[I. Call to order]
[00:00:03]
KIND OF LAST. AT THIS TIME. I LIKE TO CALL TO ORDER THE ARCHITECTURE REBORN MEETING FROM MONDAY, DECEMBER 11TH 2023 COULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL? MR HENSON? HERE, MR. ITEM HERE, MR. BROWN HERE, MR DAVID HERE, MR MALLETS HERE, MISS MORE HERE, MR STROLLER. COUNCIL MEMBER BRISK HERE. THERE ARE SIX VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT. WE HAVE A QUORUM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS
[III. Action on minutes: November 13, 2023]
THERE ANY ACTION ON THE MINUTES FOR THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1320 23. I FOUND THE MINUTES TO BE APPROPRIATE AND COMPLETE MY STANDPOINT, I HAVE NOTHING TO ADD TO THEM AND NO, NO, NO ONE ELSE DOES THAT WILL MOVE APPROVAL. I'LL SECOND MHM. MR EATON? YES I'M SORRY. WAS THAT MR HANSON OR MR MALICE ON THE SECOND? MR. MR MR MALINS. YES. MR BROWN? YES MR DAVEY? YES MISS MORE? YES MR HENSON? YES? MOTION PASSES. THERE'S SIX VOTES TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. THANK YOU,[IV. Additions or corrections to agenda]
UH, STAFFING THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE NEXT AGENDA FROM STATS? SO YOU'RE YOU'RE YOU'RE LABORING ALONE TONIGHT. I'M IMPRESSED TO SEE YOU BACK UP AND AT THE OARS.IT'S GREAT TO BE BACK. GOOD TO SEE EVERYONE AGAIN. SORRY TO INTERRUPT, MR. RIGHT THIS TIME.
I'D LIKE TO ADMINISTER THE OATH TO ALL WITNESS OF APPLICANTS AND STAFF WHO PLAN TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? IS FUNNY TIME. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY VISITORS HERE FOR ITEMS NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA.
[VI. Cases]
SEE NONE. I'D LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH CASE ARABY 16 2023 PER CERTIFICATE APPROPRIATENESS TO CONSTRUCT SIX NEW TO TOWN HOMES ALONG RICHMOND SQUARE, LOCATED GENERALLY NORTH OF MAIN STREET. THE APPLICANT IS MOUTHS, ARCHITECTS AND MR HANSEN. I'M GOING TO EXCUSE MYSELF AND STEPPED DOWN TO THE FLOOR. PLEASE DO. THANK YOU. SO JUST OVERALL LOCATION. I'M SURE WE'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH IT, BUT IT'S THE SITE OUTLINED AND RIGHT HERE, SO IT'S A LONG RICHMOND SQUARE. MAIN STREET HAS WICK AND THEN THIS IS MCDONALD LANE. SO THIS IS A PUBLIC ALLEY ALONG THE BACK SIDE OF IT. AND SO THE OVERALL SAY YOU'RE GOING TO SEE IS ACTUALLY THE CONVERGENCE OF THREE DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURAL TYPES. WE HAVE APARTMENTS. SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND TOWN HOMES ALL MEETING AT THIS ONE LOCATION, SO HERE'S THE OVERALL. UH FOOTPRINTS OF THE SIX UNITS SO AGAIN, £6 HOMES UNITS FOR GENERALLY ALONG RICHMOND SQUARE. AND THEN TOO LONG HIS WICK SO THERE WILL BE A LITTLE HARD TO SEE HERE. I SHARED DRIVEWAY THAT COMES OFF OF THE PUBLIC ALLEY WHERE THEY WILL BE GARAGES THAT ACCESS THAT, AND SO AGAIN, THERE ARE THREE FRONTAGE IS SO TECHNICALLY RICHMOND SQUARE, MAIN STREET AND ZWICK ARE ALL FRONT YARDS ALONG THIS AND JUST THE OTHER CONDITIONS TO MAKE EVERYBODY AWARE IS THAT I'M SURE YOU'RE AWARE OF THE BRICK WALL THAT'S OUT THERE TODAY. THERE ARE LARGE GRADE CHANGES COMING ALONG. FROM THE STREET DOWN INTO THE SITE. SO THE BUILDING IS FORESIGHTED BRICK, UM AS SHOWN HERE, SO THIS USES CUES FROM THE RICHMOND SQUARE TRADITIONAL GEORGIAN STYLE OF ARCHITECTURE AND ROOF FORMS THAT WE SEE IN RICHMOND SQUARE AS WELL. SO THERE'S ALSO A BRICK WALL THAT SO THIS IS LOOKING ALONG MAIN STREET, SO THIS WILL GET A LITTLE ENHANCEMENT. THERE'S A BRICK WALL TODAY THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN AS IT EXISTS. SO THIS BRICK WALL PROVIDES VISUAL INTEREST AND CONTINUITY FOR THE BUILT FORM ALONG MAIN STREET, WHICH IS DESIRABLE IN ORDER TO KEEP THAT URBAN FORM ALONG THAT STREET STRETCH THERE AND THEN THE APPLICANT HAS ALSO DONE A GREAT JOB OF ADDING OPERABLE AND ACTIVE DOORS ALONG MAIN STREET AS WELL. SO IT IS EVERY ELEVATION IS PROPERLY ADDRESSING THE PUBLIC STREETS AT THE CORNERS. THE CITY ARCHITECT HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND IS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS MIDDLE MATERIALS THAT ARE IN YOUR PACKETS. AND THEN THIS WAS JUST ADDED, I THINK TODAY OR YESTERDAY. THIS IS YOU HAVE PAPER COPIES IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY, SO THIS IS SHOWING ADDITIONAL ELEVATION. SO THIS IS THE WHAT'S THE BACK OR WHAT'S REALLY ALONG MCDONALD LANE HERE, SO IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE CORNER OF MCDONALD AND CHESWICK, SO LOOKING AT THE END OF THE BUILDING THERE, AND YOU CAN KIND OF SEE WHAT THE BACK OF THAT WALL AND ALSO DESCRIBING WHAT IT'S LIKE HERE AND THEN THIS IS WHAT YOU'LL SEE ALONG THIS PRIVATE DRIVES WITH THE UM, REAR LOADED GARAGE DOORS. AND SO JUST TO MAKE, UM, JUST ADD ONE THING[00:05:04]
TO THIS, SO OUR CITY ARCHITECT HAS REVIEWED IT. HE IS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, HE SAYS THAT YOU KNOW, AND THIS IS A LITTLE BIT MORE UTILITARIAN, SINCE IT'S THE BACK, BUT HE THINKS IT'S APPROPRIATE AND THAT THIS WINDOW PROPERLY BREAKS UP THAT REAR MASSING. ONE THING THAT STAFF DOES WANT TO NOTE IS THAT THE GARAGE DOOR WITS SO THE D G R S. DO YOU REQUIRE THAT GARAGE DOORS BE NO GREATER THAN 10 FT IN WIDTH, AND SO WE SCALE THIS OUT, UM, QUICKLY. WE THINK THIS IS LARGER THAN 10 FT. SO WE RECOMMEND A CONDITION BE ADDED THAT THE GARAGE DOORS BE REVISED TO MEET THOSE CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT WAIVER IS APPROVED BY THE AIR B TO ALLOW FOR THOSE WIDER GARAGE DOORS. AND SO HERE'S AN OVERALL THREE D RENDERING. SO YOU HAVE RICHMOND SQUARE ALONG THE CORNER HERE.THIS IS MAIN STREETS HAS WORKED. AND THIS IS THE APARTMENT BUILDING RIGHT HERE. SO AT THE TIME OF THE STAFF REPORT WHEN WRITING THERE WAS NO INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOUT WINDOWS OR COLUMNS, ROOF MATERIAL COLOR LIGHTING. AND SO WHILE THE WHOLE BUILDING IS BRICK, THERE ARE SOME COMPOSITES SUCH AS, LIKE HARDY BOARD MATERIALS SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS AND IN THE WRITTEN SUMMIT MATERIAL. SO THIS IS VERY TYPICAL OF THE VILLAGE CENTER TO HAVE THAT COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND YOU'LL SEE THAT IN THE STAFF REPORT THEIR CONDITIONS RECOMMENDING THAT MATERIAL AND WINDOWS BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. AND THERE'S ALSO CODE STANDARDS. I FORGOT TO MENTION FOR THE FRONT PORCHES AS WELL. AND SO STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE FRONT PORCHES ARE REVISED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEPTH AND THE HEIGHT OF THE PORCHES FROM THE GRADE ITSELF. AND THAT'S THE PORCH FACING MAIN STREET, NOT THE PORCHES, FRONT AND BACK. IT WOULD BE BOTH. YEAH SO I THINK THERE'S LOTS OF PORCHES, PORCHES, PORCHES. OKAY, THANK YOU. SO ONE OTHER THING THAT YOU'LL SEE IS A CONDITION IS THAT OUR CODE REQUIRES UTILITIES BEING THE CIDER REAR YARD. AND SO THERE'S OBVIOUSLY NO INFORMATION ABOUT THAT AVAILABLE AT THIS POINT, SINCE THIS IS ARCHITECTURAL IN NATURE, SO STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THAT CONDITION THAT ANY NEW PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITIES BE ADDED TO THE SIDE OR REAR YARD. AND SO IT'S NOT A LONG ONE OF THE PUBLIC STREETS HERE. AND THEN, IN ADDITION TO ARCHITECTURE, THE CITY'S URBAN CENTER CODE ALSO HAS STREET STANDARDS AS WELL. AND SO THIS IS SORT OF A UNIQUE THING. AND SO I'LL GO THROUGH THESE LITTLE QUICKLY, BUT, UM, THIS IS THERE'S AGAIN THREE STREETS. SO RICHMOND SQUARE MAIN STREET AND CHESWICK SO LONG MAIN STREET HERE, UM THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING ON STREET PARKING IN ORDER TO MATCH THE EXISTING PATTERN THAT'S ESTABLISHMENT NAMES ON MAIN STREET. SO THE URBAN CENTER CODE CALLS FOR PARKING THAN SIDEWALK THAN TREE LAWN. I THINK BACK IN 2016, OR 17, THE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD APPROVED A WAIVER TO ALLOW FROM MAIN STREET TO ACTUALLY FLIP FLOP. THE I BELIEVE THE SIDEWALK IN THE TREE LINE. AND SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO ADD THAT ON STREET PARKING AND IS MATCHING THE PREVIOUS APPROVALS WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF MAIN STREET. THERE IS ONE OTHER THING THAT'S ALONG MAIN STREET. THERE IS LIKE A MINOR BUMP OUT HERE FOR THE ON STREET PARKING, AND THAT IS WHERE THERE IS A AN EXISTING UTILITY BOX. SO STAFF RECOMMENDS CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THAT THOSE EXISTING ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES ARE VAULTED THERE EITHER BURIED OR RELOCATED , SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. SO THIS HAS BEEN REQUIRED AN ACCOMPLISHED BY OTHER DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE VILLAGE CENTER. THE CITY HAS ALWAYS BEEN. OUR PLANS HAVE ALWAYS PUT AESTHETICS AS A HIGH PRIORITY AND THEN FROM A FUNCTIONAL SIDE AS WELL, LOOKING AT THIS. WE BELIEVE THAT THIS GOES AWAY, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL PARKING ON STREET PARKING SPACE TO THIS CORNER HERE. AND THEN FOR RICHMOND SQUARE. THERE'S NO CHANGE IS PROPOSED OR REQUIRED. IT'S MATCHING THE URBAN CENTER CODES RECOMMENDED STREETSCAPE THAT IS SHOWN HERE IN THIS DIAGRAM. AND THEN FOR CHESWICK, THERE IS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. THAT CERTAIN ASPECTS OF IT. YOU'LL SEE UNDERLYING HERE AND IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, SO WE RECOMMEND THAT THE SIDEWALK BE WIDENED. IT'S CURRENTLY SHOWN US 5 FT. WE RECOMMEND IT BE WIDENED TO 6 FT.
AND THEN IT ACTUALLY BE BROUGHT A LITTLE BIT CLOSER TO CHAOS WOULD DRIVE SO THAT THERE'S A 9 FT TREE LAWN. SO THE SECTION WOULD BE A DRIVEWAY INSTEAD OF PARKING. THIS WOULD BE A 9 FT TREE LINE AND THEN A 6 FT SIDEWALK, AND SO THERE WOULD BE NO ON STREET PARKING IN THE FUTURE. BUT THIS IS ACTUALLY TYPICAL. THE THERE'S BEEN OTHER LOCATIONS IN THE VILLAGE CENTER, WHERE THE AIR B HAS APPROVED A WIDER LIKE 9 FT. TREE LAWN IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE ON
[00:10:02]
STREET PARKING, IF DESIRED, AND SO THAT'S BEEN DONE AT I KNOW MILLER AVENUE AND THERE'S ONE OTHER PLACE, BUT I'M FORGETTING RIGHT NOW. SO STAFF RECOMMENDS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE SIDEWALK BE WIDE AND THAT'S THE SIDEWALK BE BRIGHT 9 FT FROM THE EXISTING ROADWAY FOR THAT TREE LAWN IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE ON STREET PARKING TO MATCH THIS DESIGN, AESTHETIC FUTURE. AND THERE'S ROOM FOR ALL THOSE THINGS AS WELL AS THEN MOVING THE POOR CHILD IS I MEAN, SOMEBODY HAS DONE THE MATH. WE BELIEVE SO AGAIN. THAT'S SOMETHING LIKE THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT. BUT IT'S ALL THE CHANGES I THINK ARE PRETTY MINUTE, SO WE AND IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO ZOOM IN HERE. BUT WE DO BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ROOM TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE THINGS. AND I CAN LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK TO THAT, TOO, IF THEY HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. SO JUST TO CLARIFY GETTING YOU'RE SAYING AT 9 FT TREE LAWN, OKAY? THIS WORKS. SO CURRENTLY THERE SHOWING A 14 FT TREE LINE SO FROM THE EDGE OF THE EXISTING STREET ALONG CHESWICK TO THE SIDEWALK, IT'S 14 FT. WE RECOMMEND THAT BEING NARROWED DOWN TO NINE, SO WE'LL INCREASE THE FRONT YARD A LITTLE BIT, BUT IT WILL PROVIDE A CONSISTENT STREET STREETSCAPE FROM LONG CASEWORK AS WELL. OKAY SOMEWHERE LOOKING BACK AT THE AT THE CONDITIONS HERE ON ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE STAFF REPORT, AND IT LOOKS LIKE MAYBE THEN ONE THAT THIS DOESN'T NECESSARILY REFLECT THAT. IS THAT CORRECT? I SEE A 6 FT SIX A 6 FT EIGHT OR 16 LIKE THAT. IT'S 6 FT. 8 FT WIDE TREMENS. WHICH CONDITION IS THAT 10 NUMBER 10 AND 10 APOLOGIZE FOR ANY CONFUSION. WEST WE GET THAT SHOULD BE THE PLAN TO BE UPDATED. PROVIDE A YEAH, I THINK SOMETHING THAT DELETED A 6 FT SIDEWALK. AND YEAH, I GUESS THAT'S AN 8 FT WIDE TREE LINED. SORRY I MIGHT BE SAYING NINE, BUT I BELIEVE IT'S YEAH. CONDITIONS LINE EIGHT. YEAH. SO YEAH. SORRY TENSION SAY PLANS BE UPDATED, PROVIDE A 6 FT. SIDEWALK IN 8 FT TREE LAWN ALONG CAUSE WITH DR OKAY, WELL, WE GOT 6 FT SIDE WALKING CONDITION NINE. YES SO WE REALLY ONLY NEED THE EIGHT FOR JUST 93 THAT CONDITION TIME. YEAH. MR BROWN NOTED THAT SIDE IS JUST SPEAKING UP ON HIS BEHALF, BUT SORRY, DIDN'T WRAP IT UP. SORRY ABOUT THIS CONDITION FOR US TO LOSE THAT, BECAUSE THEN WE WOULD READ THE WRONG THING. YEAH SORRY ABOUT THAT. GLAD WE GOT THAT STRAIGHTENED OUT. AND THEN THERE'S ALSO THREE WAIVERS AS WELL REQUESTED BY THE APPLE PINS. SO WAIVER A IS TO ALLOW THE STREET YARD, WHICH IS THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO BE 7 FT. WHERE CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM 10 FT SETBACK AND THAT'S JUST REALLY AREA OUTLINED IN RIGHT HERE ALONG RICHMOND SQUARE. SO UM SO STAFF THING SAID THIS IS UNREASONABLE REQUEST AND MEETS THE, UM THE REVIEW CRITERIA IN IN THIS CODE FOR WAIVERS. SO AGAIN, IT'S ABOUT 6.5 TO 7 FT. UM BUT SINCE IT'S A 3 FT DIFFERENCE, IT DOES NOT APPEAR SUBSTANTIAL AND STILL ACHIEVES THE APPROPRIATE PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT SO AND IT'S NOT OUTSIDE OF THE REALM OF THE VILLAGE CENTER. SO WE'RE GONNA BUILD CENTERS URBAN CENTER CODE. THERE'S OTHER AREAS IN THE CITY. I THINK EVEN THE SECTIONS OF THE APARTMENTS ALLOW FOR SETBACKS AS LOW AS FIVE STEAM, SO CERTAINLY SEVEN IS STILL WITHIN THE REALM OF WHAT'S NORMAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND OTHER AREAS OF THE VILLAGE CENTER, AND IT STILL MEETS THE GOALS OF CREATING THAT URBAN STREETSCAPES, SO THEY'RE STILL PROVIDING THE ON STREET PARKING TREE LAWN SIDEWALK. THAT'S ALL STILL BEING ACCOMMODATED ALONG THAT THAT AREA THERE, SO PROVIDING LESS OF A SETBACK DOES NOT, UM AT THE AT THE COST OF DOING OTHER THINGS, AND AGAIN, IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE URBAN FORM THAT IS DESIRED, AND THE INTENT OF OUR CODE WITHIN THE VILLAGE CENTER IN OUR STRATEGIC PLAN. THE WAIVER BE IS TO ALLOW US TO REAR YARD SETBACK OF ABOUT AS LITTLE AS 1.5 FT, WHERE CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 15 FT. SO THIS IS A VERY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCE HERE DUE TO THE SHAPE OF THE LOT. THERE'S BEEN SIMILAR WAIVERS APPROVED BY THE AIR B FOR OTHER AREAS SUCH AS MARKETING MAIN IN THE HEIGHTS CENTER PARKING LOT WHERE THERE'S THESE CURVATURE OF THE LOTS THAT THAT ARE EXISTING CONDITIONS. UM AND THE THING THAT YOU KNOW ALSO CREATES. THIS IS THAT OUR URBAN CENTER CODE ASSUMES THERE'S THAT TRADITIONAL LOT AND BLOCKED PATTERN RIGHT OF DEVELOPMENT. IT DOESN'T UH, ACCOMMODATE OR FORESEE THESE SORT OF CURVATURE STREETS THAT ASSUMES EVERY UNIT IS HAVING LIKE A RECTANGULAR LOTS BUT LIKE A DETACHED GARAGE IN THE BACK, SO WE STILL THINK THAT THIS IS ACHIEVING THE URBAN FORM THAT ARE CODES? UM UM AND[00:15:02]
HAVE THE INTENT OF BUILDING WITHIN THE VILLAGE CENTER AND AGAIN, THERE'S A SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET HERE AT THIS BUILDING ON CAMPUS WICK, AND I GUESS IT'S OFF THE PAGE. BUT THERE'S OTHER SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES ALONG MCDONNELL LANE ON ON THE OTHER SIDE AS WELL. AND THEN THE THIRD WAIVER IS CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM 90% LOT FRONTAGE, SO THE BUILDING HAS TO TAKE UP A MINIMUM OF 90% OF THE LOT FRONTAGE. AND SO HERE, THERE'S A MAINSTREAM THAT 73 RICHMOND'S AT 75 AND TEST WORKS AT 59. SO WE FEEL THAT, UM, THIS IS THERE'S UNIQUE SIGHTS. CIRCUMSTANCES UM, FOR THE SITE ITSELF. SO THE FIRST THING IS THAT IT HAS THREE FRONTAGE IS AND SO USUALLY THE FRONT YARD IS, YOU KNOW THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS THAT'S KIND OF PUSHING ALL THE BUILDINGS AND ADDITIONALLY WE KNOW THAT THERE'S A LOT OF UTILITY EASEMENTS AND SO BUILDINGS CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED OVER THOSE UTILITY EASEMENTS. SO THAT'S ALSO PUSHING THE BUILDINGS BACK. WE MENTIONED OUR UTILITY BOX ON THE FRONT HERE, AND WE KNOW THAT THERE'S OTHERS ALONG THE SCRATCH AS WELL. AND SO, UM, SO THOSE ARE THE SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS . WE BELIEVE IT'S MEETING THE INTENT OF R D GRS AND OUR URBAN CENTER CODE BY, YOU KNOW, IT'S OVERALL MAXIMIZING THE SPACE. YOU KNOW WHERE THERE'S THE ON STREET PARKING IN THE STREET SCAPE. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO, UM , KEEPING AND ACTUALLY UPGRADING THAT BRICK WALL, SO IT'S KEEPING THAT URBAN FORM THAT'S DESIRED BY THE URBAN CENTER CODE AND OUR STRATEGIC PLAN. AND THEN ALONG CHESWICK HERE, THIS IS ALSO WHERE EASEMENTS ARE, AND THIS IS ALSO WHERE IT'S TRANSITIONING TO. THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, SO WE DON'T BELIEVE IT'S OUT OF CHARACTER ON THIS SIDE, EVEN THOUGH IT'S THE LOWEST AMOUNT. IT'S KEEPING THAT DESIRED PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT ALONG CHESWICK, WHICH IS PREDOMINANTLY THOSE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SO THIS IS THE CRITERION THE STAFF REPORT. WE WERE MADE AWARE THAT THERE WAS ONE ERROR IN OUR STAFF REPORT.WE JUST DID A CODE UPDATE. AND SO I FORGET WHAT IT SAYS IN THERE, BUT IT SHOULD SAY CONDITIONS SO AGAIN, JUST AS A REMINDER. WE DID A CODE UPDATES AND NOW ONE OF THE CRITERIA HAS BEEN UPDATED TO SAY BE NECESSARY FOR REASONS OF FAIRNESS DUE TO UNUSUAL BUILDING STRUCTURE OR SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. SO TO CONCLUDE THE APPLICANT HAS SUCCESSFULLY PULLED CUES FROM THE EXISTING RICHMOND SQUARE DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN AND MATCHES THE SCALE OF THE APARTMENTS AT THE SAME TIME, SO IT'S A VERY WELL DESIGNED BUILDING. THE STREETSCAPE IS APPROPRIATE AND ALSO WELL DESIGNED AND WITH SOME MINOR CHANGES TO THE CHESWICK, UM, SIDEWALK AND TREE LINE AND WITH THE BEARING OF THESE UTILITIES WILL BE CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THOSE THREE FRONTAGE IS AND SO, UM, IF THE IF THE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD FINES, UM THAT THIS SHOULD BE APPROVED. THERE ARE THOSE CONDITIONS SOMEBODY MENTIONED DURING MY PRESENTATION AND THE STAFF REPORTS. AND THEN SINCE THE ISSUING OF THE STAFF REPORT, WE DID GET THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SO WE RECOMMEND THREE UPDATES. SO UPDATES TO CONDITIONS NINE. THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE 6 FT ALONG CHESWICK DRIVE, I THINK, YEAH, I CAUGHT THAT ONE EARLIER. AND THEN 11. THE FRONT STOOP DEPTH AND HEIGHT ARE ADVISED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. AND THEN 12.
THIS IS A NEW ONE. BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WE GOT THAT THE GARAGE DOORS SHALL BE REVISED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS OR A SEPARATE WAIVER AS APPROVED BY THE AIR B.
UM. SO WE'RE REPLACING ALL OF WHAT IS IN WHAT WE WOULD REPLACE ALL OF WHAT IS NOW IN CONDITION NIGHT WITH THAT SOMEWHERE VERSION. CORRECT THAT IS OUR RECOMMENDATION. YES WE'LL NEED TO BRING THAT BACK UP WHEN WE COME TO THAT PART OF THE MEETING, OTHERWISE WE'LL LOSE TRACK AND THAT'S MY PRESENTATION. HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I HAVE NO QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. BUT WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. RESULTS. YEAH. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME. HAVE YOU SEEN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER? DO YOU HAVE ANY ANY REACTIONS TO STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, ETCETERA, AND YOU WANT TO READ ANYTHING YOU WANT TO RESPOND WITH, OR STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS APPROPRIATE? ANYTHING I THINK EVERYTHING THAT STATED AS APPROPRIATE AND CAN BE CHANGED SIMPLY ON OUR END. HOW DO YOU ADDRESS NUMBER ITEM 12 WITH THE GARAGE DOORS. WE WOULD MAYBE CONSIDER JUST HAVING THREE INDEPENDENT GARAGE DOORS, WHICH MAY CHANGE THE OVERALL WIDTH. BUT IF THAT DOESN'T FIT ON OUR PROPOSED BUILDING, THEN WE WILL JUST SCALE BACK DOWN TO TWO, WHICH WE ORIGINALLY HAD. BECAUSE THAT THAT WOULD BE AND AGAIN. THIS WAS NOT TALKING TO THE BOARD. BUT THAT WAS THE ONE THING CAN YOU BRING UP THE REVERSE? UM UM SORRY. YEAH SO THE BOTTOM ONE BUG ME BECAUSE
[00:20:06]
THERE'S A LOT OF ASYMMETRY THERE. I MEAN, YOU'VE GOT THE ONE WINDOW ON THE GROUND FLOOR.WHICH YOU KNOW, LIKE, I'D LOVE TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE WINDOW. BUT I UNDERSTAND FROM THE FOUR PLAN WHY IT'S PROBABLY NOT PRACTICAL. BUT THEN I SEE THE BIG GARAGE WITH THE LITTLE GARAGE AND THAT JUST KIND OF AND THAT'S WHY I DROVE ALL AROUND CHESWICK AND ITALY CROSSING TODAY LOOKING FOR ANYTHING. AND I, AND ALTHOUGH THERE ARE SOME DOUBLE DOORS THERE, I NOTICED, BUT THEY WERE THERE IN ELY CROSSING. MAINLY YOU DON'T HAVE ANY INSTANCE WHERE YOU HAVE ON A SINGLE PLANE DOUBLE IN THE SCENE. YOU'VE GOT AN INSTANCE WHERE THERE'S A DOUBLE OR A DOUBLE AND A SINGLE LETTER EXACTLY THE SAME. SO I'M I'M THAT JUST LOOKS UNBALANCED TO ME, SO I WOULD EITHER LIKE THREE IF IT CAN BE DONE OR TO 10. WOULD BE MY REACTION BECAUSE THAT THAT IT JUST LOOKS THE BALANCE IS WRONG. YOU SAY TO 10 FT DOORS? WELL, I MEAN, EITHER I WANT TWO DOORS THAT ARE THE SAME WITCH OR THREE DOORS THAT ARE THE SAME WITH BUT NOT I'M TALKING FOR BUILDING I MEAN PER PER PER ITALIAN FOR UNIT THAT JUST WHEN I LOOKED AT THAT, IT JUST SEEMS IT. IT BOTHERED THE GEORGIAN PART OF ME, I GUESS IS WHAT I WOULD SAY I DIDN'T HAVE DON'T HAVE THE SYMMETRY THAT I LOOK FOR IN GEORGIAN ARCHITECTURE. THE ONLY GOOD THING IS THOSE TOURS ARE PRETTY WELL HIDDEN FROM MOST PUBLIC VIEWS OTHER THAN THE ONES OTHER THAN THE UNIT. THAT STANDS ALONE AND DOESN'T HAVE A BACKYARD NEIGHBORHOOD. BECAUSE THEN YOU'RE DOING WHAT YOU DRIVE DOWN BECAUSE WE BECAUSE WE'RE SEEING THE WHOLE SHIP, THE WHOLE SHEBANG, AND THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S WHAT PROBABLY DROVE ME MORE BECAUSE AS TO THE ONES THAT FACE EACH OTHER, BUT THE ONE THAT'S ALL BY ITSELF THAT PART THAT WE DO HAVE TO SEE THE LANDSCAPE UP THAT CORNER. WHAT IT'S A FOOT BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE PAINTED ORANGE AND POINT STUFF. UH YEAH, ONE POINT WIDE. I HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION. THANK YOU. GREAT JOB TAKING DESIGN OUT ONES FROM RICHMOND SQUARE. ONE ITEM THAT IN PARTICULAR, THOUGH, I NOTICED IT WASN'T DUPLICATED WORTHY DORMERS ALONG THE ROOF LINE. I DON'T REALLY HAVE A THOUGHT. EITHER WAY, BUT I JUST WONDERING WHAT YOU THOUGHT PROCESS WAS EITHER SETTING YOUR BUILDING TO LOOK A LITTLE DIFFERENT INTENTIONALLY. OR DIDN'T LIKE THE LOOK OF THEM ON RICHMOND OR SURE THERE IS AN INTENTIONAL DECISION TO ENSURE OUR BUILDINGS ARE COMPLEMENTARY IN TERMS OF PALETTE, BUT NOT IDENTICAL TO ONE ANOTHER, SO TO SET US A LITTLE BIT OF PARK FROM THE PRE EXISTING CONDITION. AND IF YOU THOUGHT ABOUT A BRICK SELECTION YET YES, TONES GOING ON THERE WITH RICHMOND WITH THE BUILDINGS NEXT TO IT. I HAVE A SAMPLE THAT I'M HAPPY TO SHARE WITH YOU GUYS AND SOME PHOTOS OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AT RICHMOND AS WELL AND HOW WE INTEND TO REPLICATE THAT YOU'RE PREPARED. I LOVE SHOWING TELLING. GREAT, UM SO HERE'S THE PROPOSED SAMPLE THAT WE HAVE.
BUT THIS IS SHOWING THE MODULAR SIZE, WE WOULD BE USING A OVERSIZED HANDMADE SO WHILE THE PALETTE AND TEXTURE IS A LITTLE MORE IN TUNE, THE OVERALL COMPOSURE OF IT WOULD BE LARGER IN SIZE. AND I HAVE AN EXHIBIT AS WELL SHOWING JUST PASS THAT OVER HERE, AND WE CAN. AND I'M GONNA DO ARCHITECT STUFF. SOME NOTES BASED OFF THE EXISTING SQUARE CONDITION. NO I MY COMPLIMENTS, I THOUGHT, PARTICULARLY THE TREATMENT ON MAIN STREET WITH THAT WALL IN BETWEEN. I THOUGHT WAS VERY NICE . UM AND SO IT WAS QUITE QUITE PLEASED. LOOKING AT THESE. MY REACTION. THANK YOU. YEAH. YEAH. AND AS AS FAR AS AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, THE THREE THE THREE EXISTING WAIVER REQUESTS I HAVE NO ISSUES WITH THOSE, UM I THINK THIS IS AN UNUSUAL LOT AND THANK HEAVENS. WE DID OUR REVISION TO THE CODE BECAUSE IT MAKES IT EASY BECAUSE I THINK THAT'S WHAT OUR INTENTION WAS TO BE ABLE TO SAY THIS, BUT I AGAIN I WOULD GO BACK TO THE EACH UNIT HAS TWO DOORS IF YOU CAN GET THREE, AND THAT'S FINE, BUT OTHERWISE THEY WOULD BE, THEY WOULD BE TWO DOORS THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO CODE. SO UM, TWO DOORS OF THE SAME, WHICH IS NOT A 10 FT DOOR, A 9 FT ONE. I AGREE WITH MR WRIGHT'S COMMENTS. YEAH AGAIN. I THINK IT'S A BEAUTIFUL BUILDING GREAT JOB USING THE INTERIOR LAYOUT. UH AND THOSE THOSE DOORS ALONG THE MAIN FRONTAGE ON MAIN
[00:25:08]
STREET JUST LOOKS GREAT. PROBABLY LIKE THE LAST ONE TO KEEP MY FINGERS CROSSED FOR THIS ONE COMPONENT BEFORE. YEAH, HOPEFULLY WE'LL SEE THIS ONE. YEAH. UM YOU WANT TO MAKE A NUMBER? YOU WERE LIKE MAKING NOTES THERE. MR BROWN'S OKAY. THIS IS GONNA TAKE A LONG TIME.ONE. PULL UP COMMENTS. WHY DON'T WE HANDLE? LOOK CAN WE HANDLE THE WAIVERS SEPARATELY? WHILE WE HANDLE THE WAIVERS SEPARATELY, I'LL DO THE WAIVER MOTION AND THEN YOU CAN DO THE ACTION. THE OTHER THE SECOND ABOUT THAT. IS THE BOARD COMFORTABLE WITH ME MOVING TO APPROVE ALL THREE WAIVERS AT THE SAME TIME. ANYBODY EVER RESERVATIONS ABOUT A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS? MAYBE TAKING A LOOK AT THE THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGE. THAT'S WHY THIS WAY . WHERE'S THE SEPARATION BETWEEN TWO BUILDINGS HERE? I BELIEVE IT'S 14 FT. SO I WAS JUST WONDERING IF YOU KNOW IF THERE'S ANY CONSIDERATION FOR BASICALLY IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S REPEATING THIS ASIDE AT THOSE TWO LOCATIONS, AND THAT DOES START TO BECOME VERY CLOTHES FOR THE AMOUNT OF WINDOWS AND THEN WITH THE, UM YES, THE SEPARATION BEING SOMEWHAT SMALL, SMALLER THERE, SO I WOULD. ENCOURAGED TO GIVE SOME CONSIDERATION FOR WHAT THAT FEELS LIKE. WALKING BETWEEN THERE. AS WELL AS FROM INSIDE. UM, THAT WAS ONE COMMENT. UH CERTAINLY GOING TO HAVE TO LIKE YOUR NEIGHBOR. I MEAN, YOU'RE IF YOU'RE IF YOU HAVE YOUR WINDOW OPEN IN THE EVENING, YOU WANT TO BE QUIET. THERE'S ALSO, UM I WOULD TAKE A LOOK AT THE FIRE CODE FOR SEPARATION. THERE'S CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF OPENING ALLOWED, UM EXACT COULDN'T COME INTO PLAY THERE MIGHT NOT ALLOW THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF THAT AMOUNT OF OPENINGS. UM THE OTHER QUESTION. COMMENT. JUST DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE ELSE WOULD HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH THIS, BUT WITH THIS BEING OPEN HERE IN THE CENTER THAT IS PRETTY STEEP. DROP OFF. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE WOULD BE ANY, UM CONSIDERATION FOR, LIKE A LEDGE OR ANYTHING BEHIND THERE, OR JUST THIRD ANY ISSUES WITH THAT, WITH THEIR LOOKS TO BE A STANDARD RAILING, SO I DON'T SEE THAT AS AN ISSUE, BUT UM, COULD BE COULD BE A BIT OF A HAZARD. NOT SURE. ANYONE ELSE WOULD FEEL THAT WAY OR IF IT'S A DEAL IN TERMS OF THE WINDOW OPENING IN THE CENTER OPENING NOW YEAH. 12 FT, DOWN OR SO NEED SOMETHING IN THAT CENTER OPENING THAT WOULD KEEP SOMEBODY FROM CLIMBING THROUGH. YEAH, OR YEAH. JUST. CONSIDERATION I GUESS I GUESS FROM FROM FROM A FROM A RB STANDPOINT, I DON'T KNOW THAT WE CAN ARE CONCERNED ABOUT SAFETY. OH IT'S BEAUTIFUL BUT DANGEROUS. THAT'S OKAY. IT'S GOT THE BUT I AGREE WITH MR IF WE WERE TO BE FULL HEIGHT, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT BE WITH I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH A LARGER COVERING OF THAT WINDOW TO KEEP SOMEBODY FROM PHONY CLIMBING THROUGH THE KID AND SAID, WHAT COULD I CAN DO? MOM? YEAH. IS IT A PLACE FOR IRONWORKER? YEAH, THAT'S I CAN SEE THE IRON NORTH. IT'S REAL. YEAH NOT SOMETHING I FEEL NEEDS TO BE IN THERE JUST LIKE FUTURIST CONSIDERATION. UM. THE OTHER QUESTION OR COMMENT WITH THE FIVE WINDOW FRONT FACADE. I SEE THE CENTER WINDOWS, A BATHROOM WINDOW AND TO ME, THEN TELEVISION CAN FEEL A LITTLE CROWDED. AND SO I JUST WONDER IF THAT WINDOWS ENTIRELY NECESSARY.
UM WHAT IT HMM. BETTER AS A SMALLER WINDOW. UM I THINK THERE'S A LEVEL OF PRIVACY THAT HAVING GOT FOUR HIGH WINDOW MY LEGAL A LITTLE BIT TO BE DESIRED . THAT HAPPENS ON BOTH SIDES.
PARTICULARLY ON THE ONES THAT LOOK RIGHT ACROSS. YEAH. 14 FT AWAY. UM. ALL THE OTHER. UM IF YOU HAVE THE BACK ELEVATIONS WELL, OH, THESE WINDOW WELLS GET TO BE A LITTLE DEEP ONCE OR BEYOND 30 INCHES, THEY WOULD REQUIRE GUARD RAIL OR SOMETHING, UM, TO PREVENT FALLING THROUGH,
[00:30:02]
SO YOU MIGHT WANT TO IMAGINE HAVING A GUARDRAIL THERE. OTHERWISE THE LEVELS WERE TO COME OUT. THEY COULD HAPPEN. THEY COULD GO WITHOUT CARD REAL, BUT YOU STILL HAVE A BIT OF A DROP OFF THERE. UM SO THAT BASICALLY FROM OUR STANDPOINT THAT HAVE GUARDRAILS ARE REQUIRED AND THAT THAT COULD BE THAT COULD BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. PRESUMABLY I DON'T KNOW, DO WE? UNLESS WE WILL DO WE WANT TO LOOK AT THEM OR CAN STAFF APPROVE IT? I THINK I DON'T SEE IT AS UM I'VE I KNOW YOU GUYS. I DON'T I DON'T THINK I NEED THAT. WE JUST HAD ANOTHER CONDITION. WE'LL SEE THE GUARDRAILS WINDOW WELLS IN THE IRON WORK IN THE CENTER MAIN STREET RETAINING WALL OR SUBJECT STAFF. YEAH IF NECESSARY, IF NEEDED, BASED ON WHAT THE ELEVATION UM. I FELT THE SAME WAY ABOUT THE SINGLE WINDOW HERE AS WELL. IT FELT A LITTLE LONELY. UM JUST WONDERING IF THE THREE WINDOWS UP TOP COULD TIE INTO THE ONE WINDOW BLOW. AND MAYBE THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF THAT LINEAR OR SOMETHING. TWO AND TWO MIGHT ALIGN BETTER OR SOMETHING. I UNDERSTAND PLAYING WHY IT OCCURS THAT WAY, BUT THIS REVELATION WASN'T DOING A LOT FOR ME. AND THEN THE ONLY OTHER COME AHEAD WAS JUST ON THAT. SLIGHT PLAN THAT 1 FT CORNER.THE ONLY THING I THOUGHT ABOUT WAS LIKE A SNOWPLOW. THIRD PUSHING SNOW IS THAT YOU KNOW, BECAUSE I'D BE A POTENTIAL ISSUE BOLLARDS OR CONCERNS ON THAT. OTHERWISE, I THINK IT LOOKS GREAT. SO THE ONLY QUESTION THEN FOR ME IS THAT THAT ON THE ON SINGLE WINDOW ON THE GROUND LEVEL. FROM THE BOARD STANDPOINT. AND AGAIN IT BOTHERED ME, SO THAT'S WHY I WANT TO RAISE IT UP A LITTLE BIT. DO WE WANT? DO WE WANT TO REQUIRE A CHANGE? THAT'S THE QUESTION. AND IF SO, WHAT WOULD WE BE COMFORTABLE WITH, OKAY? BECAUSE I THINK I THINK WE CAN COMMENT. WE WOULD WE WOULD WELCOME A CHANGE. AND LET'S STAFF APPROVE IT. BUT THE QUESTION FOR US IS DO WE WANT TO REQUIRE A CHANGE? IN WHICH CASE THEN WE NEED TO HAVE A FURTHER DISCUSSION. IS THAT AGAIN? I DON'T KNOW. I'M NOT CRAZY ABOUT IT. I UNDERSTAND WHY IT'S THERE.
BUT I, BUT I DON'T I DON'T LIKE IT, BUT I WANTED, BUT OBVIOUSLY MR DAVIES HAS COMMENTED ABOUT IT TO THE QUESTION IS WHAT DO OTHER BOARD MEMBERS? HOW DO OTHER BOARD MEMBERS FEEL ABOUT IT? IT IS VERY DETACHED FROM THE THREE WINDOWS THAT ARE BEYOND IF YOU LOOK AT HIM THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGE, THEY'RE VERY SEPARATE. SO I DON'T SEE THAT NEEDING ANY ALIGNMENT, NECESSARILY, BUT MAYBE JUST SAYING TO GO FROM ONE WINDOW TO TWO WINDOWS THAT ARE EQUALLY WELL. BALIN STIR THAT MASTER. PRIMARILY YEAH, PROBABLY PROPOSED IN ORDER TO NOT CHANGE OUR FLOOR PLAN, WITH THE CONSIDERATION OF AN ADDED WINDOW IS POTENTIALLY ADDING TO FALSE WINDOWS EVENLY SPACED ON EITHER SIDE WITH MEDIA HERRINGBONE BRICK IN IT, SO IT STILL GIVES THE ILLUSION OF AN OTHER WINDOW.
BUT WITH AN INFIELD SPACE. YES THEY WERE EQUALLY, I GUESS. PRESUMABLY THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN LINED UP RATHER THAN HAVE DONE. THREE THAT DON'T MATCH UP WITH THE ONES ABOUT OR WOULD YOU RATHER JUST HAVE THREE? YOU DON'T CARE WHETHER THAT LINE UP AS LONG AS THEY WERE STORING. IT SHOWS IN THIS VIEW, BUT IT'S SO FAR. IT'S OKAY. SO YEAH, I MEAN, I'M I'M I'M THE MASTER OF FALSE THINGS. WHAT WOULD YOU MAKE BOTH OF THEM THEN YOU WOULD ONLY HAVE ONE WINDOW IN THAT MASTER ABOUT ONE WINDOW ON THAT FIVE SIDE. YEAH. SO WE COULD JUST SAY YEAH, I HAD A FOUR WINDOW. TWO I THINK YOU'RE PROPOSING DAD, TWO FOR WINDOWS AND EVEN SPACE FROM TUFO AND THAT THIRD AT THAT WINDOW.
YEAH, THAT WOULD LIKE TO CLUTTERED. HERE. ONE FOR WINDOW RIGHT NEXT TO YOUR REAL WINDOW.
IF YOU'RE GONNA BE YOU'RE GOING TO KEEP THE TWO ABOVE IN LINE. THE PROBLEM IS IF YOU IF YOU GO WITH IT. SORRY I'M WORKING AT AT THE BEDROOM. SO IF YOU PUT IF YOU MOVE THIS REAL WINDOW TOO MUCH RIGHT TO NOT BE ABLE TO PUT A BED ANYWHERE UNLESS YOU PUT A DEAD UNDER THE WINDOW, SO I GET THAT SOME, BUT SO IS WHAT BUT YOU COULD MOVE IT A LITTLE BIT AND THEN HAVE THREE MIGHT BE BETTER THAN TWO. BECAUSE YOU DID TOO TO BALANCE THEN YOU'D HAVE TO HAVE THIS WINDOW KIND OF WHERE THE BED IS. UNLESS YOU WANTED YOUR VET SUCH THAT WHEN YOU LOOK ALL THE WAY DOWN THE HALL FROM BED, WHICH THINGS NOT OPTIMAL. STAYED IN AIRBNB S THAT DO THAT. BUT THEN I DIDN'T LIKE IT. WERE YOU BROUGHT UP THE LINE ? DO YOU THINK WE'RE THE SINGLE FOE WINDOWS SOMEWHERE IN THERE? THE FACT THAT THEY'RE SO DISPLACED AT ANY OTHER ANGLE WITH THAT? JUST ADD ENOUGH. AND
[00:35:06]
THERE AND THERE. YEAH, I WOULD OFFER YOU KNOW, WITH THE WAY THINGS CAN CHANGE. I WOULD OFFER SOME, YOU KNOW, DESIGNER DISCRETION FOR MAKING IT FEEL A LITTLE ALRIGHT, SO WE ADD ONE OR TWO FOR WINDOWS THAT SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. HOW ABOUT THAT? YOU GUYS ARE YOU GUYS HAPPY WITH? YEAH AND JUST SAYING ANDREW PASSED ME THIS QUICK SKETCH TO SHOW UM THREE SEPARATE GARAGE DOORS SO WE CAN FORM TO THE 10TH MAXIMUM. OKAY WHAT'S WHAT'S WHAT'S WHAT? YOU BRING IT UP, BRING IT UP APPROACH. YOU KNOW THAT'S THAT'S AWESOME, SO THE ACTIVE WINDOW WON'T LINE UP WITH. BECAUSE BECAUSE BECAUSE THEY'RE ALL FORESTS. YEAH I DO THINK IT'S AN APPROVED APPROPRIATE FOR THOSE TWO FACADES. LITTLE MISLEADING THAT THEY'RE CONNECTING. MIGHT PUT A FLAG FLAG IN THE MIDDLE. THERE NOT BE A COURTYARD AND YOU COULDN'T SEE IT ANYWAYS. AND I NOTICED THE WITH THAT TOWN HOME IS ABOUT 30 FT. SO PROBABLY BE MORE LIKE 9 9 FT GARAGE WORKERS.WHO. CAREFUL YEAH, ALRIGHT. YEAH. GOOD COMMENTS. THANK YOU. I FEEL BETTER ABOUT THAT. OKAY SO YOU GOT YOU MADE JIM MADE APPROPRIATE NOTATIONS. MAYBE A ANYTHING ELSE? THAT'S ALL FOR ME . ABSOLUTELY CAN I GO AHEAD? ARE WE THEN PROTECT MY ORIGINAL QUESTION? IS THE BOARD COMFORTABLE ENOUGH? THE WAIVERS? WE CAN THEN APPROVED THEM ALL IN ONE BOAT. NO OBJECTION. AND LET ME LET ME LET ME MOVE APPROVAL. OF THE FOLLOWING WAIVERS WAIVER TO USE THE C SECTION. 2.518 TO ALLOW THE STREET YARD SETBACK TO BE SEVEN PLUS OR MINUS FEET FROM RICHMOND SQUARE. WE'RE CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM 10 FT SETBACK. A WAIVER TO UCC SECTION 2.51 C TO ALLOW THE REAR YARD SETBACK. FOREIGN MCDONALD'S LAYING FOREIGN TO BE 1.5 PLUS OR MINUS FEET. WHERE CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 15 FT SETBACK AND A WAIVER TO U. C C SECTION 2.51 TO ALLOW THE BUILDING WIDTH TO BE LESS THAN 90% WERE CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 90% AND THAT THOSE IN THE APPROVED WITS ARE 73% REMAIN 75% FOR RICHMOND SQUARE AND 50. 9% CHESWICK DRIVE. SO MOVED. SORRY. THERE'S YEAH, THAT'S IT. IN A SECOND. SECOND ANYBODY SECOND. YES. FRIEND. MR ITEM. YES HENSON. YES MR DAVEY? YES MISS MORE? YES MR BROWN. YES MOTION PASSES. THERE ARE FIVE VOTES TO APPROVE THE WAIVERS.
ALRIGHT I'M GOING TO SEEK APPROVAL. AN APPLICATION A RB 106 2023 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPROVAL. ALL OF WHAT? YOUR SUBJECT STAFF APPROVAL. IF HE COMPOSITE MATERIAL IS TO BE USED FOR TREATMENT OR SCREENING ELEMENTS, THE USE AND TYPE OF THE MATERIAL IS SUBJECT STEP APPROVAL. WINDOWS MUST COMPLY WITH DRG REQUIREMENTS. ABOVE GROUND.
MECHANICAL DEVICES SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE SIDE OR WERE YARD BEHIND ALL PORTIONS OF THE PRINCIPAL FACADE. AND SHALL WE FULLY SCREENED FROM THE STREET AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES? A LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND MEET OUR LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. LIGHTING PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED IN THE SUBJECT. BICYCLE PARKING SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED AND LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT AWAY. THE TRASH CONTAINERS. SHE'LL BE STORED INTERNAL OF THE BUILDING INSIDE THE GARAGE. THE EXISTING UTILITY BOXES ALONG MAIN STREET MUST EITHER BE A VAULTED OR RELOCATED TO BEHIND THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SUBJECT TO THE CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. PLANS SHALL BE REVISED . GOOD NOW, OKAY? UH, THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE 6 FT. WIDE ALONG COSMIC DRIVE, GO BACK DOWN. THE FRONT STOOPED UP AND HEIGHT ARE NUMBER 10. YEAH. THE PLAN SHALL BE UPDATED TO PROVIDE A 9 FT WIDE TREE LONG FOOT WIDE. WHAT STEVE TOLD US RIGHT, 19 8 OR NINE THERE. TREE LINED TONIGHT, RIGHT CODE SAYS, OKAY. AH 8 FT. PLEASE. SORRY IF I SAID OKAY? THE PLAN SHALL BE UPDATED TO PROVIDE 8 FT WIDE TREE LAWNS ALONG COSMIC DRIVE. GO BACK UP. 11 FRONT STOOP, DEPTHS AND
[00:40:05]
HEIGHTS ARE REVISED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. 12. GARAGE DOORS SHALL BE REVISED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS OR SEPARATE LABOR APPROVED. JUST STOP REQUIREMENTS . UM 13. GUARDRAILS AT THE WINDOW WELLS AND IRONWORK ON THE CENTER OF MAIN STREET, ELEVATION RETAINING WALL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL, IF REQUIRED REQUIRED. AND 14 AND TWO FOR WINDOWS. TO BE. VISIT ELEVATION, ALL ALL REAR ELEVATIONS. FIRST FLOOR. SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. ALL SECOND THAT EXCELLENT, WELL DONE THAT PROVED MOTION WATER. WOULD YOU READ? CONDITION 13 1 MORE TIME FROM SURE. GUARDRAILS WINDOW WELLS? YEAH GUARDRAILS AT THE WINDOW WELLS AND IRONWORK. ON THE CENTER MAIN STREET RETAINING WALL. REQUIRED. SHALL BE SUBJECT TO SOUTH AFRICA. HUVELLE IF REQUIRED. CENTER MAIN STREET. UH, RETAINING WALL THANK YOU. YEAH. MHM. MR BROWN. MR IDEAS THE SECOND? YES YES, WITH PLEASURE. MR BROWN? YES. MR I 10? YES. MR DAVEY? YES. MS MOORE ? YES MR HENSON? YES MOTION PASSES. THERE ARE FIVE VOTES TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE MODIFICATION OF CONDITION NINE. THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE 6 FT. WIDE ALONG CHESWICK 11, THE FRONT STOOP DEPTH AND HEIGHT. SHOULD BE REVISED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. 12 THE GARAGE DOOR SHOULD BE REVISED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. 13. GUARDRAILS AT THE WINDOW WELLS AND IRONWORK CENTER MAIN STREET RETAINING WALL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL, IF NEEDED, RIGHT? YES, IF NEEDED, SUBJECT TO STAFF OF PEOPLE. THANK YOU. AND 14. TO FOLLOW WINDOWS TO REAR ELEVATIONS SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. FIRST ORDER FIRST. THANK YOU. EXCELLENT DRAWING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH ANY OTHER[VIII. Poll members for comment]
BUSINESS FOR THE BOARD? THAT ANY COMMENTS HAPPY HOLIDAYS TO EVERYONE, IT'S AGAIN. PLEASURE TO CONTINUE TO SERVE WITH YOU ALL. LIKE THANK YOU OR ANYTHING COMING DOWN THE PIKE OR IS IT TOO SOON TO KNOW UH, I THINK IT'S TOO SOON TO KNOW, BUT I'M SURE WE'LL HAVE LOTS OF EXCITING APPLICATIONS IN 2020 FOR SURE WE WILL LOOKING FORWARD TO IT. BUSY HERE. HAVE A SAFE, HAPPY, HAPPY HOLIDAY. EVERYONE YOU'VE GOT COLORED LIGHTS. I ASSUME WE ALL GOT MR MAYORS MUCH. YEAH ENTERTAINING ENJOYED IT. I MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. I'LL SECOND. ALRIGHT MR ITEN? YES, MR HENSON MOORE? YES MR DAVIES? YES MR MALLETS? YES MR BROWN* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.