[00:00:01]
COMMISSION READY? OKAY, SO SIGNIFIED BY TURNING YOUR MIC ON. I LIKE TO CALL OVER THE
[I. Call to Order]
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR MONDAY, DECEMBER 19TH 28 22 3 OTHER ROLL, PLEASE. MR KIRBY. MR WALLACE PRESENT, MISS BRIGGS HERE. MR. LARSON, PRESIDENT. MR. SCHELL, PRESIDENT. MR SHAW HERE.[III. Action of Minutes]
JUST AS A REMINDER FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD. PLEASE MAKE SURE YOUR MICROPHONES ON WHEN YOU'RE SPEAKING. THANKS TO STARDOM THREE ACTION IN THE MINUTES. WE HAVE TWO SETS OF MINUTES IN FRONT OF US. I HAD ONE CHANGE OF CONTENT IN THE. NOVEMBER 7TH AMENDMENTS ON PAGE FIVE. UM. I THINK THE WORD OF OFFICERS GOT MARKETS OFFERS, WHICH ONES? NOVEMBER, 7TH. APARTMENT DOWN, SPOKE OF ZONING OFFERS. SHE'LL BE OFFICER. AND YOU NEED A SPACE FURTHER DOWN THE FIRST TIME WE MENTIONED 100 AND 85 BETWEEN AWARD SHOW AND 1 85 INTO AN L IF YOU'VE GOT IT NEXT TO THE D.THAT WAS ALL I CAUGHT IN TERMS OF SUBSTANCE HAVE ANY CHANGE? DO THAT CHANGES HERE. OKAY, UM. I DON'T TAKE TOO LONG. I WANTED TO CONTRAST THE NOVEMBER 21 MINUTES AND THE NOVEMBER 7TH MINUTES. UM AND CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, BUT I PREFER THE FORMAT OF THE NOVEMBER 7TH MINUTES. AND I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT IT WASN'T JUST ME, SAYING THAT BEFORE DIRECTING STAFF TO RETAIN THE OVER STYLE. I AGREE, OKAY. I'M GOOD. DO I HEAR ANY ACTION ON THE MINUTES? AS AMENDED. YOU WANT TO PROVE IT TOGETHER? STILL UM, I DON'T HAVE. I DON'T HAVE ANY CORRECTIONS FOR NOVEMBER.
21. ARE THERE ANY CORRECTIONS FROM NOVEMBER 23. HOW MANY OF YOU APPROVED THE MINUTES FROM THE NOVEMBER CENTER 2022 MEETING IN NOVEMBER. 21ST 2022 MEETINGS. HASN'T IT? CAN WE I WOULD DO IT SEPARATELY. IF YOU'RE MAKING IT OKAY. YOU WANT TO BE INTERESTING ? UM THAT'S NOT BEEN SECONDED.
YET. HANS THE ONLY RESTRICTED TO THE SEVENTH TO START WITH YES. OKAY. DO I HEAR A SECOND FOR THE 7TH 2ND? DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. CAN WE GET A ROLE? MR SCHELL? YES. MS BRIGGS? YES. MR LARSON? YES MR WALLACE. YES. MR KIRBY? YES. DO YOUR EMOTION FOR THE NOVEMBER 21ST MINUTES. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE NOVEMBER 21ST 2022. SO HERE A SECOND. I'LL SECOND THATR THE NOVEMBER 21ST MINUTES. THE ROLE, PLEASE. MR LARSON? YES MR KIRBY, MR WALLACE. YES. MS BRIGGS? YES. MR SCHELL? YES. THANKS US TO ITEM FOUR EDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA. DO
[IV. Additions or Corrections to Agenda]
WE HAVE ANY HAVE ONE EDITION? I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE TO YOU WILL WALTHER THE NEW FACE HERE TONIGHT. HE REPRESENTS OUR ENGINEERING DIVISION. MOVING FORWARD, YOU WILL BE SEEING A LOT MORE OF WILL AT OUR ENGINE. OUR MEETINGS FOR ENGINEERING. THANKS. DID YOU SEE THAT? WELCOME. LET ME JUST COMMENT ON YOUR COMMENT ON THE MINUTES BECAUSE I DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO JUMP IN, AND WE JUST WANT TO SAY UM, I COULD GO EITHER WAY ON THE MINUTES. I THOUGHT THAT THE WAY THAT THE MINUTES WERE DONE ON A TOPICAL BASIS, AS OPPOSED TO A SPEAKER HAS MADE SOME SENSE. BUT I WILL CONCEDE THAT IT'S EASIER TO CHECK. WHAT USE FOR WHAT AN INDIVIDUAL COMMISSION MEMBER SAYS, WHICH IS WHAT I'M MOSTLY CONCERNED ABOUT WHEN I READ IN MINUTES THE OTHER WAY, SO I COMPLIMENT YOU ON THE WAY YOU DID THE MINUTES BECAUSE I THOUGHT THEY WERE WELL DONE. BUT I WOULD DEFER TO THE GENERAL CONSENSUS OF THE COMMISSION AS TO HOW DESTRUCTION, OKAY? ITEM[VI. Cases]
FIVE HEARING OF VISITORS FOR ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. DO WE HAVE ANY SUCH VISITORS FOR THINGS THAT ARE NOT ON OUR CURRENT AGENDA? TAKES US TO OUR CASES. OUR FIRST CASES RB 1 34 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CAN WE HEAR FROM STAFF, PLEASE? THANK YOU. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A SCREENING PLAN FOR EXTERIOR STORAGE AT THE[00:05:04]
APPLICANTS WAREHOUSE BUILDING. CODE EXTERIOR STORAGE SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN THE GE DISTRICT UNLESS A PLAN FOR SCREENING IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE 61 ACRE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE DRUG STREET, NORTH ALGAE E ZONING DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DRUG STREET ROAD WEST OF PARIS, AND ROAD AND EAST OF BEACH ROAD.THE STAR ON THIS SCREEN REPRESENTS APPROXIMATELY WHERE THE EXTERIOR STORAGE WOULD BE LOCATED ON SITE. THE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF SEVEN BUILDINGS AND ONE SUBSTATION. THE SITE PLAN IS TURNED SO NORTH IS ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE SCREEN. THE TENANT LANSING BUILDING PRODUCTS WOULD BE LOCATED IN ONE OF THE 77 BUILDINGS, WHICH IS 1777 WHERE. 7700 SQUARE FEET AND THE AREA OF PROPOSED FOR THE EXTERIOR STORAGE IS APPROXIMATELY 32,000 SQUARE FEET. LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF THIS SITE. THE EXTERIOR STORAGE WOULD BE LOCATED WHERE THE OWNER HAD PREVIOUSLY SHOWN SPECULATIVE TRUCK PARKING. THE APPLICANT ASKED THAT THE DURATION OF THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE AND SCREENING BE FOR AS LONG AS THE TENANT HOLDS THE LEASE. SHOULD THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE APPLICATION STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. THAT THE APPROVAL BE TIED TO THE SPECIFIC TENANT. ALL MATERIALS PROPOSED FOR STORAGE OUTSIDE ARE WEATHERPROOF EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS AND WILL HAVE NO IMPACT ON RAINWATER RUNOFF. AND EIGHT FT. HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE IS BEING PROPOSED TO SCREEN THE EXTERIOR STORAGE. AND THE CHAIN LINK MATERIAL WILL BE BLACK, VINYL CODED AND THE FENCE WILL HAVE BLACK SLAT SCREENING. THE PROPOSED BLACK VINYL CODED CHAIN LINK FENCE HAS, UM BEEN UTILIZED SUCCESSFULLY IN OTHER AREAS OF THE BUSINESS PARK SO THE FENCE WOULD NOT BE OUT OF CHARACTER. THE PROPOSED STORAGE AREA. IT'S LOCATED TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND WOULD BE A DATE ADJACENT TO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, A SUBSTATION AND A FUTURE DATA CENTER. IT IS ALSO ADJACENT TO A CONSERVATIVE CONSERVATION EASEMENT, WHICH IS HEAVILY WOODED AND WILL PROVIDE A SUBSTANTIAL SCREENING. THEREFORE IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE FENCE WILL BE VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC AREAS AND STREETS AND THE VISUAL COMPONENTS OF THE STATE WILL NOT BE COMPROMISED.
THE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS OF THE SITE WILL NOT BE COMPROMISED. IT IS, UM IN THE AREA WHERE THE TRUCK PARKING WAS PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED. BUT THE SITE WILL STILL HAVE 45 TRUCK AND TRAILER PARKING SPACES ON SITE. UM. IN THIS LARGER STRIP BEHIND THE BUILDING. WHICH IS EXCEEDING THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF LOADING SPACES REQUIRED FOR CODE. SHOULD THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE APPLICATION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT CONDITION LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND WITH THAT I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. WELCOME. UM IN OUR PACKET. IT'S GOT A ENGINEERING REPORT. MHM. WHICH IS MARKED TMD REZONING. IS THAT THEN SHUFFLED TO THE WRONG OKAY? IS THERE ANY OTHER ENGINEERING? NEXT, PLEASE. OKAY HERE'S THE SAME THEM. ENGINEERING. THERE ARE NO COMMENTS ON THIS, OKAY? CAN WE HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT? ON THIS SIDE. SEEMS TO BE BEST PLACED ON THE PROPERTY. APPRECIATE IT. AFTER ALL THE RECHARGE BASINS. FOR BY FILLING
[00:10:13]
FIRES, OBVIOUSLY SO THEY ARE LOOKING INTO. GET THE EXTERIORS OR AREA. WOULD YOU LIKE? ACTUALLY, I NEED TO SWEAR EVERYBODY IN, UM SO WE CAN STEP BACK ONE. UM WHAT EVERYONE ELSE WHO HAS WISHED EVERYONE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION PLEASE RISE. THIS MORNING. I DIDN'T.YEAH, GO AHEAD. DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? THANK YOU. LET'S RESUME THE CASE. AH! WAS EVERYTHING YOU JUST SAID THE TRUTH, OKAY? UM. IN THE REPORT, IT SAYS NOT INCLUDING SAND, AGGREGATE OR OTHER BASED MATERIALS. UM THAT IS THE INTENT NOT TO STORE THINGS LIKE SAND AND GRAVEL HERE. SO I WANTED TO EXPLICITLY. YEAH. WORRY ABOUT THESE STORIES AND MORE SPECIFICALLY SAYING CUSTOMER REPORTS. THE OUTSIDE. UM YOU WOULDN'T MIND IT BEING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THOSE ITEMS MARKED NOT INCLUDED, ARE SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED. UNDER THIS FROM. BUT YOU ALSO HAD THAT THERE WOULD BE NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORED OR DO WE HAVE OTHER ZONING THAT WOULD KICK IN IF THEY'RE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORED HERE. I NONE THAT I CAN THINK OF. OKAY, SO. IN PARTICULAR NOTES. UM. SPEAKING TO EVERYTHING IS WATERPROOF STUFF. THIS MEANS THAT ALL THE NOOKS AND CRANNIES THEN IN THE SUMMERTIME ARE MOSQUITO BREEDING GROUNDS IF WE'RE NOT CAREFUL, THE THERE IS STILL NEEDED TO ALLOW. FROM MY STRUCTURES. TO BE STRONG. I WAS REFERRING TO THE ITEMS THEMSELVES. FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU STARTED ADORE FLAT AND IT'S GOT A OR A WINDOW FLAT. IT WILL PULL WATER. SO. THE LIGHTNING THINKS THAT FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME AND LETTING WATER STABLE ON MATERIALS, OBVIOUSLY AND THE. CARE OF LIABILITY USE, SO IT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY'RE IN AND OUT EVERY DAY. THAT WATER. CONDITIONS REGARDING THAT. GOOD. OTHER COMMISSION MEMBERS, QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS. JUST A QUICK ONE. SO YOU IT'S SAD. I BELIEVE THERE WE GO. THAT THE THERE'S A GATE.
ON THE I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE THE EAST SIDE. I THOUGHT YOU SAID YES. RIGHT HERE. AND KEEP ME HONEST. THESE ARE PARKING SPACES . THE DEPARTMENT FACES. OKAY, SO NO CONCERN ABOUT OBVIOUSLY SPACING HERE AND SO ON. OKAY AND THEN SECOND QUESTION IS FOR STAFF. UM I THINK CHELSEA YOU HAD MENTIONED THERE'S SOME OTHER AREAS IN THE BUSINESS PARK THAT HAVE THE BLACK VINYL CODED. UM OBVIOUSLY FENCING, FENCING, BLACK, VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCING. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE THE PRIVACY SLATS. BUT THERE IS THE BLACK VINYL COATED FENCING AND OTHER AREAS. I DON'T KNOW IF OTHERS HAVE THAT PRIVACY SLAP. IT'S BEEN UTILIZED IN THE RESEARCH INFORMATION DISTRICT AREA LIKE THE SOUTH, THE ROAD AREA FOR THE UTILITY YARDS FOR THE DATA CENTERS IN THAT AREA.
AND WHILE IT'S NOT TRAIN LINK, AP ALSO USES BLACK COATED METAL FENCING FOR THEIR SUBSTATIONS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BUSINESS PARK. GREAT. THANK YOU. HAVE A QUESTION FOR CLARIFICATION. SO IT'S AN EXISTING TRUCK PARKING AREA, SO THE FENCED AREA IS IN THAT TRUCK PARKING AREA. CORRECE
[00:15:07]
PARKING AREA AND THAT. OKAY AND THE ENTIRE 32,000 SQUARE FEET WOULD BE PAVED, CORRECT. YOU CAN DO THIS. OKAY. THANK YOU. JUST ONE QUICK QUESTION. WOULD THAT BE THAT FOLKS HERE EAST? THAT'S A GOOD NIGHT ON THE IF WE'RE GOING TO THE LAB, IS THAT OKAY? UM, IS THAT VISIBLE TO THE NEIGHBORING LOT AT ALL VERY DENSE FORESTS OVER THEIR CONSERVATION, EVEN IN VERY HIGH QUALITY WELL, PROTECTED BY SO I ACTUALLY HAD. THAT'S GREAT. THE VICTORY IS VERY THICK. A LOT OFR STAFF. DO WE WANT THIS TIED TO THE TENANT OR THE TYPE OF BUSINESS? I BELIEVE WE RECOMMENDED TO THE TENANT IN THIS CASE. UM WE COULD DO THE SAME TYPE OF BUSINESS AS WELL AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION SEES THAT AS BEING MORE PRUDENT. I WAS MORE INTERESTED IN WHY ONE OR THE OTHER BE AIRED SO THAT WE KNOW THAT WE'RE DOING THE RIGHT THING WHEN WE HAVE A CHOICE OF TWO YEAH, I THINK HISTORICALLY, I THINK THE PLANNING COMMISSIONS PUT CONDITIONS OR USE BOTH MEANS TO AS A AS A MEANS OR AS A WAY TO END THESE, UM HE'S TEMPORARY TYPE OBJECTS. I THINK THAT'S WHY WE DID. THE TENANT WAS. I THINK THAT WAS MAYBE THE MOST RECENT WAY. WE HAVE DONE IT IN THE EARLY INDUSTRIAL PARK, BUT CERTAINLY WHERE SUPPORTIVE OF IT'S THE TYPE OF USE AS WELL. UM AND FOR THE APPLICANT, DID YOU HAVE A PARTICULAR CARE ON THAT? REGARD. THE COMMISSION THINKS.JUST HOPING NOT TO HEAR IT AGAIN IN 10 YEARS THAT THEY SELL. IT KEEPS THE BUSINESS YEAH, IT'S THE EASY TO DO BUSINESS WITH AND HOW MUCH CONTROL DO WE WANT? BALANCE AND EITHER I'M GOOD.
EITHER WAY, I WAS JUST MAKING SURE THAT WE WEREN'T IT'S A LONG TERM LEASE, AND WE'RE NOT EXPECTING THEM TO MOVE IN A LONG TIME. THEN WE JUST STAY WITH THE TENANT. BUT OKAY? THROUGH THE TENANT. UM WE DO HAVE ONE SPEAKER CARD. ZACH OKAY. ON THE AGENDA. YOU'RE ON THE AGENDA, OK , ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? I MOVED TO ACCEPT THIS STAFF REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS INTO THE RECORD. FOR A RB 1 34. MY WORD ADDICTS WITH THE EXCLUSION OF THE CITY ENGINEER MEMBER THAT WAS IMPACTED START SO NOTED. DO I HEAR A SECOND ON THE DOCUMENTS? I SECOND IT DISCUSSION OF THE MOTION. CAN I GET THE ROLE? MR KIRBY? YES. MR LARSON? YES MR WALLACE? YES MISS BRIGGS? YES MR SCHELL? YES DOCUMENTS AS CHANGED INTO THE RECORD. DO I HEAR A MOTION FOR THESE? A RB. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE CERTIFICATE APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION ARB 134, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. CONDITIONS THE APPROVAL IS TIED TO THE SPECIFIC TENDON, WHICH IS LANSING BUILDING PRODUCTS. NUMBER TWO THAT THERE ARE NO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORED ON THE SITE. WITHIN THIS DEFENSED AREA. AND NUMBER THREE THAT THEY WILL NOT BE ANY STANDING WATER.
IN MATERIALS STORED ON THE SITE. CAN I OFFER AS A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT THAT THE. THINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO UNDER ROMAN THREE CAPITAL A LITTLE A NOT TO INCLUDE HIS PART OF THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL. YES. DO I HEAR A SECOND? SECOND. DISCUSSION OF THE MOTION. CAN I HEAR THE ROLE MR LARSON? YES. BRAVES? YES. MR WALLACE. YES. MR KIRBY? YES MR SHELL. PASS THIS
[00:20:10]
501. DON'T I JUST NOTED THAT THE AGENDA. YEAH, I WAS THE AGENDA DOES. I WAS HOPING THAT THAT WAS CLEAR. WHEN I PAUSES, SAYING THOSE BUT I WAS READING DOWN THERE. THESE ARE BOTH IS NOT HIS ONLY CHANGES THAT L D. SO DID AGAIN. HEY NEIL. YES. I DIDN'T HEAR EVERYTHING WITH BRUCE'S.BUT DID YOU ALSO GET THE APPROVALS TIED TO THE SPECIFIC TENANT? YES, OKAY. FIRST THAT WAS FIRST ONE OUT OUT. YEP. THANK YOU. HMM. GOOD LUCK TAKES US TO ZONING CHANGE. 1 35 2022.
A LOT OF PROPERTY. GIVE ME SOME STAFF, PLEASE. THANK YOU. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. THIS REQUEST IS TO REZONE 403.2 ACRES FROM AGRICULTURAL TO TECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. THE PROPOSED REZONING SERVES AS AN EXPANSION OF THE NEW ALBANY INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARK. THE PROPOSAL CONSISTS OF 25 PARCELS WITHIN FOUR SEPARATE GROUPS, ALL LOCATED WITHIN LOOKING COUNTY.
GROUP A IS ABOUT 13 ACRES SOUTH OF MILLER ROAD, GENERALLY WEST OF CLOVER VALLEY. GROUP B IS ABOUT 312 ACRES NORTH OF GREEN CHAPEL ROAD SOUTH OF MILLER ROAD. AND IT SITS BETWEEN BEACH ROAD AND CLOVER VALLEY. GROUP C IS ABOUT 15 ACRES ALONG DRUG STREET, EAST OF HARRISON AND GROUP D. IS ABOUT 62 ACRES WEST OF MINK STREET. AND NORTH OF JUG STREET. THE PARCELS ARE CURRENTLY BEING ANNEXED INTO THE CITY, AND THE ANNEXATION IS SCHEDULED TO BE ON UM CITY COUNCIL'S AGENDA FOR JANUARY 3RD FOR THE FIRST READING. THE NEIGHBORING USES AND ZONING DISTRICTS INCLUDE T N D L G E. AND UNINCORPORATED AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL EACH OF THE FOUR GROUPS OF PARCELS SHARE A BOUNDARY AND ARE ADJACENT TO THE ALREADY ZONED TMD CLASSIFICATION. THE PERMITTED USES INCLUDE ALL OF THOSE AND THE LIMITED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT , THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER. AND A LIST OF OTHER USES THAT WE'RE IN THIS STAFF REPORTS SUCH AS SUBSTATIONS. ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND SOLAR PANELS. THE TMD IDENTIFIES TWO DEVELOPMENTS.
FLAGSHIP AND PRIMARY PROJECTS. A FLAGSHIP PROJECT MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 500 ACRES FOR A SINGLE PROJECT, A PRIMARY PROJECT. UM IS INTENDED TO BE THE SAME SIZE AND SCALE AS EXISTING MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION CENTERS ALREADY IN THIS CITY. LAST YEAR FOR THE FIRST TMD REZONING, THE CITY DID A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. THE CITY IS IMPLEMENTING OR PLANS TO IMPLEMENT AH, NECESSARY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, UH, THAT THIS REZONING CURRENTLY FRONTS. THE TMD ZONING DISTRICT ESTABLISHES MORE RESTRICTIVE STEP BACKS AND THE, UM SORRY, THEN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A NEARBY L G. AND THE TMD INCLUDES ITS OWN LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS, WHICH THIS IS THE ONLY ZONING DISTRICT THAT ESTABLISH ITS ITS OWN FULL LANDSCAPE PLAN. FOR THE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL SETBACKS, INCLUDING THOSE ALONG GREEN CHAPEL AND ME. IT IS A TIERED SYSTEM. THE TYPICAL SETBACK IS 300 FT FOR PAVEMENT IN 500 FT FOR BUILDINGS. A 68 FT. TALL MOUND IS REQUIRED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THIS SETBACK AREA. AND SETBACKS MAY BE REDUCED IN SOME AREAS TO 100 FT FOR PAVEMENT AND 300 FT FOR BUILDING IN WHICH CASE A 13 TO 15 FT. TALL MOUND IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SETBACK. FOR AREAS ADJACENT TO ANY PROPERTY WERE RESIDENCES ARE PERMITTED, WHICH INCLUDES ALL OF
[00:25:06]
THE BOUNDARIES SURROUNDING UH, THIS EXISTING SUBDIVISION HERE IN THE MIDDLE UM DO YOU SETBACKS ARE ENHANCED FOR THOSE THAT ARE ADJACENT TO RESIDENCES. IF A BUILDING EXCEEDS 65 FT IN HEIGHT , THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BUILDINGS SETBACK IS INCREASED TO A SUBSTANTIAL SETBACK OF 300 FT.IN ADDITION, A 10 FT TALL MOUND IS REQUIRED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THIS SETBACK AREA.
OVERALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TMD ZONING AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS. PLAN CONSIDER EXISTING RESIDENTIAL, UM AND, UH, RESIDENTIAL NATURE OF THE SURROUNDING AREA BY REQUIRING LARGER SETBACKS, MOUNTING AND LANDSCAPE RESTRICTIONS TO MAINTAIN UM. TO REMAIN SENSITIVE TO THOSE EXISTING USES. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE ENGAGED TO ALBANY STRATEGIC PLANS. NORTH AREA ADDENDUM. EMPLOYMENT CENTER LAND USE CATEGORY. THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT MEETS RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOUND IN THE PLAN AND THE TMD ACTUALLY IMPROVES UPON MANY OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN ADJACENT EXISTING ZONING TEXT. SHOULD THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE REZONING APPLICATION AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND A CONDITION. UM THOSE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THIS STAFF REPORT. AND WITH THAT I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ENGINEERING. YES SO STAFF RECOMMENDS THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE CITY ENGINEER COMMENTS BE ADDRESSED AT THE TIME OF ENGINEERING PERMITS SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. ADDITIONALLY FOR THIS PLAN WHERE AVAILABLE. RECOMMEND PROVIDING GRATIFICATION AT ALL. OHIO EPA, A ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. WE RECOMMEND THAT ALL PROPOSED ROADS WERE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUBLIC ROAD STANDARDS. AND FINALLY WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT. WE RECOMMEND THAT A 40 FT PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY, AS MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE, BE DEDICATED FOR ALL COLLECTORS STREETS. 50 FT OF PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY AS MEASURED FROM THE ROAD CENTERLINE BE DEDICATED FOR ALL ARTERIAL STREETS. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? NOT FROM HERE. DO YOU REMEMBER THERE WAS EXCLUDED PREVIOUSLY. DO YOU WANT THAT INCLUDED INTO THIS PACKET, THEN? THAT'S WHAT PLACE JUST TO CLARIFY. CAN WE HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT, PLEASE? BEING OUT IN THE COLD. ABSOLUTELY. THIS IS REALLY. THE.
THE PIECES THAT EXTENSION PHOTO SITES. JOSEPH.
HIMSELF. ANY CONFLICT WITH CONDITIONS. STEPH COURT. IN A QUICK ONE JUST TO MAKE SURE EFFECTIVELY. THIS IS IDENTICAL ZONING TO WHAT'S AROUND IT. IN TERMS OF TMD. THERE'S NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TMD HERE AND THE TMD THERE, OKAY? QUESTIONS. COMMENTS FROM COMMISSION. SO THE PROPERTY ALONG MINK. IT HAS A LITTLE NOTCH OUT OF IT ISN'T I GUESS I'M JUST LOOKING FOR SOME CONTEXT OF THAT TIME. GASSING, BUT I'D RATHER HEAR WHAT THE REASON IS. PEOPLE. IS IT SOMETHING THAT COULD POTENTIALLY COME BACK IN THE FUTURE AND UM I WOULD HOPE SO. AFTER THE HOMEOWNER OBVIOUSLY JUST. JUST A QUICK FOLLOW UP THERE
[00:30:17]
LIKE CAN SOMEONE WHEREABOUTS IS THAT ON MAKE. IS THAT IS IT JUG AT THE VERY TOP. AT THE BOTTOM, OKAY? SO IT'S NORTH OF JUG. OKAY? BARN AND INFORM. OKAY? THANK YOU.QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS. I GUESS I'M JUST FOR CLARITY IN THE FUTURE. I GET THIS. IT'S 400 ACRES. IT DOESN'T HIT THE 500 NORMAL FOR CMD. IF THIS WERE, I DON'T KNOW. 10 MILES NORTH AND IT WERE STAND ALONE AND WE'RE ONLY 400 ACRES. WE WOULDN'T EVEN BE ENTERTAINING, RIGHT? IS A QUESTION. CITY. VIEW OF VALUE. GOTCHA. THANK YOU. TO MY THAT POINT, THOUGH I WOULD AGREE THAT THIS WAS COMPLETELY SEPARATE WAS UNDER THE 500 PROBABLY HAVE A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE. BEING CONNECTED IS WHAT MAKES IT MIGHT WONDER. THIS QUESTION'S FOR STAFF IN THE AREA THAT'S MARKED FOR THE AREA THAT IS ISLAND EFFECTIVELY. IT'S MARKED ON OUR ZONING MAP. A COUPLE SLIDES AGO AS METRO PARK IF YOU GO BACK TO THE ONE MORE. HAS THE COLOR BREAK OUT OF THE OKAY? THERE WE GO. THAT'S MARKED AS METRO PARK. YES SO IT'S, UH, IDENTIFIED AS METRO PARK RIGHT AT THE FRANKLIN LOOKING COUNTY LINE HERE, SO, UM , ENTIRELY WITHIN THE FRANKLIN COUNTY, WHICH ALSO CORRESPONDS WITH THE NEW OPENING PLAYING LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. THIS IS WHERE THE CITY IS IDENTIFIED AND EXPANSION OF THE PARKS. AND SO THERE IS UNDERLYING A BIT REDEVELOPED TO RESIDENTIAL. BUT THIS IS WHERE THE NEW ALBANY STRATEGIC PLAN RECOMMENDS AND EXPANSION OF THE OTHER THE METRO PARKS OR THE JOINT PARKS DISTRICT. THE OTHER ONE RIGHT? EXISTING RESIDENTIAL. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS RIGHT HERE. OH, I'M SORRY. SO THIS IS THE BERMUDA SUBDIVISION, SO THIS IS HATCHED AS BOTH RESIDENTIAL IN ORDER TO RECOGNIZE ITS EXISTING USE IT IT'S THE ONLY TRUE SUBDIVISION, I GUESS. BESIDES THE FITZPATRICK, ONE LOCATED HERE WEST OF BEACH, BUT IT'S HATCHED INDICATE THAT IN THE FUTURE THIS STRATEGIC PLAN THINKS THE MOST APPROPRIATE USE IS THE EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT STRATEGIC PLAN RECOMMENDS THAT IF IN ONE THE BERMUDA SUBDIVISION IS ANNEXATION, REZONED THAT IT SHOULD ALL BE AN ACTION REASON IS ONE LARGE PIECE INSTEAD OF LOCKED BY LOTS AND RECOGNITION OF THE HOMES WITHIN THAT PRIVATE SUBDIVISION. SO THAT IS, UM YOU KNOW THE ONE AREA WHERE IT IS RECOGNIZED AS RESIDENTIAL TODAY, BUT THE HATCHING INDICATES FUTURE EMPLOYMENT CENTER. THANK YOU.
WOULD THAT BE DIFFERENT THAN THIS PART OF THE BOTTOM THE YELLOW AT THE BOTTOM BECAUSE WITH THAT BE CONSIDERED TO BE NO DOUBT. VERY, VERY BOTTOM RIGHT THERE. HOW WOULD THAT BE DIFFERENT? OH SO THIS IS ACTUALLY PARK ZONE RIGHT HERE. UH IT'S YEAH, IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE. BUT I THINK THIS IS THE SAME GREEN. IF I'M NOT IN THIS TAKEN HAS THE GOLF COURSES AND THE PARKS WITHIN CITY, NEW ALBANY. THIS IS I BELIEVE A WETLAND PRESERVE AREA THAT'S LOCATED JUST NORTH OF MORRIS AND WEST OF THE TRUE ICE ARENAS RESIDENTIAL. THAT'S WHY I ASKED . YEAH I HAD TO TAKE A LOOK TO THANK YOU, STEVE. HOW MANY PROPERTIES ARE IN THE. DOWN NOSE
[00:35:03]
. ERROR. THEY WENT FROM THE PUBLIC KNOWING THAT THERE IS NO ONE IN THE PUBLIC. I MOVED TO ACCEPT THE STAFF REPORTS RELATED DOCUMENTS INTO THE RECORD. FOR ZONING CHANGE 1 35, NOTING THAT THE WE REQUIRE THE ENGINEERING REPORT THAT IT GOT STAPLED TO THE OTHER PART OF THE PACKET.BUT YOUR SECOND ON THE STAFF REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS. I'LL SECOND IT. AND DISCUSSION ON THE DOCUMENTS MOTION. THE ROLE, PLEASE. MR KIRBY? YES. MR LARSON? YES. MR SCHELL? YES. MS BRIGGS. YES MR WALLACE? YES. DO I HEAR A MOTION FOR THE ZONING CHANGE ITSELF? I'LL MOVE FOR A MOTION OF APPROVAL FOR APPLICATION Z C 135-202 2 BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND THE STAFF REPORT. WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. DO I HEAR A SECOND? SECOND. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION FOR THE ZONING CHANGE. THE ROLE, PLEASE.
MS BRITS? YES. MR SHELL. MR KIRBY? YES. MR WALLACE? YES. MR LARSON? YES. GOOD LUCK. DO WE
[VIII. Poll members for comment]
HAVE ANY OTHER BUSINESS? FOR MEMBERS FOR COMMENTS BRUCE DAVE. MARY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY HOLIDAYS UNTIL 2023 MY COMPLIMENTS TO WHOEVER DID THE LEADS. HAPPY HOLIDAYS, EVERYONE.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.