May 01, 2023 Planning Commission

[I. Call to order]

[00:00:03]

MEMBERS. I'D LIKE TO CALL HER THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR MONDAY. MAY THE 1ST 2023, PLEASE. MR KIRBY, PRESIDENT. MR WALLACE PRESENT. MISS BRIGGS. HERE. MR. LARSON, PRESIDENT. MR. SCHELL, PRESIDENT. COUNCIL MEMBER BRISK. SHE IS ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER SHELF. HE IS

[III. Action on minutes: April 17, 2023]

CORRECTION. AS STATED. DO I HEAR A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT THANK YOU. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION OF THE MINUTES. THE ROLE, PLEASE. MR WALLACE? YES. MR LARSON? YES. MR SHELL. STAYING? I WAS NOT PRESENT. MISS BRIGGS. YES. MR KIRBY? YES. I HAVE FOUR VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE OF THE MIDST. AS CORRECTED. APRIL 17TH. THANK YOU. OTHER ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA. DO WE

[IV. Additions or corrections to agenda]

CORRECTIONS IS PROBABLY NOT WHERE I WANT THE UPDATE TO THE MINUTES FOR APRIL, 3RD. WOULD SOMEONE CARE TO EITHER PRESENT THAT OR MAKE A MOTION. I WOULD JUST ASK THESE AMENDMENTS CORRECT MY MISINTERPRETATION OF WHAT WAS SAID AT THE MEETING. UM, AND THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS JUST SEEK TO CORRECT THOSE STATEMENTS. IN. IS THIS CLARIFICATION OR CORRECTION BASED ON YOUR LISTENING TO THE TAPE? DETERMINING THAT WHAT YOU HEARD ON THE TAPE IS MORE ACCURATE THAN WHAT YES, THAT'S CORRECT. AFTER REVIEWING THE REPORTING DETERMINED THAT, UM I HAD MISINTERPRETED A COUPLE OF STATEMENTS. AND THESE CORRECTIONS ARE INTENDED TO UPDATE THE MINUTE BECAUSE IT'S UNUSUAL FOR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. MEMBERS, FRANKLY. AND WHEN I SAW THE CORRECTIONS, I KIND OF. I KIND OF RECALL THE CONVERSATION BEING THE WAY THAT YOU READ IT DOWN. SO BUT ANYWAY, UM GIVEN GIVEN THE CLARIFICATION FROM SOURCE OF DON'T STOP. CHANGES TO THE APRIL 3RD MINUTES. I WOULD MOVE THAT WE FREE. THE. SUBMITTED CORRECTIONS TO THE APRIL 3RD 2023. DO I HEAR A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION ON THE THIRD CORRECTIONS. EITHER ROLL, PLEASE. MR WALLACE? YES, YES. MR KIRBY? YES. MR LARSON? YES. MR SCHELL? YES. I HAVE FIVE VOTES IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE APRIL

[00:05:04]

YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, BUT THE TRUTH THANK YOU AND THERE'S ALL MAKE SURE OUR PHONES ARE SILENT. ITEM FIVE IS HEARING THE VISITORS FOR ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. DO WE HAVE ANY SUCH VISITORS? HEARING NONE WHEN WE WANT OUR FIRST CASE IS A REZONING ZONING CHANGE. 11 2023

[VI. Cases]

GO AHEAD. THE FINAL PLAN FOR THE RELEASE OF DIVISION OF LAT, FOUR AND SIX A WILL BE IN THE HAWKS MORE SUBDIVISION AND GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HAWKS MORE DRIVE. SO FOR THIS APPLICATION.

IN 2015. THE LOT WAS REPLANTED. LOT SIX WAS REPLANTED TO ADD. A 0.6 ACRE PORTION OF THE EXISTING ULTIMATE PARCEL TO LOTS SIX, INCREASING THE SIZE TO 1.14 ACRES. NOW KNOWN AS LOT SIX, A.

ACCORDING TO THE HAWKS MORE NORTH PD AND LOTS FOUR AND FIVE HAVE BEEN COMBINED INTO A SINGLE

[00:10:05]

SO THIS IS SIX A WHAT'S AND WHAT ? SIX B SIX B IS WHAT THE WHOLE NEW PARCEL WILL BE IS WHAT'S AS WELL WILL BE KNOWN AS SIX. A IS THIS AREA IN THE BACK THIS L SHAPED A LOT. THIS IS LIKE FOUR.

IT WAS COMBINED WITH FLAT FIVE AND SO WE IDENTIFY IT FOR THE FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITORS, AND IT'S JUST A LOT FOR SO WHAT FOUR AND FIVE CONVENTION HAVE BEEN COMBINED IN HIS IDENTIFIED JUST AS A LOT FOR AND THEN THIS PLANT WILL COMBINE SIX, A FOUR AND THE PREVIOUS FIVE INTO ONE LARGE LOT KNOWN AS SIX B. THERE ARE FOUR ASH TREES. TWO AND FAIR CONDITION AND 10 IN GOOD CONDITION. THE SURVEY ALSO INCLUDES A PORTION OF LOT FOR AND AS SHOWN THERE ARE AT LEAST EIGHT TREES THAT ARE SIX INCHES OR LARGER AND THERE ARE TOO POOR. TO FAIR AND FOR GOOD CONDITION TREES. SIMILAR TO THE 2015 EXPANSION OF LOT SIX DAYS PLANT. THE GOAL OF THIS FINAL PLAN IS TO RELOCATE THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE IN EASEMENTS TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE LOT. RELOCATING THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE IN EASEMENTS WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PLANET AREA. CURRENTLY LOVE FOR HAS THE TRUE PRESERVATION ZONE AND EASEMENTS LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF THE PLANET PROPERTIES. LOT 66 A. M FOUR. WHICH SPLITS THE PROPERTIES, THE PLANETARY PRESERVATION RESTRICTS DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANY KIND WITHIN IT. THEREFORE RELOCATING THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE AND EASEMENTS WORLD ALLOW FOR SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO BE CONSTRUCTED BETWEEN THE FUTURE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOME OR NOT, FOR AS PART OF THE PERMITTING PROCESS, THE CITY ENGINEER WILL REVIEW ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO THE REMAINING DRAINAGE EASEMENT. RUNNING THROUGH THE PROPERTY. AND STAFF CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. INTERVIEWING. THERE'S NO COMMENTS ON THE, UH, THE FIRST PORTION OF THAT READING. UM THE REZONING, UM AS FAR AS THE AS WAS STATED WE WILL REVIEW ANY TRAINING IMPACTS WITH

[00:15:05]

THERE WAS A VARIANCE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I BELIEVE LAST YEAR FOR THAT POOL TO BE LOCATED ON THE SIDE YARD INSTEAD OF THE REAR, AND SO THAT IS TAKEN UP THE ABUNDANCE OF THE DEVELOPERS SPACE IN LOS FOUR AND FIVE PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE REZONING AND THE FINAL PLATT COMBINES LOTS 64 AND FIVE IN ORDER TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TO BE BUILT ON LOT SIX TO SERVE THE HOME AND LOCK FOUR GOOGLE MAPS HAS A MUCH MORE CURRENT PICTURE SHOWING SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION. SO WHEN, WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN DON AFTER TWO LIVENESS. IF THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED, THERE'S GONNA BE ONE BIG LOT. WITH THE HOUSE THAT'S SITTING ON WHAT USED TO BE 54. OR BOARD. WELL, NO, IT USED TO BE FIVE UNTIL THEY FIND OR IT'S 500. ALRIGHT SO AND THEN WE'LL HAVE THE POOL AND THEN WE'LL HAVE A BUNCH OF OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.

WHATEVER THOSE ARE THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY ALL RIGHT NOW I'M CALLED A DRAINAGE UTILITY. ISN'T IT MIGHT HISTORY SORRY UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT THAT GOES ALONG THE BACKSIDE. BORN BY AND THROUGH. LOT 62 LEFT IN THERE IS THAT STILL UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT. SO THAT IS CORRECT. SO BACK IN 2015, THE PLANNING COMMISSION IMPROVED VERY MUCH THE SAME PLANNING REQUEST WHERE THERE WAS A TREE PRESERVATION ZONE AND THE BACK OF LOTS SIX AND A LOT ENDED RIGHT HERE SO THAT PROPOSAL ADDED THIS SQUARE SECTION AND PART OF THIS TOO LATER ON AND MOVED THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE THAT WAS HERE TO THE REAR OF THE LOT, AND IT'S A LITTLE HARD BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF LINE WORK. AND SO THAT CREATED WHAT'S KNOWN AS TODAY'S LOT SIX A. AND SO THERE WAS A BASICALLY A ONE FOR ONE TRADE. THE AREA OF THIS TREAT. PRESERVATIONS ALMOST MOVED TO THE BACK OF THIS AREA. AND SO THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND UTILITY EASEMENT REMAINS TODAY.

THIS PLANT WILL DO THE SAME. IT WILL KEEP THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE BACK OF THESE PROPERTIES, BUT LITTLE MOVE THE TREE PRESERVATION ZONE TO THE REAR OF THIS LOT. SIX B, WHERE YOU CAN THINK OF IT AS NOW INSISTING LOT SIX A. WHERE THERE IS NONE TODAY SO VERY SIMILAR TO 1015. THAT'S APPROXIMATELY THE SAME AREA AS JUST BEING RELOCATED TO THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE NEW OVERALL LOT. AND THE REASON STATED FOR REMOVED, MOVING, RELOCATING THE TREE PRESERVATION ALLOWS TO MAKE IT BUILDABLE. BUT IF IT'S A UTILITY AND DREAMING, JESUS, IT'S REALLY NOT BUILDABLE ANYWAY. SO IT'S IT WOULDN'T BE BUILDABLE BUT BASED ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE PLATTE TODAY, AND THIS WAS AT CITY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THAT IT SAYS YOU CAN DO NOTHING WITHIN THIS TREE PRESERVATION ZONE, SO YOU CAN'T PUT ANY PAVEMENT OF ANY SORT. YOU REALLY CAN'T ENCROACH THIS OTHER THAN BURIED UTILITIES FOR ANY REASON. SO THE THINKING WAS, IF YOU'RE COMBINING ALL OF THIS INTO ONE LOT AND IF THERE IF THESE FEATURE ACCESSORIES STRUCTURES ARE SERVING THIS PRIMARY HOUSE IT WOULD BE NICE IF YOU COULD BUILD, YOU KNOW EITHER SIDEWALK OR PATH OR SOMETHING TO PROVIDE DIRECT CONNECTION. OTHERWISE, YOU'D HAVE TO LOOP AROUND THE EXISTING THREE PRESERVATION ZONE TO GET TO THE STRUCTURES THAT WOULD BE BUILT WITHIN THIS AREA ON THIS LOT. AND SO THIS ALLOWS FOR AND OUR EYES COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT.

OR YOU CAN JUST THINK OF IT MORE AS DIRECT ACCESS TO BECAUSE YOU ARE CORRECT TO BE NO DEVELOPMENT PER SE WITHIN THIS AREA, BUT THIS PLANT DOES ALLOW FOR PATHS AND PAVED AREAS FOR WALK ABILITY TO GO FROM FOUR AND FIVE UP TO THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE LOT UP HERE. FROM THE ENGINEERING POINT OF VIEW. MAYBE I'M JUST MISSING IT. IF YOU PUT SIDEWALKS AND STUFF DOESN'T THAT BLOCK THE DRAINAGE? SO AS MR WELFARE WHO'S OUR COMMUNITY ELEMENT ENGINEER, SO WE WOULD REVIEW THAT TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS STILL POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON THE LOTS. UM AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IF AND ONE THAT IS SUBMITTED. SO THE PLAN ALLOWS FOR THE ENGINEERING STAFF TO REVIEW THOSE PAVEMENT AREAS WITHIN THAT DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO ENSURE THERE'S NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS. AND THE OWNER WOULD NEED TO KNOW THAT IF FOR SOME REASON, UTILITIES NEEDED TO COME

[00:20:07]

SO IT HAS NO REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE TEXT IT BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. AND THEN JUST AS A REMINDER TO THIS PROPERTY DOES HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEN BUILDINGS ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED, SO PART OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS MIDDLE IS A LANDSCAPE PLAN. UH SO CERTAINLY THE PLANNING COMMISSION COULD SEE A LANDSCAPE PLAN IN THE FUTURE TO SEE WHAT IS BEING PLANTED WITHIN THAT AREA TO THE NORTH. BUT WE DON'T HAVE THAT PLAN NOW. WE DO NOT. WE HAVE A TREE SURVEY BACK FROM 2015 WITH THAT PREVIOUS ACTUALLY THINK IT'S 2019 WHEN THERE WAS A REZONING HERE, SO WE KNOW WHAT IS WITHIN THIS AREA HERE. UM AND THAT'S HOW WE KNOW THAT THERE'S NOT TOO MANY TREES WITHIN THIS PORTION OF THE LOT. ROLL BACK TO YOUR GOOGLE MAP. OH, YES. THERE YOU GO. YEAH. YEAH. SO YOU CAN SORT OF SEE IT RIGHT HERE. THIS IS THE AREA WHERE STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT ADDITIONAL TREES BE PLANTED, UM, AT THE TIME OF FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEN DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. IN A MASS QUESTION. WE TALKED ABOUT BEING ABLE TO BUILD AND LIMITED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. IS THERE A GUARANTEE THERE'LL BE NO MORE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON ANY OF THE NEW PERIOD THAT WE'RE. COMBINING SO THERE'S NO GUARANTEE. UM BUT THE TEXT DOES REQUIRE THAT INFANT WHEN A THIS AREA ENCIRCLED AND RED THAT'S BEING REZONED IF THIS AREA UM IS THAT PRESSURE SHOULD SAY THIS AREA DOES RETAIN ITS ENTITLEMENTS TO HAVE A FUTURE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING NEEDED ON IT. AND THEN IF THAT SHOULD OCCUR. UM AGAIN, THIS WHOLE AREA IS BEING COMBINED. IT WOULD HAVE TO SPLIT OUT AGAIN. SO IT FOLLOWS THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS OF ONE HOUSE PER LOT FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT REQUIREMENTS. UM, SO BASICALLY AT THAT TIME, THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD HAVE TO SPLIT THE PROPERTIES AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY LIFE. BUT IT IS PERMITTED OR I SHOULD SAY IT IS INVESTED RIGHT THAT RUNS WITH THE PROPERTY AS PART OF THIS PED REZONING. THANK YOU. MANDY IN THAT PD PD. WHAT? WE JUST. COMMITTED INCLUDE THE ENTIRE LOT INSTEAD OF KEEP THAT SEPARATED BY ITSELF AND UNDERSTAND WHY A SECTION SEPARATED THE END GOAL IS TO HAVE ONE THEY LOST. YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, FROM THE UP AGAIN BECAUSE THAT MAY SHAKE FREE SOME MORE QUESTIONS. THERE WERE 11 THIS TIME. HIM TOO.

LOT OF FIVE HAS BEEN SWIMMING. THAT WOULD BE REDS AND SEPARATE . SO WE DID NOT. APPLICATION ME EVEN IS SOBER. WE DON'T WANT TO CHANGE DIFFERENT ZONES. BECAUSE THEY TEST STUFF. THEY ALSO.

FRANCES SO WE WANT TO KEEP THOSE MENUS. SO IT'S BEEN. THAT'S JUST RESORT. TRUST ME. AND I WISH

[00:25:14]

THE LINKS AS WELL. THE WESTERN. BERMAN SOLD IN 2021. IN THE ZONE. PT KEEPING THAT SAYING, I THESE ARE NAME. FORMS UP THE WESTERN. SO THE EASTERN PARCELS CONTAINING ALL STARTING. AND WE TOOK THAT SAME LOVING TAX FROM 2021. AND WE CAN AGREE WITH EVERYTHING. YEAH, SUBSTANCE. FROM THE SANFORD HOUSE, WHICH WE'VE. ON THAT SIDE. YOU'RE SLEEPING WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL OVER THE SIDE WERE IN THEIR HOME. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS ON YOUR SESSION TYPE STRUCTURES, WHICH IS A VERY HIGH . UPS UM, SO ALMOST CERTAIN TAX AND NATIONAL HEIGHT AND SMARTLY CHAPS ALL PERTAINING TO CONTEMPLATED RESIDENTIAL CLUB. BUT WE'RE PUTTING THIS RESTRICTIVE. MARKETING STANDARDS , ARMORS STRUCTURES, SO ARCHITEH QUALITY. SUCH STRUCTURES, THINGS LIKE DETAILS OUT WILLING TO BE ATTACHED BLOCK. CERTAINLY. THERE COULD BE A NATIONAL WE WOULD NEVER MUCH OVERDUE LIKE OVER DEVELOP. WE COULD TALK. TALKING ABOUT IT. DOES I MEAN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. THIS REALLY LARGE POINTS SUCCEED. FOUR WOULD BE A PRETTY DECENT THAT SO I. THE BASIC MATH THAT JUST SHOWED WHERE WE WERE IN THE 2021. HAVE INITIALLY.

SO ALL OF THE YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS. ON MY BIG BOARD, BUT THE YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS ARE ALL THE NEW SETBACKS THAT WILL APPLY TO THIS PROPERTY, SO NOTHING IS DEVELOPED. YEAH THE YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED FOOTPRINT. IN ADDITION TO THAT, I HIGHLIGHTED IN P IS HE SAYING AREA? TODAY

[00:30:03]

NEVER SAY WHAT CONNECTIONS WITHIN THAT AREA, KEEPING. OF COURSE, WITH THE ENGINEERING OF CHILDREN IN THE BRAIN THAT STARTED IN THE AREA. SO IT REALLY IS MOVING. YOU CAN SEE.

AND HELPING WITH NEGOTIATIONS, PROPERTY OWNER TO THE MORTAL BACK IN 2021. THEY ASKED GROWTH 50 FT BUILDING SEPARATION FROM THE WEST FACADE OF THEIR BARRAGE DOWN SHORT. YOU PRESERVE VESSELS. OVER HERE. NO. FIGURE IT OUT. SERVICE OF HAVING TO LOOK AT THIS TEXT FROM 2021 I. IT WAS. SO YOU'LL SEE THAT IN THE ZONING TESTING YOUR APPLICATION UNDER TWO WEEKS. THOSE ARE RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE AND SHE WAS ALREADY IN ASSISTANCE TEST. AND THEN THE FIRST WE MADE REFINEMENTS FOR STAFF WORKING DILIGENTLY. AND AGAIN PRESERVED ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY PRESERVE. SO REALLY, THIS IS GOING TO BE A WONDERFUL WONDERFUL FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND THE CITY. WE ARE GOING TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. WE ALSO OF COURSE, WITH THE HAWKS MORE SUBDIVISION IN A WAY THAT'S NUMBERS NUMBERS FOR THE NEXT APPLICATION THAT I CAN TALK.

PLEASE KEEP THEM. JUST SCARED. HE HAS TO. SEPARATELY, WHICH CAN HAVE A HIGHER TRADITIONAL STANDARD OR THE SAME, BUT WE HAVE THE MOST RESTRICTIVE POLICY. WE ALSO WILL. REVIEW BOARD FROM PRIVATE ENTITY THAT HEARTS MORE STUFF VISION. HOUSING GOODS. UM SET OF RESTRICTIONS. SO WHAT? WE'LL BE DOING EVERYTHING WE WILL BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. AND NOW IT'S PRETTY MUCH SPEAKS TO THE APPLICATION AND ITS PURPOSE. AND I HAVE TO ADDRESS QUESTIONS ON THAT APPLICATION, AND I'M WONDERING IF WE COULD YOU WANTED. TO DISCUSS THE FLAT. ONE CAREFUL WORK. THERE'S SOME SORT OF PROCEDURAL QUESTION THE FIRST SIGHT OF THE TO DO THAT. WE'D LIKE TO HEAR BOTH OF THEM. AT THE VERY, VERY END. WE WILL SEPARATE THESE TWO SEPARATE ISSUES, BUT THEY ARE BEST HANDLED AS AN INTEGRATED WHOLE. QUICK QUESTION TO THE NEW PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS EXPECTED TO GO INTO THE HAWKS, MORE COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS.

YES. SNEAKERS IN THIS CRUMMY NOT HELPS MORE WILL NOW BE INCLUDED IN HOW SMART YEAH. IT'S MORE OF A SHORT LINK WOULD ACCEPT BECAUSE THEY WOULD ALSO HAVE TO SLIDE BY SO THAT'S THE SEQUENCE THAT THEY DON'T IF THEY DO NOT SIGN ON HALLOWEEN, PERHAPS WITH FEDERAL AND WE STILL HAVE A REZONING APPLICATION OF THE LIVE . BUT THERE ARE HIGH WOULD MOST LIKELY AND THEY DON'T COME BACK.

MAYBE THEY DO A REFUND FOR THE PARTS TOGETHER. AND THE REPLY TO THE LAST 68.58. SO INSTEAD OF ONE OF MY TUESDAY OR LAST TIME. THE BETTER. HANDLE THAT. IF THE OWNERS UM. I DON'T THINK ENGLAND NOT TALKED TO A FEW PEOPLE THAT I TALKED TO THE FORMER DEVELOPMENT. YEAH. LEAST SETTING UP MEETINGS. PEOPLE DISCUSS BALLOT MEASURES OF THE H O N ITS NUMBERS TO APPROVE OF THE MEASURE. OPERATION TO ADD ADDITIONAL PROPERTY. SO AGAIN, A LOT OF THE LOWER TO BE DONE

[00:35:04]

BUT YOU'RE DESERVING, ALWAYS REGULATED DIFFERENTLY. LOST FOUR AND FIVE. SO. FROM THE OTHER PERSON BECAUSE I HAVE THIS NOW, RIGHT HERE. SOMETHING OUT OF THAT STUFF. WE HAVE ACTUALLY YOU LOOK AT IT. APPLICATION. THE ORDINANCE, NOT FOR THIS. SOMETHING THAT PERTAINS 45. AND YOU HAVE IT'S OVER. ON THIS SECTION, SO IT'S A GOOD ADMINISTRATIVE POOL. THAT LATER, PERFECT STYLE. YOU KNOW WHAT SO MANY ORNAMENTS WILL APPLY. ANSWERING QUESTIONS. TO HAVE A HANDFUL OF IT SO IT'S ENVISIONED FOR THE. THIS PLAN HAS TWO MASTERS. ONE IS A LARGE WHAT? YES, FUTURE. VISION AS TO LOTS. I WOULD SUGGEST THE WRONG TERMS. WOULD BE THEIR VISION. THIS IS OUR THOSE PLANS. THEN HOW DO WE PUT A SECOND HOUSE ON HERE WITHOUT IT? BREAKING THE ONE HOUSE PER LOT. SWIMMER. ZOMBIE. MARCUS SAID. OBSERVING REGULATIONS STANDARDS FOR ANY PROBLEM. HELPS. AND STANDARDS DENSITY. HOW MANY RESIDENTS BLOWING MENTALITY SOCIAL UNITS? STANDARDS. AND EVERYTHING IN THE CHEST. TRUE. SILENT. IN THE LIVING ROOM. BECAUSE. WE ARE ASKING FOR THIS STUDY. TO REMEMBER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL SO WE CAN STILL PUT. JAMES. BUT IF WE DO, WE ARE REACHING ABOUT ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

SENSORY STRUCTURES WITH NO RESIDENTIAL. ENFORCEMENT INTERPRETATION. IT'S ONLY. WAIT 72 16 YEARS FROM THIS SOMETHING HERE, RIGHT? PEOPLE ALSO LAW IF YOU WILL, BECAUSE THE PROBLEM.

DESCRIBED BY LEGAL DESCRIPTION, MEATS AND TOWNSPEOPLE DESCRIPTION THAT WE PROVIDED THAT APPLICATION. TEST. SO THAT IS YOUR FOR ZILLION PURPOSES, AND THAT IS YOUR ZONING DISTRICT . BLOOD GO AHEAD QUICKLY BECAUSE WE WORKED WITH THE APPLICANTS. THERE'S ALSO PROVISIONS IN THE TEXT THAT REQUIRES THAT LOT TO BE BASICALLY SPLITTING IN OR SUBDIVIDED AGAIN, IF AND WHEN

[00:40:04]

THAT'S CORRECT. THAT WAS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. DID THAT ATTACHED TO COMPANY SUGGESTION OF STAFF. FOR THE. RELATED TO THE TEST. BUT KEEP IT IN MIND. LOCATIONS. THAT IS DESCRIBED YOUNG PATIENT SO IT'S THE COMBINED SIX B SIX B NOT COMBINED GOT REZONED. YES B IS THE PROPERTY IN MIND AND QUESTION. YOU'RE LOOKING AT A RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS AND ALL OF A SUDDEN TEST REQUIREMENTS OF THIS IPTV TEST. TO PLAY. MOVIE TEST DOES NOT CONTROL THEY HAVE THEIR OWN TESTS. SO THE BLOCK IS REALLY KNOW WHAT THAT WAS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE ZONING APPLICATION. TO ACCOMMODATE THE CITY. WE'VE AGREED THE LANGUAGE THAT WE ARE GOING TO RESIDENTIAL PLACE A WEEK NOW. TO BRING THE PIECE FOR THE CITY TO ADMINISTER. THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTS. HOW DOES THAT JIVE WITH THE. RE SUBDIVISION REQUEST WHERE IT'S SAYS HERE GOING TO COMBINE LOTS FOREIGN 16 TO A SINGLE PARCEL. RIGHT? BECAUSE THE CITY STAFF. TO HELP CLIENTS ONE FROM WHAT IS ZONING PROPERTY TO HAVE WELL. THIS IS OUR. WHATEVER THE DATA, IS THIS OR THIS THIS PROPERTY AND QUESTIONS. SOMETHING, BUT I'M TALKING ABOUT. HOW MANY DOGS DO YOU HAVE THIS PLANET SUBDIVISION? WE'VE REDUCED A LOT. 68 ONE. PROVIDING SEXUAL BECAUSE 60. CLASSIFICATIONS TO GIVE MYSELF TAPS. BECAUSE OF FATHER'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT. THIS IS THE CASE WHERE ONE PARCEL WILL HAVE MULTIPLE ZONING DISTRICTS. CORRECT. IF WE WANT PERSONAL. EDUCATIONS. THIS IS BIGGER. LET ME GET A FASHION WISE. THE DISTRICTS ARE AND THAT'S THERE TO USE ONLY THAT'S BECAUSE THOSE NEEDS AND POLICY DESCRIPTION SERVICES. IT'S TOTALLY LEGAL. EVERYTHING. YEAH THERE IS NOTHING IN OUR CODE, IT SAYS YOU CAN'T HAVE TWO ZONING DISTRICTS ON ONE PARCEL. IN FACT, THAT DOES EXIST TODAY AND OTHER SECTIONS OF THE COUNTRY CLUB AND THE WAY THAT IS RECORDED WHEN WE UPDATE OUR OFFICIALS, ZONING MAP THAT DOES FOLLOW THE MEATS AND BOUNDS. SO OUR OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WILL SHOW THIS ONE PARCEL WITH THE TUESDAY DISTRICTS OVER IT. I UNDERSTAND THAT LEGALITY IF YOU'RE HAVING TO ZONING DISTRICTS ANYWAY. COUNTRIES ALL THE STUFF YOU WANT TO DO THAT REPLANTING. THEY WANT TO. A PERSON. IMAGES. FOR YOU COULD DO THAT AND JUST ADD IT TO LIGHT SIX RIGHT TO EVERYTHING. AND WINE. FIRST THIS PIECE. IT'S A THESE 300. TO PURCHASE A 0.58% EXTENDS EAST OF IT. SO. BUT THE ISSUE MORE YEAH. INTO THAT. AND WE'RE CREATING A NEW MORE LIKE THIS. SO YOU GUYS NECESSARY AS WELL. OPERATION. LITERALLY ADD ADDITIONAL PROPERTY. THAT IS PRETTY PLANETS MANDATED TO

[00:45:08]

ALONG WITH THAT. SEPARATE QUESTIONS RELATED. WHERE WOULD THE SECOND DWELLING UNIT GO? GO IN? THE CLASSIC LOT SIX. WOULD IT GO TO THE NORTH AND THE NEW PART. I MEAN TEXT, WHICH WE USE THE SAME LANGUAGE WOULD PERMIT SINGLE FAMILY. TO FACE HER TALKS MORE AND THE CREATION. DOWN IN

[00:50:05]

BECAUSE THERE WAS NO ROOM BEHIND IT. BEHIND THAT, BUT STRUCTURED TO BUILD. NOW WE'RE NOW WE'RE GETTING AN APPLICATION THAT SAYS THAT THE OWNER OF FOUR AND FIVE IS NOT GOING TO BUY ALL THE PROBLEMS BEHIND THEM. WHICH WOULD HAVE BOOTED OUT THE NEED FOR A VARIANCE FOR A SIGN OF OUR SWIMMING. IS THERE ANY MAN? HOW DOES THAT WORK WHEN THE NEED FOR A VARIANCE? GETS BOOTED OUT BY SUBSEQUENT EVENTS WHERE THE OWNER. WHERE THE SAME OWNER NOW IS GOING TO OWN THESE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 17 YOU KNOW WHAT I'M ASKING, AND I DON'T THINK THAT MAKES WHAT'S HAPPENED.

SUBSEQUENT MAKES ANY DIFFERENCE TO THE VARIANTS COULD TAKE THE VARIANCE AT THE TIME. IT COMES SO BASED UPON THAT THE VARIANCE IS WHERE IT IS. COULD WIN COULD WE MAKE AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST THAT THE SIDE GUARDS SWIMMING POOL BEING REMOVED? REYNOLDS FINISHED . WELL, THEY MAY WANT TO STOP. UM WELL, WE FIGURED THIS OUT. YEAH I DON'T KNOW. I'M JUST WONDERING BECAUSE IT'S THIS WHOLE THING IS BOTHERING ME THAT I'M NOT SURE. ONCE THE VARIANCE IS GRANTED THE POOLS BUILT, YOU COULD HAVE THEM. PULL THAT OUT. MOVING AT THAT POINT, WE WOULDN'T BE BE. WE WILL BE PULLING IT OUT AS A BECAUSE OF THE VARIOUS APPOINTED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS OTHER SEPARATE REQUEST. YOU SERIOUS? SO YEAH, I'M ABOUT YES, BUT BUT YOU WOULD HAVE TO AGREE TO THE CONDITIONS SO YOU WOULD BE A GREEN. YOUR CLIENT WOULD BE A GRANGER PAUSE. CONDITION OF GETTING MONEY WANTS HERE, WHICH WE DON'T HAVE TO GIVE. YOU THINK AS YOU GO DOWN THAT ROAD DEAL WITH THAT VARIANCE BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY BEEN APPROVED. UM I WOULDN'T. I WOULDN'T GO CHANGING THAT AND STARTED IMPROVED. QUESTION FOR STAFF WHEN WE GET PROVEN, YOU D DO WE NEED TO HAVE A VERY LAYOUT? WHAT'S INTENDED ON THERE OR NOT? I'VE SEEN THAT IN THE PAST AND SOME DEVELOPED SO AS FAR AS I GO, I, P D, UM REZONING GOES, THEY DON'T HAVE TO SHOW WHAT COULD BE DEVELOPED . IT INCLUDES JUST A SUBDIVISION MAP AND STANDARDS THAT USUALLY TAKES THE FORM OF A P U D TEXT. UM SO CERTAINLY THROUGH THE TEXT , AND THROUGH THIS SUB AREA MAP , THAT IS WHAT CODE REQUIRES AS FAR AS THE ENVISIONING GOES, BUT THAT'S ALSO WHY THERE IS A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. SO WHILE IT'S NOT REQUIRED TODAY, UM IT IS REQUIRED IN THE FUTURE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, SO IN FACT, THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS DETAILED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, LANDSCAPING. HARDSCAPE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE ABLE TO REVIEW SORT OF THE APPLICATION, OR I SHOULD SAY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STONING TEXT AT A FUTURE MEETING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. I MEAN, I WOULD BE ABLE TO OPINION THAT WE SHOULD LIMIT THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS WITH A LOT. I HEARD TO YOU WELL, TWO BUILDINGS AT THE 25 FT AND THEN WHEN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT BANKING WE WOULD HAVE THE DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW FAR AND HOW BIG IT IS BECAUSE IT'S HARD TO HAPPENING TO GIVE LIKE BRIDE. APPROVAL FOR SOMETHING YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE IT. THOSE THIS IS. PLACE 76 ACRES, WHICH WOULD BE SO DIFFERENT FROM ONE. 20 FT BY 60 POINT SIZE LOT. SO IT'S 65 1 20. UM, AND SHE WAS SO THREE STRUCTURES OUT OF THE CAR. I THINK THE. YOU KNOW, SHIP TO SAY TO SENSORY STRUCTURES ON THIS LOT. IS THE VARIOUS ENTITLEMENTS ENTITLEMENTS FOR A HOME WE HAVE TO SEND HOME. I'M SORRY TYPE YOU'VE GOT AND REQUESTED THAT

[00:55:06]

THAT LOOKS LEGITIMATE TO ME. BASED ON THE SUPPORT INTO AREA. AND WHERE WOULD LIKE FOOTPRINTS WOULD BE BASED ON THE YELLOW SETBACK. SO THAT THAT WOULD BE THE REQUEST FOR TRACK. YES MY ONLY CONCERN WITH THE FOUR I GUESS. IDEALLY, YOU COULD PUT FOUR ON THE TOP RIGHT HAND PORTION 1234 STILL LIVING ROOM FOR ANOTHER. HUGE SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU'VE GOT WHAT'S THE TOTAL ACRES ON THAT TOP PORTION? 1.726 SO THEN YOU POTENTIALLY COULD HAVE A LARGE STATE SIZED HOUSE AND FOUR STRUCTURES WITH NO LIMIT OF SIZE, YOU COULD GOBBLE THAT UP PRETTY QUICK. IT'S ONLY TAX THOSE SOON AS A RESIDENTIAL DRAWING. IT'S BUILT ON MONSTERS.

THE WE ARE RESTRICTED TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. THEY WANT TO BUILD. OPPORTUNITY OF THE TEXT. SO TINY IS EVERYTHING. WE DON'T WANT TO ORDER DEVELOP THIS PART. BUT IT ISN'T VAST AREA, YOU KNOW. IF YOU LOOK AT JUST 14% OR EVEN MONTHS. THOSE PRIMARY AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE FOOTPRINT. YOU GET THAT IDEA OVER HERE? I THINK IF YOU SAID FOUR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, THAT'S. PLUS, WE HAVE ALL THOSE SERVICES. YOU HAVE THAT ONE. IN THE CURRENT ZONING. THERE IS A SIZE LIMIT FOR THIS CENTURY STRUCTURE. AND. IT ISN'T LIKE HOUSE STRUCTURE. THE CASH GARAGE, SO THAT COULD BE BUT IT IS FIGHTS. THAT'S WHY WE WANTED IT FLEXIBLE. THE CITY BEFORE ANYTHING. CONSTRUCTED FOR APPROVAL. YEAH. WE ALSO TO TAKE THOSE PLANS TO THE HOPS MORE ANGEL WAY, AND THEY HAVE AND THEY ARE THE NEIGHBORS SUPPOSED TO SO DON'T BE KEEPING A KEEN EYE ON THAT WILL DEFINITELY GET TO MAKE SURE AND KEEPING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. LET ME GO BACK TO MAKE SURE I HEARD SOMETHING RIGHT? SO IF A PRESIDENT GETS BUILT ON HERE THEY WILL BE RESIDENTS, PLUS TWO STRUCTURES. IF THERE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE STUDY YET, UH, PLAYER REIMBURSED MHM BACK TO THE DEFAULT STANDARDS OF. THAT SHE WAS HISTORY STRUCTURES BECAUSE OF PRIMARY MOMENTS A PRIMARY USE IN THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THE ACCESSORY USE. BUT I BELIEVE IT'S OUR CLIENTS WERE TO BUILD THE PRIMARY HOME. AND START BUILDING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.

[01:00:04]

NO, I WAS THINKING THAT, UM WE'VE WE'VE SEEN EVEN IN THE COUNTRY CLUB WHERE PEOPLE TRY TO PUT MORE THINGS AND FIT ON THE LOT, AND THIS HAS AS AS WRITTEN . IT HAS AN UNLIMITED NUMBER OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. AND THEN WHEN WE'RE DONE WITH ALL OF THOSE, WE PUT A HOUSE ON IT.

OKAY AND I DON'T FIND THAT PALATABLE. UM SO. IF IT HAD BEEN DONE. IN THE OTHER ORDER, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A HOUSE AND TWO AS THE ENTITLEMENT ONCE YOU PUT THE HOUSE THERE FIRST. AND SO WHAT I'M ASKING IS THERE A POINT AT WHICH YOU SAY IF WE BUILD ANOTHER STRUCTURE, WE NO LONGER HAVE THE ABILITY TO BUILD THE HOUSE. YES I THINK THEY ARE YOU SAYING RESTRUCTURES FOR SO THAT WOULD BE LIKE PRIMARY. TO ASSESS THAT WOULD FIT UNDER THE OLD WAY. YEAH. TWO. TALK ABOUT MAKING ME AND. IT'LL BE A IT'LL BE A CONDITION OF THREE STRUCTURES TOTAL. WE COULDN'T CALL IT. CENTURY STRUCTURE ABOUT THREE STRUCTURES. WHEN YOU COMFORTABLE WITH THEM. I'M STILL WORKING OUT. I? YES EFFECTIVELY BECAUSE YOU'RE BASICALLY SAYING LOTS SIX CLASSIC AND THE TWO HALVES EACH ARE BIG ENOUGH FOR A BUILDING. ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT HORRENDOUS NUMBER OF TREES WOULD GO AWAY. UM, BUT THAT'S WHY WE DON'T HAVE CONTROL OVER THAT. SO I WANT TO JUMP IN ABOUT LOT SIX. SO, UM, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT. SO FIRST OF ALL, KEEP ME HONEST HERE, SO YOUR CLIENT ALREADY OWNS LOT SEX? NO, THEY FOUR AND FIVE. OKAY SO THEY'RE IN IN CONTRACT FOR LOT SIX. AND THEN LOTS SIX B. AT THE TIME AT THE TOP IS NO LONGER SHIP. IT'S SIX A IT INCLUDES THAT TOP PIECE. BECAUSE OF THOSE GONNA BE RIGHT THERE. YEAH FAVORITE NOW. ONE OF MY SIX EGGS. ON THE SAME IT SEEMS SO HARD. SO THEY DON'T OWN SIX. I AS A AS OF THIS MOMENT IN TIME. AND I KNOW ABOUT THE 60 BECAUSE WE TALKED ABOUT THAT EARLIER. THAT'S THE PIECE THAT'S FURTHER EAST. NORTH OR NEXT TO IT. I CAN SEE IT ON. YEAH. SO WHAT I'M STRUGGLING WITH IS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO LOT SIX. IS THERE GOING TO BE? YEAH IS THERE GOING TO BE THE LOT HERE THAT FACES HAWKS MORE? THIS LOT HERE. THIS IS VERY DIFFERENT FOR ME THAN THIS. SO THIS FACES AND OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A POOL HERE, BUT THERE'S OTHER SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE HERE. THERE'S OTHER SINGLE FAMILY FAMILY RESIDENTS AROUND THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT. LIKE WHAT'S THE PLAN? THERE IS THAT IS THAT IS THE PLAN FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME. IS THERE A PLAN FOR A FULL HOUSE. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO FLUSH OUT BECAUSE I THINK THAT AGAIN IS VERY DIFFERENT THAN THIS. SORT OF PLAN. ASSESSMENT TYPE STRUCTURES. HOUSE. DIFFERENT

[01:05:06]

SO HOW'S NATURALIZED GARDEN TYPE FEELING? THE FIRST SUBDIVISION. SO AND I KNOW YOU'VE INDICATED THAT YOU'RE IN THE PROCESS OF SPEAKING WITH OTHER NEIGHBORS WITHIN HAWKES MORE AND SO ARE EARLY SIGNS AND INDICATE SUPPORT FROM OTHER NEIGHBORS WITHIN HAWKES MORE FOR A POOL HOUSE TYPE STRUCTURE ON LOT SIX. A. IT DOESN'T SPEAK FOR THE BETTERMENT THIS POINT PERSON MEETINGS WITH DEVELOP. THE FORMER WAREHOUSE MORE AND. JOURNALIST SUPPORTIVE ACTUALLY, ONE BLESSING. AS FOR MEETING WITH. HMM. ELABORATION OF. AS WELL AS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FULL. HOWEVER, IT CAN'T BE APPROVED ANYWAY. THEY DON'T GET TOO MUCH. BUT AND THERE IS A ISSUE. A SORT OF A TITLE. ISSUE ON THIS COMPANY, AND WE HAVE TO CLEAR THAT WITH AND PURCHASED THE PROPERTIES TO DO ABOUT I AGREE. THEY LOVE THEIR NEIGHBORS. MM HMM. THEY KNOW THE PRODUCT. THE. NEIGHBORS HAVE WORKED TOGETHER AND CARE ABOUT EACH OTHER. I REALLY JOURNALIST SUPPORTED. MOST FIVE GREAT TO SEE THAT ONE. COMMISSION. THE PAST FEW WEEKS. THE DETAILS ON THAT. EVER MOMENT DECLARATIONS ARE THE ADDITIONAL YOU DON'T NEED MEMBERS OF THEIR MAJORITY OR SOMETHING. SO WE HAVE TWO MECHANISMS WITHOUT ACTUALLY FREE. OPERATION. AND ANY OF THIS. MHM ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. THANK YOU. AND THEN STEVE QUESTION FOR STAFF. IS THERE ANY LIKE PRECEDENTS OF A SITUATION LIKE THIS ELSEWHERE, LIKE IN A COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY? AS IT RELATES AGAIN TO THIS. LOT THAT IS NEXT TO A POOL SINGLE FAMILY HOME, ETCETERA THAT AGAIN. REMOVE THIS JUST FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES HAS BEEN ACQUIRED BY THE SAME FAMILY AND IT'S HONEST STREET. IT'S ON KEEP ME HONEST. I BELIEVE A LITTLE ROUND ABOUT THERE, RIGHT . IT'S FRONT FACING AND THERE IS A POOL HOUSE. WHATEVER GARDEN HOUSE, SOME OTHER SORT OF BEAUTIFUL. STRUCTURE THAT FITS WITHIN THE HAWKS MORE ARCHITECTURAL COMMUNITY, ETCETERA. I'D SAY QUESTIONNAIRE . WE HAD EVERYTHING. THAT ONE. I CAN REMEMBER VIVIDLY THE WAS SIMILAR TO THIS NOW. THEY DID NOT HAVE THE WHOLE. SIX B SECTION THAT TOP SECTION INVOLVED, BUT THEY DEFINITELY TOOK THE FRONTAGE. LOT OF SEX THAT WAS UNDERGROUND ABOUT YOU CAN TURN THAT INTO AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR A POOL BUILDING THAT THAT'S WHEN I KNOW FOR SURE THAT I WAS LAST YEAR. YEAH, THAT'S CORRECT. YEAH, THAT WAS ALSO FOR A POOL AND POOL HOUSE. THE STRUCTURES RECORD OUR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES DO REQUIRE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPEAKING OF NEIGHBORS, NEIGHBORS WITHIN 200 FT FOR SENT LETTERS AND NOTIFIED OF THIS MEETING AND NEIGHBORS WITHIN 200 FT ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE NOTIFIED OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT POINT HEARING AS WELL. AND SO THAT INCLUDES. I BELIEVE SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS. KEEP ME HONEST. I THINK THIS WAS IN THE PAPERWORK THAT I'M SORRY. WRONG WAY THERE WOULD BE LIKE UP HERE. AND LIKE BEAUMONT. IS THAT

[01:10:05]

THOSE PROPERTIES THAT WE WOULD CONTROL. ACCEPTING ONLY THE CLASS. RIGHT? THE. I THINK WHAT YOU'RE SAYING NEIL IS THAT IF ALL THE TREES THAT ARE BEING PRESERVED CURRENTLY AT THE AT THE REAR OF LOT FORWARD CHOPPED DOWN THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A BUNCH OF TREES THAT STOP AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO START AGAIN BEHIND ON PARADE. YEAH. WOULD WALK THREE WAS PURCHASED.

GET A NEW. THE TREES IN THE MARKET FOR PRESERVATION TOWN. WE'RE GONNA BE THERE. TREASON IS RELATIVELY LIGHT ON THE GROUND. UM YEAH. 100% VESTED INTEREST. WE'LL UNDERSTAND. CREDIT. THERE.

THEY'RE IN HERE NOW WOULD BE A WONDERFUL PIECE OF INPUT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR CASE. BECAUSE THEY HAVE. IF THIS WAS A VARIANCE, IT WOULD BE CRITICAL BECAUSE THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THIS COMES ACROSS AS BIG JUST THE BIGGEST. SORRY WORDS VARIOUS WE'VE EVER SEEN.

SO TO SPEAK. THIS LOOKS LIKE A HUGE VARIANCE LAID OVER TOP TALKS MORE UH AND DONE BY A DIFFERENT MECHANISM, SO IT'S NOT A VARIANCE. UM I LIKE THE IDEA THAT WE HAVE AN INTEGRATED PLAN.

WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH OF AN INTEGRATED PLAN AND WOULD REALLY LOVE TO HEAR FROM THREES.

PRESIDENTS AND THE NEXT ONE OVER AS PART OF THAT THIS IS NOT AN ERRAND BEARING ARE YOU SCARED? UNDERSTOOD AND WE DO BOSS STANDARDS OF SECTION 11 11 POINT. FOUR. RANTING ABOUT REZONING APPLICATION. INCLUDING HOW. IT'S A TRAP. OBVIOUSLY. OTHER FIELD. ADDRESS. YEAH, PURPOSES, SIR. THESE ONI INTACT TODAY SIX FT. YEAH THE 0.5 88% ADOPTED IT ENTIRELY. IN THIS APPLICATION. THE COMMITTEE. INFRASTRUCTURE, SO WE THINK THERE LOVER TYPE. CLASSIFICATION IS NOT CHANGING. ALL THE STANDARDS WITH IN PLACE. WE STILL HAVE TO ABIDE BY. IN ALL OF ITS ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. IN FACT, MORE LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON MHM WAS LIKE, YEAH, RESTRICT. SO THE ZONING IN MY OPINION IS COMPELLING. WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND TELL US RIGHT? BUT YEAH, RESPECT. ALLOCATIONS. AS WE DIDN'T FEEL WE NEED ALL OF THE STANDARDS. BUT UNDER PLAN REVIEW UM ACTUALLY, UM, A THROUGH S. THERE'S A WHOLE PILE OF THINGS FOR THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER. AND SOME OF THEM TOUCH ON THIS WITH THE VARIANTS. IT WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY CRYSTAL CLEAR. THAT IT WOULD BE SO AND WHILE I'M NOT SAYING THIS IS A VARIANCE, IT IS A DOES CHANGE. ZONING AND SOME LIMITATIONS THAT THE NEIGHBORS PURCHASE EXPECTED TO BE THERE. EXPECTATIONS UNDER THE DECLARATION THAT EVERYONE. NO MARRIAGE IS IN PLACE UNLESS

[01:15:12]

[01:20:09]

NO. HOW THEY'RE USED AND NOT WHAT THEY ARE THAT DETERMINES WHETHER OR NOT THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY IF YOU WOULD SAY THAT I SAW YOU NOD YOUR HEAD. I NEED TO SPEAK INTO MY THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT. IT'S HOW THEY'RE USED. NOT HOW THEY'RE SET UP. SO LIKE YOU SAID, YOU COULD HAVE IT. WITH YOUR COUCH, YOUR BED, YOUR KITCHEN THAT WHATEVER IT IS, BUT IF IT'S NOT BEING USED AS A RESIDENCE, THEN IT'S NOT A IT'S NOT A RESIDENCE. IT'S CONVENIENCE WHILE YOU'RE WORKING IN THE GARAGE, SO TO SPEAK. SHOULD CONTROL THIS BECAUSE YOU'RE WILLING CODE OF PROMISED THAT YOU NEED LIVING QUARTERS. A KITCHEN. PRIMARY PRESIDENTS FOR FAMILY OR SOMETHING SO WE COULD ADD OURSELVES. THAT'S NOT NEW STRUCTURES. TOTALLY CONTROL THAT ISSUE. WORST. AND WE HEAR WHAT THE. CODE SAYS I WAS A DENTAL UNIT IS DEFINED AS BECAUSE THEY GOT ASKED EARLIER ABOUT THE TIMING, EUROPEAN DAVE WELL FOR THE DWELLING UNIT ARE YEAH, BECAUSE WE HAVE ONE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WAS ALL RIGHT NOW, WHAT'S A RESIDENCE? THE LEGAL MINIMUM, SO CODE DEFINES A DWELLING OR RESIDENTS, IT SAYS IT MEANS ANY BUILDING OR PORTION THEREOF, WHICH IS DESIGNED OR USED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES. BUT NOT INCLUDING A CABIN, HOTEL, MOTEL, ROOMING HOUSE OR OTHER SUCH ACCOMMODATION USED FOR TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY AND SAYS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING MEANS A BUILDING DESIGNED FOR OCCUPIED EXCLUSIVELY BY ONE FAMILY. YEAH, HE WOULD EARLY ON THERE WAS USING. YOU WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF STUFF WHEN WE STARTED DOWN THIS PATH. NO I THINK THAT'S WHERE I WANTED TO END UP, OKAY. SO, YEAH, I THINK WE'RE THAT ANSWER MY QUESTION. I BELIEVE MY COMMENT FOR STAFF IS BUT IF THIS DOES GET TABLED CAN WE WORK OUT? WHAT A REASONABLE SIZE FOR MAXIMUMS ON ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ARE FOR MARGE. LOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. IF THEY'RE DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE IN CODE. AND WE CAN PULL OUR RESEARCH FROM WHEN WE DID OUR CODE UPDATE BACK IN 2018 19. I THINK WE MADE A LIST OF ALL THE VARIANCES FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. UM SO WE CAN CERTAINLY FIND THAT DATA AGAIN AND PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A LONG LONG WHILE WE'RE THERE. THE. BUILDING

[01:25:01]

ACCOMPLISHED BECAUSE THEN NOT ONLY DO WE AS PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO SAY YES OR NO, BUT THE APPLICANT KNOWS I SHOULD BE GOOD ON THIS. THEY SET THE NUMBERS. THERE WERE NUMBERS THAT BOTH SIDES COULD AGREE ON. A BLANK CHECK IS NOT WHAT I FEEL LIKE WRITING TONIGHT ON ACCOUNT OR SIZE OR ESPECIALLY HEIGHTS. WORKABLE ISSUE. IT'S A WORKABLE SET OF ISSUES. I THINK SO RIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS, IMPORTANT WRITINGS. YES, YOU LOOK AT THE SIZE. AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE FINAL FLAT THAT YOU'RE PROPOSING THAT RESIDENCE, HAS HE, BUT I THINK THAT FOOTPRINT ASPECT FOOTAGE I WOULD SUGGEST THAT ANY ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WOULD BE LESS THAN THE QUICK PRINT OF THE PROBLEM. RESIDENTS THAT'S ON THE FLOOR RIGHT NOW. WOULD BE A STARTING POINT TO LOOK AT NEIGHBORHOODS AT WORK. I STARTED . CONSIDERATION PRESUMING BEFORE HOUSE DOESN'T ENCLOSED ENTIRE OLYMPIC SIZED POOL. THE HOUSE NEXT TO THE POOL THAT IN CLOSING THE POOL BECAUSE OTHERWISE YOU WOULD NEED A REALLY BIG STRUCTURE. QUESTIONS. FOR I FORGET ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THESE TWO CASES? OKAY? I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION AHEAD. BY DOING THE FINAL PLAN. THE LARGER SIZE. THAT'S THE NEEDS FOR THE FEAR CLIENT FROM A CITY PERSPECTIVE. HIS ONE RELAX. VERSUS THE OTHER. MORE COMPLICATED FOR THE CITY OR LESS COMPLICATED, OR IS IT IT'S NO MORE COMPLICATED FOR THE CITY. I WOULD SAY. AS FAR AS CITY PURPOSES GO, IT'S NOT REQUIRED, BUT IT'S CERTAINLY IS ANOTHER MECHANISM TO CREATE ONE LOT, SO YOU COULD DO A LOT COMBINATION, BUT DUE TO THE OTHER REASONS FOR THE A AND THE CCR, THE APPLICANT HERE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO REQUEST TO DO THIS PLATZ. IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THOSE OTHER REQUIREMENTS FROM THE ATRIAL WAY , SO I WOULD SAY IT'S NO MORE OF A BURDEN OR FOR THE CITY. IF ANYTHING, IT'S MORE OF A BURDEN FOR THE APPLICANT. THE MOVING OF THE TREE PRESERVATION DISTRICT ARMY LOT FOR TO THE NEW LOT THAT COMES UNDER THE FINAL PLATT RATHER THAN UNDER THE RESULTS.

THAT'S CORRECT. IT WILL BE RECORDED WITH THE PLATTS AND THEN JUST TO MAKE SURE IT'S COMPLETELY CLEAR. WE ALSO ADDED IT TO THE ZONING TEXT SORT OF AS BUILT IN SUSPENDERS APPROACH WHILE WE'RE WORKING OUT WHAT IT IS, THAT MAKES US A BETTER AND MORE COMPLETE APPLICATION. CAN WE HAVE SORT OF SOMETHING? MODESTLY ENFORCEABLE ABOUT WHAT TREE PLANTINGS WOULD BE REQUIRED. RIGHT NOW, WE'VE GOT SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL, AND MAYBE WE'LL WAIT TILL FINAL GOVERNMENT PLAN. MY RECOMMENDATION OF THE POINTING COMMISSION WOULD LIKE WOULD BE

[01:30:04]

IF THERE WAS MORE TREES IN NORTH OF LOVE FOR I WOULD ASK FOR IT EARLY BECAUSE THE TREES COULD GO AWAY FROM LOT FOUR FAR QUICKER THAN THEY COULD BE REQUIRED. PLANTED ON SIX SIX DOESN'T GET ANY REQUIREMENTS UNTIL THEY COME UP WITH AN FDP, WHICH COULD BE YEARS. OR COULD LOSE THE TREATY IS THE DAY AFTER THIS, THE INTEREST IT'S GOT A LOT OF THEM, BUT IF THERE WERE MORE HERE WOULD BE A LOT MORE PRESSING ISSUE. YEAH, THAT'S TRUE. FOR THE CONDITION IS THEY CAN'T EXISTING ZONE. WHO WAS UNTIL THEIR REPLACEMENT. YEAH. IT'S NOTHING ALONG THAT LINE. IT'S NOT TOO I'M GONNA SAY BURDENSOME. PROBABLY BE THE RIGHT WAY TO DO THIS. YEAH, I THINK SO. THE PRESERVATION ALSO BECOMES EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY FOR THAT NEW NORTHERN ZONES, SO JUST LIKE THE BACON REMOVE THE TREES WITHIN THE LOT FORWARD. FIVE DAY ONE OF APPROVAL OF THE PLATTE ANYTHING THAT'S EXISTING AND THE NEW ZONE, YOU KNOW, ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. THAT HAS TO BE SAVED. IT WOULDN'T BE SUPPLEMENTED DAY ONE, BUT IT WOULD HAVE TO BE PRESERVED. THEY WON THE PRESERVATION ZONE ALLOW PLANNING OF NATIVE SPECIES. ALLOWING NATIVE PLANTINGS. YES OKAY SO THEY COULD REINFORCE THE WITHOUT WORRYING ABOUT IS IT CONVERSATION CONSERVATIONS ON YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO TOUCH IT IS LIKE NOWHERE ALLOWED TO PLANT MORE TREES IN THE TREES OWN, OKAY. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE DIDN'T HAVE A GOTCHA. BUILT IN I COULD MAKE IT A CONDITION THAT ANY TREE REMOVED. IN THE NORTH SIDE OF BLOCK FOR WE HAVE TO IMMEDIATELY BE REPLACED ONE FOR ONE. THE TRUTH THAT ARE SUCCEEDING. TO CHOOSE THEIR PLUS , IT WOULDN'T HAVE DRAINAGE STORMWATER DRAINAGES DURING THE DECENT NEVER BEEN PLANTING TREES. THAT TOO. STORY. ON THE TEXT. THE TEXT IS ASIDE FROM THE RETENTION OF THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT. IDENTICAL TO THE EXISTING TEXT FOR NOT ROCKS MARKET FOR THE HAWKS MORE NORTH IS THAT WHAT I HEARD IS GOING TO BE HOSTILE. THAT SAME 20. OKAY I BELIEVE IT. IT'S ALL THE SAME SETBACK STANDARDS. I BELIEVE THAT THE PLANE HAS ACTUALLY INCREASED STORE OR MAYBE SLIGHTLY INCREASED THE SETBACK FROM THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. OTHERWISE IT IS AT LEAST THE SAME MINIMUMS. WHAT I LOOKED FOR AND DID NOT FIND IN MY PACKET WAS MARKED TEXT. WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN SEVERELY APPRECIATE IT TO KNOW THAT IF THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE, AND EASIER TO COMPARE CONTRAST. THIS VERSUS WHAT IT USED TO BE. UM AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND HAWKS MORE CLASSIC FOR LACK OF BETTER. YES YEAH, WE HAVE. YEAH YEAH, I'M SURE WE HAVE. YEAH MANY. YEAH THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL. I CAN'T SAY THAT WE ARE STAFFED WITH THE APPLICANT. WE'VE GONE THROUGH THE TEXT MANY TIMES. WE FEEL VERY CONFIDENT THAT ALL OF THE SAME ZONING COMMITMENTS ARE IN THERE THAT THIS IS A GOOD FEEDBACK FOR FUTURE APPLICATIONS TO KIND OF GET ONE CLEAN. FINAL RED LINE.

I'M NOT SURE WE COULD DUPLICATE IT. WELL, IN THIS CASE, WE'VE HAD ANY SORT OF RENDITIONS BACK AND FORTH. UM BUT WE DO FEEL, UH , WITH 100% OF SURETY ALL OF THE SAME MINIMUM SETBACKS AND ALL THOSE PREVIOUS COMMITMENTS ARE MET FROM THE EXISTING ZONING BECAUSE IT IT MAKES IT A LOT EASIER TO REASSURE ANOTHER LAWYER, BUT REDLINE TEXT MAKES IT A LOT EASIER. OKAY, HERE'S THE DIFFERENCES. HOWARD'S WE CALL IT DEPLOYED. YEAH. I JUST HAVE ONE. STEPHEN ONE QUESTION FOR YOU TRYING TO THINK AHEAD OF THIS. SO WHEN THIS BECOMES ONE PARCEL. AND I'M JUST THINKING OF THE EVERINGTON DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD ABOUT SIDE YARD VERSUS FRONT. UM, BY COMBINING THOSE LOTS IN DOING THAT, HAVING LOT FOR ALREADY ESTABLISHED IS THE FRONT FRONTAGE OF THIS PARCEL.

DOES THAT CHANGE ANYTHING IN THAT LOT SIX FOR ANY TYPE OF STRUCTURE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE BUILT THERE. WHAT THE SIDE OR WHAT? THE FRONT OF THIS PARCEL LOOKS LIKE THAT SO IT ACTUALLY DOES NOT THE ONLY THING THAT BY COMBINING IT WOULD TAKE AWAY INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES. UH SO

[01:35:02]

WE FELT ON QUITE 7 TO 6. WE WOULD REPLY. 39 SPLIT IT SOMEONE TO WHAT YOU SEE TODAY.

WHAT MY POINT IS. IT GETS COMBINED. THE INTERNAL AMEN. COMBINED INTERNAL LOT LINES GO AWAY. YOU DO THAT? JUST. SO WHEN IT'S WONDERFUL.

OKAY, SO YOU. AS YOU BUILD THE LAW AS THINGS ARE BUILT ON LOT SIX THEY HAVE TO BUILD AS THOUGH IT WERE NOT COMBINED WITH FOREIGN FIVE. THE NEW SIX OKAY, SO THANK YOU SO ANSWER. THAT MEANS THAT SIX COULD ALWAYS BE SUBDIVIDED OFF. AND STILL MEET ALL THE SETBACKS. THE BEST WAY ANYONE IN THE FUTURE WITH LIFE EVER SPLIT. TIME WISE. YEP OKAY. SIX A. IT'S MORE COMMON FOR US TO HEAR THAT INTERNAL LOT LINES GO AWAY FROM THE COMPANY DOES THIS ALL THE TIME AND SO THEN THE RE SPLIT IS A REAL DEAL. BECAUSE THEN YOU HAVE TO COME OUT. WE COULDN'T SPLIT IT AND COME UP WITH NONCONFORMING. LOTS, OKAY? SORRY. NO IT'S NOT A CONDITION LATER CHANGE THAT I'M LOOKING AT THIS PLANT COULD CAUSE CONFUSION. IF EVERYONE BE OKAY WITH THIS BECAUSE THIS.

JUST COLOR 1.7. WE NEEDED ONE MORE DESIGNATION, AND THAT IS THAT COMBINED AREA BEFORE IT IS REPLANTED TO BE THE NEW SIX B SIX B REALLY WANT TO BE 60 AND WHAT'S OUTLINED ON? THAT IS REALLY THAT THE INTERMEDIATE STEP. SO THAT WE CAN TALK ABOUT THE PARCELS OF THE DAY BECAUSE.

WE DON'T WANT TO FIND IT OUT ANY KIND OF A LOT, WE SAY. IT IS ONE THING SOMETHING TO SIX ACRES.

PERSONAL NUMBER, WHICH EXISTING LOST EXCITING. IT'S DESCRIBED DESCRIPTION. IT IS NOT 60 60.

XX. THIS ZONES LIKE. CAN WE MAKE SURE THAT THESE DIAGRAMS ARE PART OF THE RECORD? YEAH I DON'T THINK WE NEED TONIGHT. IT SOUNDS LIKE THIS IS GOING TO BE TABLED. UM THAT'D BE VERY HELPFUL AND THEN ANY CHANGES FOR THE NEXT MEETING. MAYBE. THE BORDER. SURE, I THINK IT'S PROBABLY

[01:40:09]

YEAH, THIS NOW WHICH OF COURSE IS FAR AS 21. THE ORIGINAL SWEET CALL IT EXHIBIT 81. QUICK CHECK WITH STAFF. WE OUTRUNNING YOUR ABILITY TO RECORD SO IF IT'S AROUND THE APPLICANT, WE GOT HOME WE CAN HOLD ON TO THESE. WE CAN ACTUALLY SCAN THESE AND MAKE DIGITAL RECORDS TO PUT THEM INTO THE PERMANENT MINUTES. ALL THE STAFF TO ME. ABLE TO SING WITH US ON THAT. OKAY? OF THE THREE SUB DIVISION OF LOST SIX, WHICH WAS THE ORIGINAL DREAM PLATFORM SITS TO SIX AND A PAGE PLAN THAT IS IMPORTED. TO BE EXHIBITED. WOULD YOU REPEAT THAT? REPEATED YES, PLEASE. EXHIBIT B IS THE DIVISION THAT WANTS SIX SO MUCH MORE. AND AS THE ORIGINAL REPLANTED LOCKS THEM INTO BLOCKS, SIX A ON THE SECOND PAGE OF. IT IS KNOWN AS LOST AND SAY , THIS IS THE SUBSISTENCE LAW CITIZENS EXIST TODAY. AND THAT'S ALSO THE BACK PAGE ON ONE OF OUR SUBMISSION PACKET ITEMS. THIS IS THE FINAL REFUND PUBLICATIONS. THIS COULD BE EXHIBIT C. SO I HAVE TO CREATE A NEW MODEL SIX FT. 2.4568.

MAKE THE HOMEWORK THAT I HAVE I WAS ABOUT TO DO THAT. YOU JUST GOING OVER MY NOTES AS WELL. I HAVE THREE ITEMS SO FAR. CHECK WITH YOUR CLIENT. ABOUT THREE STRUCTURES AND MAXIMUM, UM NEED HEIGHT, HEIGHT SIZE LIMITS ON STRUCTURES. UM ABSOLUTELY WITH THE CONCURRENCE OF STAFF. UH, TREE LANGUAGE ON THE NOT DEEP. NORTH SIDE OF LOT FOR REMOVAL OF TREES AND REPLANTING INTO THE NEW LOT. SIX NORTH LOT LINE. DID I MISS ANYBODY'S LIST? IT WAS MORE A YEAR LISTED. I DID NOT CITE IN MY MASTER LIMITATION ON THE SIZE OF THE OH, YES, UM, SIZE AND HEIGHT LIMITS ON STRUCTURES. YES THAT'S CITY STAFF WILL ON OUR TWO DEALS. WE HAVE A ACCESSORIES SIZE STRUCTURE, CODE UPDATE RESEARCH THAT WE CAN BRING IN FROM PAST VARIANCES AND THEN ALSO RESEARCHING THE SIZE OF EXISTING HAWKS MORE HOMES. IT WAS AWESOME. SOME DISCUSSION OF CHANGING THE LANGUAGE IN SECTION REVENUE TO BE REGARDING RESIDENCE AND RESIDENCES.

I WAS ON YOUR HOMEWORK LIST OF. COMMENTARY EITHER DIRECTLY OR WRITTEN THIS FOR ME, OWNERS A LOT THREE, ESPECIALLY OH, AS IT CHANGES WHAT IS NEXT TO THEREFORE RESERVATIONS, THOUGH? I'M NOT SEVEN, I THINK WOULD BE NICE TO HEAR FROM YOU. THAT'S NOT NEARLY THE GOT TO DO AS MUCH AS IT IS FOR. THREE. GIVE HER ANOTHER PAPER, OKAY? THE OTHER THING STAFF RECOMMENDS IS THAT MAYBE WE ADD A PROVISION TO THE TEXT. IT'S ALREADY THE APPLICANT THAT JUST CLARIFIES ALSO BUILT IN SUSPENDERS THAT IF THESE IF AND WHEN THESE LOTS OR I GUESS THE PLOTS IMPROVES, SO THESE ARE ALL COMBINED THAT THIS ZONING EXHIBIT THE SETBACKS ON THE SUNNIS, IT APPLIES EVEN AFTER COMBINATION EVEN AFTER COMBINATION JUST SO THAT'S CLEAR ON THE RECORD IF WE ALL WIN THE LOTTERY, DON'T COME BACK TOMORROW. THAT'S LET'S CLEAR FOR REALLY DON'T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT

[01:45:01]

JOINT MOTION, RIGHT? SO I MOVED FOR ACCEPTANCE ESTABLISH PORTS ARE LIVE DOCUMENTS INTO THE RECORD FOR FINAL PLAN 12 2023. SECOND. DISCUSSION ON THE DOCUMENTS MOTION FOR FINAL PLATT MODIFICATION. A LITTLE PLACE. MR KIRBY. MR. WALLACE YES, MR SCHELL? YES, MR LARSON BRIGGS? YES DOCUMENTS. HOW LONG DO WE HOW LONG DO YOU NEED FOR THE TABLING 30 DAYS. IF WE HAVEN'T THE PLANNING COMMISSION TABLES TO THE NEXT UPCOMING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET THIS ON IN TWO WEEKS . BUT LET US CHECK TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN MEET ALL OF OUR NOTIFICATION AND POSTING DEADLINES. UM BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AND OUR DEADLINES TO GET THEM ON THE SOONEST. MEETING DATE POSSIBLE EMOTIONAL TABLE TO THE NEAREST REGULAR MEETINGS. THAT IS WITHIN NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. YES WOULD WORK.

DON'T YOU MAKE THAT MOTION THAT WAS WELL, SAID. I MOVE THAT WE TABLE ZONING CHANGE 11 2023 TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING THAT CAN MEET THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS SHOULD WE CAN WE CAN WE MOVE TO TABLE BOTH CASES AT THE SAME TIME. THANKS. SO CAN WE I DON'T WANT A TIME. ONE AT A TIME. SECOND DOWN SO THE MOTION TO TABLE IS THAT CLEAR FOR STUFF? YES YES, AND FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION DISABLED. THE ROOM, PLEASE. MR KIRBY. MR SCHELL, MR. LARSON BRIGGS? YES, MR WALLACE. I HAVE FIVE VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO TABLE TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING THAT MEETS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE SAME MOTION FOR FINAL PLAN 12 2023. THE TABLE. DO I HEAR A 2ND 2ND? DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION TO TABLE THE ROLE, PLEASE. MR KIRBY ? YES. YES, MISS WALLACE. MR WALLACE. EXCUSE ME. YES, LARSON.

MR SHELL. I HAVE FIVE VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO TABLE TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING THAT MEETS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. THANK YOU. GOOD LUCK REPORT SEEING YOU AGAIN. APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. YEAH, LET'S TAKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK. OR SO.

STAFF READY. LET'S BEGIN. OUR NEXT HEARING IS VARIANCE 46 2023 TO BE CONSTRUCT WITHIN THE PLANET DRAINAGE EASEMENT STRAIGHT LINE. CAN WE HEAR FROM STAFF, PLEASE? OKAY THIS NEXT VARIANCE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW A DEBT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A PLANTED. DRAINAGE EASEMENT. IT IS LOCATED AT 78 31 STREETS, ME. STRAITS FARM, LEE. THE SUBDIVISION PLAYER ESTABLISHED A DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY FOR THE COLLECTION IN CONVENIENCE OF STORM WATER. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE NEW ALBANY COUNTRY CLUB SECTION 27 FARM RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION. THE PROPOSED X IS 37 FT WIDE AND 16 FT DEEP FROM THE REAR. OF THE HOME AS SHOWN IN THE HATCHED AREA. THE DECK PROPOSES TO ENCROACH BETWEEN 1 TO 7.5 FT INTO THE

[01:50:01]

JIM KNOX ON WITH SOME YEAH. YES, THE MAN WHO ALWAYS IN THE MM HMM. THAT DOES. THERE. SOLD. TO BUY THEM. WAS. IT IS. SO WHITE. JACK THERE. WE FEEL. FOR ACCESS TO THE HOME SO AND STRUCTURE. A LOT CLOSER TO EIGHT PEOPLE. OR. THERE IS JUST CAN'T BELIEVE WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURE.

QUESTIONS COMING FROM THE COMMITTEE. CONSTRUCTION STARTED. YOU JUST NEVER WAITING PERMITS.

ZONE. THANK YOU FOR DOING IT IN THAT ORDER. JUST HAD ONE. I JUST WANT TO NOTE ON PAGE THREE OR FIVE OF THE STAFF REPORT, IT SEEMS TO SHOW THE MANHOLE COVER IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD. EXACTLY WHERE IT IS. DID THE SAME. RIGHT THERE.

HOTEL, THE MEASUREMENT IS. WITHIN A COLLEGES OF BEING. AT SIX FT NUMBER. I DIDN'T MEASURE

[01:55:03]

REACCELERATION OKAY, THANK YOU. CAN WE MAKE SURE THAT THIS NEW SLIDE IS IN THE RECORD BEFORE WE CLOSED DOWN. ENGINEERING THIS IS DRAINING, DRAINING AS WELL RIGHT? IT SERVES THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY DREAMS PRISON. CORRECT THE DRAIN. JINX RANGES BEEN EXTENDS TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ON BOTH SIDES AND TO THE REAR IN THE NEIGHBORING SECTION, 24. YOU'RE ABLE TO BUILD THE DECK. BAKE IT SO THAT IT DOES NOT. INTERFERE WITH TRAINING ISSUES. MINT CORRECT? YES, THERE WILL NOT NO TAX ZONE. POSED. WATER. SO BACK LOOKING, YOU CAN REDESIGN THE DECK AND CONSTRUCTIVE AWAY. THAT THAT IS COMPLIANT WITH THE. THE SOUP WHERE THE CITY GET SMART, YOU CAN MAKE IT SMALLER. OF THAT SONG INDIAN HAD DISCUSSED IN THE HOME. AT THIS TIME. AMERICAN STATES. I PREFER THIS BUT THERE MAY BE THERE MAY BE AN ALTAR DESIGN. REPUBLICAN QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. IF SO, COME UP TO THE MIKE. GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS . I'M SHELLY DOWN. 45 30 ACCURATELY FARM ROAD ALBANY, HE LIVED DIRECTLY TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. UM I GUESS MY MAIN QUESTION IS ONE. WE WERE THE FIRST HOME THERE AND ALL THE SURROUNDING COMES WITH BUILT AFTER OURS. THEY SAID THIS REALLY HIGH. THE SLOPE OF IT IS VERY HARD. WE'VE HAD BRINGING ISSUES THAT. MILLION HOUSES, SO WE ACTUALLY DID HAVE ONE OF THE FILTERS INSTALLED. IN CHINA. WE WERE GETTING A LOT OF BONDING OVER TO THE CITY ENGINEER ON THAT. SO MY QUESTION IS THAT CUT OUT? FOR THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT REALLY JUST FROM THE ANIMAL ACCESS, OR IS THERE A FUNCTIONAL IMPACT? BECAUSE THAT BRINGS DIRECTLY TO THE BACK OF OUR LIVES? HIGH SCHOOL GRADE. IS WRITING FOR RIGHT PAST THE I DIDN'T KNOW IF IT WAS JUST FOR ACCESS. THERE'S A SWIM THERE, RIGHT? BASED ON THIS BEING A MANHOLE AND NOT A CATCH BASIN. I WOULD ASSUME BASED ON THE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS. THIS IS FOR ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE IF IT WAS ACTUALLY A CATCH BASIN, AS DEPICTED. ONE AFTER THE UPPER LEFT. I WOULD IMAGINE HAVING FUNCTIONAL USE, UM WITH AN OPEN LID, BUT THIS HAS A CLOSED LID. UM, I BELIEVE UM, SO THIS IS JUST FOR ACCESS AND IMPORTANT ENTRY. SO IF THERE LIKE SLOW BRAIN CHANGES TO THE LAW THAT HAVE TO BE DONE. ACCOMMODATE THE DEATH WOULD RESPECT THE FLOW OF WATER PATHWAY TO THEM. THIS CURRENT. THE SHORT FORM IS YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO CHANGE YOUR NEIGHBORS, DRAINAGE. SO THAT'S WHAT I OWE CODE. OKAY THIS IS BEING IT LOOKS LIKE A DRAINAGE SWELL TO ME FROM PLANTS BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE YOU PUT THE CATCH BASINS. CORRECT IT'S MOST LIKELY CONVEYING DRAINAGE TO THE CATCH BASIN, NOT ON THIS PROPERTY PAYING IS THAT IN THE EVENT OF LARGE RANGE, YOU MIGHT SEE SHEET FLOW IN THE BACKYARDS TOWARDS THOSE CATCH BASINS. CORRECT OKAY AND SO IS SWELL THE CORRECT TERM YES. SO YEP.

BUILDING ON THAT. THE VILLAGE, AND THIS BOARD HAS BEEN VERY CAREFUL TO MAKE SURE THAT THINGS DON'T GET PUT IN. THE SWELLS, SO THEY WORK. BEYOND. THE VILLAGE HAS SUBJECT OVER THE YEARS I'VE BEEN HERE PUSHING 40 YEARS AND THE VILLAGE EVENTUALLY. YES UH, RAIN EVENT THAT SHOWS YOU WHY IT'S A BAD IDEA TO SCREW WITH THE DRAINAGE. THERE HAVE BEEN SO SOME, WE'VE HAD 200 YEAR FLOODS IN THE LAST 20 YEARS. UM AND THEY SHOWED EVERY EVERYTHING THAT DIDN'T DRAIN RIGHT.

[02:00:01]

STAFF REPORT THERE. YES, THE CONDITIONS AND STAFF REPORT. DO I HEAR A SECOND? SECOND.

DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. CAN I GET THE ROLE? MR KIRBY. MR WALLACE. MISS BRIGGS. NO. MR LARSON. MR SHELL. I HAVE FIVE BOOKS AGAINST THE MOTION. MOTION FAILS. OKAY? EXIST. YOU NEED TO GET SOME EXPLANATION AS TO WHY, UM IT DOESN'T IT IS A SUBSTANTIAL VARIANCE. THERE ARE CITY SERVICES INVOLVED. DON'T GET IN FRONT OF ME. 0.5 AND EVALUATION. YEAH, IT WAS. I PRESUME IT'S PURCHASED WITH THE KNOWLEDGE IT CERTAINLY PREDATES THE AND THERE'S NO SEX IN THE RECORD. THAT WAS AND CAN BE SOLVED WITH SMALLER DECK. HMM AND IT WOULD CERTAINLY SET A PRECEDENT. REALLY DON'T WANT THAT ON OUR DRAINAGE SWALES. AND I WOULD JUST ADD THAT WE DID RECENTLY. HAVE YOU A SIMILAR VARIANTS IN THE REGION NECESSITY. MENTIONED AND WE TURNED THAT ONE DOWN AS WELL. SO MULTIPLE ONES. SO IN THAT SITUATION. KEEP WITH PRESIDENT.

WE'VE ALREADY SAID WE NEED TO SAY NO. ONE. THIS ONE. YEAH. CLAIM COMMENTS IS CONSISTENT. I CONCUR WITH EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SHARED AS WELL, AS YOU KNOW, CONCERNED ABOUT DISRUPTION OF CITY INFRASTRUCTURE. UM AND SETTING A PRECEDENT. YEAH. FINALLY AGAIN, THE PRESIDENT AND THEN, UM THERE IS A FAIRLY EASY SOLUTION OF SHRINKING THE DECK. TO KEEP IT. STOPPER. AREA SO. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER BUSINESS? NONE FROM STAFF. ALL MEMBERS FOR COMMENT. NO NO, THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SARAH. FOR MENIAL WITH THAT

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.