[I. Call to order] [00:00:08] LIKE TO CALL TO ORDER THE NEW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10TH. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. HANSEN HERE. MR. ITEM HERE, MR. MALITZ HERE, MISS MOORE. MR. DAVIES HERE, MR. STROLLER HERE. MR. BROWN HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER BRISK HERE. THERE ARE SIX VOTING MEMBERS [III. Action on minutes: September 8, 2025 ] PRESENT. WE HAVE A QUORUM. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY ACTION ON THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 13TH, 2025 MEETING? I'D LIKE TO MAKE ONE CORRECTION ON PAGE SIX OR ADDITION ON PAGE SIX, WHERE I EXPLAIN MY NO VOTE ON WANTING TO. DIDN'T WANT TO APPROVE THE REZONING WITHOUT MORE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. LIKE TO ADD A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AREA ALONG 605. ANY OTHER CORRECTIONS TO THE. AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO MOVE TO APPROVE THE ACTION. THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 13TH, 2025. I'LL SECOND. MR. HANSEN. YES. MR. BROWN? YES, MR. DAVEY? YES. MR. ITEM. YES. MR. MOLINS. YES, MR. STROLLER? YES. THE AYES HAVE IT. THERE ARE SIX VOTES TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED. PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE AUDIO. SORRY. THANK YOU. STAFF, DO WE HAVE ANY STAFF? DO WE HAVE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO TONIGHT'S AGENDA? NO. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO ADMINISTER THE OATH. ALL WITNESSES AND APPLICANTS WHO PLAN TO ADDRESS THE BOARD THIS EVENING. DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY VISITORS HERE FOR ITEMS? NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. SEEING NONE, [VI. Cases] I'M GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FIRST CASE, WHICH IS A OR B FIRST AND ONLY CASE A OR B 54 2025 FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO ALLOW NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FOR THE NEW ALBANY PLAIN LOCAL SCHOOLS AT 5101 SWICKARD WAS BOULEVARD. THE APPLICANT IS VICTORIA NEWELL SHAW ASSOCIATES. YES, PLEASE. I'LL MAKE SOME BRIEF COMMENTS BEFORE WE PASS IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT TO GO MORE IN DETAIL WITH THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE. BUT AS A REMINDER TO THIS BOARD, THE ARB DID REVIEW AND APPROVE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO BE DEVELOPED AT 5101 SWICKARD WOODS BOULEVARD. THE APPLICATION WAS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS THAT THEY RETURNED TO THE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD AT A LATER DATE TO WORK THROUGH SOME FINAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING, COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE BY SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. AND THAT'S WHAT THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO DO TONIGHT. SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND PASS IT OVER TO THEM AND SWITCH TO THEIR POWERPOINT PRESENTATION. MAY I ASK ONE MORE QUESTION, PLEASE? I KNOW I SEE MR. RUBY'S HERE TONIGHT. SO IS THIS I KNOW THAT THE NEW ALBANY COMPANY IS WAS WORKING WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT TO DO THEIR OWN REVIEW. ARE THOSE COMMENTS OR WHATEVER'S BEEN PROVIDED? ARE THOSE INCORPORATED INTO WHAT WE'RE SEEING ON THE PACKET THAT WE'VE RECEIVED? YES. YEAH. WE SPENT A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF TIME. IN. GOING THROUGH THE CRITIQUE THAT THE ARB PROVIDED, THEY SPENT A LOT OF TIME GOING THROUGH THOSE AS WELL. THEY DIDN'T AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT THIS BOARD HAD TO SAY. THE VAST MAJORITY. YES. THERE WERE SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT ROOF HEIGHT OR THE THE SLOPE OF THE ROOF. AND I THINK WE LANDED ON SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN. THERE WERE A WHOLE SERIES OF THINGS. THE PACKAGE IN FRONT OF YOU REPRESENTS THE THE AR SEE OUR OWN RECOMMENDATION THAT INCORPORATE YOUR COMMENTS TO THE EXTENT WE WERE WRONG. OKAY. OKAY. SO IF WE DO HAVE COMMENTS THAT PERTAIN TO THE LAST ONES, THE BOARD HAD PROVIDED, SOME OF THOSE MAY HAVE ALREADY BEEN CONTEMPLATED BY THOSE. OKAY, I CAN RESPOND, HOWEVER. OKAY THAT'S FINE. WELL THEN I'LL TRY TO NARROW MY COMMENTS TO ASSUMING THAT THEY'VE BEEN THAT THEY'VE BEEN DISCUSSED. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I'M VICKI NOEL FROM SHORE ARCHITECTS. JUST BRIEFLY. THESE ARE THE EXACT SAME SITE PLANS THAT YOU'VE LOOKED AT PREVIOUSLY. WE RECEIVED OUR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS ON. I ONLY HAVE THESE IN CASE YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS. FLOOR PLANS ARE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS YOU LOOKED AT PREVIOUSLY, EXCEPT FOR ELIMINATION. THIS IS REQUEST THAT I'LL GO OVER THE ELEVATION, THE ELIMINATION OF [00:05:02] THE BUMP OUTS THAT WE HAD AT THESE SECTIONS OF THE BUILDING. THAT WAS SOMETHING WE WERE ASKED TO REMOVE FOR OUR REVIEW WITH NEW ALBANY COMPANY. AND PRIMARILY THAT WAS BECAUSE THE BUILDING IS NOT FULLY SYMMETRICAL BETWEEN THE FRONT HALF OF THE BUILDING AND THE BACK HALF, OR THE BACK CLASSROOM WING HERE. AND THEY THOUGHT THAT HAVING THOSE BUMP OUTS ACCENTUATED THAT. SO THEY PREFERRED THAT THOSE WERE REMOVED, JUST GENERAL ROOF PLAN. AND THEN OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS. AND I'LL GO THROUGH THESE IN GREATER DETAIL SO YOU CAN SEE THEM BETTER. THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS THROUGH THE COURTYARD WHERE THE BUMP OUTS WERE ELIMINATED AT THOSE THREE LOCATIONS. SO THINGS THAT YOU HAD ASKED US TO DO LAST TIME, AND I HOPE THAT WE HAVE ADDRESSED NOW TO YOU, WE DID REDESIGN THE PROPORTIONS ON CUPOLA. WE REDESIGNED THE PROPORTIONS ON THE DIVIDED LIGHTS THROUGH MULTIPLE WINDOW OPENINGS TO THE ELEVATIONS. WE MODIFIED THE HEIGHT OF THE JACK ARCHES SO THE JACK ARCHES ON THE FIRST FLOOR ARE EXTENDED. FIVE FORCES. THE JACK ARCHES ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE BUILDING ARE EXTENDED TO FOUR FORCES. THEY DON'T FIT TO MAKE THEM UP ON THAT SECOND FLOOR WITHOUT RAISING THE ENTIRE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, WHICH IS SOMETHING WE ARE NOT INTENDING TO DO. WE ADDED ROLLOCKS ALONG ALL OF THE SECOND STORY WINDOWS. WE ADDED QUOINING AS REQUESTED. WE REVISED THE RAKE AND PEDIMENT DETAIL, AND WE ALSO REVISED THE BAND COURSING ON THE BUILDING. SO CURRENTLY I HAVE THREE PROJECTED RUNNING BLOOD COURSING ACROSS THAT BAND. IT'S A VERY TRADITIONAL GEORGIAN DETAIL. SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT CHANGED SINCE THE LAST TIME YOU SAW IT WERE THE GABLED PEDIMENTS AT THE ENDS OF THE BUILDING. WHEN YOU INITIALLY SAW THIS ELEVATION, YOU DID HAVE A PALLADIAN WINDOW WITH A CAST STONE PANELS BELOW. WE REMOVED THAT AT THE REQUEST OF THIS CITY OF NEW ALBANY'S ARCHITECT THAT PREFERRED WINDOWS ACROSS THOSE ELEVATIONS. WHEN THIS WENT BACK IN FRONT OF NEW ALBANY COMPANY THROUGH RAMSAR REVIEW WAS THE ONE ELEMENT THEY WERE REALLY DISAPPOINTED THAT WE ELIMINATED FROM THE BUILDING. AND THEY ASKED, ASKED US TO ADD THAT. SO WE APPLIED. I JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW WHY YOU'RE SEEING THAT CHANGE IN THAT ELEMENT COMING BACK AND BUILDING. WE ALSO ADDED THE CAST STONE HERRINGBONE DETAILS THAT YOU HAD ASKED, AND THAT WAS THE PALLADIAN WINDOW. WE WERE JUST DISCUSSING AND THE. HERRINGBONE INSET, I WANT TO CALL THEM FALSE WINDOWS. THEY'RE IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS AROUND THE BUILDING. THEY REQUESTED BOTH THROUGH THIS BOARD AND AGAIN MADE SOME ADDITIONAL REQUESTS AND OTHER LOCATIONS IN THE BUILDING WHERE THEY WANTED THEM ADDED. THIS IS WHERE WE ELIMINATED THE COURTYARD THAT I PREVIOUSLY SPOKE OF. AND THEN YOU HAD ASKED US TO LOOK AT BASICALLY TRUNCATING THE CENTRAL SECTION OF THE ROOF. AND WE DID DO STUDIES. I CAN ONLY COULD ONLY LOWER THAT PORTION APPROXIMATELY THREE FOOT IN ELEVATION. IT STARTED TO HIGHLIGHT THE FACT THAT THE BUILDING WAS NOT SYMMETRICAL TO THE FRONT IN HERE, AND WE FELT IT MADE LITTLE IMPACT IN THE CHANGE IN ELEVATION. SO WE KEPT THE ROOF HEIGHT AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED. THE OTHER REQUEST THAT WE HAD HAD WAS FOR PROVIDING A WATER TABLE. AND AGAIN, THAT'S BECOME COST PROHIBITIVE. THIS BUILDING, AS IT STANDS NOW, HAS HAD SIGNIFICANT CONSTANT INCREASE IN WATER TABLE WITH ADDING TO THE EXPENSE OF THE FOUNDATIONS FOR THE STRUCTURE. AND SO WE'RE NOT WILLING TO ACCOMMODATE THAT REQUEST. IT WAS ONLY A TRUE ACTUAL WATER TABLE IS ONLY PROVIDED ON TWO OF THE CURRENT PNEUMONIA SCHOOLS. THE OTHER SCHOOLS HAVE SOMETHING SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING AND WE'RE DOING PROJECTING OR ROLL OUT FORCING AT THAT SAME ELEVATION. BUT IT'S NOT A TRUE WATER TANK. SO THESE ARE JUST ELEVATIONS. NOW WALKING AROUND THE BUILDING AS IT IS CURRENTLY DESIGNED. CLOSER VIEW OF THE [00:10:03] FRONT ENTRY AND FRONT PORCHES. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE INSET PANELS WHERE THEY'VE BEEN HANDED. THIS IS A VIEW OF THE COURTYARD AND THE VIEW OF THE EXTENDED LEARNING AREA. WALKING AROUND TO THE REAR OF THE BUILDING. WE DID, AND A CENTRAL FEATURE AT THIS LOCATION. IT WASN'T IN THE DESIGN PREVIOUSLY. OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATION. THIS IS LOOKING ALONG THE WALK THAT COMES THROUGH SWICKARD WOODS. AND THIS IS BASICALLY LOOKING AT THE MECHANICAL COURT. AND WE DID HAVE A REQUEST THAT WAS BE SCREENED WHICH WILL GET ACCOMMODATED IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND BRING US BACK TO THE FRONT ELEVATION. SO BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOU HAD ASKED OF ME, I HOPE I HAVE ADDRESSED ALL OF YOUR DELIVERY REQUESTS. UNFORTUNATELY, THE THE THE THE THE PICTORIAL REPRESENTATIONS DON'T HAVE PAGINATION, SO IT'S HARD FOR ME TO, TO REFERENCE. BUT CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE FIRST GO BACK TO ONE OF THE, I GUESS EARLIER VERSION OF THE FRONT AND THE FRONT ELEVATION? YEAH. AND THE ONE THAT. OKAY. KEEP GOING. ONE MORE. WELL THERE'S I'M LOOKING AT I'M LOOKING AT THIS ONE SPECIFICALLY. SPECIFICALLY. THAT IS ACTUALLY TOWARDS THE BACK AS WE GO BACK. AND AT LEAST IN WHAT I'M LOOKING AT HERE, UNLIKE THAT ONE, I'M SEEING A DOWNSPOUT RIGHT THERE ON TOP OF THE QUOINS. YOU'RE SEEING A DOWNSPOUT, I MEAN, A. WHAT WE RELOCATED OKAY. SO THAT'S GONE. OKAY. I JUST IT SEEMED LIKE OKAY. THEN THAT WAS MY QUESTION. IT SEEMED LIKE, COULDN'T WE PUT IT SOMEPLACE SO IT WASN'T COVERING THE QUOINS? JUST AS A CLARIFICATION, WE WERE STILL WORKING ON THE DOWNSPOUT PLACEMENT AND WE WERE STILL WORKING ON HOW THIS PEDIMENT ALIGNMENT THAT WAS NOTED TO STAFF. THAT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION TO SIMPLY STATE THAT THEY WERE STILL WORKING OKAY, BUT WE CORRECTED THOSE ITEMS FOR THIS IS THIS IS NOT THERE IN THE FINAL. OKAY. AND THEN THE ONLY OTHER QUESTION THAT I HAD WAS AND I'M NOT SO ON THE I KNOW AND THIS WAS A COMMENT MADE I THINK BY MR. MALITZ AND I UNFORTUNATELY I'M NOT SMART ENOUGH TO USE THE ARCHITECTURAL TERMS. SO IT'S, IT'S LET'S SEE IF I CAN FIND IT ON THE PAGE HERE. I LIKE WHAT YOU DID, BUT I JUST IT WASN'T NOTED IN YOUR COMMENTS. SO LET ME GET YOUR IF I CAN. OR MAYBE I'M NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO. I'LL TELL YOU WHAT. LET ME LET MR. MALITZ TALK IF HE WANTS TO AND I'LL. I'LL FIND THE PAGE. I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT, RATHER THAN ME LOOKING FORWARD HERE IN REAL TIME. I DO HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS. I'M JUST PULLING THIS UP ON MY SCREEN. JUST WENT BLANK WHILE YOU'RE PULLING IT UP. AND I DO HAVE ONE THOUGHT AND YOU CAN ADDRESS IT. IS THERE ANY REASON NOT TO HAVE THE HIGHER JACK ARCHES ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE MAIN BODY, SINCE THERE'S PLENTY OF ROOM? THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION, I WOULD SAY. YEAH, I THINK THE I THINK THE SPACE BETWEEN THE, THE WINDOWS AND THAT MAIN ELEVATION COULD USE A LITTLE LIFT ANYWAY. SO YEAH, I WOULD BE THAT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO ME. AGAIN, I CAN'T TELL YOU ANY OF THE EXISTING SCHOOLS THAT. ARE ONE OF THE BUILDINGS WITH ONLY THREE. THE REST OF THEM ARE ALL CONSISTENTLY COURSES FOR THE ARCHES. SO I'LL. DID YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS? NO, THAT'S ONE THING THAT JUMPED OUT AT ME. I'M SURE YOU HAVE OTHERS, I JUST YEAH, I HAVE A FEW. SO I APPRECIATE THE UPDATES AND THANK YOU FOR CLICKING THROUGH THE COMMENTS AGAINST THE THE DESIGN CHANGES. I'LL, I'M GOING TO SKIP OVER THE ROOF DISCUSSION BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT'S PRETTY WELL BEEN SETTLED. THE I DO HAVE A KIND OF AN EITHER OR QUESTION REGARDING THE WATER TABLE, THE ROWLOCK AND THE COINS. I, I DO FEEL PRETTY STRONGLY THAT THE [00:15:01] COINS DON'T WORK WELL WITHOUT A WATER TABLE. I THINK IT LEAVES THEM FLOATING IN MID-AIR, UNLESS YOU BRING THEM ALL THE WAY DOWN THROUGH THE FOUNDATION, WHICH IS KIND OF ATYPICAL. SO I WONDER IF ANY CONSIDERATION COULD BE GIVEN TO EITHER ELIMINATING THE COINS OR INTRODUCING A WATER TABLE ON THE MAIN ENTRANCE ONLY? THAT WOULD BE ONE QUESTION. DO YOU WANT ME TO LIST MY THOUGHTS, OR DO YOU WANT TO TAKE THEM ONE BY ONE? SO ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT JUST DOING THE WATER TABLE ANYWHERE THAT COINS ARE LOCATED? BASICALLY, YES. YEAH. WHICH APPEARS TO BE JUST REALLY AROUND THE FRONT, THE FRONT BOX, I THINK THAT'S DIFFICULT FOR FOR US TO ACCOMMODATE JUST BECAUSE I KNOW IN MR. SCHEUER'S CAN STEP IN IF HE LIKES, BUT I KNOW THE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS THAT THEY'RE FACING, AND I'M NOT SURE HE'S GOING TO WANT TO ENTER THE COST PASSWORD. WELL, THEY ARE NOW. SURE. I'LL BRING IT AS A SUGGESTION. TO ME, IT'S SORT OF LIKE I SAID, IT FEELS MORE LIKE AN EITHER OR TO ME. SO I UNDERSTAND IF THERE'S A COST PROHIBITIVE REQUEST. CERTAINLY. BUT I, I WOULD ARGUE THAT MAYBE THE COINS AREN'T DOING THE JOB THEY SET OUT TO DO IF THEY'RE NOT PROPERLY TERMINATED. THAT'S MY THAT WOULD BE MY COMMENT REGARDING THAT ITEM. SO I CAN LEAVE THAT UP TO YOU GUYS TO DECIDE WHAT YOU KNOW, WHAT YOU THINK IS BEST. I RESPOND. MICHAEL, SORRY SUPERINTENDENT. WE'RE ABOUT $3 MILLION OVER BUDGET RIGHT NOW BASED UPON ALL THE DESIGN CHANGES THAT HAPPENED THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS, BOTH WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ARB AND WITH A REVIEW THROUGH NACO. SO IF THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR COST SAVINGS, I'M GOING TO GO THERE. SO IF THE COINAGE ISN'T A REQUIREMENT, THEN LET THE COINAGE DISAPPEAR. THAT WAS FUNNY BECAUSE A MILLION OVER BUDGET, AND WE JUST SPENT TWO HOURS WITH BOARD OF EDUCATION TRYING TO COME UP WITH WHERE'S THIS MONEY COMING FROM? SO HONESTLY, I'M IN A BUDGETARY CONCERN RIGHT NOW. SO ANYTHING YOU CAN OFFER ME THAT SAVES MONEY, I'M INTERESTED. WELL, THEN GREAT, I'LL KEEP GOING THEN. MY NEXT QUESTION IS. IT APPEARS AS THOUGH, SINCE OUR LAST MEETING, THAT THE CONCEALED GUTTER AND EAVE DETAILS BEEN INTRODUCED INTO THE DESIGN THAT DIDN'T APPEAR TO BE THERE PREVIOUSLY. SO IF THAT IS A CONCEALED GUTTER SYSTEM, THAT'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO CLEAN UP THAT EAVE DETAIL AND POTENTIALLY HAVE EXPOSED GUTTERS ON THE BUILDING, IT IS NOT THE CASE. SO WE ADDED ADDITIONAL TRIM PIECES ACROSS THE FRONT SO THAT I COULD GET THE PEDIMENT TO CLOSE TO THE GUTTER IN YOUR ELEVATION, BUT IT IS NOT A CONCEALED GUTTER. THE GUTTER IS WELL, THEN SOMETHING ISN'T RIGHT BECAUSE THE DRIP LINE OFF THE EDGE OF THE EAVE ROLLS PAST THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE GUTTER, AND THE GUTTER IS DISCONNECTED FROM WHAT APPEARS TO BE THE GUTTER LINE. SO I GUESS I WOULD ASK FOR SOME CLARIFICATION THERE, BUT THAT SEEMS LIKE AN EXPENSIVE DETAIL. REGARDLESS, IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF STEPS THAT YOU HAVE IN THE OVERALL EAVE CONDITION, I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU. AND IT IS NOT A RECESSED GUTTER. OKAY, WELL, I THINK THE RENDERINGS ARE A BIT. MAYBE THE RENDERINGS ARE JUST A BIT MISLEADING. UNINTENTIONALLY I'M SURE. BUT AT THIS LOCATION HERE, THIS IS WHERE THE GOVERNOR'S IN THE ROOM. YOU HAVE THE SAME OCCURRENCE HERE, BUT WE EXTENDED THE TRIM DOWN JUST ON THAT FRONT FACE SO THAT THERE'S A MARRIAGE BETWEEN THE TWO, BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU REQUESTED OF US. BUT IT'S NOT A HIDDEN. YEAH, I THINK I THINK THOSE COMMENTS MUST HAVE GOTTEN MISINTERPRETED. I CERTAINLY WOULD NOT BE DRIVING TOWARD THAT DETAIL. SO IF THAT DETAIL IS A RESULT OF COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE BY THIS BOARD, THEN IT WAS MISINTERPRETED. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW WHAT I SEE IS A OVERSCALED DETAIL THAT, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, IN THE SPIRIT OF THE COMMENTS JUST MADE, IF THERE'S BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS HERE, I JUST DON'T KNOW THAT I SEE THE VALUE OF OF THAT, BOTH IN PROPORTION AND IN EXECUTION. I'M HAPPY TO SCALE IT BACK. SO IN MOST INSTANCES, WE'VE TRIED TO MATCH THE DETAILING THAT'S EXISTED ON THE OTHER BUILDINGS. SO YOU HAVE THIS OCCURRING ON THE OTHER SCHOOL BUILDINGS ON THEM THE WAY THAT THAT'S DETAILED. WE CAN DO SOMETHING SIMILAR AT THAT LOCATION AS WELL. I'LL CONTINUE ON. THANK YOU. I GUESS JUST A COUPLE MORE REMARKS THEN THE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THE JACK ARCHES ARE 4/4 OR FIVE. COURSE, I THINK THAT THE DETAILING IS STILL NOT ACCURATE ON THAT. SO I WOULD REQUEST THAT THOSE BE CORRECTED. I MEAN, THEY'RE SHOWN AS PARALLEL LINE CUTS, WHEN IN FACT IT WOULD BE A SPLAYED CUT FOR THE JACK ARCH. SO BUT I WOULD ALSO SUGGEST IN PARALLEL TO THAT. DISPLAYED. YES. OKAY. I DON'T THINK THAT YOU HAVE ANY OF THE SCHOOL BUILDINGS OR DETAILED ELEMENTS. THEY THEY ARE ALL THE BRICKS ARE CUT AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TOP TO CREATE THE ANGLE, BUT THEY ARE ALL CONSISTENT. I WOULD OKAY, WELL I, I'M NOT I'M [00:20:04] NOT I THEN I NEED TO GO BACK AND REVISIT THAT. BUT REGARDLESS THAT IS A IT'S A HEAVY LET ME JUST SAY THIS. IT'S A HEAVY HANDED DETAIL AND I DON'T MEAN ANY DISRESPECT BY THAT USE OF THE WAY I'M SAYING THAT, BUT IT'S A STRONG VISUAL APPEARANCE, AND I WOULD QUESTION WHETHER OR NOT IT'S APPROPRIATE, AGAIN, FOR THE ADDED EXPENSE OF PUTTING KEYSTONES ACROSS ALL OF THOSE. I THINK THAT'S ANOTHER THING THAT COULD BE SIMPLIFIED, AND I DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S ADDING A LOT OF VALUE TO THE DESIGN. AND I THINK THE PROPORTIONS OF THE KEYSTONE, BASED ON THE WAY THAT YOU HAVE THE JACK ARCHES DRAWN, IS CREATING AN EXAGGERATED APPEARANCE OF THOSE. I DON'T THINK IT'S DOING THE BUILDING ANY SERVICE AND IT'S ADDING COST. SO WE COPIED THE SAME DETAIL THAT WAS USED ON THE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL FOR THE JACK ARCHES IN THE COIN STONE COINS THAT ARE IN THE BUILDING. SO THE STONE COINS WERE ALSO ACTIVISTS FROM NACO AND RAMZA. SO WHILE I'M HAPPY TO ELIMINATE THEM, IF YOU JUST WANT TO STRAIGHT, STRAIGHT BRICK JACK ARCH, I HAVE TO HAVE THEIR PERMISSION TO DO THAT AS WELL. I MEAN, THAT'S I'M JUST AGAIN, MAKING REMARKS AND SUGGESTIONS BASED ON WHAT WAS SUBMITTED TO US. I DO I THINK SOME ADJUSTMENT IS WARRANTED ON THE ON THE JACK ARCHES. AND I WOULD FAVOR SIMPLICITY IN THAT INSTANCE, PARTICULARLY GIVEN THE REMARKS ABOUT BUDGET. SO I'LL PAUSE MY REMARKS THERE IF ANYONE ELSE HAS ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD. I'M HAPPY TO STAY INSIDE MY QUESTION. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE WHAT THE DETAIL THAT I WANTED TO JUST RAISE WAS, WAS ON THE COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION. IF IT'S THERE. OKAY, WELL, ON THE COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION. DO YOU HAVE THAT? SOUTH ELEVATION? YEAH, I ALL OF THE ANGLES THAT I HAVE. OKAY. ARE, ARE LIKE THIS OKAY. SO THE SO I DON'T KNOW THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GET YOU THE OKAY. SO I, I JUST NOTED THAT AND AGAIN I DON'T THE THE I KNOW DID NOTE A CHANGE THERE I GUESS I THINK WE WE TALKED ABOUT IT DURING THE BOARD MEETING AND DID YOU NOTE THIS CHANGE MR. MALIK. IT WAS THAT WAS WHAT I BROUGHT. I BELIEVE IT WAS I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT THAT. BUT YOU DIDN'T RAISE IT. ARE YOU REFERRING TO THIS? I THINK HE IS. YEAH. WE WE WE WE DIDN'T LIKE THAT AND WE WANTED TO GO AND WE NOW HAVE THAT. I JUST WANTED TO HAVE THAT. YEAH I DID OKAY I SEE WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO NOW. YES I, I AGREE THAT'S THAT'S BETTER. OKAY. IF EVERYONE ELSE DOES, IF MR. MALIK LIKES IT THEN I'M I'M HAPPY. DON'T SAY THAT. YEAH. IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND. JUST CONFIRMING FOR ME ALL THE JACK ARCHES. THEY'RE NOT VERTICAL. TRULY VERTICAL AT 90 DEGREES. SO I'M GOING TO, IF YOU'LL BEAR WITH ME. BLADE. YES. NOT VERTICAL. YES. THANK YOU. COULD YOU DESCRIBE THE GEOMETRY OF THE BRICK? THE JACK? I'M GOING TO GO OUT AND TAKE A PICTURE. IS. SO WHEN I WAS TALKING ABOUT THE BRICK THROUGH THE STRAIGHT, IT'S IT'S CONSISTENT IN WIDTH. AND WHEN THEY FORM, THE BRICK ARCHES ARE COMING IN ANGLE AT THE BOTTOM, COMING IN ANGLE AT THE TOP. THAT CREATES THE SLOPE. SO THESE ARE THE WINDOW JACK ARCHES THAT ARE ON THE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL. WE WERE FOLLOWING A SIMILAR DETAIL FOR KEEPING CONSISTENCY ACROSS THE CAMPUS SITE. THANK YOU. I JUST DID THAT CLARIFY IT. DOES IT REALLY THE THE SPLAYED NATURE OF THE JACK ARTS REALLY DEPENDS UPON THE KEYSTONE KEYSTONES IS DRAWN HERE. HAVE A DIFFERENT GEOMETRY TO THEM I THINK. SO THESE THESE THESE THESE WERE THEY WERE ACTUALLY FOLLOWING THE DETAILS THAT WERE IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING. RIGHT. I MEAN THE KEYSTONE THAT I'M LOOKING AT HERE. HAS A MUCH WIDER ANGLE. ARE YOU, ARE YOU LOOKING AT THE ONE THAT'S IN THE RENDERING OR LOOKING AT. OKAY. SO WE'RE LOOKING AT THOSE RENDERINGS. THE ONLY THING THAT WE CAN DO IS ELEVATIONS IS TILT THE TILT OF IT. SO I PROVIDED A DETAIL IN THE DRAWINGS THAT SHOWS YOU THE DETAIL OF HOW THAT JACK ARCH WILL ACTUALLY BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE BUILDING. WE TRIED OUR HARDEST TO GET THAT TO LOOK AS REALISTIC AS [00:25:05] POSSIBLE, BUT THERE'S JUST SOME I SECOND THAT. IT'S VERY HARD. YEAH, SOFTWARE AND IT'S ONLY AS WELL THE JACK ARCHES ARE ONLY AS GOOD AS THE GUY CUTTING THEM IN THE FIELD. YEAH, TO BE PERFECTLY HONEST WITH YOU. SO. YEAH. I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT THE DETAIL ON THE ACTUALLY THIS THAT PREVIOUS ELEVATION IS GOOD BELOW THE PALLADIAN WINDOW. WHEREAS THIS FALSE WHITE. YES. SOMETHING IT READS VERY HEAVY WHITE IN THAT FALSE PANEL THERE. AND I'D BE CURIOUS ABOUT OTHER OPINIONS REFERRING TO. YEAH. AND WONDERING WHETHER THE LIKE WHETHER THE BASE SHOULD CONTINUE BELOW THERE. I KNOW IT'S IN THE PLAN. IT READS AS STORAGE BEHIND THERE. SO THERE'S THAT'S THE REASON FOR NO WINDOWS. AND I'D JUST BE CURIOUS TO HEAR A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THAT DETAIL. THE PANELS ARE THERE BECAUSE THERE ARE LOCATIONS WHERE THEY'RE STORAGE ROOMS OR IN THE GYMNASIUM AND PLACES WHERE WE DON'T WANT WINDOWS. WHEN WE HAD WINDOWS AT THOSE ELEVATIONS, THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN SPANDREL GLAZING, MEANING THEY THEY WOULD HAVE APPEARED DARK ALL THE TIME ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. THE. PROPORTIONS ON THOSE CAST STONE PANELS WAS ALSO SOMETHING THAT WE HAD RECEIVED FEEDBACK FROM AND THROUGH MUSEUMS. THEY WANTED TO THE PROPORTIONS TO MORE NEAR THE HEIGHT OF THE DOORS AND THE TOP OF THE WINDOWS AT THE LOWEST PORTION OF THE PANEL. THOSE ARE SOME ADJUSTMENTS WE MADE FROM WHAT WE HAD DESIGNED PREVIOUSLY. GOTCHA. I GUESS IT HELPS TO KNOW THEY'RE CAST STONE AS WELL. IT READ. IS NOT THAT SO? DETAIL EITHER? YEAH. CAN YOU CARRY YOUR BASE ACROSS HERE? ANDREW? DID YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON THAT DETAIL OR. THE WHITE PANEL YOU MEAN. YEAH I MEAN. NO, I DON'T PREFER IT, BUT I THINK THAT'S BEEN DISCUSSED. SO I'M GOING TO RESERVE MY, MY REMARKS TO THE THINGS THAT I THINK MATTER MOST. BUT NO, I DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S IDEAL. I GUESS I JUST DON'T SEE THE REASON WHY. LIKE IF THE BASE WERE TO CONTINUE THERE AND IT WOULD STOP AT THE BASE OR, OR THE TWO. THE TWO BRICKS, HONESTLY, I THEY WANT TO DO IT TO APPEAR MORE AS A DOORWAY. IF YOU'RE JUST ASKING THAT THE BASE COME ACROSS HERE, I MYSELF HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTION. I I'M NOT NECESSARILY PREFERENCE BUT I'M, I'M OKAY WITH WHATEVER'S BESIDE IT. IT'S JUST IN THE RENDERS. I WANTED TO BRING IT UP AT LEAST. CAN YOU GET BACK TO THE JACK ARCH THAT YOU SHOWED ON THE INTERMEDIATE BUILDING? SO JACK ARCHES IS DRUNK, IS DRAWN THAT YOU IN YOUR POCKET. THE THE ANGLE THAT JACK ARCH LOOKS NOTHING LIKE THE JACK ARCH ON THE INTERMEDIATE BUILDING THAT WAS DONE IN THE FIELD. THE CAST KEYSTONE ITSELF. SO TYPICALLY THE CAST KEYSTONE, TYPICALLY THE ANGLE ON THAT JACK ARCH IS BETWEEN 60 AND 70 DEGREES. CAN YOU GO TO THE PHOTO OF THE ONE ON THE INTERMEDIATE BUILDING THAT YOU TOOK? THAT'S NOT ENOUGH. OF AN ANGLE ON THAT BUILDING, IN MY OPINION. THOSE KEYSTONES WERE CUT. NOT LIKE WHAT THIS SHOWS, WHICH IS APPROPRIATE. THAT IS, THOSE CAST KEYSTONES ARE FAR TOO RECTANGULAR IN NATURE THAN WHAT WE HAVE HERE, WHICH SETS THE. SO WHAT I CAN'T CONTROL IS I CAN LOOK AT WHAT THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE THAT WERE IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, AND I CAN DETAIL TO MATCH THOSE. I CAN'T CONTROL WHAT HAPPENED WHEN THE BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED AND HOW MASON CONSTRUCTED IT ON THIS BUILDING. I CAN'T CONTROL IT ON OUR BUILDING. I'M GOING THROUGH CONSTRUCTION. UNLESS THIS. UNLESS IT'S THE ANGLE OF THE PHOTO, THIS THIS DRAWING FOR THIS CAST KEYSTONE, WHICH YOU CAN CONTROL EVERY SINGLE TIME BECAUSE THEY'RE ALL CAST, WILL DETERMINE. THE ANGLE OF THE [00:30:11] JACK ROUSH. AND IT SHOULD LOOK LIKE THE DRAWING, NOT LIKE THE INTERMEDIATE BUILDING, IN MY OPINION. THAT'S WHY. THAT'S WHY I PROVIDED THE DETAIL. YOU CAN SEE WHAT YOU WERE. THAT'S WHAT MY EXPECTATION IS, OUR EXPECTATION. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? I CAN APPRECIATE THE CONCERNS WITH THE OVERALL COST OF THE BUILDING. I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT YOU DID. GETTING TOGETHER ON THE INTERMEDIATE BANDING COURSE, THE BASE COURSE, THE BASE BANDING COURSE, TRYING TO TRYING TO STAY RESPONSIBLE WITH COSTS. I AGREE WITH MR. MALITZ ON THE QUOINING. IF IT'S NOT NECESSARY AND EVERYBODY CAN GET BY THAT AND SAVE A LITTLE BIT FOR THE FOR THE TAXPAYERS, ALL THE BETTER. OTHERWISE I WAS GOOD WITH ALL THE DESIGN CHANGES. AS NOTED, I DID HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF REGARDING. THERE WERE A TON OF CONDITIONS REGARDING LANDSCAPING, BUT THERE WAS NO LANDSCAPE DRAWING OR INFORMATION INCLUDED. I HAD A FEW QUESTIONS ON THAT STUFF, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE ASSUMING THERE. YEAH, SO STAFF IS GOING THROUGH THAT ON THEIR OWN AND JUST YEAH, WE TYPICALLY REVIEW THAT WHEN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SUBMITTED FOR THE ENGINEERING PERMIT, THERE'S EXTENSIVE SCREENING AROUND THE THE PARKING FIELD. BUT WHO ARE WE SCREENING IT FROM? I MEAN YOU GOT THE SCHOOL AND YOU'VE GOT YOU KNOW, IT'S CERTAINLY NOT FRONT AND CENTER TO A, YOU KNOW, A MAIN, A MAIN STREET. IT JUST SEEMED EXTENSIVE TO ME. I DO APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT CUTTING BACK SOME PAVING AREAS AND ADDING ADDITIONAL GREEN SPACE OR TREES, BUT IT DIDN'T REALLY NOTE HOW THAT WAS CHANGING, HOW THE SITE PLAN WAS GOING TO CHANGE WITH RESPECT TO THE PAVING PLAN SHOWING MORE GREEN SPACE OR ADDED DIMENSIONS THERE. SO THOSE ARE SOME OF MY QUESTIONS REGARDING THAT. YEAH. THE FOR THE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING, THAT'S A BASE CODE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL PARKING LOTS BE SCREENED FROM OFF SITE, JUST SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY LIGHT SPILLAGE ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. DEVIATING FROM THAT WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER. SO THAT'S AGAIN JUST A BASE CODE REQUIREMENT. I CAN PULL THE OTHER COMMENTS. WHAT ADJACENT PROPERTIES? I KNOW IT'S IT'S BASICALLY IT'S INTERNAL TO THE CAMPUS. WOULD YOU MIND GOING TO THE SITE PLAN VICTORIA. SORRY. AND MAYBE MR. BROWN IF YOU COULD TALK ABOUT SO THE WHAT WE WOULD EXPECT TO SEE THAT SCREENING WOULD BE ALONG THIS ROAD HERE. AND THEN TYPICALLY AGAIN TYPICALLY WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT WRAPPED AROUND. SO IT'S SCREENED FROM ANY OPEN SPACE AREAS THAT LIGHT BLEEDING OVER AND MAYBE SOME ADDITIONAL SCREENING HERE AS WELL THE BASE CODE WOULD REQUIRE I GUESS MY POINT IS THE. YOU GOT THE WOODS ON THIS SIDE OVER HERE. YOU KNOW, BASICALLY THE STREET FACES THE POOL. IT'S ALL, YOU KNOW, CITY PROPERTY. IT'S NOT A MAIN STREET THAT'S UTILIZED. THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL HERE. AGAIN, JUST FROM A COST PERSPECTIVE. CERTAINLY WANT THE BUILDING TO LOOK GREAT AND THE PROPERTY LOOK GREAT. BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT WE NEED TO TO GO TO THAT LENGTH. JUST JUST FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT, ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS UP HERE WE PASSED LAST TIME. CORRECT. SO THIS IS ALL THIS ISN'T FOR US NOW, FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE, WE CAN ALWAYS REVISIT IT. BUT WHAT WE DID WAS WE PASSED THIS LAST TIME. I DON'T KNOW, WE MAY NOT I MAY NOT HAVE BEEN HERE. NO, I WAS NOT OKAY. YEAH. WE PASSED ALL THIS ALREADY. OKAY. AND THE ONLY THING WE SAID IS COME BACK TO US WITH THESE UPDATED DRAWINGS. AND SO THAT, AT LEAST IN THEORY, IS THE ONLY THING THE BOARD CAN'T PRESUMABLY REOPEN. BUT BUT FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE, I THINK THAT SHIP HAS SAILED. YEAH, WE COULD, WE COULD. WHY DO WE HAVE TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS TO TODAY'S MOTION? IT'S JUST NOT. THIS IS THE STAFF. STAFF JUST REPEATED PRIOR TO TODAY'S MOTION WILL HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS. CORRECT? THEY DID. WE AGREED TO THE PREVIOUS CONDITIONS AND WE WILL ACCOMMODATE THEM. WE JUST DIDN'T BRING THE LANDSCAPING PLANS BACK IN BECAUSE AS MR. HAD STATED, THIS IS SOMEWHAT MISLEADING CONSIDERATION. STAFF USED THE SAME REPORT. I THOUGHT THESE WERE ALL NEW CONDITIONS THAT WERE BEING ADDRESSED. STAFF USED THE SAME REPORT AND THEN HIGHLIGHTED WHAT CHANGED. BUT BUT BUT USED THE SAME REPORT, BUT THAT THE REST OF THE REPORT IS ALREADY BEEN [00:35:02] CONSIDERED AND PASSED. SO DEFINITELY UNDERSTAND YOUR COMMENTS AND APPRECIATE THOSE. MR. BROWN, WE CAN WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO MAKE SURE IF ANYTHING'S ABOVE AND BEYOND CODE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE WE ELIMINATE ANY OF THAT LANDSCAPING JUST TO HELP WITH SOME OF THAT COST SAVINGS. SURE. OKAY. YEAH. YEAH, I'M I'M GUESSING THAT THE WOOD EDGE WOULD BE CONSIDERED SCREENING. AT LEAST THAT'S HOW I WOULD VIEW IT IS TO SAY, HERE'S THE EDGE OF THE WOODS THAT SIDES ALREADY SCREENED. YEAH, IT'S PRETTY CLEARLY ALREADY HAS A HARD TO FIND TREE LINE. SO YEAH. AND THAT THAT MIGHT BE A MORE APPROPRIATE. WELL, I'LL GO BACK AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE COMMENTS AND WE'LL WORK WITH THEIR TEAM, BECAUSE THAT PROBABLY IS A MORE APPROPRIATE WAY TO SCREEN THAT VERSUS DISTURBING THAT EXISTING VEGETATION, NEW MATERIAL. SO WE'LL WORK WITH THEM. WELL IF THERE'S A MOTION TO BE PROPOSED SUGGESTED THIS EVENING, WHAT PART OF THIS I THINK WHAT WE WOULD BE DOING. AND AGAIN, I'LL LET ME SEE IF STAFF AND THE APPLICANT, I MEAN, I THINK. I MEAN, I GUESS THE QUESTION IS, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE'RE SPECIFIC? IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE OBJECT SO MUCH TO IN THIS THAT WE WANT TO WE WANT TO I THINK THE MOTION WOULD BE TO APPROVE THE REVISED. THE REVISED. DETAILS, REVISED ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS. AND THE QUESTION IS, DO WE WANT TO WITHHOLD OUR APPROVAL TO SOMETHING OR CONDITION OUR APPROVAL SO AS TO SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT WE ARE WE WOULD, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO SAY NO COINS, BUT THAT THEN THROWS IT BACK INTO THE APPROVAL AND WE GET INTO A NEW ALBANY COMPANY ARB FIGHT. I WE WANT TO SAY THAT WE'RE OKAY WITH OR WITHOUT COINS, AND WE WOULD PREFER NO, NO COINS AND AND BUT LEAVE IT AT THAT SO THAT THEY CAN GO FORWARD BASED UPON THAT. WITH THAT RESOLUTION, I THINK WE CAN MAKE THIS SIMPLE. I THINK I WOULD JUST ASK THAT THE APPLICANT AND THE NEW ALBANY COMPANY TAKE OUR COMMENTS UNDER ADVISEMENT AND WE MOVE ON. SO WE'RE BUT WE'RE HAPPY TO APPROVE WHAT'S BEFORE US BECAUSE I THINK WE'RE I THINK WHAT YOU'RE ASKING IS, ARE WE GOING TO SIMPLY PUT IT TO A VOTE, A YES NO, NO CONDITIONS? I'M FINE WITH THAT. SO I JUST WANT TO GO ON THE RECORD TO SAY THAT I HOPE THOSE COMMENTS ARE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION AND WE'LL SEE WHERE THINGS LAND. SO I THINK WE'D BE HAPPY TO ELIMINATE THE COINS AS LONG AS THAT IS APPROPRIATE WITH NEW ALBANY COMPANY, I THINK WOULD JUST BE SIMPLER FOR US TO JUST SO. SO YES, I GUESS WHAT. LET ME TRY A MOTION. SO I WOULD MOVE THAT THE BOARD. NOW GIVE ITS APPROVAL TO GIVE ITS APPROVAL TO THE REVISED DRAWINGS AS TO AND THAT THE APPLICANT IS INVITED TO TAKE ACCOUNT OF OUR COMMENTS HERE TONIGHT, WHICH WILL BE REFLECTED IN THE MINUTES IN TERMS OF GOING FORWARD WITH THOSE DRAWINGS. WE DON'T NEED TO SEE THESE DRAWINGS AGAIN. SO THAT THAT IS MY MOTION. SECOND. MR. ITEM. YES. MR. YES. MR. HENSON YES. MR. BROWN YES. MR. YES. MR. DAVIS YES, YES. THE MOTION PASSES. THERE ARE SIX VOTES TO GRANT THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. STAFF HAS MASTER SIGN UPDATE FOR US? YES. [VII. Other business ] MAYBE BEFORE WE GET THERE REAL QUICK, WE PROBABLY WILL BE MEETING OVER IN THE NEXT ROOM. IN THE PREVIEW ROOM OVER THERE. BUT JUST REAL QUICK, I DO WANT TO REMIND THE BOARD, YOU SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED EMAILS FROM ME AND CHRISTINA ABOUT TWO ITEMS. SO WE DO HAVE OUR VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION EVENT THAT WE'RE HOLDING. WE'VE GOTTEN SOME SOME RESERVATIONS FROM FROM FOLKS, BUT JUST WANT TO ENCOURAGE YOU GUYS ALL TO RSVP FOR THAT. THAT'LL BE ON DECEMBER 9TH OVER AT BRICKHOUSE BLUE, INNOVATE NEW ALBANY. AND THEN WE ALSO ARE OFFERING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL BOARD MEMBERS TO GET THEIR HEADSHOTS UPDATED AND TAKEN. I BELIEVE I EMAILED YOU GUYS ABOUT THAT, BUT THAT'S ON NOVEMBER 18TH FROM 5 TO 630 HERE AT VILLAGE HALL. YOU JUST STOP AT ANY TIME UPSTAIRS IN OUR STUDIO AND GET YOUR HEADSHOT TAKEN. WE CAN SHARE THAT WITH YOU AS WELL. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. BLAKE, ARE WE READY TO HEAD OVER TO THIS WORKSHOP? OKAY, PERFECT. WE'RE GOING ALL RIGHT. I'M SORRY. AFTER THE [VIII. Poll members for comment ] GIRLS GET MARRIED, RIGHT? YEAH. GRACE IS ENGAGED, BY THE WAY. OH. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FOLLOWING THE MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD? QUICKLY? WHAT'S COMING DOWN THE PIKE FOR NEXT [00:40:02] MONTH? ANYTHING NEXT MONTH? WE SHOULD HAVE THE NEW ALBANY FOOD PANTRY, NEW ALBANY FOOD PANTRY. THAT IS ALL I KNOW OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. OKAY, AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE, WE'LL HAVE THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SOUTH OF GANNON PARKWAY OVER IN LOGAN PROPERTY. THAT'LL BE COMING IN PRETTY SOON. SOUTH SOUTH OF WHERE? NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL. OH, OKAY. ALL THIS HOUSING BETWEEN DUBLIN GRANVILLE ROAD BY THE BY THE FIRE STATION. YEAH, RIGHT. BUT THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO THINGS I KNOW. IN THE NEAR TERM, I WOULD MOVE TO ADJOURN. I'LL SECOND. MR. ITEM. YES, MISTER? YES, MR. HENSON? YES, MR. DAVEY? YES, MR. STROLLER? YES, MR. BROWN? YES. MOTION PASSES. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.