[I. Call to order]
[00:00:07]
CALL TO ORDER THE NEW ALBANY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 10TH. CHRISTINE, COULD YOU PLEASE CALL? ROLL CALL? MR. HINTON HERE. MR. ITEM MR. BROWN HERE. MR. DARBY HERE.
MR. MALLET HERE. MISS. MOORE HERE. MR. STRAW HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER. BRISK. WE HAVE SIX
[III. Action on minutes: July 13, 2026 ]
VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT. WE HAVE A QUORUM. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY ACTION ON THE MINUTES OF JULY 13TH, 2026? I HAVE NO ISSUES. I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE. I'LL SECOND. MR. BROWN. YES, MISTER. YES. MISS. MOORE. YES. MR. HINSON. YES. MR. STROLLER. YES. MR. DAVIES. YES, THE AYES HAVE IT. THE MOTION PASSES WITH ALL VOTES TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS SUBMITTED. THANK YOU.[IV. Additions or corrections to the agenda ]
STAFF, IS THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO TONIGHT'S AGENDA? AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO ADMINISTER THE OATH TO ALL WITNESSES AND APPLICANTS WHO PLAN TO ADDRESS THIS BOARD. IF YOU PLEASE, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY VISITORS HERE FOR ITEMS NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. SEEING NONE,[V. Cases]
I'M GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FIRST CASE OF A RB362026 FOR 6905 CENTRAL COLLEGE ROAD.IT'S A NEW BUILD CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AND WAIVERS. THE APPLICANT IS OLD WORLD CUSTOM HOMES. PATRICK MILLER, CAN WE PLEASE HAVE STAFF REPORT? YES. SO THIS IS OUR THIRD SET OF PLANS FOR THIS APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT HAS WORKED INCREDIBLY DILIGENTLY WITH STAFF AND THE BOARD AND THE CITY ARCHITECT OVER THE PAST FEW MONTHS TO ALIGN WITH OUR REQUESTS AND MEET THE INTENT OF THE DGRS, AS WELL AS CREATE A HIGH QUALITY, ARCHITECTURALLY COHESIVE HOME. THIS IS OUR SITE ON 6905 CENTRAL COLLEGE ROAD. LAST MONTH, FOLLOWING UPDATES THAT FOCUSED ON THE GARAGE, THE ARB WAS GENERALLY FAVORABLE TOWARDS THE APPLICATION BUT WANTED UPDATES TO THE WEST SIDE ELEVATION, SO THESE CHANGES INCLUDE ADDING LANDSCAPE SCREENING TO THE GARAGE AREA WITH NATWEST ELEVATION IN GENERAL, ADDING FAUX WINDOWS OR SHUTTERS TO THE GYM MASS AND TO THE GARAGE MASS ON THAT WEST ELEVATION, SIMPLIFYING THE ROOF CONDITION OR BRINGING IT DOWN A BIT MORE. CONTINUING THE EAVES OVER THE GYM MASS FROM THE GARAGE FACADE AND PROJECTING THE GABLE FORM ON THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE GYM.
ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY ARCHITECT MADE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GYM MASS TO USE A BARN STYLE ARCHITECTURE TO MAKE IT APPEAR MORE SECONDARY AND SEPARATE FROM THE MAIN HOME. SO THE REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATIONS COME TO THIS CHANGE IN THE ELEVATIONS. WE HAVE LAST MONTH'S ELEVATION ON THE WEST, ELEVATION ON THE TOP, AND THEN THE NEW ELEVATION ON THE BOTTOM THERE, AS WELL AS IN THE PACKAGE THAT SHOULD BE AT ALL OF YOUR SEATS. WE CAN ADD THAT INTO THE RECORD. THE CHANGES ALIGN WITH WHAT WAS REQUESTED BY THE ARB, SUCH AS THAT GABLE BEING EXTENDED. I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN SEE THAT ON THE SCREEN, BUT SUCH AS THE GABLE BEING BROUGHT OUT A BIT, THE EAVE BEING CONTINUED ACROSS THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE GYM, MASS FAUX SHUTTERS, AND THE BARN STYLE ARCHITECTURE THAT THE CITY ARCHITECT RECOMMENDED BY USE OF THE SQUARE WINDOWS ON THAT GYM MASS. SEVERAL ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THE HEIGHTENED WATER TABLE, THE VERTICAL SIDING, ETC. AND THESE ARE SOME RENDERINGS OF THOSE CHANGES AS WELL. WE DID INCLUDE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE LANDSCAPING WILL BE ADDED AROUND THAT GYM DRIVEWAY AREA TO BE ALIGNED WITH THE REQUEST OF THE ARB FROM LAST MONTH. AND JUST A REMINDER, AND TO SUMMARIZE THE REQUESTS OF THIS WHOLE APPLICATION, THIS IS NOT IN THE VILLAGE CENTER. SO THIS ISN'T A TYPICAL COA THAT YOU GUYS SEE. IT'S NOT FOR THE BUILDING AS A WHOLE. IT IS FOR THE HARDIE BOARD AND STONE AS EXTERIOR MATERIALS, AS WELL AS FOR THESE WAIVERS. I CAN GO INTO MORE DEPTH ABOUT ANY OF THEM AGAIN IF WE NEED. AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HERE AND THE APPLICANTS ARE HERE. ANY COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD? MR. MOUSE? THANK YOU. I REVIEWED THIS WITH STAFF. THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS WITH ME, AND THANKS FOR WORKING ON THE REVISIONS AND WORKING THROUGH IT WITH US. WE APPRECIATE IT.
I'M SUPPORTIVE OF OF WHAT I SEE HERE. I HAD, I THINK THE TO SUMMARIZE FOR THE MY FELLOW
[00:05:03]
BOARD MEMBERS, AS YOU GUYS RECALL FROM LAST MONTH, THE REALLY THAT THAT RIGHTMOST ELEVATION THERE, I THINK THE INCLUSION OF THE BUMP OUT OF THE FOUNDATION PLAN, THE INTRODUCTION OF THE WINDOWS, THE RECONCILIATION OF THE DISSIMILAR ROOF LINES. I THINK IT GOES A LONG WAY TOWARD TYING THE WHOLE DESIGN TOGETHER MUCH MORE EFFECTIVELY. SO I APPRECIATE YOUR WILLINGNESS TO TAKE A THIRD PASS AT THIS WITH US. I DID HAVE TWO QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. WELL, ONE FOR STAFF AND ONE FOR THE APPLICANT. CAN WE HAVE WE CONFIRMED THE HEIGHT OF THAT BARN? AND IS THAT WITHIN THE LOCAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS? IT JUST IT STRUCK ME AFTER I WAS REVIEWING THIS, THAT IT IS RATHER TALL, WHICH WE KNEW. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT INADVERTENTLY STEPPING INTO ANOTHER ISSUE. YEAH, I CAN LOOK INTO THAT FOR SURE. AND AT THE TIME OF PERMIT AND ZONING COMPLIANCE REVIEW, I CAN DOUBLE CHECK THAT AS WELL. OKAY. AND THEN MY SECOND QUESTION IS, AND YOU MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE IT FOR THE SCREEN, BUT I ONE THING I NOTICED AS I WAS REVIEWING THE PACKETS THAT YOU PROVIDED WAS THE ROOF LINES APPEAR TO BE MUCH MORE RESOLVED FROM THE PREVIOUS VERSION. HOWEVER, I NOTICED ONE JUST QUESTION THAT I HAD AND IT WAS ON PAGE. IT WAS THE LEFT ELEVATION. AND I'M SORRY TO DO THIS, BUT I'M JUST GOING TO POINT SO THAT YOU GUYS HAVE A GENERAL IDEA OF WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, RIGHT IN THIS AREA RIGHT HERE. YES. IT APPEARS AS THOUGH THE TWO ROOF PITCHES ARE DISSIMILAR AND THE THE HIP ROOF THAT TURNS THE CORNER ON WHERE THAT I THINK IT'S A COVERED PORCH TO THE RIGHT. IS THAT CORRECT? IS IT A SCREENED PORCH? IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THAT THAT THE PITCH OF THAT ONE HIP IS DIFFERENT THAN BOTH OF THE NESTED GABLES TO THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT. IF POSSIBLE, I WOULD JUST RECOMMEND THAT THEY ALL BE THE SAME. OKAY, IF THAT DOESN'T DO ANYTHING DISRUPTIVE TO THE OVERALL DESIGN, IT JUST CAUGHT MY EYE, SO I WANTED TO BRING IT UP WHILE I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY. OTHERWISE I DIDN'T HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS. I, I KNOW THAT WE HAVE OFTEN AS A BOARD REGARDING THE WAIVERS, THE, THE HARDIPLANK VERSUS WOOD SIDING IS KIND OF A CUSTOMARY WAIVER THAT WE HAVE TO, TO CONTEMPLATE.SO I THINK THAT'S BEEN IN KEEPING WITH SIMILAR APPLICATIONS. AND REGARDING THE DOUBLE BAY GARAGE DOOR, WAS THERE A PROGRAMMATIC REQUEST FOR THAT OR WAS THAT STRICTLY AN ESTHETIC REQUEST? I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THAT BECAUSE I WAS NOT HERE FOR THE FIRST MEETING REGARDING THAT, I BELIEVE IT WAS MOSTLY AN ESTHETIC REQUEST. IT ALSO COMBINES THE FOUR INTO THREE GARAGE DOORS TECHNICALLY, AND KIND OF REDUCES THAT VISUAL IMPACT OF IT, AS WELL AS CREATES A SORT OF CONNECTING FEATURE OF THE MAIN HOUSE AND THE END FORM OF THE GARAGE. THAT MAKES SENSE. I'M NOT AN ARCHITECT, SO I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY THE RECOMMENDATION BY CITY ARCHITECT. WAS IT OKAY, ACTUALLY? OKAY, GREAT. BECAUSE IT WAS THE DESIRE OF THE CLIENT TO HAVE A DOUBLE WHITE DOOR. SO WHEN HE MADE THAT SUGGESTION, WE WE GLADLY WENT THAT ROUTE. ARE YOU PLANNING ON PUTTING TRANSOM WINDOWS IN THE GARAGE DOORS OR IS THAT AM I READING THAT CORRECTLY TO HAVE GLASS? OKAY. YES. OKAY. I THINK IN CONSIDERATION OF THE OF IF THE BOARD AGREES IN CONSIDERATION OF THAT DOOR, AND SINCE YOU'RE ALREADY SHOWING THE GLASS TRANSOMS ON THE DOORS, AND I KNOW SOMETIMES THINGS CHANGE AS YOU GO FROM DESIGN TO CONSTRUCTION, BEEN THERE, IT WOULD BE MY PREFERENCE THAT THE GLASS TRANSOMS BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THAT WAIVER, SO LONG AS THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE AN ISSUE WITH YOUR CLIENT OR WITH THE PROJECT. I THINK IT JUST HELPS MAKE THAT FEEL IN KEEPING WITH THE REST OF THE OVERALL DESIGN. IT'S A LARGE HOME, AND I THINK IT'S WORTHY OF THAT LITTLE DETAIL THAT I THINK WILL MAKE THAT DOUBLE DOOR FEEL MORE IN STEP WITH THE OVERALL DESIGN.
OKAY, OTHERWISE, I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS. THANK YOU. I DO HAVE A COMMENT. WHEN I'M LOOKING AT THE REAR OF THE HOME, THERE'S SO MANY DIFFERENT SIZES OF WINDOWS. SO THE RECTANGULAR WINDOWS I THINK ARE OFF JUST BY A LITTLE. I FEEL LIKE IT WOULD BE MORE COHESIVE WITH ALL THREE BUILDINGS TO HAVE THE THE RECTANGULAR WINDOWS AT LEAST THE SAME SIZE. AND THEN LET'S SEE, THERE'S THREE, THERE'S SIX SQUARE WINDOWS THAT, LIKE THE THREE ON THE IN THE MIDDLE BUILDING ARE CLOSE TO THE ONES ON THE, THE GYM, BUT THEY'RE JUST ENOUGH, JUST SMALL ENOUGH TO MAKE IT. IT JUST LOOKS LIKE THERE'S A LOT GOING ON. IF THOSE COULD BE SIZED UP OR SIZED DOWN TO BE THE SAME, THAT WOULD BE MY ONLY COMMENT. WHICH WINDOWS ARE YOU REFERRING TO?
[00:10:04]
THESE THREE ARE BIGGER THAN THESE THREE. AND THEN THESE WINDOWS HERE ARE CLOSE TO THESE, BUT THEY'RE NOT THE SAME. LIKE THERE'S JUST THESE ARE THE DIFFERENCE IS PROBABLY BECAUSE OF THE SILL HEIGHT OF THESE SECOND STORY WINDOWS VERSUS THE LOWER SILL HEIGHT OF THESE WINDOWS HERE. THIS I COULD GET THESE ARE SO CLOSE. THEY'RE NOT. AND LIKE THE BUILDING HAS DIFFERENT, YOU KNOW, DIFFERENT FINISHES. I FEEL LIKE TO TIE IT IN JUST, IT'S A MINIMAL CHANGE FOR THE HEIGHT, BUT IT'S JUST, IT SEEMS VERY BUSY. I THINK YOU MAY RUN INTO AN ISSUE THOUGH, BECAUSE OF THE SCALE OF THIS ELEVATION RELATIVE TO THE SCALE OF THIS ELEVATION. IF YOU WERE TO SCALE IT UP, YOU'D PROBABLY FIND THAT THE WINDOWS WOULD SCALE UP. I'M AFRAID THESE ARE GOING TO LOOK OVERSCALED IF THEY'RE LARGER AND MATCH THE SIZE OF THESE, BECAUSE THEY ARE IN PROPORTION WITH THE OVERALL MASS, AS THESE ARE. I SAW THAT TOO, BUT THAT WAS HOW I READ IT.I, I AGREE WITH ANDREW THAT IT COULD BE AWKWARD. IT COULD LOOK VERY SMALL IF YOU TOOK THE SMALLER WINDOWS AND PUT THEM ON THE LARGE FORM, I THINK THEY WOULD BE TOO SMALL. I THERE'S JUST A LOT GOING ON, ESPECIALLY WITH THE WINDOW THAT IS IN BETWEEN THE ROOF PEAK. LIKE THERE'S, THERE'S JUST VISUALLY, IT'S, IT'S. SO WHAT WE'VE GOT HERE WITH THE THREE SMALLER WINDOWS, JUST FOR A TINY BIT OF CONTEXT, THOSE ARE INTO BATHROOMS. OKAY. AND SO THE CLIENT REALLY WANTED TO HAVE SOME NATURAL LIGHT, BUT ALSO PRIVACY. SO WE TRIED TO SIZE IT APPROPRIATELY TO, TO HOW THEY WANTED THE ROOM TO FUNCTION. AND THEN AS WE MOVE INTO THE BARN SIDE, I WOULD ALMOST SAY THE WINDOWS MIGHT BE SLIGHTLY UNDERSIZED FOR THE MASS OF THE BARN. YOU KNOW, IF WE, YOU KNOW, RAN IT INTO THAT FASCIA BOARD THAT'S RUNNING AROUND AND THEN DO THE APPROPRIATE SIZE TO THE SCALE OF THE WALL. BUT AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO CREATE TOO MUCH DIFFERENCE, BUT LIKE THE SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS, YOU'RE RIGHT. I'VE GOT, I'VE ONLY GOT SO MUCH SPACE ABOVE THE FLOOR. AND SO THAT'S WHY IT'S A DIFFERENT HEIGHT WINDOW THAN THE ONES BELOW. THE ONE THING I DO THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE THAT. I THINK THEY'RE FINE THE WAY THEY PERSONALLY. BUT TO MISS MOORE'S COMMENT, THE. I DO WONDER IF THAT WINDOW ISN'T EXTRANEOUS AND THAT'S UP TO YOU GUYS OR IF THAT IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU COMMENTED ON THAT COULD HELP. IT'S IT'S IT IS OCCUPYING A RATHER SMALL PEDIMENT AND IT'S, IT'S SLIGHTLY OVERSCALED FOR IT. I THINK THIS IS PRETTY SUCCESSFUL WHEN YOU COMPARE THE ORIGINAL TO THE REVISED. I'M AMBIVALENT TO THE NECESSITY OF THAT WINDOW IN THE GABLE RIGHT THERE. OKAY. IS THERE A ROOM BEHIND IT OR IS IT PURELY DECORATIVE? NO, IT'S IT'S ACTUALLY EVENT. OKAY. YEAH.
WHICH THE CITY ARCHITECT WAS WORRIED THAT IF WE HAD GABLES THAT HAD AN ACCENT AND ONES THAT DIDN'T, THAT IT COULD POTENTIALLY CAUSE QUESTION. IF IT'S I SEE YOUR POINT TO THE SCALE OF IT. IF IT'S EVENT, YOU MAY JUST TO KEEP THE SILL OF IT AWAY FROM THE AWAY FROM THE HIP.
THAT'S THAT'S TURNING INTO IT. I MEAN, WE'RE SPLITTING HAIRS AT THAT POINT, BUT I DO THINK THAT'S WORTH REINFORCING AS TO THE, TO THE WINDOWS THAT ARE BOTH PART OF THE BARN AND THE, AND THE ADJACENT STRUCTURE TO THE LEFT, I, I'M OKAY WITH THEM BEING DIFFERENT SIZES, BUT WHAT ABOUT IF YOU GOT RID OF THE VENT UP THERE AND PUT A THIRD WINDOW HERE? IF YOU LOOK, IT'S LIKE SPACE, SPACE, SPACE, LIKE IN THE FRONT. YOU HAVE NICE CLUSTERS, THINGS GOING ON IN THE BACK. IT'S LIKE EVERYTHING IS KIND OF THERE'S, THERE'S JUST IT'S NOT FLOWING FOR ME.
LIKE I WANT TO SHOW THAT MAYBE WITH THE. OH, YEAH. SO THE, THE APPLICANT KNOWS WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT, I THINK. DOES THAT LOOK LIKE IT WAS. IF YOU GOT RID OF THIS VENT HERE AND PUT ONE MORE WINDOW, WHETHER IT'S FALSE OR REAL RIGHT THERE. SO AT LEAST YOU HAVE LIKE, SEE HOW THIS SPACING IS THE SAME AS THIS SPACING IS THAT SPACING IS THAT I JUST, I FEEL LIKE IT NEEDS SOMETHING TO KIND OF BREAK UP THE MONOTONOUS OF THIS. OKAY. IT WOULD BECOME SOMETHING FALSE. I GOT TO SHOWER THERE, WHICH I MEAN, IT COULD BE IN THE SHOWER, BUT IN THIS CASE FOR HER, I'M SURE IT WOULD BE BETTER TO HAVE LIKE FALSE WHERE WE'VE INTRODUCED ON THE VERY FRONT PORTION, THAT'S ACTUALLY LIKE A CLOSED SHUTTER VERSUS A WINDOW AT THE BACK OF THAT GARAGE AT THE VERY FRONT. AND SO I DON'T KNOW IF THAT CAUSES WHICH ONE WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD REPEAT HERE AT THE VERY FRONT. OH, THAT'S THE CLOSE. OKAY. I SEE, I THINK IT'S THE, THE CHOPPINESS OF THE SPACING, WHICH IS IF IT DOESN'T FLOW AS NICE AS THE FRONT, AND I KNOW IT'S THE BACK, BUT I FEEL LIKE SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE EITHER ADDED. SO YOU'RE LOOKING
[00:15:05]
AT ADDING A THIRD SMALL WINDOW IN THAT SPACE. I JUST THINK THAT GETS A LITTLE CLUTTERED RIGHT IN THAT LAYERING THERE. AND I GUESS I JUST WANT TO CHIME IN THAT Y'ALL CAN HAVE THE DISCUSSION AND AGREE TO STUFF, BUT I THINK THIS MIGHT BE GOING BEYOND THE SCOPE OF WHAT THE WAIVER REQUEST IS AND WHAT WE CAN DO IN THAT SITUATION. SO TALK IT THROUGH.AND IF YOU CAN COME UP WITH A SOLUTION, THAT'S FINE. BUT I THINK IT'S STARTING TO GO A LITTLE FAR AFIELD ON THOSE KIND OF COMMENTS. AND THAT'S, THAT'S TOTALLY FINE. JUST SOMETHING THAT I NOTICED MAYBE SOMETHING TO LOOK AT, BUT OKAY. THANK YOU. DO EACH WAIVER INDIVIDUALLY PACKAGED. IT CAN BE EITHER WAY, HOWEVER YOU SEE FIT. YOU CAN APPROVE ALL FOUR WAIVERS. I'LL MAKE A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE WAIVERS A, B, C, AND D. AND INCLUDE AS A CONDITION. MR. MALTZ'S COMMENTS ON THE PORCH ROOF TO MATCH THE PITCH OF THE. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY? THE TRANSOM WINDOWS IN THE GARAGE DOOR, THE TRANSOM WINDOWS IN THE GARAGE DOOR AND THE GLASS TRANSOMS BE INCLUDED ON THE GARAGE DOORS? YES, AND THAT THE REAR GARAGE DOOR AREA MUST BE SCREENED FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY AND LANDSCAPING MUST BE INSTALLED ALONG THE WEST ELEVATION. SUBJECT STAFF APPROVAL. EXCELLENT. SECOND. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY IS THIS FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AND ALL FOUR WAIVERS. CORRECT.
THANK YOU. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR A OR B 36 2026. EXCELLENT. THANK YOU, MR. HINSON. YES. MR. BROWN YES. MR. STROLLER YES, MISS. MOORE YES. MR. MULLINS. YES. MR. DAVEY.
YES, THE AYES HAVE IT. THE MOTION PASSES WITH ALL VOTES TO APPROVE THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS, WITH ALL FOUR WAIVERS AND THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS, THE THAT MR. MALTZ'S COMMENT THAT THE PORCH ROOF MATCHED THE PITCH AND THAT THEIR GLASS TRANSOMS ON THE GARAGE DOORS. IS THAT IT? OKAY, THAT MATCHES THE PITCH OF THE TWO ADJACENT ROOFS OF THE TWO ADJACENT ROOFS OF THE TWO ADJACENT ROOFS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU BOTH. YES. THANK YOU.
WE APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR FLEXIBILITY. IT'S GOING TO BE BEAUTIFUL. YEAH. OUR NEXT CASE IS ARB 51 2026 FOR 4674675 ALBANY ROAD. FIRST CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE HOME AND GARAGE STRUCTURES. THE APPLICANTS. NEW ALBANY COMPANY AND CAN WE HAVE STAFF REPORT, PLEASE? YES. SO THIS RESIDENCE IS LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE NEW MARKET STREET ROUNDABOUT AND SOUTH OF THE FARMERS INSURANCE INSURANCE OFFICE AND THE NEW ALBANY POLICE STATION. RIGHT UP AT THE TOP HERE DOES NOT WORK. JUST AS A REMINDER, SINCE WE DON'T GET MANY OF THESE. THESE ARE THE THREE CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DEMOLITION WITHIN THE VILLAGE CENTER, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THESE CRITERIA MUST BE MET IN ORDER TO APPROVE THE DEMOLITION. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE HOME TO BE DEMOLISHED DUE TO THE STATE OF THE BUILDING. BOTH INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE HOME ARE IN NEED OF LOTS OF REPAIRS, AND THE HOME DOES NOT HAVE ANY HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND DOES NOT CURRENTLY MEET ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR THE AREA, AND THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED THE PICTURES ON THE SCREEN, AS WELL AS THE ONES INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET, TO KIND OF SHOW SOME OF THOSE POOR CONDITIONS OF THE HOME. AND I, AS WELL AS THE APPLICANT, ARE HERE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, WOULD YOU MIND GOING BACK TO THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE? I JUST WANT TO GET MY BEARINGS. IS NORTH UP ON THIS? YES. AND THIS IS THE INTERSECTION OF MARKET STREET EXTENSION AND NEW ALBANY. REYNOLDSBURG? YES. THIS IS THE POLICE STATION. OKAY, WE'RE RIGHT UP HERE. I JUST GOT A LITTLE TURNED AROUND AS I WAS LOOKING AT THIS. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND I GUESS MY FOLLOW UP QUESTION IS, IS, IS THE APPLICANT PROVIDED ANY PLANS TO REPLACE THAT STRUCTURE AT THIS TIME? NOT THAT I'VE BEEN TOLD. OKAY, SO THIS IS STRICTLY A DEMOLITION REQUEST. OKAY. THANK YOU. VERY GOOD. YEAH. I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE DEMOLITION OF THIS STRUCTURE AS A RB51-2026. SECOND. SORRY, DO WE SEE THAT THE SITE'S SEATED AND. YES, SIR.
[00:20:11]
YEAH. CREATE GREEN SPACE WHILE WE WAIT FOR DEVELOPMENT? GREAT. THANK YOU. MR. BROWN. YES, MISS.MOORE YES. MR. HENSON. YES. MR. STROLLER. YES. MR. DAVEY. YES. MR. MALIK. YES, THE AYES HAVE IT WITH ALL VOTES TO APPROVE TYPEKIT APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION. GREAT. THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS FOR US THIS EVENING? ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD? NO. MISSING MR. ITEM NOTED IN THE RECORD, AND I MOVE TO ADJOURN. SECOND. MR. HENSON. YES. MR. STROLLER YES.
MR. BROWN YES. MISS. MOORE YES. MR.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.