE A 50 FT BUILDING AND PAVEMENT SETBACK ALONG ALL PROPERTY LOAN ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES. THE VARIANCE SURPLUS, THE APPLICANT IS SEEKS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED BUILDING OF PAYMENTS BACK FROM 50 FT TO 25 FT ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE, THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE AND THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. THEY WILL RETAIN THE INCREASED SETBACK OF THE 50 FT DOLLARS PAYMENTS SETBACK ALONG WELLINGTON ROAD. ALL THE SITES WHERE THE VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED. OURS OWNED AND USED UNTIL ART ZONED TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL USES TO BE DEVELOPED. AND AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE A COMMERCIAL SITE IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THIS ONE THAT IS CURRENTLY IN CONSTRUCTION, AND THEY DO HAVE THAT REDUCED 25 FT BUILDING SET BACK ON THEIR PROPERTY. IT'S JUST JUST NOT APPLY TO THIS ONE THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING TONIGHT.
STAFF DOES BELIEVE THAT THE VARIANCE REQUEST PRESERVES THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE GE ZONING DISTRICT AND LIMITATION TAXED AS THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. LARGE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS HAVE TYPICALLY BEEN PUT IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF REZONING WHEN THERE ARE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USES AROUND THE PROPERTY. SO THIS IS AN IMAGE. THIS IS AN AREA FROM 2009. WHEN THE SITE WAS REZONED AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, EVEN ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF, BUT THERE WAS AN OLD HOME ON THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST . THERE'S A HOUSE THAT'S REALLY CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE, SO AT THAT TIME WHEN THE PROPERTY WAS REZONED, IT MADE SENSE WHY WE WANTED TO HAVE THOSE LARGER SETBACKS. KIND OF ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT FURTHER HERE IN THIS NEXT IMAGE, SO JUST BEAR WITH ME HERE. BUT AGAIN, I HAVE OUTLINED THE IMAGE OR THE PROPERTY AND RED HERE. SO DIFFICULT TO SEE, BUT IT'S RIGHT HERE. AS YOU CAN SEE, SINCE THEN THERE'S BEEN A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT'S TAKEN PLACE BOTH IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA AND ESPECIALLY RIGHT NEXT TO THE SITE. SO HAS MENTIONED THE STAFF REPORT. THIS IS THE FACEBOOK CAMPUS, WHICH IS IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, AS YOU CAN SEE THERE. WELL WELL UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH LARGE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. THE SITE IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND THEN TO THE WEST.
UM OUR COMMERCIAL LEASE COMMERCIAL USES ARE PERMITTED AS WELL. SO FOR THESE REASONS, WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS SUBSTANTIAL. AND WE DON'T THINK THAT THESE LARGER SETBACKS ARE WARRANTED ANY LONGER. ADDITIONALLY YOU'LL SEE SOMETHING MENTIONED IN THE STAFF REPORT. BUT THE BASE GS ON IN DISTRICT AND CITY CODE ALLOWS FOR A 20 FT. 25 FT SETBACK. UM BY RIGHT. THAT'S HOW THE TAXES WRITTEN SO AGAIN NOT CREATED. REITERATE THIS, BUT ON THE APPLE CAME TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY PLACE THOSE LARGER RESTRICTIONS ON THEMSELVES BECAUSE TIMES WERE DIFFERENT BACK THEN. RIGHT THERE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES THAT NEED TO SCREEN SO WITH THAT STUFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VARIOUS APPLICATION. THANK YOU. CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT STAFF REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS INTO RECORD FOR VARIANCE 1 12 TO 0 TO TWO SO MOVED SECOND. MR SMITH. YES MR JACOB. MR SCHELL? YES. MR LITTLE IS YES. SAMUELS? YES? DOES THE APPLICANT WANT TO HAVE ANY WORDS OR HEARING THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AARON UNDERHILL WITH UNDER HELEN HODGE HERE AT 8000 PARKWAY IN THE ALBANY. UM, NOT MUCH MORE TO SAY. I THINK, UM, UH, THOSE IMAGES ARE VERY INTERESTING TO LOOK AT COME A LONG WAY IN A RELATIVELY SHORT PERIOD OF TIME HERE IN THE ALBANY AND HAVE THE PRIVILEGE TO BE PART OF MOST OF THE ZONING OVER THE YEARS AND YOU KNOW, I THINK WHAT WE'VE BEEN MINDFUL OF AS THE NEW ALBANY COMPANY AND ITS AFFILIATES. BJ HOLDINGS IS OUR IMPACT ON THE RESIDENCES AROUND US. AND SO AT THE TIME, WE WERE SORT OF ON THE EDGE OF A ZONING DISTRICT HERE AND WE ANTICIPATED YOU KNOW THAT WE COULD HAVE
[00:15:03]
NEIGHBORS. WE DID HAVE NEIGHBORS , IN FACT AROUND US, SO I THINK THE CHANGING CONDITIONS IN THE AREA WARRANT GRANTING OF THE VARIANTS AND ALL WE'RE REALLY DOING IS ASKING, TOO. THE SAME CONDITIONS WILL BE THERE. WE HAVE TO PUT THE LIMITATION ON THERE TO BEGIN WITH, SO WE'RE BASICALLY POINT CODE. THANK YOU. I UNDERSTAND YOU CORRECTLY. THE JUST UP HERE ON THE PARCEL TO THE RIGHT. DOESN'T HAVE THAT. SAYING LIMITATION NOW THAT'S CORRECT, SO IT'S A 25. RIGHT AND SO WHEN WE SEE THAT HE'S ALREADY KNEW WHAT THESE WERE HIS OWN COMMERCIAL, THE ONE MORE TALKING ABOUT AND SO THERE WE JUST WENT AHEAD WITH THE 25 FT. THAT WOULD TYPICALLY ALLOW. SO THAT WAS SECONDLY, WHAT WAS GOING ON AND THE LONG TERM AROUND IT AS OPPOSED TO THIS PIECE. KIND OF GUESSING WHAT THE FUTURE HELD. SO IF THIS WAS ZONED COMMERCIAL THAN IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE 25, BUT BECAUSE IT'S LG RIGHT. SO ANOTHER WORDS, IF THE L WOULDN'T BE IN FRONT OF THE G CODE, IT WOULD BE 25. OKAY? IS THAT SOMETHING THAT I'M GOING TO PUT ON MY NAIL KIRBY HAT? IS THAT SOMETHING? WE SHOULD TAKE A LOOK AT LIKE GOING FORWARD, GIVEN THE I'M JUST THINKING OF TRYING TO THINK OF A SITUATION WHERE BUILDING WOULD BE A ZONE THAT WAY. I WANT TO SHORTER. YEAH WITH EACH ZONING REZONING APPLICATION. WE GET OUT HERE. WE DO KIND OF LOOK AT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LET'S SURROUNDING IT. WE TRY TO BE SENSITIVE THOSE NEIGHBORS, SO I DO THINK WE DO A PRETTY GOOD JOB. WHERE WE NEED TO HAVE THAT REDUCED SETBACK APPLYING THAT HASN'T SEANCES.BUT WE DO. THERE ARE SOME TEXTS AND SOME NEWER TAX THAT ACCOUNT FOR CHANGING CONDITIONS. YEAH THAT WERE NOT CAPTURED BACK IN 2009, WHERE THIS ONE WAS WRITTEN THAT I THINK WE'VE KIND OF CORRECTED FOR GETTING AT YOUR POINT. UM I GUESS IF IT WAS A RESIDENT 50 WOULD BE MAYBE NOT ENOUGH, RIGHT? 25 I GUESS COMING HERE AS WELL. YEAH, I THINK WE'VE YOU KNOW? REALLY THE FALL INTO THIS LG DISTRICT MORE BECAUSE IN RECENT YEARS BECAUSE OF THE SPEED TO MARKET THAT'S WHY YOU'VE SEEN A LOT OF SUCCESS HERE THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND YOU CAN SEE THE BUILD ENVIRONMENT IS STILL VERY GOOD STAFF DOES A GREAT JOB. BUT THAT'S WHY THOSE LIMITED LIMITATION TEXTS OR LIKE 8 10 PAGES LONG SO WE CAN DICTATE ARCHITECTURE AND SETBACKS AND THINGS. SO UH, YOU KNOW, WE TAKE THEM AS THEY COME, BUT CERTAINLY IN A SITUATION WHERE WE HAVE EXISTING CONDITIONS AROUND IN EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR EXCELLENT STARTS. OKAY THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS? I GUESS. SAME QUESTION I ASKED BEFORE ANY ISSUES FROM THE NEIGHBORS KNOW THANK YOU. IS THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET. IS THAT ZONED COMMERCIALLY AS WELL ? SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT SPLIT HERE, AND YOU CAN KIND OF SEES OF THIS PROPERTY RIGHT HERE. YOU CAN SEE THE PARCEL LINE THAT IS ZONED TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AS THEY'RE PROVIDING, UM, THE SCREENING THAT'S REQUIRED BY THE SENDING TEXT THIS PROPERTY EVERY YEARS UNTIL OFFER COMMERCIAL USES. SO THERE'S VARIANCE IS SO LET'S WHERE THOSE THREE HERE IT IS. UH YES. SO THE VARIANCE WOULD REDUCE US THAT BACK ALONG THE PERIMETER. BOUNDARIES ARE NOT TOUCHING THE 50 FT REQUIREMENT ALONG MORE THAN ONE ROAD. I'M GONNA ASK THE SAME QUESTION AGAIN. UM UM. DO WE HAVE PRECEDENCE OF DOING THIS? YES THE THERE IS PRECEDENT FOR BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BORDERS ENDING APPEALS TO APPROVE VARIANCE REQUESTS TO REDUCE THE SETBACK. IN SIMILAR SITUATIONS. THANK YOU. OF THE LAND. THAT'S THERE ARE THE VARIOUS PLOTS. I MEAN, I ASSUME THERE'S ALMOST WOULD BE ALMOST UNIFORMITY AT THIS POINT TO KIND OF ALL. MINUS THE ONE OBVIOUSLY THAT WE DISCUSSED EARLIER. BUT FOR THE MOST PART THIS WE ALMOST UNIFORMITY AT THIS POINT, RIGHT? YEAH BUT SHE'S ACHIEVING A CONSISTENT SET BACK BETWEEN SITES. YEP. THANKS. IS THERE A MOTION? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE VARIANCE 1 12 222. SECOND. MR SMITH? YES. MR RUSSIA? YES, YES. MS SAMUELS. MR SCHELL? YES, MR JACOB? YES? RIGHT? CONGRATULATIONS THANKS.
SURE. MR RUSSELL S. I REALIZED THAT YES. SHE DIDN'T REPORT VERY INTO 90 LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO
[00:20:05]
ACCEPT THE STAFF REPORT FOR VARIANCE. 12 1920 25 2020. THE MOTION. DID YOU MOVE? I DIDN'T VOTE NO. ARE WE STILL BACK ON WERE ON THE ORIGINAL ONE. WE DIDN'T ACCEPT THE STAFF REPORT.SO DID YOU MAKE A MOTION TO YES , EXCEPT THE STAFF ALL SECOND THAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
SORRY ABOUT THAT. MR MARTINEZ? YES, MR SHELL. MR JACOB? YES MR SMITH? YES, SAMUELS. OKAY ANY OTHER BUSINESS NATURAL STAFF AROUND. OKAY CAN I HEAR A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING? MEETING ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.