[I. Call to order]
          [00:00:03]
          MEMBERS. I'D LIKE TO CALL HER THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR MONDAY. MAY THE 1ST 2023, PLEASE. MR KIRBY, PRESIDENT. MR WALLACE PRESENT. MISS BRIGGS. HERE. MR. LARSON, PRESIDENT. MR. SCHELL, PRESIDENT. COUNCIL MEMBER BRISK. SHE IS ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER SHELF. HE IS 
          [III. Action on minutes: April 17, 2023]
HERE. THANK YOU. OUR THIRD ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE MINUTES FROM APRIL. 17TH I'D LIKE TO OFFER A CLARIFICATION. LOOKING AT PAGES FOUR AND FIVE. UM. CLARIFIED WITH PLANNING. MANAGER MAYOR THAT THE DISTANCE FROM THE EDGE WAS AT LEAST 50 FT. TO BE VERY SPECIFIC. THAT SHOULD ALSO SHOWS UP ON PAGE FIVE IN THE CONDITION. UM THAT DISTANCE BETWEEN THE CENTER LINE. THE CREEK. AND THE EDGE OF THE 25 FT EASEMENT AT THE PERIPHERY OF THE PAVEMENT. IS 50 FT OR MORE. WAS WHAT WAS AGREED TO IN OTHER WORDS, HALF HALF OF THE UM. CONSERVATION ZONE WAS ON THIS SIDE OF THE CREEK. CORRECT. AND OF THOSE CURVES WOULD BE BACK ON THAT CURB. BECAUSE WITH THE 25 FT EASEMENT, IT GETS EASY TO MISCONSTRUE. WHAT'S 25 FT. AND WHAT'S 50 FT FROM THE EDGE OF THE 25 FT EASEMENT, WHICH IS THE FARTHEST PIECE OF THING THAT IS PART OF THE ROAD. FROM THERE, THE CENTER LINE. ARE THERE ANY OTHER CORRECTIONS? I HEAR A MOTION FOR THE MINUTES FROM APRIL 17TH. TO PROVE THE MINUTES . MABEL 17 2023 2023 MEETINGS WITH THE CLARIFICATION. 
          CORRECTION. AS STATED. DO I HEAR A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT THANK YOU. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION OF THE MINUTES. THE ROLE, PLEASE. MR WALLACE? YES. MR LARSON? YES. MR SHELL. STAYING? I WAS NOT PRESENT. MISS BRIGGS. YES. MR KIRBY? YES. I HAVE FOUR VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE OF THE MIDST. AS CORRECTED. APRIL 17TH. THANK YOU. OTHER ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA. DO WE 
          [IV. Additions or corrections to agenda]
NEED TO DO ANYTHING WITH REGARD TO THE REQUESTED CORRECTION? PROBABLY A GOOD IDEA. DO THAT NEXT? YES. WAS IT SHIPPED OUT WITH ME IN ADDITIONAL CORRECTION TO THE AGENDA THAT WAS GOING SORRY. LET US ADD IT TO THE GENERAL. UM THE ITEM THAT WE'RE SPEAKING OF IS THE ONCE A. 
          CORRECTIONS IS PROBABLY NOT WHERE I WANT THE UPDATE TO THE MINUTES FOR APRIL, 3RD. WOULD SOMEONE CARE TO EITHER PRESENT THAT OR MAKE A MOTION. I WOULD JUST ASK THESE AMENDMENTS CORRECT MY MISINTERPRETATION OF WHAT WAS SAID AT THE MEETING. UM, AND THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS JUST SEEK TO CORRECT THOSE STATEMENTS. IN. IS THIS CLARIFICATION OR CORRECTION BASED ON YOUR LISTENING TO THE TAPE? DETERMINING THAT WHAT YOU HEARD ON THE TAPE IS MORE ACCURATE THAN WHAT YES, THAT'S CORRECT. AFTER REVIEWING THE REPORTING DETERMINED THAT, UM I HAD MISINTERPRETED A COUPLE OF STATEMENTS. AND THESE CORRECTIONS ARE INTENDED TO UPDATE THE MINUTE BECAUSE IT'S UNUSUAL FOR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. MEMBERS, FRANKLY. AND WHEN I SAW THE CORRECTIONS, I KIND OF. I KIND OF RECALL THE CONVERSATION BEING THE WAY THAT YOU READ IT DOWN. SO BUT ANYWAY, UM GIVEN GIVEN THE CLARIFICATION FROM SOURCE OF DON'T STOP. CHANGES TO THE APRIL 3RD MINUTES. I WOULD MOVE THAT WE FREE. THE. SUBMITTED CORRECTIONS TO THE APRIL 3RD 2023. DO I HEAR A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION ON THE THIRD CORRECTIONS. EITHER ROLL, PLEASE. MR WALLACE? YES, YES. MR KIRBY? YES. MR LARSON? YES. MR SCHELL? YES. I HAVE FIVE VOTES IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE APRIL 
          [00:05:04]
THREE MINUTES. THANK YOU. OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA? FROM STAFF. THANK YOU. WHAT? EVERYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION COMMISSION TONIGHT, PLEASE RISE. 
          YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, BUT THE TRUTH THANK YOU AND THERE'S ALL MAKE SURE OUR PHONES ARE SILENT. ITEM FIVE IS HEARING THE VISITORS FOR ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. DO WE HAVE ANY SUCH VISITORS? HEARING NONE WHEN WE WANT OUR FIRST CASE IS A REZONING ZONING CHANGE. 11 2023 
          [VI. Cases]
CAN HEAR FROM STAFF, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING STAFF. THIS IS, UH , REQUESTS FOR REZONING OF 1.76 ACRES LOCATED AT SIX. A HAWKS MORE FROM TWO D. FOR AN AREA KNOWN AS HAWKS MORE NORTH AND THEN DID. IN 2020. LOT SIX WAS REZONED TO IT. IT WAS APPROVED WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ESTABLISHES ENHANCED SETBACKS AND REQUIREMENTS. THE TRUE PRESERVATION ZONE, UM, WAS TO BE RELOCATED TO A NEW LOCATION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PARCEL. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REZONING IS TO ALLOW THE OWNERS OF LATIN FOR TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY WITH ACCESSORY STRUCTURES WHILE RETAINING THE ENTITLEMENTS TO CONSTRUCTIVE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN THE FUTURE. IN ADDITION, THE REZONING WOULD ALLOW ACCESSORY STRUCTURES STANDARDS TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE WITHOUT PRIMARY STRUCTURE INTO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, INCLUDING INCREASING THE MAXIMUM HYPER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, REMOVING THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, WHICH THE TEXT ALLOWS THAT THERE BE NO MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DETACHED GARAGES, OUTBUILDINGS. PATIOS PAID AREAS SHEDS AND OR POOL HOUSES USED AND CONSTRUCTED AND ANY OTHER SIMILAR IN NATURE. REMOVING THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FEET FOR EACH ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, WHICH THE TEXT STATES THAT THERE BE NO MAXIMUM AREA OR SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. AND THEY PLAN ON INCREASING THE SETBACKS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AS THE TEXT STATES TO ADD A NEW 50 FT. SETBACK TO THE EASTERN BOUNDARY LINE OF LOTS, XB AND THE WEST OF REYNOLDSBURG NEW ALBANY ROAD. THAT INCLUDES RELOCATING TREAT PRESERVATION ZONE FROM WHAT FORWARD TO THE PARCEL AS SEEN IN THE FINAL PLAN JUST COMING UP. AND THE PROPOSED TAX ROUTINES AND APPLIES ALL ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN MATERIALS AND STYLES FROM THE HAWKS. MORE NORTH REZONING TEXT TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN ADDITION TO THE FUTURE, SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE THE TEXT PROPOSES TO ALLOW ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS TO HAVE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 45 FT AND THE TEXT ROUTINES, THE MAXIMUM 45 FT BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL HOME FOUND IN THE EXISTING HAWKS. MORE ZONING TEXT. EVEN THOUGH THE PROPOSED EU DE TEXT ALLOWS FOR LARGER AND GREATER QUANTITY OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THAN THE CITY CODE ALLOWS. THERE ARE ALSO ENHANCED SETBACKS AND BUFFERS FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH. THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES CANNOT ENCROACH THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONES AND MUST FOLLOW THE SETBACKS AS THE PRINCIPAL DWELLING UNIT, THEREBY INCREASING THE SETBACKS. ADDITIONALLY DUE TO THE SHAPE OF THE LOT SIX A BEING A FLAG WATT. THERE ARE LARGER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES WILL BE POSITIONED BEHIND THE EXISTING HOME SO THEY WILL BE LESS VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC STREETS, MAKING THEM APPEAR SUBORDINATES SINCE THEY ARE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED TO THE REAR OF THE PRINCIPAL DWELLING UNITS. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED BY PC PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY DWELLING UNIT OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO ENSURE THAT THE DESIGNS ARE APPROPRIATE. AND IF IT'S SORRY ABOUT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THE STAFF CONTINUE TO TALK ABOUT THE FINAL PLAISANCE. IT IS CLOSELY RELATED AND DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS FINAL DEVELOPMENT POINT AS WELL. 
          GO AHEAD. THE FINAL PLAN FOR THE RELEASE OF DIVISION OF LAT, FOUR AND SIX A WILL BE IN THE HAWKS MORE SUBDIVISION AND GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HAWKS MORE DRIVE. SO FOR THIS APPLICATION. 
          IN 2015. THE LOT WAS REPLANTED. LOT SIX WAS REPLANTED TO ADD. A 0.6 ACRE PORTION OF THE EXISTING ULTIMATE PARCEL TO LOTS SIX, INCREASING THE SIZE TO 1.14 ACRES. NOW KNOWN AS LOT SIX, A. 
          ACCORDING TO THE HAWKS MORE NORTH PD AND LOTS FOUR AND FIVE HAVE BEEN COMBINED INTO A SINGLE 
          [00:10:05]
PARCEL IN 2022. THIS APPLICANT PROPOSES TO COMBINE LOTS FOR AGAIN, WHICH WAS ALREADY COMBINED WITH FIVE AND SIX A INTO A SINGLE PARCEL. THIS NEW SINGLE PARCEL WILL BE CALLED ABOUT SIX FT. AND IN ADDITION TO THAT, THEY'RE GOING ON RELOCATING THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE AND EASEMENTS ON LAT FORWARD TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF LOT SIX. THE APPROVAL OF THIS FINAL WILL INCREASE IN SIZE OF ONE LOT THAT ALLOWS MORE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES BUILT ON THE LOT SINCE LOT FOR IS DEVELOPED WITH A HOME IMPORT. SOME CHANGES TO KNOW IN THE FINAL PLATE INCLUDE THAT THE APPLICANT IS RETAINING AND KEEPING ALL PREVIOUS FONT FRONT SETBACKS AND THROUGH PRESERVATION COMMITMENTS AND APPLYING THE COMMITMENTS TO THE NEW PLANET AREA. THE EXISTING LOT FOR HAS A 30 FT. DRAINAGE EASEMENT, NO BUILD ZONE AND TREE PRESERVATION ALONG THE REAR, AND IT WILL BE REMOVED AND VACATED. THE NEW PARCEL FROM THE FULTON PARCEL IS PROPOSED TO HAVE A SIMILAR 30 FT WIDE TREE. PRESERVATIONS ELEMENTARY ENERGIES MEANT NO BILLS ON THE BACK LINE. THE PLAQUE KEEPS AND EXPANDS THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE ON THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE, AND IT HAS THE SAME NOTES AND RESTRICTIONS THAT EXIST TODAY. AS REQUIRED BY PREVIOUS PLATZ STAFF RECOMMENDS A NOTE IS ADDED TO THE PLANET REQUIRING THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE MARKERS BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF THE TROOP RESERVATIONS ON TO DELINEATE THE EDGE OF THE ZONE AND AVOID ADDITIONAL ENCROACHMENTS. TREE PRESERVATION OF TREE SURVEY RATHER WAS SUBMITTED IN 2015 AS PART OF THE APPLICATION FOR PREVIOUS PLAN UNDER LOT SIX THE EXISTING TREE PRESERVATION ZONE ON LATTE FOR IS ABOUT 5976 SQUARE FEET. THE PROPOSED NUTRIENTS TREE PRESERVATION ZONE IS ABOUT 6221 SQUARE FEET. NOT SURE OF IT. THE SURVEY SHOWED THAT THE PROPOSED TREATMENT PRESERVATION ZONE ON THAT SIX A HAS APPROXIMATELY 16 TREES THAT ARE SIX INCHES OR LARGER. THERE ARE FOUR ASHTRAYS JUST FOR A SECOND. CAN YOU DEMARCATE SIX? A SO SIX A IS THIS FLAG SHAPED A LOT HERE. ALL OF THIS SO THIS AND GOING DOWN. 
          SO THIS IS SIX A WHAT'S AND WHAT ? SIX B SIX B IS WHAT THE WHOLE NEW PARCEL WILL BE IS WHAT'S AS WELL WILL BE KNOWN AS SIX. A IS THIS AREA IN THE BACK THIS L SHAPED A LOT. THIS IS LIKE FOUR. 
          IT WAS COMBINED WITH FLAT FIVE AND SO WE IDENTIFY IT FOR THE FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITORS, AND IT'S JUST A LOT FOR SO WHAT FOUR AND FIVE CONVENTION HAVE BEEN COMBINED IN HIS IDENTIFIED JUST AS A LOT FOR AND THEN THIS PLANT WILL COMBINE SIX, A FOUR AND THE PREVIOUS FIVE INTO ONE LARGE LOT KNOWN AS SIX B. THERE ARE FOUR ASH TREES. TWO AND FAIR CONDITION AND 10 IN GOOD CONDITION. THE SURVEY ALSO INCLUDES A PORTION OF LOT FOR AND AS SHOWN THERE ARE AT LEAST EIGHT TREES THAT ARE SIX INCHES OR LARGER AND THERE ARE TOO POOR. TO FAIR AND FOR GOOD CONDITION TREES. SIMILAR TO THE 2015 EXPANSION OF LOT SIX DAYS PLANT. THE GOAL OF THIS FINAL PLAN IS TO RELOCATE THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE IN EASEMENTS TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE LOT. RELOCATING THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE IN EASEMENTS WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PLANET AREA. CURRENTLY LOVE FOR HAS THE TRUE PRESERVATION ZONE AND EASEMENTS LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF THE PLANET PROPERTIES. LOT 66 A. M FOUR. WHICH SPLITS THE PROPERTIES, THE PLANETARY PRESERVATION RESTRICTS DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANY KIND WITHIN IT. THEREFORE RELOCATING THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE AND EASEMENTS WORLD ALLOW FOR SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO BE CONSTRUCTED BETWEEN THE FUTURE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOME OR NOT, FOR AS PART OF THE PERMITTING PROCESS, THE CITY ENGINEER WILL REVIEW ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO THE REMAINING DRAINAGE EASEMENT. RUNNING THROUGH THE PROPERTY. AND STAFF CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. INTERVIEWING. THERE'S NO COMMENTS ON THE, UH, THE FIRST PORTION OF THAT READING. UM THE REZONING, UM AS FAR AS THE AS WAS STATED WE WILL REVIEW ANY TRAINING IMPACTS WITH 
          [00:15:05]
A COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSION BEFORE WE HEAR FROM THE UP AGAIN JUST I JUST SLOW CLARIFICATION, SO WE'RE GOING FROM TWO PARCELS. WHICH IS FOUR AND FIVE THAT GOT COMBINED. AT ONE BIG PERSON. THERE'S THAT IS CORRECT TO PUT IT IN SIMPLE TERMS FOR ME. BIG PARCEL. YEAH, BIG PARCELS SIX PLUS LOTS. FOREIGN FIVE. HERE SO THERE'S CURRENTLY A HOUSE THAT WAS KNOWN AS A LOT FOR THIS IS A LITTLE OUTDATED. THERE'S CURRENTLY A POOL CONSTRUCTED. 
          THERE WAS A VARIANCE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I BELIEVE LAST YEAR FOR THAT POOL TO BE LOCATED ON THE SIDE YARD INSTEAD OF THE REAR, AND SO THAT IS TAKEN UP THE ABUNDANCE OF THE DEVELOPERS SPACE IN LOS FOUR AND FIVE PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE REZONING AND THE FINAL PLATT COMBINES LOTS 64 AND FIVE IN ORDER TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TO BE BUILT ON LOT SIX TO SERVE THE HOME AND LOCK FOUR GOOGLE MAPS HAS A MUCH MORE CURRENT PICTURE SHOWING SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION. SO WHEN, WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN DON AFTER TWO LIVENESS. IF THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED, THERE'S GONNA BE ONE BIG LOT. WITH THE HOUSE THAT'S SITTING ON WHAT USED TO BE 54. OR BOARD. WELL, NO, IT USED TO BE FIVE UNTIL THEY FIND OR IT'S 500. ALRIGHT SO AND THEN WE'LL HAVE THE POOL AND THEN WE'LL HAVE A BUNCH OF OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. 
          WHATEVER THOSE ARE THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY ALL RIGHT NOW I'M CALLED A DRAINAGE UTILITY. ISN'T IT MIGHT HISTORY SORRY UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT THAT GOES ALONG THE BACKSIDE. BORN BY AND THROUGH. LOT 62 LEFT IN THERE IS THAT STILL UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT. SO THAT IS CORRECT. SO BACK IN 2015, THE PLANNING COMMISSION IMPROVED VERY MUCH THE SAME PLANNING REQUEST WHERE THERE WAS A TREE PRESERVATION ZONE AND THE BACK OF LOTS SIX AND A LOT ENDED RIGHT HERE SO THAT PROPOSAL ADDED THIS SQUARE SECTION AND PART OF THIS TOO LATER ON AND MOVED THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE THAT WAS HERE TO THE REAR OF THE LOT, AND IT'S A LITTLE HARD BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF LINE WORK. AND SO THAT CREATED WHAT'S KNOWN AS TODAY'S LOT SIX A. AND SO THERE WAS A BASICALLY A ONE FOR ONE TRADE. THE AREA OF THIS TREAT. PRESERVATIONS ALMOST MOVED TO THE BACK OF THIS AREA. AND SO THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND UTILITY EASEMENT REMAINS TODAY. 
          THIS PLANT WILL DO THE SAME. IT WILL KEEP THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE BACK OF THESE PROPERTIES, BUT LITTLE MOVE THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE TO THE REAR OF THIS LOT. SIX B, WHERE YOU CAN THINK OF IT AS NOW INSISTING LOT SIX A. WHERE THERE IS NONE TODAY SO VERY SIMILAR TO 1015. THAT'S APPROXIMATELY THE SAME AREA AS JUST BEING RELOCATED TO THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE NEW OVERALL LOT. AND THE REASON STATED FOR REMOVED, MOVING, RELOCATING THE TREE PRESERVATION ALLOWS TO MAKE IT BUILDABLE. BUT IF IT'S A UTILITY AND DREAMING, JESUS, IT'S REALLY NOT BUILDABLE ANYWAY. SO IT'S IT WOULDN'T BE BUILDABLE BUT BASED ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE PLATTE TODAY, AND THIS WAS AT CITY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THAT IT SAYS YOU CAN DO NOTHING WITHIN THIS TREE PRESERVATION ZONE, SO YOU CAN'T PUT ANY PAVEMENT OF ANY SORT. YOU REALLY CAN'T ENCROACH THIS OTHER THAN BURIED UTILITIES FOR ANY REASON. SO THE THINKING WAS, IF YOU'RE COMBINING ALL OF THIS INTO ONE LOT AND IF THERE IF THESE FEATURE ACCESSORIES STRUCTURES ARE SERVING THIS PRIMARY HOUSE IT WOULD BE NICE IF YOU COULD BUILD, YOU KNOW EITHER SIDEWALK OR PATH OR SOMETHING TO PROVIDE DIRECT CONNECTION. OTHERWISE, YOU'D HAVE TO LOOP AROUND THE EXISTING THREE PRESERVATION ZONE TO GET TO THE STRUCTURES THAT WOULD BE BUILT WITHIN THIS AREA ON THIS LOT. AND SO THIS ALLOWS FOR AND OUR EYES COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT. 
          OR YOU CAN JUST THINK OF IT MORE AS DIRECT ACCESS TO BECAUSE YOU ARE CORRECT TO BE NO DEVELOPMENT PER SE WITHIN THIS AREA, BUT THIS PLANT DOES ALLOW FOR PATHS AND PAVED AREAS FOR WALK ABILITY TO GO FROM FOUR AND FIVE UP TO THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE LOT UP HERE. FROM THE ENGINEERING POINT OF VIEW. MAYBE I'M JUST MISSING IT. IF YOU PUT SIDEWALKS AND STUFF DOESN'T THAT BLOCK THE DRAINAGE? SO AS MR WELFARE WHO'S OUR COMMUNITY ELEMENT ENGINEER, SO WE WOULD REVIEW THAT TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS STILL POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON THE LOTS. UM AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IF AND ONE THAT IS SUBMITTED. SO THE PLAN ALLOWS FOR THE ENGINEERING STAFF TO REVIEW THOSE PAVEMENT AREAS WITHIN THAT DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO ENSURE THERE'S NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS. AND THE OWNER WOULD NEED TO KNOW THAT IF FOR SOME REASON, UTILITIES NEEDED TO COME 
          [00:20:07]
THROUGH THERE THAT THEY WOULD NOT EVEN BE ABLE TO TURN THAT. YOU'RE TELLING COMPANY. AND THAT'S PART OF WHAT IT'S DONE. YES SO THAT IS RECORDED. THIS PLANT IS RECORDED WITH THE AUDITOR SITE, SO THAT BECOMES PART OF THE CHAIN OF TITLE SO IF THE PROPERTY OF THEM ARE SOLD, IT RUNS WITH THE PROPERTY. AND SO THAT WOULD BE PART OF THAT TITLE WORK. UM THAT WOULD BE GIVEN TO A NEW PROPERTY OWNER IF AND ONE THAT SHOULD EVER SELL. JUST A FEW QUICK QUESTIONS THAT MOVING THE TREE PRESERVATIONS. IS IT? TRYING TO TAKE THE HEALTHY TREES AND RELOCATING THEM. FORD, DO YOU PLANT NEW ONES? SO PLAN APPLICATION. I BELIEVE STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THERE BE ADDITIONAL TREES SUBJECT STEP APPROVAL PLANTED WITHIN ITS REALLY JUST WITHIN THE EASTERN PORTION. THE NUTRI PRESERVATION ZONE. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE ARE TREES WITHIN THE WESTERN PORTION OF THIS AREA. UM SO IT WOULDN'T MOVE ANY TREES, BUT IT WOULD ALLOW FOR THE TREES WITHIN THIS AREA TO BE CUT DOWN. UM AT THE ELECTION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THEN WITH THE NEW PRESERVATION ZONE, WOULD, UH REALLY EXTEND THE ENTIRE NORTHERN PORTION OF THIS OVERALL LOT SIX B AND SO WILL BE PROTECTED TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE ALONG THIS ENTIRE AREA IN ORDER TO BUFFER RESIDENTS TO THE NORTH. DESSERT REQUIRE LIKE PLANNING ONE FOR ONE THIS SIZE. 
          SO IT HAS NO REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE TEXT IT BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. AND THEN JUST AS A REMINDER TO THIS PROPERTY DOES HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEN BUILDINGS ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED, SO PART OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS MIDDLE IS A LANDSCAPE PLAN. UH SO CERTAINLY THE PLANNING COMMISSION COULD SEE A LANDSCAPE PLAN IN THE FUTURE TO SEE WHAT IS BEING PLANTED WITHIN THAT AREA TO THE NORTH. BUT WE DON'T HAVE THAT PLAN NOW. WE DO NOT. WE HAVE A TREE SURVEY BACK FROM 2015 WITH THAT PREVIOUS ACTUALLY THINK IT'S 2019 WHEN THERE WAS A REZONING HERE, SO WE KNOW WHAT IS WITHIN THIS AREA HERE. UM AND THAT'S HOW WE KNOW THAT THERE'S NOT TOO MANY TREES WITHIN THIS PORTION OF THE LOT. ROLL BACK TO YOUR GOOGLE MAP. OH, YES. THERE YOU GO. YEAH. YEAH. SO YOU CAN SORT OF SEE IT RIGHT HERE. THIS IS THE AREA WHERE STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT ADDITIONAL TREES BE PLANTED, UM, AT THE TIME OF FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEN DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. IN A MASS QUESTION. WE TALKED ABOUT BEING ABLE TO BUILD AND LIMITED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. IS THERE A GUARANTEE THERE'LL BE NO MORE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON ANY OF THE NEW PERIOD THAT WE'RE. COMBINING SO THERE'S NO GUARANTEE. UM BUT THE TEXT DOES REQUIRE THAT INFANT WHEN A THIS AREA ENCIRCLED AND RED THAT'S BEING REZONED IF THIS AREA UM IS THAT PRESSURE SHOULD SAY THIS AREA DOES RETAIN ITS ENTITLEMENTS TO HAVE A FUTURE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING NEEDED ON IT. AND THEN IF THAT SHOULD OCCUR. UM AGAIN, THIS WHOLE AREA IS BEING COMBINED. IT WOULD HAVE TO SPLIT OUT AGAIN. SO IT FOLLOWS THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS OF ONE HOUSE PER LOT FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT REQUIREMENTS. UM, SO BASICALLY AT THAT TIME, THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD HAVE TO SPLIT THE PROPERTIES AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY LIFE. BUT IT IS PERMITTED OR I SHOULD SAY IT IS INVESTED RIGHT THAT RUNS WITH THE PROPERTY AS PART OF THIS PED REZONING. THANK YOU. MANDY IN THAT PD PD. WHAT? WE JUST. COMMITTED INCLUDE THE ENTIRE LOT INSTEAD OF KEEP THAT SEPARATED BY ITSELF AND UNDERSTAND WHY A SECTION SEPARATED THE END GOAL IS TO HAVE ONE THEY LOST. YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, FROM THE UP AGAIN BECAUSE THAT MAY SHAKE FREE SOME MORE QUESTIONS. THERE WERE 11 THIS TIME. HIM TOO. 
          LOT OF FIVE HAS BEEN SWIMMING. THAT WOULD BE REDS AND SEPARATE . SO WE DID NOT. APPLICATION ME EVEN IS SOBER. WE DON'T WANT TO CHANGE DIFFERENT ZONES. BECAUSE THEY TEST STUFF. THEY ALSO. 
          FRANCES SO WE WANT TO KEEP THOSE MENUS. SO IT'S BEEN. THAT'S JUST RESORT. TRUST ME. AND I WISH 
          [00:25:14]
THEY WANT TO DO THESE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, TWO OF THEM. LARGEST STATE. SO, BASICALLY YOU. ARE YOU SURE? LIKE WE KEEP THOSE CELLS. UNDER THE RESULTING APPLICATION. WE ARE RESULTING ONLY THE EXISTING XXX. RECORDS. EXCITED DOES NOT ACTUALLY STUFF TWO PIECE THERE IS A. TO MAKE IT RIGHT THERE. I'M GONNA EXPLAIN ALL THESE COLORS FOUR INCH LINE. WE DON'T. OKAY? AND THEN THE PORTION THAT YOU SEE SORT OF GRAINS TOWARDS YOU ALL BEING IN THE MORNING EAST THAT IS A HOME 58 ACRE CHARGE. THAT IS NOT YET STORM. WITH AS WELL AS AN ADMINISTRATOR. RESTRICTIONS IF THE NEIGHBORS AND HOT FOR ALLOW US TO DO THAT. THE PLOT. YOUR SPEECH. THE DOCTOR. MEMBERS OF THE AGE OF. GETTING DOWN. THE STORY. SO THIS IS A LOCATED IN TERMS OF LEGAL ISSUES. SEVEN EXACTLY CATIONS TRIGGER RESULTS DOESN'T CARE. IT'S INVOLVED IN THAT HE SHOULD VERSUS THE PLAN. 
          THE LINKS AS WELL. THE WESTERN. BERMAN SOLD IN 2021. IN THE ZONE. PT KEEPING THAT SAYING, I THESE ARE NAME. FORMS UP THE WESTERN. SO THE EASTERN PARCELS CONTAINING ALL STARTING. AND WE TOOK THAT SAME LOVING TAX FROM 2021. AND WE CAN AGREE WITH EVERYTHING. YEAH, SUBSTANCE. FROM THE SANFORD HOUSE, WHICH WE'VE. ON THAT SIDE. YOU'RE SLEEPING WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL OVER THE SIDE WERE IN THEIR HOME. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS ON YOUR SESSION TYPE STRUCTURES, WHICH IS A VERY HIGH . UPS UM, SO ALMOST CERTAIN TAX AND NATIONAL HEIGHT AND SMARTLY CHAPS ALL PERTAINING TO CONTEMPLATED RESIDENTIAL CLUB. BUT WE'RE PUTTING THIS RESTRICTIVE. MARKETING STANDARDS , ARMORS STRUCTURES, SO ARCHITEH QUALITY. SUCH STRUCTURES, THINGS LIKE DETAILS OUT WILLING TO BE ATTACHED BLOCK. CERTAINLY. THERE COULD BE A NATIONAL WE WOULD NEVER MUCH OVERDUE LIKE OVER DEVELOP. WE COULD TALK. TALKING ABOUT IT. DOES I MEAN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. THIS REALLY LARGE POINTS SUCCEED. FOUR WOULD BE A PRETTY DECENT THAT SO I. THE BASIC MATH THAT JUST SHOWED WHERE WE WERE IN THE 2021. HAVE INITIALLY. 
          SO ALL OF THE YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS. ON MY BIG BOARD, BUT THE YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS ARE ALL THE NEW SETBACKS THAT WILL APPLY TO THIS PROPERTY, SO NOTHING IS DEVELOPED. YEAH THE YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED FOOTPRINT. IN ADDITION TO THAT, I HIGHLIGHTED IN P IS HE SAYING AREA? TODAY 
          [00:30:03]
FOR THE LAST FOUR OR FIVE AS A BILL. THREE PRESENTATION AREA, BUT NOTICE. HOW ABOUT YOU SAW? A LOT OF TRUTH SERUM EXISTING THERE WAS VERY FEW TREES IN THAT AREA TO BEGIN WITH. THAT WOULD BE SHIFTED UP. THE ENTIRE POINT WILL BE THREE PRESERVATION AREA. WHICH LIKE STAFF AND SUGGESTED. 
          NEVER SAY WHAT CONNECTIONS WITHIN THAT AREA, KEEPING. OF COURSE, WITH THE ENGINEERING OF CHILDREN IN THE BRAIN THAT STARTED IN THE AREA. SO IT REALLY IS MOVING. YOU CAN SEE. 
          AND HELPING WITH NEGOTIATIONS, PROPERTY OWNER TO THE MORTAL BACK IN 2021. THEY ASKED GROWTH 50 FT BUILDING SEPARATION FROM THE WEST FACADE OF THEIR BARRAGE DOWN SHORT. YOU PRESERVE VESSELS. OVER HERE. NO. FIGURE IT OUT. SERVICE OF HAVING TO LOOK AT THIS TEXT FROM 2021 I. IT WAS. SO YOU'LL SEE THAT IN THE ZONING TESTING YOUR APPLICATION UNDER TWO WEEKS. THOSE ARE RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE AND SHE WAS ALREADY IN ASSISTANCE TEST. AND THEN THE FIRST WE MADE REFINEMENTS FOR STAFF WORKING DILIGENTLY. AND AGAIN PRESERVED ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY PRESERVE. SO REALLY, THIS IS GOING TO BE A WONDERFUL WONDERFUL FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND THE CITY. WE ARE GOING TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. WE ALSO OF COURSE, WITH THE HAWKS MORE SUBDIVISION IN A WAY THAT'S NUMBERS NUMBERS FOR THE NEXT APPLICATION THAT I CAN TALK. 
          PLEASE KEEP THEM. JUST SCARED. HE HAS TO. SEPARATELY, WHICH CAN HAVE A HIGHER TRADITIONAL STANDARD OR THE SAME, BUT WE HAVE THE MOST RESTRICTIVE POLICY. WE ALSO WILL. REVIEW BOARD FROM PRIVATE ENTITY THAT HEARTS MORE STUFF VISION. HOUSING GOODS. UM SET OF RESTRICTIONS. SO WHAT? WE'LL BE DOING EVERYTHING WE WILL BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. AND NOW IT'S PRETTY MUCH SPEAKS TO THE APPLICATION AND ITS PURPOSE. AND I HAVE TO ADDRESS QUESTIONS ON THAT APPLICATION, AND I'M WONDERING IF WE COULD YOU WANTED. TO DISCUSS THE FLAT. ONE CAREFUL WORK. THERE'S SOME SORT OF PROCEDURAL QUESTION THE FIRST SIGHT OF THE TO DO THAT. WE'D LIKE TO HEAR BOTH OF THEM. AT THE VERY, VERY END. WE WILL SEPARATE THESE TWO SEPARATE ISSUES, BUT THEY ARE BEST HANDLED AS AN INTEGRATED WHOLE. QUICK QUESTION TO THE NEW PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS EXPECTED TO GO INTO THE HAWKS, MORE COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS. 
          YES. SNEAKERS IN THIS CRUMMY NOT HELPS MORE WILL NOW BE INCLUDED IN HOW SMART YEAH. IT'S MORE OF A SHORT LINK WOULD ACCEPT BECAUSE THEY WOULD ALSO HAVE TO SLIDE BY SO THAT'S THE SEQUENCE THAT THEY DON'T IF THEY DO NOT SIGN ON HALLOWEEN, PERHAPS WITH FEDERAL AND WE STILL HAVE A REZONING APPLICATION OF THE LIVE . BUT THERE ARE HIGH WOULD MOST LIKELY AND THEY DON'T COME BACK. 
          MAYBE THEY DO A REFUND FOR THE PARTS TOGETHER. AND THE REPLY TO THE LAST 68.58. SO INSTEAD OF ONE OF MY TUESDAY OR LAST TIME. THE BETTER. HANDLE THAT. IF THE OWNERS UM. I DON'T THINK ENGLAND NOT TALKED TO A FEW PEOPLE THAT I TALKED TO THE FORMER DEVELOPMENT. YEAH. LEAST SETTING UP MEETINGS. PEOPLE DISCUSS BALLOT MEASURES OF THE H O N ITS NUMBERS TO APPROVE OF THE MEASURE. OPERATION TO ADD ADDITIONAL PROPERTY. SO AGAIN, A LOT OF THE LOWER TO BE DONE 
          [00:35:04]
BEFORE ANY OF THIS CAN BE FINAL AND IS THERE EVER BEEN ANY LAND BROUGHT INTO HAWKS MORE RESISTANT? YES, IF. THE OTHER. EVERYTHING NORTH OF THE REGULAR LOT LINE WAS BROUGHT IN. CAPTAIN LARKSPUR STARTED. EXCUSE ME, REBECCA. WOULD YOU MIND JUST HOLDING THE MIC? YOU CAN TAKE IT, RIGHT? YEAH. SO THIS IS A RECORDED INSTRUMENT AND RECORDS . THIS IS THE INSTRUMENT NUMBER . THIS IS WHAT IT WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE TODAY, THE RECORDING DATE. THIS IS A LOT 68 TODAY, SO YOU SHOULD JUST BE HERE. WITH THE NOBEL ZONE HERE IN THE TREE PRESERVATION HERE. EXPANDED THAT WAS NOT. IN ADDITION, THIS SPOT. OUR REGULAR VACATED THIS SECTION OF TREE PRESERVATION. THIS IS DOING IT'S TALKING ABOUT WORK. CONSISTENT WITH WHAT? SO THIS IS WHAT EXISTS TODAY. IS WHAT I WANT TO DO. WHICH SALARY TALK TO YOU ABOUT THIS? BUT 35 AGAIN A AND BOSTON COMEDY. REASON WHY IS FIRST TWO DIFFERENT ZONING TEXTS? ORDINANCES. PROBLEMS ALREADY, AND WE WANT TO KEEP IT SIMPLE. THIS IS ALL LEGAL HAVING A REALLY FLATTERED PROPERTY FOR PLANNING PURPOSES IN A SUBDIVISION IS A PRIVATE ISSUE. REFILE TYLER. SHE WAS FIGHTING AGAINST YOUR SUBDIVISION ISSUE. 
          BUT YOU'RE DESERVING, ALWAYS REGULATED DIFFERENTLY. LOST FOUR AND FIVE. SO. FROM THE OTHER PERSON BECAUSE I HAVE THIS NOW, RIGHT HERE. SOMETHING OUT OF THAT STUFF. WE HAVE ACTUALLY YOU LOOK AT IT. APPLICATION. THE ORDINANCE, NOT FOR THIS. SOMETHING THAT PERTAINS 45. AND YOU HAVE IT'S OVER. ON THIS SECTION, SO IT'S A GOOD ADMINISTRATIVE POOL. THAT LATER, PERFECT STYLE. YOU KNOW WHAT SO MANY ORNAMENTS WILL APPLY. ANSWERING QUESTIONS. TO HAVE A HANDFUL OF IT SO IT'S ENVISIONED FOR THE. THIS PLAN HAS TWO MASTERS. ONE IS A LARGE WHAT? YES, FUTURE. VISION AS TO LOTS. I WOULD SUGGEST THE WRONG TERMS. WOULD BE THEIR VISION. THIS IS OUR THOSE PLANS. THEN HOW DO WE PUT A SECOND HOUSE ON HERE WITHOUT IT? BREAKING THE ONE HOUSE PER LOT. SWIMMER. ZOMBIE. MARCUS SAID. OBSERVING REGULATIONS STANDARDS FOR ANY PROBLEM. HELPS. AND STANDARDS DENSITY. HOW MANY RESIDENTS BLOWING MENTALITY SOCIAL UNITS? STANDARDS. AND EVERYTHING IN THE CHEST. TRUE. SILENT. IN THE LIVING ROOM. BECAUSE. WE ARE ASKING FOR THIS STUDY. TO REMEMBER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL SO WE CAN STILL PUT. JAMES. BUT IF WE DO, WE ARE REACHING ABOUT ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. 
          SENSORY STRUCTURES WITH NO RESIDENTIAL. ENFORCEMENT INTERPRETATION. IT'S ONLY. WAIT 72 16 YEARS FROM THIS SOMETHING HERE, RIGHT? PEOPLE ALSO LAW IF YOU WILL, BECAUSE THE PROBLEM. 
          DESCRIBED BY LEGAL DESCRIPTION, MEATS AND TOWNSPEOPLE DESCRIPTION THAT WE PROVIDED THAT APPLICATION. TEST. SO THAT IS YOUR FOR ZILLION PURPOSES, AND THAT IS YOUR ZONING DISTRICT . BLOOD GO AHEAD QUICKLY BECAUSE WE WORKED WITH THE APPLICANTS. THERE'S ALSO PROVISIONS IN THE TEXT THAT REQUIRES THAT LOT TO BE BASICALLY SPLITTING IN OR SUBDIVIDED AGAIN, IF AND WHEN 
          [00:40:04]
THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THERE, SO IT WILL CONFORM TO THE CITY'S GENERAL STANDARDS OF ONE HOUSE PER LOT PER THE BEAUTY ZONING TEXT IF AND WHEN AT HOME SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ON WHAT IS NOW A LOT 68. THIS ENVISIONS AS A LARGE COMBINED LOT. MULTIPLE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN ONE RESIDENCE. AND IF SPLIT A SECOND. PRESIDENT IS ALLOWED. 
          THAT'S CORRECT. THAT WAS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. DID THAT ATTACHED TO COMPANY SUGGESTION OF STAFF. FOR THE. RELATED TO THE TEST. BUT KEEP IT IN MIND. LOCATIONS. THAT IS DESCRIBED YOUNG PATIENT SO IT'S THE COMBINED SIX B SIX B NOT COMBINED GOT REZONED. YES B IS THE PROPERTY IN MIND AND QUESTION. YOU'RE LOOKING AT A RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS AND ALL OF A SUDDEN TEST REQUIREMENTS OF THIS IPTV TEST. TO PLAY. MOVIE TEST DOES NOT CONTROL THEY HAVE THEIR OWN TESTS. SO THE BLOCK IS REALLY KNOW WHAT THAT WAS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE ZONING APPLICATION. TO ACCOMMODATE THE CITY. WE'VE AGREED THE LANGUAGE THAT WE ARE GOING TO RESIDENTIAL PLACE A WEEK NOW. TO BRING THE PIECE FOR THE CITY TO ADMINISTER. THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTS. HOW DOES THAT JIVE WITH THE. RE SUBDIVISION REQUEST WHERE IT'S SAYS HERE GOING TO COMBINE LOTS FOREIGN 16 TO A SINGLE PARCEL. RIGHT? BECAUSE THE CITY STAFF. TO HELP CLIENTS ONE FROM WHAT IS ZONING PROPERTY TO HAVE WELL. THIS IS OUR. WHATEVER THE DATA, IS THIS OR THIS THIS PROPERTY AND QUESTIONS. SOMETHING, BUT I'M TALKING ABOUT. HOW MANY DOGS DO YOU HAVE THIS PLANET SUBDIVISION? WE'VE REDUCED A LOT. 68 ONE. PROVIDING SEXUAL BECAUSE 60. CLASSIFICATIONS TO GIVE MYSELF TAPS. BECAUSE OF FATHER'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT. THIS IS THE CASE WHERE ONE PARCEL WILL HAVE MULTIPLE ZONING DISTRICTS. CORRECT. IF WE WANT PERSONAL. EDUCATIONS. THIS IS BIGGER. LET ME GET A FASHION WISE. THE DISTRICTS ARE AND THAT'S THERE TO USE ONLY THAT'S BECAUSE THOSE NEEDS AND POLICY DESCRIPTION SERVICES. IT'S TOTALLY LEGAL. EVERYTHING. YEAH THERE IS NOTHING IN OUR CODE, IT SAYS YOU CAN'T HAVE TWO ZONING DISTRICTS ON ONE PARCEL. IN FACT, THAT DOES EXIST TODAY AND OTHER SECTIONS OF THE COUNTRY CLUB AND THE WAY THAT IS RECORDED WHEN WE UPDATE OUR OFFICIALS, ZONING MAP THAT DOES FOLLOW THE MEATS AND BOUNDS. SO OUR OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WILL SHOW THIS ONE PARCEL WITH THE TUESDAY DISTRICTS OVER IT. I UNDERSTAND THAT LEGALITY IF YOU'RE HAVING TO ZONING DISTRICTS ANYWAY. COUNTRIES ALL THE STUFF YOU WANT TO DO THAT REPLANTING. THEY WANT TO. A PERSON. IMAGES. FOR YOU COULD DO THAT AND JUST ADD IT TO LIGHT SIX RIGHT TO EVERYTHING. AND WINE. FIRST THIS PIECE. IT'S A THESE 300. TO PURCHASE A 0.58% EXTENDS EAST OF IT. SO. BUT THE ISSUE MORE YEAH. INTO THAT. AND WE'RE CREATING A NEW MORE LIKE THIS. SO YOU GUYS NECESSARY AS WELL. OPERATION. LITERALLY ADD ADDITIONAL PROPERTY. THAT IS PRETTY PLANETS MANDATED TO 
          [00:45:08]
COMBINE THIS WITH SIX. IT'S NOT NECESSARILY MANDATED. COMBINE IT WITH THE 45. UM. THAT HELPS BRIGHTEN UP TOUCHED LOTS FOR THE FIRE. IDEA. WITH SIMPLE THANK YOU THAT YOU. SO IT WAS JUST THEIR GOALS. THAT REALLY PUSHED THAT. TO REPLAY IT IS NECESSARY TO BRING IN THE HALF ACRE COMBINATION IS NOT. TO BRING IN THE HALF ACRE. IT HAS TO BE REPLANTED, SUCH AS PART OF TALKS MORE, YES. THE COMBINATION OF THE NEW SIX AND 45 IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE MATTER OF CONVENIENCE. YES. TO MAKE SURE. PLUS SOME ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, PLUS MINUTES, PROCEDURES ARE ADHERED. QUESTION FOR STAFF. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE SECONDARY STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED TO BE? AS LARGE AS THESE ARE ENVISIONED TO BE. NO SO THE LARGEST. OUR CODE ALLOWS THIS 1600 SQUARE FEET FEW YEARS AGO, WE UPDATED OUR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES CODE. IF YOU RECALL ME PUT IN A TIER SYSTEM, SO IF YOU'RE LESS THAN AN ACRE IN SIZE, YOU'RE ALLOWED UP TO 800 SQUARE FEET. IF YOU'RE BETWEEN ONE AND TWO ACRES, YOU'LL HAVE 1200 SQUARE FEET AND IF IT'S TWO ACRES OR MORE THEN YOU'RE ALLOWED A TOTAL OF 1600 SQUARE FEET PER ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. SO THE DEFAULT CODE THE WAY THAT PROPERTY IS ENTITLED NOW THEY CAN HAVE UP TO TWO QUANTITY IN EACH ONE BEING 1600 SQUARE FEET, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY. WE HAVE A HEIGHT LIMIT. THERE IS A HEIGHT LIMIT. CURRENTLY IT IS BELIEVE 25 FT. FOR ALL TYPES OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. SO IT HAS HAS WRITTEN. THIS SELLING TAX WILL ALLOW ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AS LARGE AS PRETTY MUCH ANY OF THE HOUSES OF TALKS MORE THAT IS CORRECT. THAT WAS JUST TO BE AS FLEXIBLE AS POSSIBLE AS WELL. ONE WHICH HAPPEN. 45 WHICH ALSO NO, NOT SORRY. YEAH, SO WE WERE KEEN. OUR SENSORY STRUCTURES OF HIGHER TYPICAL TYPE STRUCTURES, SO I THINK THE PRODUCT IS ABLE TO WHAT WE WANT. STANDARDS. HIMSELF. NOW KEEPING. CONSTRUCTION ROLE USING NO FUTURE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SO THIS COULD BE VACANT. 12 YEARS. 15 YEARS JUST FROM LITTLE THINGS. CONSTRUCT HAPPY WITH THE HIGH ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS THESE SIZE IS THE ONE THAT WORKING THROUGH OKAY, UM. IN HYPER ANSWER FOOTAGE OR YES, YES , 45 FT A LOT. I DON'T KNOW THAT ANY EXISTING HOUSES IN HARTMAN IT 45 FT. 23 STORIES AND A LOT OF ROOF. YOU CAN. YOU CAN EASILY 15 FT OF STORY, WHICH IS HUGE. THAT'S THREE. AND TO SEE JUST WE COULD OFFER. TYPICAL 2.5 STORY, 35. CANNOT BE THE THAT WOULD LOVE TO. I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THAT RUN THROUGH STAFF. THE THIS IS A BEAUTY, AND IT IS AND HIS ORIGINALLY BROUGHT FORTH. IT WAS BROUGHT FORTH WITH ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE DRAWINGS, BUT WE HAVE TO GO CHECK THE RECORDS. WE MOST OF US HAD A PRETTY GOOD IDEA WHAT WAS GOING ON THE HAWKS MORE HOW TO GET IT CONSISTENT. YEAH. 
          ALONG WITH THAT. SEPARATE QUESTIONS RELATED. WHERE WOULD THE SECOND DWELLING UNIT GO? GO IN? THE CLASSIC LOT SIX. WOULD IT GO TO THE NORTH AND THE NEW PART. I MEAN TEXT, WHICH WE USE THE SAME LANGUAGE WOULD PERMIT SINGLE FAMILY. TO FACE HER TALKS MORE AND THE CREATION. DOWN IN 
          [00:50:05]
THIS AREA. BUT IT WENT OFF. YEAH WESTERN FACING ORIENTATION. TO NOT PEOPLE. MAYBE 2021. BEFORE THE WAR. PROBABLY SLOT IN WEST NOT SURE I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S TRUE. YES. LOCAL STYLE TO BE HERE. IF IT'S WESTERN, BASING, IT HAS TO BE UP HERE. I SUSPECTED. YEAH. YOU WANT HER? HMM. JUST A CRISIS DOESN'T UH, I DO HAVE A QUESTION. I'M STILL A LITTLE LITTLE UNCLEAR ON ALL THIS, BUT UM SO. LAST YEAR, WE APPROVED VARIANCE TO ALLOW SWIMMING POOLS IN A SIDE YARD. 
          BECAUSE THERE WAS NO ROOM BEHIND IT. BEHIND THAT, BUT STRUCTURED TO BUILD. NOW WE'RE NOW WE'RE GETTING AN APPLICATION THAT SAYS THAT THE OWNER OF FOUR AND FIVE IS NOT GOING TO BUY ALL THE PROBLEMS BEHIND THEM. WHICH WOULD HAVE BOOTED OUT THE NEED FOR A VARIANCE FOR A SIGN OF OUR SWIMMING. IS THERE ANY MAN? HOW DOES THAT WORK WHEN THE NEED FOR A VARIANCE? GETS BOOTED OUT BY SUBSEQUENT EVENTS WHERE THE OWNER. WHERE THE SAME OWNER NOW IS GOING TO OWN THESE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 17 YOU KNOW WHAT I'M ASKING, AND I DON'T THINK THAT MAKES WHAT'S HAPPENED. 
          SUBSEQUENT MAKES ANY DIFFERENCE TO THE VARIANTS COULD TAKE THE VARIANCE AT THE TIME. IT COMES SO BASED UPON THAT THE VARIANCE IS WHERE IT IS. COULD WIN COULD WE MAKE AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST THAT THE SIDE GUARDS SWIMMING POOL BEING REMOVED? REYNOLDS FINISHED . WELL, THEY MAY WANT TO STOP. UM WELL, WE FIGURED THIS OUT. YEAH I DON'T KNOW. I'M JUST WONDERING BECAUSE IT'S THIS WHOLE THING IS BOTHERING ME THAT I'M NOT SURE. ONCE THE VARIANCE IS GRANTED THE POOLS BUILT, YOU COULD HAVE THEM. PULL THAT OUT. MOVING AT THAT POINT, WE WOULDN'T BE BE. WE WILL BE PULLING IT OUT AS A BECAUSE OF THE VARIOUS APPOINTED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS OTHER SEPARATE REQUEST. YOU SERIOUS? SO YEAH, I'M ABOUT YES, BUT BUT YOU WOULD HAVE TO AGREE TO THE CONDITIONS SO YOU WOULD BE A GREEN. YOUR CLIENT WOULD BE A GRANGER PAUSE. CONDITION OF GETTING MONEY WANTS HERE, WHICH WE DON'T HAVE TO GIVE. YOU THINK AS YOU GO DOWN THAT ROAD DEAL WITH THAT VARIANCE BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY BEEN APPROVED. UM I WOULDN'T. I WOULDN'T GO CHANGING THAT AND STARTED IMPROVED. QUESTION FOR STAFF WHEN WE GET PROVEN, YOU D DO WE NEED TO HAVE A VERY LAYOUT? WHAT'S INTENDED ON THERE OR NOT? I'VE SEEN THAT IN THE PAST AND SOME DEVELOPED SO AS FAR AS I GO, I, P D, UM REZONING GOES, THEY DON'T HAVE TO SHOW WHAT COULD BE DEVELOPED . IT INCLUDES JUST A SUBDIVISION MAP AND STANDARDS THAT USUALLY TAKES THE FORM OF A P U D TEXT. UM SO CERTAINLY THROUGH THE TEXT , AND THROUGH THIS SUB AREA MAP , THAT IS WHAT CODE REQUIRES AS FAR AS THE ENVISIONING GOES, BUT THAT'S ALSO WHY THERE IS A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. SO WHILE IT'S NOT REQUIRED TODAY, UM IT IS REQUIRED IN THE FUTURE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, SO IN FACT, THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS DETAILED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, LANDSCAPING. HARDSCAPE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE ABLE TO REVIEW SORT OF THE APPLICATION, OR I SHOULD SAY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STONING TEXT AT A FUTURE MEETING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. I MEAN, I WOULD BE ABLE TO OPINION THAT WE SHOULD LIMIT THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS WITH A LOT. I HEARD TO YOU WELL, TWO BUILDINGS AT THE 25 FT AND THEN WHEN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT BANKING WE WOULD HAVE THE DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW FAR AND HOW BIG IT IS BECAUSE IT'S HARD TO HAPPENING TO GIVE LIKE BRIDE. APPROVAL FOR SOMETHING YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE IT. THOSE THIS IS. PLACE 76 ACRES, WHICH WOULD BE SO DIFFERENT FROM ONE. 20 FT BY 60 POINT SIZE LOT. SO IT'S 65 1 20. UM, AND SHE WAS SO THREE STRUCTURES OUT OF THE CAR. I THINK THE. YOU KNOW, SHIP TO SAY TO SENSORY STRUCTURES ON THIS LOT. IS THE VARIOUS ENTITLEMENTS ENTITLEMENTS FOR A HOME WE HAVE TO SEND HOME. I'M SORRY TYPE YOU'VE GOT AND REQUESTED THAT 
          [00:55:06]
THE ENTITLEMENT FOR HOME STAY. WE MUST ASSUME THAT IT WOULD BE HOME AND THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. YOU COULD HAVE SEEN THEM PLANTS PLANT. WHERE WE WOULD HAVE STUCK WITH 21 TEXT AS IT WAS WRITTEN. THAT IS NOT GO AHEAD. SURE COMING. I WOULDN'T ASK IF WE COULD INCREASE THE ABSOLUTE NUMBER OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ON THIS 1.726 ACRE TRUCK. BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE THAT'S NOT PLANS, BUT IT COULD. IN THE FUTURE. IF SOME PUT THAT ON. BUT IF THEY DID IF SOMETHING FIRST THEY HAVE TO RE CLAP. TO NOW THEY'RE STUCK WITH TWO ACCESSORY STRUCTURES BECAUSE THEY JUST GOT PRIMARY CUSTODY OF WELDING. IN THIS TEXAS. WE'VE WRITTEN IT. DOESN'T DEAL WITH THAT SITUATION. DEFAULT TO COAST STANDARDS ARE SITUATION THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH THIS ACCESSORY TYPE STRUCTURES. THAT'S OUR LEUKEMIA. AND WE WANT AT LEAST FOUR, BUT WE HAD ENOUGH LIMITED NUMBER IN THE PAST, SO I LEAVE WILLING ASK OR REQUEST THAT MORE VISIBLE BECAUSE THEN YOU COULD HAVE ONE IN THE LOT. SIX BODIES. THING TWO IN THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST ONE. 
          THAT LOOKS LEGITIMATE TO ME. BASED ON THE SUPPORT INTO AREA. AND WHERE WOULD LIKE FOOTPRINTS WOULD BE BASED ON THE YELLOW SETBACK. SO THAT THAT WOULD BE THE REQUEST FOR TRACK. YES MY ONLY CONCERN WITH THE FOUR I GUESS. IDEALLY, YOU COULD PUT FOUR ON THE TOP RIGHT HAND PORTION 1234 STILL LIVING ROOM FOR ANOTHER. HUGE SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU'VE GOT WHAT'S THE TOTAL ACRES ON THAT TOP PORTION? 1.726 SO THEN YOU POTENTIALLY COULD HAVE A LARGE STATE SIZED HOUSE AND FOUR STRUCTURES WITH NO LIMIT OF SIZE, YOU COULD GOBBLE THAT UP PRETTY QUICK. IT'S ONLY TAX THOSE SOON AS A RESIDENTIAL DRAWING. IT'S BUILT ON MONSTERS. 
          THE WE ARE RESTRICTED TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. THEY WANT TO BUILD. OPPORTUNITY OF THE TEXT. SO TINY IS EVERYTHING. WE DON'T WANT TO ORDER DEVELOP THIS PART. BUT IT ISN'T VAST AREA, YOU KNOW. IF YOU LOOK AT JUST 14% OR EVEN MONTHS. THOSE PRIMARY AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE FOOTPRINT. YOU GET THAT IDEA OVER HERE? I THINK IF YOU SAID FOUR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, THAT'S. PLUS, WE HAVE ALL THOSE SERVICES. YOU HAVE THAT ONE. IN THE CURRENT ZONING. THERE IS A SIZE LIMIT FOR THIS CENTURY STRUCTURE. AND. IT ISN'T LIKE HOUSE STRUCTURE. THE CASH GARAGE, SO THAT COULD BE BUT IT IS FIGHTS. THAT'S WHY WE WANTED IT FLEXIBLE. THE CITY BEFORE ANYTHING. CONSTRUCTED FOR APPROVAL. YEAH. WE ALSO TO TAKE THOSE PLANS TO THE HOPS MORE ANGEL WAY, AND THEY HAVE AND THEY ARE THE NEIGHBORS SUPPOSED TO SO DON'T BE KEEPING A KEEN EYE ON THAT WILL DEFINITELY GET TO MAKE SURE AND KEEPING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. LET ME GO BACK TO MAKE SURE I HEARD SOMETHING RIGHT? SO IF A PRESIDENT GETS BUILT ON HERE THEY WILL BE RESIDENTS, PLUS TWO STRUCTURES. IF THERE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE STUDY YET, UH, PLAYER REIMBURSED MHM BACK TO THE DEFAULT STANDARDS OF. THAT SHE WAS HISTORY STRUCTURES BECAUSE OF PRIMARY MOMENTS A PRIMARY USE IN THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THE ACCESSORY USE. BUT I BELIEVE IT'S OUR CLIENTS WERE TO BUILD THE PRIMARY HOME. AND START BUILDING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. 
          [01:00:04]
THOSE PREGNANT USE. FOR EXAMPLE, DISTRICT OKAY, I HAVE A THAT THAT BEGS ANOTHER QUESTION OR FLIPS IT TO ANOTHER QUESTION IF THERE IS MORE THAN THREE UH, ACCESSORY. STRUCTURES. WOULD YOUR CLIENT BE WILLING TO DECLINED TO BUILD A HOME. IF YOU BUILT A HOME FIRST WOULD GET TO ALRIGHT, SO IT'S BUILDING THREE STRUCTURES, THE SIGN THAT SAYS I DON'T NEED THE HOME. EXCEPT FOR THIS POSSIBILITY TO REALIZE THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. IT IS ANOTHER POSSIBILITY , SAY, BURDEN. PARTY BUYER BIASES, COPYING 40 YEARS, MR AND MRS WELL, HE NEVER KNEW AT THIS TIME THEY WERE GOING TO SELL THE FAMILY. BUT LET'S SAY THEY SUFFER. PERSON WANTS TO PUT THE STRUCTURES AND PRIMARY HOME. OR DO WHATEVER THEY WANT WITH IT, BUT SO LONG AS IT'S SO THAT KIND OF GOES ALONG WITH WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, YEAH, I THINK OUR CLIENTS REALLY LIMIT. STRUCTURES ACCESSORY TYPE STRUCTURES IF THEY WEREN'T GOING TO. CREATE MASTER FOUR STRUCTURES TOTAL. 
          NO, I WAS THINKING THAT, UM WE'VE WE'VE SEEN EVEN IN THE COUNTRY CLUB WHERE PEOPLE TRY TO PUT MORE THINGS AND FIT ON THE LOT, AND THIS HAS AS AS WRITTEN . IT HAS AN UNLIMITED NUMBER OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. AND THEN WHEN WE'RE DONE WITH ALL OF THOSE, WE PUT A HOUSE ON IT. 
          OKAY AND I DON'T FIND THAT PALATABLE. UM SO. IF IT HAD BEEN DONE. IN THE OTHER ORDER, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A HOUSE AND TWO AS THE ENTITLEMENT ONCE YOU PUT THE HOUSE THERE FIRST. AND SO WHAT I'M ASKING IS THERE A POINT AT WHICH YOU SAY IF WE BUILD ANOTHER STRUCTURE, WE NO LONGER HAVE THE ABILITY TO BUILD THE HOUSE. YES I THINK THEY ARE YOU SAYING RESTRUCTURES FOR SO THAT WOULD BE LIKE PRIMARY. TO ASSESS THAT WOULD FIT UNDER THE OLD WAY. YEAH. TWO. TALK ABOUT MAKING ME AND. IT'LL BE A IT'LL BE A CONDITION OF THREE STRUCTURES TOTAL. WE COULDN'T CALL IT. CENTURY STRUCTURE ABOUT THREE STRUCTURES. WHEN YOU COMFORTABLE WITH THEM. I'M STILL WORKING OUT. I? YES EFFECTIVELY BECAUSE YOU'RE BASICALLY SAYING LOTS SIX CLASSIC AND THE TWO HALVES EACH ARE BIG ENOUGH FOR A BUILDING. ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT HORRENDOUS NUMBER OF TREES WOULD GO AWAY. UM, BUT THAT'S WHY WE DON'T HAVE CONTROL OVER THAT. SO I WANT TO JUMP IN ABOUT LOT SIX. SO, UM, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT. SO FIRST OF ALL, KEEP ME HONEST HERE, SO YOUR CLIENT ALREADY OWNS LOT SEX? NO, THEY FOUR AND FIVE. OKAY SO THEY'RE IN IN CONTRACT FOR LOT SIX. AND THEN LOTS SIX B. AT THE TIME AT THE TOP IS NO LONGER SHIP. IT'S SIX A IT INCLUDES THAT TOP PIECE. BECAUSE OF THOSE GONNA BE RIGHT THERE. YEAH FAVORITE NOW. ONE OF MY SIX EGGS. ON THE SAME IT SEEMS SO HARD. SO THEY DON'T OWN SIX. I AS A AS OF THIS MOMENT IN TIME. AND I KNOW ABOUT THE 60 BECAUSE WE TALKED ABOUT THAT EARLIER. THAT'S THE PIECE THAT'S FURTHER EAST. NORTH OR NEXT TO IT. I CAN SEE IT ON. YEAH. SO WHAT I'M STRUGGLING WITH IS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO LOT SIX. IS THERE GOING TO BE? YEAH IS THERE GOING TO BE THE LOT HERE THAT FACES HAWKS MORE? THIS LOT HERE. THIS IS VERY DIFFERENT FOR ME THAN THIS. SO THIS FACES AND OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A POOL HERE, BUT THERE'S OTHER SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE HERE. THERE'S OTHER SINGLE FAMILY FAMILY RESIDENTS AROUND THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT. LIKE WHAT'S THE PLAN? THERE IS THAT IS THAT IS THE PLAN FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME. IS THERE A PLAN FOR A FULL HOUSE. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO FLUSH OUT BECAUSE I THINK THAT AGAIN IS VERY DIFFERENT THAN THIS. SORT OF PLAN. ASSESSMENT TYPE STRUCTURES. HOUSE. DIFFERENT 
          [01:05:06]
THINGS. ACCESSORY USES IN THIS INDUSTRY TYPE STRUCTURES ON THIS ENTIRE. 
          SO HOW'S NATURALIZED GARDEN TYPE FEELING? THE FIRST SUBDIVISION. SO AND I KNOW YOU'VE INDICATED THAT YOU'RE IN THE PROCESS OF SPEAKING WITH OTHER NEIGHBORS WITHIN HAWKES MORE AND SO ARE EARLY SIGNS AND INDICATE SUPPORT FROM OTHER NEIGHBORS WITHIN HAWKES MORE FOR A POOL HOUSE TYPE STRUCTURE ON LOT SIX. A. IT DOESN'T SPEAK FOR THE BETTERMENT THIS POINT PERSON MEETINGS WITH DEVELOP. THE FORMER WAREHOUSE MORE AND. JOURNALIST SUPPORTIVE ACTUALLY, ONE BLESSING. AS FOR MEETING WITH. HMM. ELABORATION OF. AS WELL AS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FULL. HOWEVER, IT CAN'T BE APPROVED ANYWAY. THEY DON'T GET TOO MUCH. BUT AND THERE IS A ISSUE. A SORT OF A TITLE. ISSUE ON THIS COMPANY, AND WE HAVE TO CLEAR THAT WITH AND PURCHASED THE PROPERTIES TO DO ABOUT I AGREE. THEY LOVE THEIR NEIGHBORS. MM HMM. THEY KNOW THE PRODUCT. THE. NEIGHBORS HAVE WORKED TOGETHER AND CARE ABOUT EACH OTHER. I REALLY JOURNALIST SUPPORTED. MOST FIVE GREAT TO SEE THAT ONE. COMMISSION. THE PAST FEW WEEKS. THE DETAILS ON THAT. EVER MOMENT DECLARATIONS ARE THE ADDITIONAL YOU DON'T NEED MEMBERS OF THEIR MAJORITY OR SOMETHING. SO WE HAVE TWO MECHANISMS WITHOUT ACTUALLY FREE. OPERATION. AND ANY OF THIS. MHM ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. THANK YOU. AND THEN STEVE QUESTION FOR STAFF. IS THERE ANY LIKE PRECEDENTS OF A SITUATION LIKE THIS ELSEWHERE, LIKE IN A COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY? AS IT RELATES AGAIN TO THIS. LOT THAT IS NEXT TO A POOL SINGLE FAMILY HOME, ETCETERA THAT AGAIN. REMOVE THIS JUST FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES HAS BEEN ACQUIRED BY THE SAME FAMILY AND IT'S HONEST STREET. IT'S ON KEEP ME HONEST. I BELIEVE A LITTLE ROUND ABOUT THERE, RIGHT . IT'S FRONT FACING AND THERE IS A POOL HOUSE. WHATEVER GARDEN HOUSE, SOME OTHER SORT OF BEAUTIFUL. STRUCTURE THAT FITS WITHIN THE HAWKS MORE ARCHITECTURAL COMMUNITY, ETCETERA. I'D SAY QUESTIONNAIRE . WE HAD EVERYTHING. THAT ONE. I CAN REMEMBER VIVIDLY THE WAS SIMILAR TO THIS NOW. THEY DID NOT HAVE THE WHOLE. SIX B SECTION THAT TOP SECTION INVOLVED, BUT THEY DEFINITELY TOOK THE FRONTAGE. LOT OF SEX THAT WAS UNDERGROUND ABOUT YOU CAN TURN THAT INTO AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR A POOL BUILDING THAT THAT'S WHEN I KNOW FOR SURE THAT I WAS LAST YEAR. YEAH, THAT'S CORRECT. YEAH, THAT WAS ALSO FOR A POOL AND POOL HOUSE. THE STRUCTURES RECORD OUR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES DO REQUIRE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPEAKING OF NEIGHBORS, NEIGHBORS WITHIN 200 FT FOR SENT LETTERS AND NOTIFIED OF THIS MEETING AND NEIGHBORS WITHIN 200 FT ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE NOTIFIED OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT POINT HEARING AS WELL. AND SO THAT INCLUDES. I BELIEVE SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS. KEEP ME HONEST. I THINK THIS WAS IN THE PAPERWORK THAT I'M SORRY. WRONG WAY THERE WOULD BE LIKE UP HERE. AND LIKE BEAUMONT. IS THAT 
          [01:10:05]
CORRECT? YES OR IT COULD, SAYS 200 FT WITHIN THE SUBJECT PARCELS. SO TODAY SINCE THIS IS THE SUBJECT PARCEL BEING REASONED WITHIN 200 FT OF THIS PARCEL. IF THIS PLAN IS APPROVED , THEN IF IT ALL BECOMES ONE LARGE PARCEL THAN AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WAS BUILT ANYWHERE ON THIS LARGER PARCEL. NEIGHBORS WITHIN 200 FT. OF THAT LARGER PARCEL WILL BE NOTIFIED ON ALL SIDES. SO WE WOULD POTENTIALLY SEE A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THEN A MODIFICATION AND THEN YET ANOTHER MODIFICATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS THEY PUT THE THREE STRUCTURES ON OVERTIME. SO YEAH . YOU HAVE A RESIGNING TONIGHT. FINAL PLATT TONIGHT AND THEN IF THEY BUILD THREE SEPARATE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES INDEPENDENTLY TRADE, YOU CAN HAVE THREE DIFFERENT FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. YEAH, OVER TIME. IN EACH CASE SINCE EACH CASE RECORDER. ALSO THE PERMISSION OF THE O A. IN A MORE NARROW FOCUS. DO YOU HAVE ANY WOULD BE NICE TO YOUR COMMENTARY FROM THE FOLKS IN THREE ABOUT THE MOVING OF THE PRESERVATION ZONE, WHICH LEADS TO THE BACK OF THEIR PRESERVATION ZONE BEING MOVED NORTH WE ARE A LOT TREE PRESERVATION OF THEMSELVES. 
          THOSE PROPERTIES THAT WE WOULD CONTROL. ACCEPTING ONLY THE CLASS. RIGHT? THE. I THINK WHAT YOU'RE SAYING NEIL IS THAT IF ALL THE TREES THAT ARE BEING PRESERVED CURRENTLY AT THE AT THE REAR OF LOT FORWARD CHOPPED DOWN THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A BUNCH OF TREES THAT STOP AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO START AGAIN BEHIND ON PARADE. YEAH. WOULD WALK THREE WAS PURCHASED. 
          GET A NEW. THE TREES IN THE MARKET FOR PRESERVATION TOWN. WE'RE GONNA BE THERE. TREASON IS RELATIVELY LIGHT ON THE GROUND. UM YEAH. 100% VESTED INTEREST. WE'LL UNDERSTAND. CREDIT. THERE. 
          THEY'RE IN HERE NOW WOULD BE A WONDERFUL PIECE OF INPUT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR CASE. BECAUSE THEY HAVE. IF THIS WAS A VARIANCE, IT WOULD BE CRITICAL BECAUSE THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THIS COMES ACROSS AS BIG JUST THE BIGGEST. SORRY WORDS VARIOUS WE'VE EVER SEEN. 
          SO TO SPEAK. THIS LOOKS LIKE A HUGE VARIANCE LAID OVER TOP TALKS MORE UH AND DONE BY A DIFFERENT MECHANISM, SO IT'S NOT A VARIANCE. UM I LIKE THE IDEA THAT WE HAVE AN INTEGRATED PLAN. 
          WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH OF AN INTEGRATED PLAN AND WOULD REALLY LOVE TO HEAR FROM THREES. 
          PRESIDENTS AND THE NEXT ONE OVER AS PART OF THAT THIS IS NOT AN ERRAND BEARING ARE YOU SCARED? UNDERSTOOD AND WE DO BOSS STANDARDS OF SECTION 11 11 POINT. FOUR. RANTING ABOUT REZONING APPLICATION. INCLUDING HOW. IT'S A TRAP. OBVIOUSLY. OTHER FIELD. ADDRESS. YEAH, PURPOSES, SIR. THESE ONI INTACT TODAY SIX FT. YEAH THE 0.5 88% ADOPTED IT ENTIRELY. IN THIS APPLICATION. THE COMMITTEE. INFRASTRUCTURE, SO WE THINK THERE LOVER TYPE. CLASSIFICATION IS NOT CHANGING. ALL THE STANDARDS WITH IN PLACE. WE STILL HAVE TO ABIDE BY. IN ALL OF ITS ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. IN FACT, MORE LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON MHM WAS LIKE, YEAH, RESTRICT. SO THE ZONING IN MY OPINION IS COMPELLING. WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND TELL US RIGHT? BUT YEAH, RESPECT. ALLOCATIONS. AS WE DIDN'T FEEL WE NEED ALL OF THE STANDARDS. BUT UNDER PLAN REVIEW UM ACTUALLY, UM, A THROUGH S. THERE'S A WHOLE PILE OF THINGS FOR THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER. AND SOME OF THEM TOUCH ON THIS WITH THE VARIANTS. IT WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY CRYSTAL CLEAR. THAT IT WOULD BE SO AND WHILE I'M NOT SAYING THIS IS A VARIANCE, IT IS A DOES CHANGE. ZONING AND SOME LIMITATIONS THAT THE NEIGHBORS PURCHASE EXPECTED TO BE THERE. EXPECTATIONS UNDER THE DECLARATION THAT EVERYONE. NO MARRIAGE IS IN PLACE UNLESS 
          [01:15:12]
THEY YEP. MECHANISM. TWO. GET THE CHEAP PURPOSES BUT AGAIN. THAT SAID THAT. EVEN HIGHER SUPPER'S ON OURSELVES. THE SPIRIT OF NEGOTIATIONS THAT I HAVE ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS PRIOR IN 2020. JUST WE CAN GET GARNER SUPPORT. HONESTLY. IT'S FROM MY PEACE OF MIND GOING BACK. YOU HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THE MAXIMUM THREE STRUCTURES? AND HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT NEGOTIATING THE HATE? TO ANSWER THE HEIGHT ISSUE. AND SAVORY, FLAT FEET OR 40. IT WOULD BE REASONABLE. TO US. AND IT GIVES . STRUCTURES BECAUSE TO ME IT SOUNDS REASONABLE, BUT I NEED TO KNOW. AND I CAN TABLE. THE CHANCE THAT ISRAEL SAFE. I HAVE A COUPLE MORE QUESTIONS. I'M NOT SURE IF I'M GONNA DRAGON MAYBE JUST STAFF SO. WITH REGARD TO VEHICULAR ACCESS, IT SAYS THE PRIMARY VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM THE PROPERTY WILL BE PROVIDED USING A DRIVE WHERE A DRIVEWAY CONNECTING HAWKS MORE DRY. SO IS THAT THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY THAT IS THAT SERVICES? WHAT FOUR OR IS THAT GOING TO BE ANOTHER POTENTIAL DRIVEWAY? THAT SERVICES LAST SIX A THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER DRIVEWAY THAT WOULD SERVE WATCH JUST 16 SO THEY COULD HAVE ANOTHER DRIVEWAY WITHIN THIS AREA HERE, ALRIGHT? AND STEVE. WHAT DISTINGUISHES A SORT OF A RESIDENTIAL. STRUCTURE FROM AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND TO WHAT EXTENT CAN AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ACCOMMODATE. PEOPLE RESIDING THERE. IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. SO THE DEFINITION OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. AH! THE DEFINITION OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ISN'T A SUBORDINATE STRUCTURE OR SURFACE LOCATED ON THE SAME LOT AS A PRINCIPAL BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, AND IT SAYS THIS ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS INCIDENTAL TO THE USE OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. AND SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE DEFINITION OF A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE, IT SAYS THAT IS THE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS WHERE FAMILIES ARE MEANT TO LIVE. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT TO TRY TO CLARIFY THE INTENT OF THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS THAT ARE ALLOWED ON THIS LOT, AND ALSO JUST TO CLARIFY TO MAKE SURE IT'S CLEAR THAT THAT PD TEXT IS THE ZONING THAT SUPERSEDES ALL THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES WITHIN THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES. SO IT'S CLEARLY GO TO THE PD TEXT FOR RIGHT TO REGULATE IN NETWORK ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. SO WE FEEL THAT BASED ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE TEXT, IT'S CLEAR THAT YOU COULDN'T HAVE ANOTHER DWELLING UNITS OR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS WITHIN ONE OF THESE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES BASED ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE PD. TEXT. UM THAT WAS ACCESSORY STRUCTURE COULD HE ALSO RIPPED THAT SAME THING FOR DWELLING UNIT? HOW WE DEFINED WELL IN EUROPE WAS MY NEXT WALKING REAL CLOSE TO HOW BIG IS THE MOTHER IN LAW SUITE HAVE TO BEAT HER. HOW SMALL OR WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE MISSING? WHAT DOES THE GUESTHOUSE HAPPENED BEFORE IT BECOMES A D? YOU COME FROM CAMPUS WHEN I HEAR FAMILY COMPOUND? THAT'S WHAT I'M BEGINNING TO HEAR, BEGINNING TO HEAR COTTAGES IN THE BACK THAT THE IN LAWS ARE GOING TO STAY LIKE THAT. BY THE TEXT THAT WE DRIVE. UM EH WOULD ALLOW FOR HP ARE ALL OF THE PERMANENT. AND A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CLUB. PRIMARY RESIDENCE. IF YOU DID. YOU COULD ALSO GO TO SENSORY STRUCTURES TO THAT. ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN. AND IN ANY JURISDICTION, OKAY? AND IN ADDITION WE COULD. GOOD TO BE THAT IS NOT. BUT DETACHED ROW RANCH. FULL HOUSE STRUCTURE. SO WE'RE SAYING BUILD THOSE ITEMS WITHOUT PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL BUILT AND THAT IS NOT TYPICAL, RIGHT? THEY DON'T KNOW. SO THERE IS NO IDEA TO REMOVE PEOPLE. I'M NOT SURE I'M READY. THINK 
          [01:20:09]
NOTHING LIKE. I THINK THIS RESTRICT THOSE KINDS OF USES, BECAUSE IF YOU HAVE A FAMILY STRUCTURES AND WELL. JUST HIT NUMBER TWO, A. THINGS THAT SEXUAL LIFE. BUT I DON'T FEEL YOUR SENSORY STRUCTURES UNDER THE CONDITIONAL AND LIMITS OF STRUCTURES THAT YOU DESIRE. WE CAN'T WE COULD GO. VERY BUT THEN WE'RE LIMITED TO BUT IT'S NOT LIKE. SO YOU WOULD BE COMFORTABLE WITH LANGUAGE THAT SAID SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF THAT ANY ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WOULD NOT BE RESIDENTIAL IN NATURE. OR SOMETHING TO THAT FIRST OR ACCESSORY TYPE STRUCTURE. TO BE PERMITTED USES HERE. SURE. THE MINUTES. WHAT WAS THE. I JUST SAID SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF ANY ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WOULD NOT AT THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT ANOTHER SIDE. TO IT'S ABOUT USE , NOT THE CHARACTER. IT'S NOT. IT'S NOT ABOUT WHAT'S IN THERE. IT IS LITERALLY LIKE COULD BELONG HERE. PEOPLE BUILD DETACHED GARAGES THAT WILL HAVE A BATHROOM SO THEY CAN WASH THEIR HANDS AFTER THEY WORK ON THEIR CAR, AND THEY MIGHT HAVE A MICROWAVE IN THE IN THE LITTLE STUDY UPSTAIRS, UM AND IN A COUCH, AND IF THERE'S A FOLD OUT COUCH, YOU JUST TURNED IT INTO A STUDIO APARTMENT, BUT IF THEY DON'T LIVE IN IT AS A RESIDENCE IT'S A GARAGE IF THEY LIVE IN IT AS A RESIDENT, THAT SAME STRUCTURE BECOMES ONE BY THE USE , AND I WANT TO RUN THAT BY LAW ON OUR SIDE TO SEE IF I'M YEAH, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT BEFORE THIS SPEAK FOR MR ALBERT. BUT, YES, IT'S KIND OF LIKE YOU KNOW IT WHEN YOU SEE A BIGGER IT IS ABOUT THE USE. AND YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. MR CHAIRMAN. WE HAVE MANY EVEN POOL HOUSES THAT HAVE KITCHENETTES AND SEATING AREAS. I THINK IT'S WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT THE WHOLE, YOU KNOW, IT'S HOW IT'S GOING TO BE USED WITH ITS PRIMARY INTENT IS SWEETS IN THE COUNTRY CLUB. THERE'S MORE THAN ZERO OF THEM. 
          NO. HOW THEY'RE USED AND NOT WHAT THEY ARE THAT DETERMINES WHETHER OR NOT THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY IF YOU WOULD SAY THAT I SAW YOU NOD YOUR HEAD. I NEED TO SPEAK INTO MY THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT. IT'S HOW THEY'RE USED. NOT HOW THEY'RE SET UP. SO LIKE YOU SAID, YOU COULD HAVE IT. WITH YOUR COUCH, YOUR BED, YOUR KITCHEN THAT WHATEVER IT IS, BUT IF IT'S NOT BEING USED AS A RESIDENCE, THEN IT'S NOT A IT'S NOT A RESIDENCE. IT'S CONVENIENCE WHILE YOU'RE WORKING IN THE GARAGE, SO TO SPEAK. SHOULD CONTROL THIS BECAUSE YOU'RE WILLING CODE OF PROMISED THAT YOU NEED LIVING QUARTERS. A KITCHEN. PRIMARY PRESIDENTS FOR FAMILY OR SOMETHING SO WE COULD ADD OURSELVES. THAT'S NOT NEW STRUCTURES. TOTALLY CONTROL THAT ISSUE. WORST. AND WE HEAR WHAT THE. CODE SAYS I WAS A DENTAL UNIT IS DEFINED AS BECAUSE THEY GOT ASKED EARLIER ABOUT THE TIMING, EUROPEAN DAVE WELL FOR THE DWELLING UNIT ARE YEAH, BECAUSE WE HAVE ONE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WAS ALL RIGHT NOW, WHAT'S A RESIDENCE? THE LEGAL MINIMUM, SO CODE DEFINES A DWELLING OR RESIDENTS, IT SAYS IT MEANS ANY BUILDING OR PORTION THEREOF, WHICH IS DESIGNED OR USED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES. BUT NOT INCLUDING A CABIN, HOTEL, MOTEL, ROOMING HOUSE OR OTHER SUCH ACCOMMODATION USED FOR TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY AND SAYS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING MEANS A BUILDING DESIGNED FOR OCCUPIED EXCLUSIVELY BY ONE FAMILY. YEAH, HE WOULD EARLY ON THERE WAS USING. YOU WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF STUFF WHEN WE STARTED DOWN THIS PATH. NO I THINK THAT'S WHERE I WANTED TO END UP, OKAY. SO, YEAH, I THINK WE'RE THAT ANSWER MY QUESTION. I BELIEVE MY COMMENT FOR STAFF IS BUT IF THIS DOES GET TABLED CAN WE WORK OUT? WHAT A REASONABLE SIZE FOR MAXIMUMS ON ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ARE FOR MARGE. LOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. IF THEY'RE DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE IN CODE. AND WE CAN PULL OUR RESEARCH FROM WHEN WE DID OUR CODE UPDATE BACK IN 2018 19. I THINK WE MADE A LIST OF ALL THE VARIANCES FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. UM SO WE CAN CERTAINLY FIND THAT DATA AGAIN AND PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A LONG LONG WHILE WE'RE THERE. THE. BUILDING 
          [01:25:01]
FOOTPRINTS ON HOUSES AND HAWKS MORE, FOR EXAMPLE, TO SAY. IF IT'S SMALLER THAN THIS, WE KNOW IT'S SMART, SMALLER THAN A HOUSE NEEDS A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT 55 50 LOTS OF ON THIRD STREET AND YOU'VE GOT AN ACRE AND CHANGE OR TWO ACRES AND CHANGE HERE. AND SO THE SIZE OF A HOUSE THAT'S THE SIZE OF THESE HOUSES. THESE ARE HOW BIG THE HOUSES ARE, AND I'M BETTING THAT A LOT OF THEM ARE NOT SMALL. UM SO THAT THEY ARE IN PERSPECTIVE, TOO. THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN'T HAVE LARGE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. IT JUST MEANS THAT YOU KNOW, COMPARED TO WHAT COMPARED TO OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND SMALLER ZONING DISTRICTS, OKAY? LARGER THAN OUR HOUSE LARGER THAN THE HOUSE. OKAY? IN OTHER IN ALL OF OUR OTHER CODE DISTRICTS, IT TAKES VARIANCES AND A BUNCH OF OTHER THINGS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE WENT THROUGH BECAUSE MY I LIVE IN A HISTORIC HOUSE AND THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE. BEING A BARN IS BIGGER THAN FOOTPRINT IN THE HOUSE AND GET IT UNDER CONFIRMATION. WE HAD TO GO THROUGH A HANDFUL OF SEQUENCES, AND SO LIKEWISE HERE THAT IT WOULD BE CORRECTLY PROPORTIONED . IF IT WAS CLEARLY AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. WE JUST NEED TO KNOW WHAT THAT IS NOT. I'M NOT ADVERSE TO IT BEING LARGE ISSUE THE GRAND SCHEME OF THINGS BUT NOT LARGEST, COMPARED TO THE HOUSES THAT ARE AROUND IT BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORS HAVING INTEREST THAT THE HOUSE OF THE BIG THING AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND LITTLE THINGS AS YOU WALK AROUND THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE CAN CERTAINLY RESEARCH BUILDING FOOTPRINT SIZES AND YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. PART OF THE, UM I THINK INFORMATION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION, OUR BORDERS AND APPEALS LOOKED AT AS APPROPRIATE DESIGN. SO IF IT IS AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE THAT'S A LARGE BARN, MAKING SURE IT'S UH, SIZED APPROPRIATELY BASED ON HISTORIC PRECEDENTS AND MAKING SURE IT'S ARCHITECTURALLY APPROPRIATE AS A I THINK, YOU KNOW HALLMARK OF NEW ALBANESE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS. AND SO, UM, YOU KNOW, VARIANCE IS A TYPE OF SECONDARY REVIEW. IN THIS CASE, IT WOULD BE A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SO IT'S STILL WOULD GET THAT SECONDARY REVIEW. SO TO SPEAK, I E HAS COME BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THOSE ENTITLEMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT WOULD JUST BE A DIFFERENT APPLICATION IN THIS CASE. AND MY GOAL HERE IS TO BAKE THEM INTO THE ZONING TEXT SO THAT THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS VERY EASILY. 
          ACCOMPLISHED BECAUSE THEN NOT ONLY DO WE AS PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO SAY YES OR NO, BUT THE APPLICANT KNOWS I SHOULD BE GOOD ON THIS. THEY SET THE NUMBERS. THERE WERE NUMBERS THAT BOTH SIDES COULD AGREE ON. A BLANK CHECK IS NOT WHAT I FEEL LIKE WRITING TONIGHT ON ACCOUNT OR SIZE OR ESPECIALLY HEIGHTS. WORKABLE ISSUE. IT'S A WORKABLE SET OF ISSUES. I THINK SO RIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS, IMPORTANT WRITINGS. YES, YOU LOOK AT THE SIZE. AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE FINAL FLAT THAT YOU'RE PROPOSING THAT RESIDENCE, HAS HE, BUT I THINK THAT FOOTPRINT ASPECT FOOTAGE I WOULD SUGGEST THAT ANY ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WOULD BE LESS THAN THE QUICK PRINT OF THE PROBLEM. RESIDENTS THAT'S ON THE FLOOR RIGHT NOW. WOULD BE A STARTING POINT TO LOOK AT NEIGHBORHOODS AT WORK. I STARTED . CONSIDERATION PRESUMING BEFORE HOUSE DOESN'T ENCLOSED ENTIRE OLYMPIC SIZED POOL. THE HOUSE NEXT TO THE POOL THAT IN CLOSING THE POOL BECAUSE OTHERWISE YOU WOULD NEED A REALLY BIG STRUCTURE. QUESTIONS. FOR I FORGET ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THESE TWO CASES? OKAY? I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION AHEAD. BY DOING THE FINAL PLAN. THE LARGER SIZE. THAT'S THE NEEDS FOR THE FEAR CLIENT FROM A CITY PERSPECTIVE. HIS ONE RELAX. VERSUS THE OTHER. MORE COMPLICATED FOR THE CITY OR LESS COMPLICATED, OR IS IT IT'S NO MORE COMPLICATED FOR THE CITY. I WOULD SAY. AS FAR AS CITY PURPOSES GO, IT'S NOT REQUIRED, BUT IT'S CERTAINLY IS ANOTHER MECHANISM TO CREATE ONE LOT, SO YOU COULD DO A LOT COMBINATION, BUT DUE TO THE OTHER REASONS FOR THE A AND THE CCR, THE APPLICANT HERE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO REQUEST TO DO THIS PLATZ. IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THOSE OTHER REQUIREMENTS FROM THE ATRIAL WAY , SO I WOULD SAY IT'S NO MORE OF A BURDEN OR FOR THE CITY. IF ANYTHING, IT'S MORE OF A BURDEN FOR THE APPLICANT. THE MOVING OF THE TREE PRESERVATION DISTRICT ARMY LOT FOR TO THE NEW LOT THAT COMES UNDER THE FINAL PLATT RATHER THAN UNDER THE RESULTS. 
          THAT'S CORRECT. IT WILL BE RECORDED WITH THE PLATTS AND THEN JUST TO MAKE SURE IT'S COMPLETELY CLEAR. WE ALSO ADDED IT TO THE ZONING TEXT SORT OF AS BUILT IN SUSPENDERS APPROACH WHILE WE'RE WORKING OUT WHAT IT IS, THAT MAKES US A BETTER AND MORE COMPLETE APPLICATION. CAN WE HAVE SORT OF SOMETHING? MODESTLY ENFORCEABLE ABOUT WHAT TREE PLANTINGS WOULD BE REQUIRED. RIGHT NOW, WE'VE GOT SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL, AND MAYBE WE'LL WAIT TILL FINAL GOVERNMENT PLAN. MY RECOMMENDATION OF THE POINTING COMMISSION WOULD LIKE WOULD BE 
          [01:30:04]
TO MAKE IT PART OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS . THAT WAY THE PLANNING COMMISSION CAN REVIEW WHAT THOSE PLANTINGS ARE, UM AND APPROVE IT . AND CERTAINLY WE CAN HAVE OUR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REVIEW AND PROVIDE COMMENTS AS PART OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PACKAGE. 
          IF THERE WAS MORE TREES IN NORTH OF LOVE FOR I WOULD ASK FOR IT EARLY BECAUSE THE TREES COULD GO AWAY FROM LOT FOUR FAR QUICKER THAN THEY COULD BE REQUIRED. PLANTED ON SIX SIX DOESN'T GET ANY REQUIREMENTS UNTIL THEY COME UP WITH AN FDP, WHICH COULD BE YEARS. OR COULD LOSE THE TREATY IS THE DAY AFTER THIS, THE INTEREST IT'S GOT A LOT OF THEM, BUT IF THERE WERE MORE HERE WOULD BE A LOT MORE PRESSING ISSUE. YEAH, THAT'S TRUE. FOR THE CONDITION IS THEY CAN'T EXISTING ZONE. WHO WAS UNTIL THEIR REPLACEMENT. YEAH. IT'S NOTHING ALONG THAT LINE. IT'S NOT TOO I'M GONNA SAY BURDENSOME. PROBABLY BE THE RIGHT WAY TO DO THIS. YEAH, I THINK SO. THE PRESERVATION ALSO BECOMES EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY FOR THAT NEW NORTHERN ZONES, SO JUST LIKE THE BACON REMOVE THE TREES WITHIN THE LOT FORWARD. FIVE DAY ONE OF APPROVAL OF THE PLATTE ANYTHING THAT'S EXISTING AND THE NEW ZONE, YOU KNOW, ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. THAT HAS TO BE SAVED. IT WOULDN'T BE SUPPLEMENTED DAY ONE, BUT IT WOULD HAVE TO BE PRESERVED. THEY WON THE PRESERVATION ZONE ALLOW PLANNING OF NATIVE SPECIES. ALLOWING NATIVE PLANTINGS. YES OKAY SO THEY COULD REINFORCE THE WITHOUT WORRYING ABOUT IS IT CONVERSATION CONSERVATIONS ON YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO TOUCH IT IS LIKE NOWHERE ALLOWED TO PLANT MORE TREES IN THE TREES OWN, OKAY. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE DIDN'T HAVE A GOTCHA. BUILT IN I COULD MAKE IT A CONDITION THAT ANY TREE REMOVED. IN THE NORTH SIDE OF BLOCK FOR WE HAVE TO IMMEDIATELY BE REPLACED ONE FOR ONE. THE TRUTH THAT ARE SUCCEEDING. TO CHOOSE THEIR PLUS , IT WOULDN'T HAVE DRAINAGE STORMWATER DRAINAGES DURING THE DECENT NEVER BEEN PLANTING TREES. THAT TOO. STORY. ON THE TEXT. THE TEXT IS ASIDE FROM THE RETENTION OF THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT. IDENTICAL TO THE EXISTING TEXT FOR NOT ROCKS MARKET FOR THE HAWKS MORE NORTH IS THAT WHAT I HEARD IS GOING TO BE HOSTILE. THAT SAME 20. OKAY I BELIEVE IT. IT'S ALL THE SAME SETBACK STANDARDS. I BELIEVE THAT THE PLANE HAS ACTUALLY INCREASED STORE OR MAYBE SLIGHTLY INCREASED THE SETBACK FROM THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. OTHERWISE IT IS AT LEAST THE SAME MINIMUMS. WHAT I LOOKED FOR AND DID NOT FIND IN MY PACKET WAS MARKED TEXT. WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN SEVERELY APPRECIATE IT TO KNOW THAT IF THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE, AND EASIER TO COMPARE CONTRAST. THIS VERSUS WHAT IT USED TO BE. UM AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND HAWKS MORE CLASSIC FOR LACK OF BETTER. YES YEAH, WE HAVE. YEAH YEAH, I'M SURE WE HAVE. YEAH MANY. YEAH THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL. I CAN'T SAY THAT WE ARE STAFFED WITH THE APPLICANT. WE'VE GONE THROUGH THE TEXT MANY TIMES. WE FEEL VERY CONFIDENT THAT ALL OF THE SAME ZONING COMMITMENTS ARE IN THERE THAT THIS IS A GOOD FEEDBACK FOR FUTURE APPLICATIONS TO KIND OF GET ONE CLEAN. FINAL RED LINE. 
          I'M NOT SURE WE COULD DUPLICATE IT. WELL, IN THIS CASE, WE'VE HAD ANY SORT OF RENDITIONS BACK AND FORTH. UM BUT WE DO FEEL, UH , WITH 100% OF SURETY ALL OF THE SAME MINIMUM SETBACKS AND ALL THOSE PREVIOUS COMMITMENTS ARE MET FROM THE EXISTING ZONING BECAUSE IT IT MAKES IT A LOT EASIER TO REASSURE ANOTHER LAWYER, BUT REDLINE TEXT MAKES IT A LOT EASIER. OKAY, HERE'S THE DIFFERENCES. HOWARD'S WE CALL IT DEPLOYED. YEAH. I JUST HAVE ONE. STEPHEN ONE QUESTION FOR YOU TRYING TO THINK AHEAD OF THIS. SO WHEN THIS BECOMES ONE PARCEL. AND I'M JUST THINKING OF THE EVERINGTON DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD ABOUT SIDE YARD VERSUS FRONT. UM, BY COMBINING THOSE LOTS IN DOING THAT, HAVING LOT FOR ALREADY ESTABLISHED IS THE FRONT FRONTAGE OF THIS PARCEL. 
          DOES THAT CHANGE ANYTHING IN THAT LOT SIX FOR ANY TYPE OF STRUCTURE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE BUILT THERE. WHAT THE SIDE OR WHAT? THE FRONT OF THIS PARCEL LOOKS LIKE THAT SO IT ACTUALLY DOES NOT THE ONLY THING THAT BY COMBINING IT WOULD TAKE AWAY INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES. UH SO 
          [01:35:02]
THE SIDE LOT LINES ON THE WESTERN PROPERTY AND THE EASTERN PROPERTY REMAINED THE SAME. THE FRONT YARD SETBACK REMAINS THE SAME AND CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT. IN FACT, IT'S A LITTLE BIT LARGER HERE AS IT EXISTS IN LOT SIX, BUT COMBINING ALL INTO ONE LOT PROVIDES MORE FLEXIBILITY AND REMOVES THE INTERNAL SETBACKS TO ALLOW FOR MORE COHESIVE DESIGN. INTERNAL TO THE LARGER LOT SIX. THE APPLICATION OF. DEVELOPMENT ON THE COMBINED PARCEL COULD PRECLUDE A FUTURE SPLIT. BECAUSE YOU COULDN'T MEET THE SETBACKS AND LOT LINES NEEDED ONCE IT WAS SPLIT. TWO. 
          WE FELT ON QUITE 7 TO 6. WE WOULD REPLY. 39 SPLIT IT SOMEONE TO WHAT YOU SEE TODAY. 
          WHAT MY POINT IS. IT GETS COMBINED. THE INTERNAL AMEN. COMBINED INTERNAL LOT LINES GO AWAY. YOU DO THAT? JUST. SO WHEN IT'S WONDERFUL. 
          OKAY, SO YOU. AS YOU BUILD THE LAW AS THINGS ARE BUILT ON LOT SIX THEY HAVE TO BUILD AS THOUGH IT WERE NOT COMBINED WITH FOREIGN FIVE. THE NEW SIX OKAY, SO THANK YOU SO ANSWER. THAT MEANS THAT SIX COULD ALWAYS BE SUBDIVIDED OFF. AND STILL MEET ALL THE SETBACKS. THE BEST WAY ANYONE IN THE FUTURE WITH LIFE EVER SPLIT. TIME WISE. YEP OKAY. SIX A. IT'S MORE COMMON FOR US TO HEAR THAT INTERNAL LOT LINES GO AWAY FROM THE COMPANY DOES THIS ALL THE TIME AND SO THEN THE RE SPLIT IS A REAL DEAL. BECAUSE THEN YOU HAVE TO COME OUT. WE COULDN'T SPLIT IT AND COME UP WITH NONCONFORMING. LOTS, OKAY? SORRY. NO IT'S NOT A CONDITION LATER CHANGE THAT I'M LOOKING AT THIS PLANT COULD CAUSE CONFUSION. IF EVERYONE BE OKAY WITH THIS BECAUSE THIS. 
          JUST COLOR 1.7. WE NEEDED ONE MORE DESIGNATION, AND THAT IS THAT COMBINED AREA BEFORE IT IS REPLANTED TO BE THE NEW SIX B SIX B REALLY WANT TO BE 60 AND WHAT'S OUTLINED ON? THAT IS REALLY THAT THE INTERMEDIATE STEP. SO THAT WE CAN TALK ABOUT THE PARCELS OF THE DAY BECAUSE. 
          WE DON'T WANT TO FIND IT OUT ANY KIND OF A LOT, WE SAY. IT IS ONE THING SOMETHING TO SIX ACRES. 
          PERSONAL NUMBER, WHICH EXISTING LOST EXCITING. IT'S DESCRIBED DESCRIPTION. IT IS NOT 60 60. 
          XX. THIS ZONES LIKE. CAN WE MAKE SURE THAT THESE DIAGRAMS ARE PART OF THE RECORD? YEAH I DON'T THINK WE NEED TONIGHT. IT SOUNDS LIKE THIS IS GOING TO BE TABLED. UM THAT'D BE VERY HELPFUL AND THEN ANY CHANGES FOR THE NEXT MEETING. MAYBE. THE BORDER. SURE, I THINK IT'S PROBABLY 
          [01:40:09]
EASIER FOR BEING RECOGNIZE IT THAT WAY. SO YEP, I THINK IT'S PRETTY FINE. SO I WOULD LIKE JUST MYTH. YOU KNOW THAT I AM PART OF IS THE SITE OF. EXHIBIT A. THE LAST PAGE. THAT'S IT. 
          YEAH, THIS NOW WHICH OF COURSE IS FAR AS 21. THE ORIGINAL SWEET CALL IT EXHIBIT 81. QUICK CHECK WITH STAFF. WE OUTRUNNING YOUR ABILITY TO RECORD SO IF IT'S AROUND THE APPLICANT, WE GOT HOME WE CAN HOLD ON TO THESE. WE CAN ACTUALLY SCAN THESE AND MAKE DIGITAL RECORDS TO PUT THEM INTO THE PERMANENT MINUTES. ALL THE STAFF TO ME. ABLE TO SING WITH US ON THAT. OKAY? OF THE THREE SUB DIVISION OF LOST SIX, WHICH WAS THE ORIGINAL DREAM PLATFORM SITS TO SIX AND A PAGE PLAN THAT IS IMPORTED. TO BE EXHIBITED. WOULD YOU REPEAT THAT? REPEATED YES, PLEASE. EXHIBIT B IS THE DIVISION THAT WANTS SIX SO MUCH MORE. AND AS THE ORIGINAL REPLANTED LOCKS THEM INTO BLOCKS, SIX A ON THE SECOND PAGE OF. IT IS KNOWN AS LOST AND SAY , THIS IS THE SUBSISTENCE LAW CITIZENS EXIST TODAY. AND THAT'S ALSO THE BACK PAGE ON ONE OF OUR SUBMISSION PACKET ITEMS. THIS IS THE FINAL REFUND PUBLICATIONS. THIS COULD BE EXHIBIT C. SO I HAVE TO CREATE A NEW MODEL SIX FT. 2.4568. 
          MAKE THE HOMEWORK THAT I HAVE I WAS ABOUT TO DO THAT. YOU JUST GOING OVER MY NOTES AS WELL. I HAVE THREE ITEMS SO FAR. CHECK WITH YOUR CLIENT. ABOUT THREE STRUCTURES AND MAXIMUM, UM NEED HEIGHT, HEIGHT SIZE LIMITS ON STRUCTURES. UM ABSOLUTELY WITH THE CONCURRENCE OF STAFF. UH, TREE LANGUAGE ON THE NOT DEEP. NORTH SIDE OF LOT FOR REMOVAL OF TREES AND REPLANTING INTO THE NEW LOT. SIX NORTH LOT LINE. DID I MISS ANYBODY'S LIST? IT WAS MORE A YEAR LISTED. I DID NOT CITE IN MY MASTER LIMITATION ON THE SIZE OF THE OH, YES, UM, SIZE AND HEIGHT LIMITS ON STRUCTURES. YES THAT'S CITY STAFF WILL ON OUR TWO DEALS. WE HAVE A ACCESSORIES SIZE STRUCTURE, CODE UPDATE RESEARCH THAT WE CAN BRING IN FROM PAST VARIANCES AND THEN ALSO RESEARCHING THE SIZE OF EXISTING HAWKS MORE HOMES. IT WAS AWESOME. SOME DISCUSSION OF CHANGING THE LANGUAGE IN SECTION REVENUE TO BE REGARDING RESIDENCE AND RESIDENCES. 
          I WAS ON YOUR HOMEWORK LIST OF. COMMENTARY EITHER DIRECTLY OR WRITTEN THIS FOR ME, OWNERS A LOT THREE, ESPECIALLY OH, AS IT CHANGES WHAT IS NEXT TO THEREFORE RESERVATIONS, THOUGH? I'M NOT SEVEN, I THINK WOULD BE NICE TO HEAR FROM YOU. THAT'S NOT NEARLY THE GOT TO DO AS MUCH AS IT IS FOR. THREE. GIVE HER ANOTHER PAPER, OKAY? THE OTHER THING STAFF RECOMMENDS IS THAT MAYBE WE ADD A PROVISION TO THE TEXT. IT'S ALREADY THE APPLICANT THAT JUST CLARIFIES ALSO BUILT IN SUSPENDERS THAT IF THESE IF AND WHEN THESE LOTS OR I GUESS THE PLOTS IMPROVES, SO THESE ARE ALL COMBINED THAT THIS ZONING EXHIBIT THE SETBACKS ON THE SUNNIS, IT APPLIES EVEN AFTER COMBINATION EVEN AFTER COMBINATION JUST SO THAT'S CLEAR ON THE RECORD IF WE ALL WIN THE LOTTERY, DON'T COME BACK TOMORROW. THAT'S LET'S CLEAR FOR REALLY DON'T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT 
          [01:45:01]
THE CONTRACTOR THAT DROPPED THE SECOND SWIMMING POOL IN ONE OF THE SETBACK. SIGNS THAT THEY'VE GOT IT'S WORTH 300 PEOPLE. WHAT LINE? NO, YOU'RE 30 FT. FROM A LOT LINE YOU CAN'T SEE. OTHER QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONER. ALRIGHT, SO. BUT ITS REACH FOR GET JAMMED UP. DO WE NEED TO MOVE, THOUGH? REPORT. SO YEAH, I WAS GOING TO DO NEXT. SO I MOVED FOR ACCEPTANCE, THE STAFF REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS IN THE RECORD FOR ZONING CHANGE. 11 2023 DO I HEAR A SECOND ON THE DOCUMENTS, MOTION SECOND. THAT WE'VE GOT CLARIFICATION AND SOME OF THE EXHIBITS. AS WELL. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION ON THE DOCUMENTS. GENERAL, PLEASE. MR KIRBY? YES. MR WALLACE. MISS BRIGGS? YES, MR LARSON. MR SHELL. THE DOCUMENTS. THANK YOU. 
          JOINT MOTION, RIGHT? SO I MOVED FOR ACCEPTANCE ESTABLISH PORTS ARE LIVE DOCUMENTS INTO THE RECORD FOR FINAL PLAN 12 2023. SECOND. DISCUSSION ON THE DOCUMENTS MOTION FOR FINAL PLATT MODIFICATION. A LITTLE PLACE. MR KIRBY. MR. WALLACE YES, MR SCHELL? YES, MR LARSON BRIGGS? YES DOCUMENTS. HOW LONG DO WE HOW LONG DO YOU NEED FOR THE TABLING 30 DAYS. IF WE HAVEN'T THE PLANNING COMMISSION TABLES TO THE NEXT UPCOMING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET THIS ON IN TWO WEEKS . BUT LET US CHECK TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN MEET ALL OF OUR NOTIFICATION AND POSTING DEADLINES. UM BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AND OUR DEADLINES TO GET THEM ON THE SOONEST. MEETING DATE POSSIBLE EMOTIONAL TABLE TO THE NEAREST REGULAR MEETINGS. THAT IS WITHIN NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. YES WOULD WORK. 
          DON'T YOU MAKE THAT MOTION THAT WAS WELL, SAID. I MOVE THAT WE TABLE ZONING CHANGE 11 2023 TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING THAT CAN MEET THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS SHOULD WE CAN WE CAN WE MOVE TO TABLE BOTH CASES AT THE SAME TIME. THANKS. SO CAN WE I DON'T WANT A TIME. ONE AT A TIME. SECOND DOWN SO THE MOTION TO TABLE IS THAT CLEAR FOR STUFF? YES YES, AND FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION DISABLED. THE ROOM, PLEASE. MR KIRBY. MR SCHELL, MR. LARSON BRIGGS? YES, MR WALLACE. I HAVE FIVE VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO TABLE TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING THAT MEETS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE SAME MOTION FOR FINAL PLAN 12 2023. THE TABLE. DO I HEAR A 2ND 2ND? DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION TO TABLE THE ROLE, PLEASE. MR KIRBY ? YES. YES, MISS WALLACE. MR WALLACE. EXCUSE ME. YES, LARSON. 
          MR SHELL. I HAVE FIVE VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO TABLE TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING THAT MEETS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. THANK YOU. GOOD LUCK REPORT SEEING YOU AGAIN. APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. YEAH, LET'S TAKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK. OR SO. 
          STAFF READY. LET'S BEGIN. OUR NEXT HEARING IS VARIANCE 46 2023 TO BE CONSTRUCT WITHIN THE PLANET DRAINAGE EASEMENT STRAIGHT LINE. CAN WE HEAR FROM STAFF, PLEASE? OKAY THIS NEXT VARIANCE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW A DEBT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A PLANTED. DRAINAGE EASEMENT. IT IS LOCATED AT 78 31 STREETS, ME. STRAITS FARM, LEE. THE SUBDIVISION PLAYER ESTABLISHED A DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY FOR THE COLLECTION IN CONVENIENCE OF STORM WATER. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE NEW ALBANY COUNTRY CLUB SECTION 27 FARM RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION. THE PROPOSED X IS 37 FT WIDE AND 16 FT DEEP FROM THE REAR. OF THE HOME AS SHOWN IN THE HATCHED AREA. THE DECK PROPOSES TO ENCROACH BETWEEN 1 TO 7.5 FT INTO THE 
          [01:50:01]
DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN THE YELLOW ABOVE. RIGHT AROUND HERE. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONTAINS A MANHOLE AND STORM WATER PIPE. THIS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER PIPE DISTRIBUTES WATER TO THE NEIGHBORING STORM WATER BASIN, AND THIS UNDERGROUND SEWER HAS TWO STORM WATERS, WHO ARE PASSES BYPASSES THAT DRAINS RAINWATER FROM THE STREETS, FARM SUBDIVISION AND FAMILY SUBDIVISION. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE CITY INFRASTRUCTURE . MULTIPLE MANHOLES ARE LOCATED ALONG THE REAR OF AND OF THIS HOME AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. THIS MANHOLE STRUCTURE IS USED TO ACCESS AND MAINTAIN THE STORMWATER SEWER SYSTEM BENEATH THE GROUND. IN THE MANHOLE IS LOCATED AT A CRITICAL INSPECTION POINT AS RIGHT HERE IN THIS GREEN. MOST IMPORTANTLY, THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS SIZED TO ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT ACCENTS IF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS NEEDED TO DIG DOWN TO THE PIPE AND PREPARE IT. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS SIZE TO ENSURE CITY STAFF AND OTHER UTILITIES HAVE SUFFICIENT SPACE TO ACCESS. IF MAINTENANCE IS REQUIRED. THE VARIANCE APPEARS TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY DUE TO THE LOCATION OF THE DECK IN THE AREA WHERE THE CITY INFRASTRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED. APPROVING THIS VARIANCE WOULD BE A PRESIDENT SETTING AND HISTORICALLY, THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HAS ONLY APPROVED PARTIAL ENCROACHMENTS WHERE THERE ARE NO CITY CITY UTILITIES WITHIN THE EASEMENT. APPROVING THIS PERIODS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE DELIVERY OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES. HERE'S THE PROBLEM CAN BE SOLVED BY DECREASING THE SIZE OF THE DECK, SO IT IS CONSTRUCTED COMPLETELY OUT OF THE EASEMENT. WHILE THE EXPERIENCE APPEARS TO BE SUBSTANTIAL IF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS BASIS FOR APPROVAL HOLD, HARMLESS AGREEMENT SHOULD BE ENTERED INTO THIS APPLICATION TO ENSURE THAT THE APPLICANT IS AWARE THAT THE CITY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE DECK IN THE EVENT THAT THE EASEMENT AREA HAS TO BE ACCESSED IN THE FUTURE. AND STAFF IS READY FOR QUESTIONS. ENGINEERING. AS STATED IN THAT SUMMARY. THE MANHOLE IS UM IF THERE WAS AN EVENT WHERE MAINTENANCE NEEDS TO BE PERFORMED. UM. WE FEEL THAT THE DECK IS ENCROACHING ON THAT. AREA OF BUILDING SPACE. THANK YOU. COME HERE FROM EUROPE. YES. 
          JIM KNOX ON WITH SOME YEAH. YES, THE MAN WHO ALWAYS IN THE MM HMM. THAT DOES. THERE. SOLD. TO BUY THEM. WAS. IT IS. SO WHITE. JACK THERE. WE FEEL. FOR ACCESS TO THE HOME SO AND STRUCTURE. A LOT CLOSER TO EIGHT PEOPLE. OR. THERE IS JUST CAN'T BELIEVE WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURE. 
          QUESTIONS COMING FROM THE COMMITTEE. CONSTRUCTION STARTED. YOU JUST NEVER WAITING PERMITS. 
          ZONE. THANK YOU FOR DOING IT IN THAT ORDER. JUST HAD ONE. I JUST WANT TO NOTE ON PAGE THREE OR FIVE OF THE STAFF REPORT, IT SEEMS TO SHOW THE MANHOLE COVER IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD. EXACTLY WHERE IT IS. DID THE SAME. RIGHT THERE. 
          HOTEL, THE MEASUREMENT IS. WITHIN A COLLEGES OF BEING. AT SIX FT NUMBER. I DIDN'T MEASURE 
          [01:55:03]
TO THE EDGE. OKAY? YOU SEE WHAT I'M GETTING AT? YES WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT. THOSE FIGURES ONE AND TWO, SO FIGURE ONE IS THE ENGINEERING PLANS AND THEN FIGURE TWO IS APPROXIMATE LOCATION BASED ON THOSE ENGINEERING PLANS. THIS EXHIBIT TONIGHT IS A NEW EXHIBIT. THAT WAS, AS THE APPLICANT SAID, PREPARED BY HIM AND PRESENTED GIFTS GIVEN TO STAFF SINCE THIS PUBLISHING THE STAFF REPORT, SO THIS IS A NEW DIMENSION EXHIBITS . UM THAT WAS PROVIDED TO US AFTER THE STAFF REPORT WAS ISSUED. CATHOLICS AND IN THE CASE OF PROBLEM HANDS. 
          REACCELERATION OKAY, THANK YOU. CAN WE MAKE SURE THAT THIS NEW SLIDE IS IN THE RECORD BEFORE WE CLOSED DOWN. ENGINEERING THIS IS DRAINING, DRAINING AS WELL RIGHT? IT SERVES THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY DREAMS PRISON. CORRECT THE DRAIN. JINX RANGES BEEN EXTENDS TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ON BOTH SIDES AND TO THE REAR IN THE NEIGHBORING SECTION, 24. YOU'RE ABLE TO BUILD THE DECK. BAKE IT SO THAT IT DOES NOT. INTERFERE WITH TRAINING ISSUES. MINT CORRECT? YES, THERE WILL NOT NO TAX ZONE. POSED. WATER. SO BACK LOOKING, YOU CAN REDESIGN THE DECK AND CONSTRUCTIVE AWAY. THAT THAT IS COMPLIANT WITH THE. THE SOUP WHERE THE CITY GET SMART, YOU CAN MAKE IT SMALLER. OF THAT SONG INDIAN HAD DISCUSSED IN THE HOME. AT THIS TIME. AMERICAN STATES. I PREFER THIS BUT THERE MAY BE THERE MAY BE AN ALTAR DESIGN. REPUBLICAN QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. IF SO, COME UP TO THE MIKE. GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS . I'M SHELLY DOWN. 45 30 ACCURATELY FARM ROAD ALBANY, HE LIVED DIRECTLY TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. UM I GUESS MY MAIN QUESTION IS ONE. WE WERE THE FIRST HOME THERE AND ALL THE SURROUNDING COMES WITH BUILT AFTER OURS. THEY SAID THIS REALLY HIGH. THE SLOPE OF IT IS VERY HARD. WE'VE HAD BRINGING ISSUES THAT. MILLION HOUSES, SO WE ACTUALLY DID HAVE ONE OF THE FILTERS INSTALLED. IN CHINA. WE WERE GETTING A LOT OF BONDING OVER TO THE CITY ENGINEER ON THAT. SO MY QUESTION IS THAT CUT OUT? FOR THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT REALLY JUST FROM THE ANIMAL ACCESS, OR IS THERE A FUNCTIONAL IMPACT? BECAUSE THAT BRINGS DIRECTLY TO THE BACK OF OUR LIVES? HIGH SCHOOL GRADE. IS WRITING FOR RIGHT PAST THE I DIDN'T KNOW IF IT WAS JUST FOR ACCESS. THERE'S A SWIM THERE, RIGHT? BASED ON THIS BEING A MANHOLE AND NOT A CATCH BASIN. I WOULD ASSUME BASED ON THE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS. THIS IS FOR ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE IF IT WAS ACTUALLY A CATCH BASIN, AS DEPICTED. ONE AFTER THE UPPER LEFT. I WOULD IMAGINE HAVING FUNCTIONAL USE, UM WITH AN OPEN LID, BUT THIS HAS A CLOSED LID. UM, I BELIEVE UM, SO THIS IS JUST FOR ACCESS AND IMPORTANT ENTRY. SO IF THERE LIKE SLOW BRAIN CHANGES TO THE LAW THAT HAVE TO BE DONE. ACCOMMODATE THE DEATH WOULD RESPECT THE FLOW OF WATER PATHWAY TO THEM. THIS CURRENT. THE SHORT FORM IS YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO CHANGE YOUR NEIGHBORS, DRAINAGE. SO THAT'S WHAT I OWE CODE. OKAY THIS IS BEING IT LOOKS LIKE A DRAINAGE SWELL TO ME FROM PLANTS BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE YOU PUT THE CATCH BASINS. CORRECT IT'S MOST LIKELY CONVEYING DRAINAGE TO THE CATCH BASIN, NOT ON THIS PROPERTY PAYING IS THAT IN THE EVENT OF LARGE RANGE, YOU MIGHT SEE SHEET FLOW IN THE BACKYARDS TOWARDS THOSE CATCH BASINS. CORRECT OKAY AND SO IS SWELL THE CORRECT TERM YES. SO YEP. 
          BUILDING ON THAT. THE VILLAGE, AND THIS BOARD HAS BEEN VERY CAREFUL TO MAKE SURE THAT THINGS DON'T GET PUT IN. THE SWELLS, SO THEY WORK. BEYOND. THE VILLAGE HAS SUBJECT OVER THE YEARS I'VE BEEN HERE PUSHING 40 YEARS AND THE VILLAGE EVENTUALLY. YES UH, RAIN EVENT THAT SHOWS YOU WHY IT'S A BAD IDEA TO SCREW WITH THE DRAINAGE. THERE HAVE BEEN SO SOME, WE'VE HAD 200 YEAR FLOODS IN THE LAST 20 YEARS. UM AND THEY SHOWED EVERY EVERYTHING THAT DIDN'T DRAIN RIGHT. 
          [02:00:01]
EVERYTHING THAT WAS COMPROMISED. ALL OF A SUDDEN SHOWED UP. UM SO NOT ALLOWED TO CHANGE YOUR NEIGHBORS DRAINAGE AND THERE IS A SWELL BACK THERE, AND IT DOES SORT OF FUNCTIONAL PURPOSE FOR SHEET FLOW. OKAY AND I SEE IT. DID YOU BUILD THIS STACK AND ALLOW THE VARIANT AND WANTED TO DO SOME KIND OF LANDSCAPING OR SCREAMING AROUND THE FACT THAT IS THAT ALLOWED. IT DEPENDS ON THE TERMS OF THE VARIANCE. WHAT EXACTLY ALLOWS AND IF IT'S A NARROWLY WRITTEN VARIANTS. IT WOULD JUST BE THAT THE DECK IS ALLOWED TO PROJECT OVER. UM, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S WRITTEN TIGHT ENOUGH TO SAY IT'S NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE SUPPORTS IN THERE OR CAN CANTILEVER OVER. UM THE VILLAGE CODE MUST HAVE GOT THIS WRONG IS NOTHING GOES THERE. YES A SIMILAR TO THE VARIANCE IS THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARD FOR EVERINGTON SUBDIVISION TRAINING . JEEZ AND THE PLATINUM SAY THERE CAN BE NO IMPROVEMENTS OR OBSTRUCTIONS TO THE FLOW OF, UM UH, STORMWATER WITHIN DRAINAGE, USE MINTS WITHOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. SO IF THE CITY ENGINEER REVIEWS PLANTINGS AND DENIES IT, THEN THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE A VARIANCE REQUEST SIMILAR TO THIS VARIANCE REQUEST TONIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OTHERS. I MOVED TO ACCEPT DOCUMENTS RELATED STEP FOR THE STAFF PROPORTION RELATED DOCUMENTS IN THE RECORD FOR VARIANCE. 46 2023 YR SECOND ON THE DOCUMENTS. SECOND. DISCUSSION OF THE DOCUMENT, NOTING THAT THE DRAWING PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT BE INCLUDED. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. HERE. THE ROLE FOR THE DOCUMENTS. MR KIRBY. MR LARSON? YES, MR SCHELL? YES, MR WALLACE? YES VOTES IN FAVOR OF DOCUMENTS DRAWINGS SUBMITTED BY THE ACT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON VARIOUS ITSELF. I MOVE FOR APPROVAL VARIANCE 46 2023. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONERS. CONDITIONERS. 
          STAFF REPORT THERE. YES, THE CONDITIONS AND STAFF REPORT. DO I HEAR A SECOND? SECOND. 
          DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. CAN I GET THE ROLE? MR KIRBY. MR WALLACE. MISS BRIGGS. NO. MR LARSON. MR SHELL. I HAVE FIVE BOOKS AGAINST THE MOTION. MOTION FAILS. OKAY? EXIST. YOU NEED TO GET SOME EXPLANATION AS TO WHY, UM IT DOESN'T IT IS A SUBSTANTIAL VARIANCE. THERE ARE CITY SERVICES INVOLVED. DON'T GET IN FRONT OF ME. 0.5 AND EVALUATION. YEAH, IT WAS. I PRESUME IT'S PURCHASED WITH THE KNOWLEDGE IT CERTAINLY PREDATES THE AND THERE'S NO SEX IN THE RECORD. THAT WAS AND CAN BE SOLVED WITH SMALLER DECK. HMM AND IT WOULD CERTAINLY SET A PRECEDENT. REALLY DON'T WANT THAT ON OUR DRAINAGE SWALES. AND I WOULD JUST ADD THAT WE DID RECENTLY. HAVE YOU A SIMILAR VARIANTS IN THE REGION NECESSITY. MENTIONED AND WE TURNED THAT ONE DOWN AS WELL. SO MULTIPLE ONES. SO IN THAT SITUATION. KEEP WITH PRESIDENT. 
          WE'VE ALREADY SAID WE NEED TO SAY NO. ONE. THIS ONE. YEAH. CLAIM COMMENTS IS CONSISTENT. I CONCUR WITH EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SHARED AS WELL, AS YOU KNOW, CONCERNED ABOUT DISRUPTION OF CITY INFRASTRUCTURE. UM AND SETTING A PRECEDENT. YEAH. FINALLY AGAIN, THE PRESIDENT AND THEN, UM THERE IS A FAIRLY EASY SOLUTION OF SHRINKING THE DECK. TO KEEP IT. STOPPER. AREA SO. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER BUSINESS? NONE FROM STAFF. ALL MEMBERS FOR COMMENT. NO NO, THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SARAH. FOR MENIAL WITH THAT
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.